Chem 59-250 Hybridization The problem of accounting for the true geometry of molecules and the directionality of orbitals is handled using the concept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Shape Sect 9.4. VSEPR Model Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Electron pairs will position themselves.
Advertisements

Copyright McGraw-Hill Chapter 9 Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Section 8.4 Molecular Shapes
Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories. The properties of a molecule depend on its shape and and the nature of its bonds. In this unit, we will discuss.
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Molecular Geometry & Bonding Theories
VSEPR Theory – Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion theory
VSEPR Theory and Valence bond theory. Learning Outcomes At the end of this presentation the students will be able to: 1.Explain VSEPR Theory 2.State the.
Molecular Shapes Chapter 6 Section 3. Molecular Structure It mean the 3-D arrangement of atoms in a molecule Lewis dot structures show how atoms are bonded.
Lecture 7 Molecular Bonding Theories 1) Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory Simple theory for qualitative prediction of geometry of polyatomic.
Trigonal Bipyramidal Electronic Geometry: AB5, AB4U, AB3U2, and AB2U3
-Understand how the absence or presence of lone pairs of electrons affects the geometry of a molecule -Know what the various geometries are and how to.
Carvone Bucky ball Molecular Geometry Chapter 8 Part 2.
MOLECULAR GEOMETRY AND CHEMICAL BONDING THEORY
Geometry of Molecules VSEPR Theory. Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory (VSEPR) The geometry of the molecule at any given central atom is determined.
Chem Bonding in Molecules Covalent Bonding Valence state electron configurations and Promotion Energies Valence electrons and valence shell orbitals.
VSEPR Theory Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion.
Molecular Shape Section 9.4
Molecular Shape VSEPR Model. Molecular Shape Physical/Chemical PROPERTIES SHAPE of Molecule (VSEPR) Overlap of ORBITALS (Hybridization)
Chemical Bonding and Molecular Geometry
Copyright©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Covalent Bonding: Hybrid Atomic Orbitals.
Section 3.3 – Part A Pg Objective: 1) Apply VSEPR theory to predict molecular shapes.
Molecular Geometry. 2-D and 3-D Lewis Structures explain the two dimensional structure of molecules In order to model the actual structure of a molecule.
Molecular Structure Molecular geometry is the general shape of a molecule or the arrangement of atoms in three dimensional space. Physical and chemical.
Molecular Shapes If you were to draw the Lewis structure for Carbon tetrachloride based on what you have already taken in this class, you may come up with.
VSEPR Theory. Molecular Structure Molecular structure – the three- dimensional arrangement of atoms in a molecule.
VESPR Theory. Molecular Structure Molecular structure – _______________ arrangement of atoms in a molecule.
Bonding Theories Part 2: VSEPR Theory. Objectives Describe how VSEPR theory helps predict the shapes of molecules Describe how VSEPR theory helps predict.
Molecular Shapes Chapter 6 Section 3. Lewis dot structures show how atoms are bonded together, but they often do not illustrate the true shape of a molecule.
Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories
Section 8.13 Molecular Structure: The VSEPR Model VSEPR: Valence Shell Electron-Pair Repulsion. ▪Used to predict a 3-dimensional shape of a molecule ▪Based.
Ch-8 Part II Bonding: General Concepts. Molecular Geometry and Bond Theory In this chapter we will discuss the geometries of molecules in terms of their.
Chemical Bonding-I Covalent Bonds
▪ Thus, the geometry of a molecule is determined
Chapter 9 Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories
Hybrid Orbitals © Evan P. Silberstein, 2010.
Sahara Williams.
Shapes.
Covalent Bonding: Orbitals.
Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Ch 9 – Covalent Bonding: Orbitals
Ch.14 Covalent Bonding Hybridization.
VSEPR and Molecular Geometry
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
A 2s orbital superimposed on a 2px orbital
Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories
Ch. 6 – Molecular Structure
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
Ch. 6.5 Bonding Theories Molecular Geometry.
MOLECULAR GEOMETRY Bonding Unit.
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
CHEMISTRY 161 Chapter 10 Chemical Bonding II
Molecular Shapes and Hybrid Orbitals
Ch 9 – Covalent Bonding: Orbitals
Molecular Structure Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion
Chapter 9 – Molecular Geometry and Bond Theory
Molecular Structure II. Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
Valence Shell electron pair repulsion model 3D models
Molecular Shapes It mean the 3-D arrangement of atoms in a molecule
Molecular Shapes VSEPR Model
Molecular Shapes Mrs. Chan.
Resonance Structures Some molecules are not well described by Lewis Structures. Typically, structures with multiple bonds can have similar structures with.
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
Presentation transcript:

Chem Hybridization The problem of accounting for the true geometry of molecules and the directionality of orbitals is handled using the concept of hybrid orbitals. Hybrid orbitals are mixtures of atomic orbitals and are treated mathematically as Linear Combinations of the appropriate s, p and d Atomic Orbitals (LCAO). Linear sp hybrid orbitals A 2s orbital superimposed on a 2p x orbital The two resultant sp hybrid orbitals that are directed along the X-axis (in this case) The 1/  2 are normalization coefficients.

