Marine assessment workshop 15-16 th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY MSFD regional data work flow: schema and examples Document: DIKE TSG1 WP4 MSFD.
Advertisements

NRC Biodiversity EEA new Strategic Cycle Copenhagen, 27&28 October 2013 Ivone Pereira Martins, Head of Group, NSV1.
Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.
Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
EEA status for MPAs August 2013 Marine protected areas report 2013 Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV1 & NSV4, EEA.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
(18 JUNE 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
26 February 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG.
Professionalising knowledge and data products It works!! Data –> Information flow for MSFD.
Marine and coastal thematic assessment for the EEA’s 2010 State of the Environment report Trine Christiansen (EEA)
EIONET Marine Workshop 25 October 2010 Neil Holdsworth, ICES Data reporting: making the most of EMODNET.
INSPIRE Developing the “Marine Pilot” project: Directorate-General Environment Governance, Information & Reporting Unit EC/EEA.
21 November 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) Meeting.
Trine Christiansen(EEA) Neil Holdsworth (ICES and ETC/ICM) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8 WG-DIKE, 30 September
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
26 February 2014 Views to practical support on management of HELCOM biodiversity data by an EU Service contract Hermanni Kaartokallio (SYKE) EEA workshop.
Fishing and Habitat Integrity Leonie Dransfeld D3+ workshop April 2014.
David Connor European Commission DG Environment Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry Towards integrated marine environmental information WG DIKE.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
(21 October 2015) Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) EMODnet-MSFD Cooperation process.
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Indicators and underlying data-flows to be used in 2017 Quality Status Report - Data & information system Virginie Hart, Programme Officer, Monitoring.
Deltares, Delft, Netherland
Alignment and Integration to MSFD
EMODnet Chemistry initiative
1.
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
Towards a marine information system for Europe
MSFD integrated reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Trine Christiansen March 19, 2013
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
TG-DATA meeting. 7-8 June 2017, Copenhagen
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Results of breakout group
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
Mapping and assessment of ecosystem and their services
TG Data - Inspire Usage Options
Conclusions: Parallel session 2, Group 2
European Commission DG Environment
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
MSFD list of criteria elements
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
Group 2.
15th meeting of MSCG, 9 February 2015, Brussels
MSFD list of criteria elements
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
1.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
6th meeting of TG DATA February 2018, Brussels
1.
OSPAR biodiversity assessments Intermediate Assessment 2017
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
1.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
European Environment Agency
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
- Plans on the revision of reporting schemas/guidance -
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
By-catch work at ICES Lara Salvany,
Presentation transcript:

Marine assessment workshop th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA

Indicators – state of the art Setting the context: -Indicators are used by the RSC and the EEA for assessment purposes -Given that MSFD has to enhance regional cooperation and the reporting for 2018 assessments will be reviewed… -Window of opportunity: indicator assessments can be used by MS for the MSFD reporting obligations -Need: selection and agreement on regional and pan-european indicators to be used within the MSFD assessments Steps in the process: 1.Indicators inventory 2.Availability of indicator specifications and data sources 3.State of development of the indicators 4.Selection of indicators to be used in the European assessment

Indicators – state of the art 1.Indicators inventory -A compilation of existent information and data-flows within the RSC and the Eionet has been performed in the frame of the COM service contract “Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions” -The EEA/ETC has revised the report and made a resume where: -The indicators have been mapped against the DPSIR framework (used by the EEA for the assessments) -It has been completed for some elements (mainly drivers, pressures and responses) with potential indicators to be used/developped, as well as data-sources and information

Indicators – state of the art 2. Availability of indicator specifications and data sources -Links to technical specifications, as well as to assessments and data sources have been added to the inventory when available -Results: only HELCOM and the EEA have the technical specifications available online. Regarding the access to data: not a lot of data accesible and generally not available in an harmonised way. -To be discussed under MSFD CIS: data to be made available under art.19(3): -Maybe the data-sets feeding the indicators?? -Linked to that: INSPIRE marine pilot led by JRC, which will cover the requirements needed for MSFD data-sets to align with INSPIRE -Within the new MSFD data-model, where level 3 is about data and 2.5 about indicators: level 3 is supposed to provide only links to data-sets and related metadata

Indicators – state of the art

3. State of development of the indicators -Indicators to be used: living discussion within the RSC -The EEA/ETC is completing the indicators inventory with the information presented in March 2015 by HELCOM and OSPAR in the following documents: -HELCOM core indicator overview -Summary of BDC 2015 agreement with respect to biodiversity indicators and expected assessments for the IA2017 -Only enough developped indicators should be used

Indicators – state of the art 4. Selection of indicators to be used in the European assessment The inventory will be resumed in a table showing the following fields: FIELDSEXAMPLE DPSIR component State Type Chemical Element / MSFD descriptor D5 RSC/Organism HELCOM Name of indicator DIN concentration, winter average MSFD related criteria 5.1 MSFD related indicator Type of indicator core Status Already assessed URL_Metadata (Technical specification) URL_Assessment URL_source-datasets data-and-confidence Criteria to be used for the selection is still under development The selection will be the basis for the HOPE indicators discussion Also the indicators metadata profile is to be decided, if possible streamlining with the RSC

Indicators – state of the art Examples of indicators that can be selected: -DRIVERS: Already in place: aquaculture and fishing effort (EEA): Others could be used and adapted: sea-transport of goods (EUROSTAT) -PRESSURES: Already in place: Pathways of introduction and spread of NIS (EEA) Two or more RSC using them (potentially to be used): Nutrient and contaminant loads (riverine, point sources and atmospheric depositions), radionuclides discharge, marine litter in beaches, munitions waste Data available, therefore an indicator could be created: Total landings, and landings/discards rate (DCF- Data dissemination, hosted by JRC), dredged material disposal… -STATE: Selection of mammals, birds, turtles and fish: distributional range (1.1.1.), population abundance (1.2.1.) and demographic characteristics (1.3.1.) Selection of habitats: distributional range (1.4.1.), condition and typical species and communities (1.6.1.) Selection of NIS: trends in abundance, temporal occurrence and spatial distribution (2.1.1.) Nutrient levels in the water column: could be NO3, NO2, NH4, PO4 Metals in sediment and biota: could be Cd, Hg, Pb -IMPACTS: Physical damage: extent of the seabed significantly affected by human activities (6.1.2.) Effect of nutrient enrichment: Chl-a (5.2.1.), water transparency (5.2.2.), oxygen (5.3.2.) Acute pollution events and their impacts -RESPONSES: Spatial measures: protected areas (now EEA CDDA, but next future EEA indicator on MPAs)