Chem Orthogonality and Normalization Two properties of acceptable orbitals (wavefunctions) that we have not yet considered are that they must be orthogonal to every other orbital and they must be normalized. These conditions are related to the probability of finding an electron in a given space. Orthogonal means that the integral of the product of an orbital with any other orbital is equal to 0, i.e.: Normal means that the integral of the product of an orbital with itself is equal to 1, i.e.: where n  m and  means that the integral is taken over “all of space” (everywhere). This means that we must find normalization coefficients that satisfy these conditions. Note that the atomic orbitals (  ) we use can be considered to be both orthogonal and normal or “orthonormal”.

Chem Example of the orthogonality of  1 and  2 Thus our hybrid sp orbitals are orthogonal to each other, as required.

Chem s 2p 1s Be 2 H Be* BeH 2 Hybridization Valence bond theory treatment of a linear molecule: the bonding in BeH 2 The promotion energy can be considered a part of the energy required to form hybrid orbitals. The overlap of the hybrid orbitals on Be with the 1s orbitals on the H atoms gives two Be-H (sp)-1s  bonds oriented 180° from each other. This agrees with the VSEPR theory prediction. sp 2p Be* (sp)

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of a trigonal planar molecule: the bonding in BH 3 2s 2p B B* This gives three sp 2 orbitals that are oriented 120° apart in the xy plane – be careful: the choice of axes in this example determines the set of coefficients. B* (sp 2 ) sp 2 2p

Chem The coefficients in front of each atomic wavefunction indicate the amount of each atomic orbital that is used in the hybrid orbital. The sign indicates the orientation (direction) of the atomic orbitals. Remember that you have to use each atomic orbital completely (columns) and that each hybrid must be normal (rows). Check this by summing the squares of the coefficients. 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1 So the entire s orbital has been used 1/6 + 1/6 + 4/6 = 1 So the entire p x orbital has been used 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 So the entire p y orbital has been used 1/3 + 1/6 + 1/2 = 1 So this hybrid is normal 1/3 + 1/6 + 1/2 = 1 So this hybrid is normal 1/3 + 4/6 = 1 So this hybrid is normal y x The signs in front of the coefficients indicate the direction of the hybrid:  1 : -x, +y  2 : -x, -y  3 : +x, 0y

Chem s 3 H B* The overlap of the sp 2 hybrid orbitals on B with the 1s orbitals on the H atoms gives three B-H (sp 2 )-1s  bonds oriented 120° from each other. This agrees with the VSEPR theory prediction. Valence bond theory treatment of a trigonal planar molecule: the bonding in BH 3 sp 2 2p

Chem s 2p C C* Valence bond theory treatment of a tetrahedral molecule: the bonding in CH 4 This gives four sp 3 orbitals that are oriented in a tetrahedral fashion. sp 3 C* (sp 3 )

Chem s 2p 1s C 4 H C* Valence bond theory treatment of a tetrahedral molecule: the bonding in CH 4 The overlap of the sp 3 hybrid orbitals on C with the 1s orbitals on the H atoms gives four C-H (sp 3 )-1s  bonds oriented ° from each other. This provides the tetrahedral geometry predicted by VSEPR theory. sp 3 C* (sp 3 )

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of a trigonal bipyramidal molecule: the bonding in PF 5 3s 3p P P* 3d P* ( sp 3 d) 3d 3d z 2 3p z 3p y 3p x 3s sp 3 d z 2 The appropriate mixture to form a trigonal bipyramidal arrangement of hybrids involves all the ns and np orbitals as well as the n d z 2 orbital. PF 5 has an VSEPR theory AX 5 geometry so we need hybrid orbitals suitable for bonds to 5 atoms. ns and np combinations can only provide four, so we need to use nd orbitals (if they are available).

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of a trigonal bipyramidal molecule These coefficients are exactly the same as the result for the trigonal planar molecules because they are derived from the same orbitals (sp 2 ) These coefficients are similar to those for the sp hybrids because they are formed from a combination of two orbitals (pd). The orbitals are treated in two different sets. Remember that d orbitals are more diffuse than s or p orbitals so VBT predicts that the bonds formed by hybrids involving d orbitals will be longer than those formed by s and p hybrids.

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of a trigonal bipyramidal molecule: the bonding in PF 5 F 2s2p F 2s2p F 2s2p 3d P* ( sp 3 d) F 2s2p F 2s2p The overlap of the sp 3 d hybrid orbitals on P with the 2p orbitals on the F atoms gives five P-F (sp 3 d)-2p  bonds in two sets: the two axial bonds along the z-axis (180° from each other) and three equatorial bonds in the xy plane (120° from each other and 90° from each axial bond). This means that the 5 bonds are not equivalent!

Chem The square pyramidal AX 5 geometry requires mixing with a different d orbital than in the trigonal bipyramidal case. Sb(C 6 H 5 ) 5 You should consider what orbital(s) would be useful for such a geometry and we will see a way to figure it out unambiguously when we examine the symmetry of molecules. d orbitals

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of an octahedral molecule: the bonding in SF 6 3s 3p S S* 3d S* ( sp 3 d 2 ) 3d FFFFFF The overlap of the sp 3 d 2 hybrid orbitals on S with the 2p orbitals on the F atoms gives six S-F (sp 3 d 2 )-2p  bonds 90° from each other that are equivalent. You can figure out the normalization coefficients. 3d z 2 3p z 3p y 3p x 3ssp 3 d 2 3d x 2 -y 2

Chem sp 2 2p N*(sp 2 ) Cl 3s3p O 2s2p 2s 2p N Valence bond theory treatment of  -bonding: the bonding in ClNO    A drawing of the VBT  bond in ClNO. There are three “objects” around N so the geometry is trigonal planar. The shape is given by AX 2 E (angular or bent). The overlap of the sp 2 hybrid orbitals on N with the 3p orbital on Cl and the 2p orbital on O give the two  bonds and it is the overlap of the “left over” p orbital on N with the appropriate orbital on O that forms the (2p- 2p)  bond between the two atoms.

Chem s 2p N N+N+ O-O- 2s2p O-O- 2s2p O 2s2p Valence bond theory treatment of  -bonding: the bonding in the nitrate anion There are three “objects” around N so the geometry is trigonal planar. The shape is given by AX 3 (trigonal planar). sp 2 2p N + *(sp 2 )     The overlap of the sp 2 hybrid orbitals on N with the the 2p orbitals on the O give the three (sp 2 -2p)  bonds and it is the overlap of the “left over” p orbital on N with the appropriate orbital on the uncharged O atom that forms the (2p-2p)  bond. VBT gives only one of the canonical structures at a time.

Chem s 2p Each C Valence bond theory treatment of  -bonding: the bonding in ethene There are three “objects” around each C so the geometry is trigonal planar at each carbon. The shape is given by AX 3 for each carbon. sp 2 2p C*(sp 2 ) The overlap of the sp 2 hybrid orbitals on C with the the 1s orbitals on each H give the four terminal (sp 2 -1s)  bonds. The double bond between the C atoms is formed by a (sp 2 - sp 2 )  bond and the (2p-2p)  bond. 1s 4 H sp 2 2p C*(sp 2 )      Each C*

Chem Valence bond theory treatment of  -bonding: the bonding in SOCl 2 3s 3p S S* 3d There are four “objects” around S so the geometry is tetrahedral and the shape is given by AX 3 E (pyramidal). sp 3 3d S*(sp 3 ) O 2s2p Cl     The overlap of the sp 3 hybrid orbitals on S with the 3p orbitals on Cl and the 2p orbital on O give the three  bonds and, because the lone pair is located in the final sp 3 hybrid, it is the overlap of the “left over” d orbital on S with an appropriate p orbital on O that forms the (3d-2p)  bond in the molecule.

Chem s 3p Cl Cl* 3d Valence bond theory treatment of bonding: a hypervalent molecule, ClF 3 3d Cl* ( sp 3 d) FFF The overlap of the sp 3 d hybrid orbitals on Cl with the 2p orbitals on the F atoms gives three P-F (sp 3 d)-2p  bonds in two sets: the two axial bonds along the z-axis (less than 180° from each other because of the repulsion from the lone pairs) and the one equatorial bond halfway between the other Cl bonds. Again, the bond lengths will not be the same because there is more d contribution to the axial hybrid orbitals. There are five “objects” around Cl so the geometry is trigonal bipyramidal and the shape is given by AX 3 E 2 (T-shaped). Consider this: Why are such molecules T-shaped instead of pyramidal or planar?

Chem Summary of Valence Bond Theory 1.Write an acceptable Lewis structure for the molecule. 2.Determine the number of VSEPR objects around all central atoms and determine the geometry around the atom. 3.Construct hybrid orbitals suitable for the predicted bonding. 4.Link orbitals together to make bonds. 5.Describe the bonding. Include the names of the orbitals involved in each bond. Draw pictures of the bonds formed by the overlap of these orbitals. Two objects around Be, so AX 2 (linear) Two orbitals pointing 180° from each other needed, so use two sp hybrids Two (sp-1s) Be-H  bonds. sp 1s