Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Use of Prognostic Meteorological Model Output in Dispersion Models Eighth Modeling Conference Research Triangle Park, NC.
An initial linkage of the CMAQ modeling system at neighborhood scales with a human exposure model Jason Ching/Thomas Pierce Air-Surface Processes Modeling.
Alan H Huber Physical Scientist; PhD, QEP NOAA, ASMD, in partnership with the US EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC, USA THE 5TH ANNUAL.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
Sub-Grid Scale Modeling of Air Toxics Concentrations Near Roadways Prakash Karamchandani, Kristen Lohman & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 6th Annual.
1 WILMINGTON AIR QUALITY STUDY Status Update and Introduction to Modeling Protocol Vlad Isakov Todd Sax August 27, 2003 California Air Resources Board.
Adel Hanna 1, Jason Ching 1, Joseph Pinto 2 1 UNC Institute for the Environment, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 2 National Center for Environmental.
Jerold A. Herwehe Atmospheric Turbulence & Diffusion Division Air Resources Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 456 S. Illinois.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
UNCLASSIFIED Initial Study of HPAC Modeled Dispersion Driven by MM5 With and Without Urban Canopy Parameterizations Dr. Chris Kiley – NGC Dr. Jason Ching.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Combining HYSPLIT and CMAQ to resolve urban scale features: an example of application in Houston, TX Ariel F. Stein (1), Vlad Isakov (2), James Godowitch.
Impacts of Biomass Burning Emissions on Air Quality and Public Health in the United States Daniel Tong $, Rohit Mathur +, George Pouliot +, Kenneth Schere.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Planning and Technical Support Division August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Use of space-based tropospheric NO 2 observations in regional air quality modeling Robert W. Pinder 1, Sergey L. Napelenok 1, Alice B. Gilliland 1, Randall.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
1 Neighborhood Assessment: Technical Issues to be investigated in the Wilmington Air Quality Study Vlad Isakov Todd Sax May 06, 2003 California Air Resources.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
1 Open Discussion Technical Challenges for Statewide Application Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Jonathan Pleim NOAA/ARL* RTP, NC A NEW COMBINED LOCAL AND NON-LOCAL PBL MODEL FOR METEOROLOGY AND AIR QUALITY MODELING * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Donna Schwede NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
The Near-road Exposures and Effects of Urban air pollutant Study (NEXUS) investigating whether children with asthma living near major roadways in Detroit,
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
SLCP Benefits Toolkit:
Simulation of PM2.5 Trace Elements in Detroit using CMAQ
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
2003 CMAS Workshop Community Scale Air Toxics Modeling with CMAQ by Jason Ching ARL,NOAA & USEPA, RTP, NC, USA October 27-29, 2003.
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
High-resolution air quality forecasting for Hong Kong
Hybrid Plume/Grid Modeling for the Allegheny County PM2.5 SIPs
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
MODELING AT NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE Sylvain Dupont and Jason Ching
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
JEHN-YIH JUANG, Donna Schwede, and Jon Pleim
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP, NC

Collaborators Mohammed A Majeed Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation New Castle, DE Vlad Isakov Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA RTP, NC Andrey Khlystov Duke University, Durham, NC

Outline of Presentation Background and Rationale of investigation Conceptual Hybrid modeling approach Description and role of EDATAS database to fine scale air toxic modeling Future Plans

For many air quality model applications, while desireable, current models are typically unable to resolve both regional and local scale features. The problem: For every grid resolution, there are unresolved sub-grid features: CMAQ 4x4 km grid Local details within a grid cell Sub-grid concentration distribution Detailed fine-scale measurements are needed for model evaluation

4 km CMAQ only Hybrid approach (CMAQ with local scale modeling) Example of regional and local model results CMAQ and Hybrid results for Philadelphia study reflecting enhanced details to CMAQ from incorporating local scale modeling with the hybrid approach

A Hybrid Approach to Provide Local Details from Dispersion Model to CMAQ*: CMAQ (Hybrid) = CMAQ + Local (Fine Scale Details) * Paper “Using CMAQ for Exposure Modeling and Characterizing the Sub-Grid Variability for Exposure Estimates “ Isakov, Irwin and Ching; Accepted for Publication in JAMC CMAQ 4x4 km grid Fine scale details from a dispersion model

Hybrid approach provides a means for introducing fine scale concentration detail to regional scale model simulations This approach needs to be evaluated A collaboration of opportunity! –Field study monitoring program, EDATAS, Enhanced Delaware Air Toxics Assessment Study focus on Wilmington, DE –Concurrent investigations to characterize fine scale fields of air toxics and PM –Continue investigations toward advancing the development of advanced air quality modeling tools for air toxics and other applications.

A rich database of air toxics measurements to provide: (1)Better understanding of the micro-level air quality impacts of emission sources. (2) Enhanced spatial resolution of the ambient toxics dataset throughout city and variability at spatial scales of order 100m by mobile measurements (3) Means to evaluate our hybrid approach Measurements of Ozone, HCHO, Cr(VI), fine particles

Grids for concentration distribution at neighborhood scales

Neighborhood scale variability of formaldehyde (summer 2005) The X-axis shows the concentration of HCHO in  mol/m 3 The Y-axis shows the number of observations.

COMMENTS on EDATAS The EDATAS database of toxics (including HCHO and Cr(VI) measurements using mobile van transects provide a unique, albeit limited bases for characterizing air toxics at neighborhood scales. Future efforts will focus on utilizing such data for evaluating and assessing advanced air toxics modeling such as hybrid modeling approaches.

Fine scale model investigations for Wilmington, DE Modeling is the only tool that provides a link between sources and ambient concentrations Modeling at fine scales need evaluation. EDATAS will be used for this purpose. Model ready detailed emission inventory has been prepared, including road-linked emissions data. Air toxics version of CMAQ to be run in nested mode to 1 km grid size Local scale modeling (using AERMOD) applied to local emission sources, thus providing sub grid information to CMAQ at 4 km or greater Preliminary results follow: Example simulation is for a July, 2001 average.

(A) 12 km(B) 4 km(C) 1 km A B C A urban B urban C rural Example: Regional to fine scale using Nested grid CMAQ (benzene)

Example of Time Series for HCHO CMAQ (12km) & 95 th percentile from the 12x12 distribution (based on 1 km grid CMAQ results Grid cell “A” Urban (see previous slide) Jul Aug HCHO Concentration (ppb)

Example of local contributions of HCHO using AERMOD. Information to be used with CMAQ as needed for the hybrid approach

Next steps Implement the hybrid approach by incorporating local scale with CMAQ modeling Evaluate and assess both such outputs with EDATAS database (of mobile measurements) Perform additional CMAQ modeling at 1 km grid size to investigate fine scale resolution of combined regional and local scale contributions to investigate the characteristics of SGV and corresponding distribution functions as a complement to CMAQ at grids sizes of 4 and 12 km. Explore and examine the merits of applications that utilize (a) hybrid modeling approach as well as (b) an enhanced CMAQ system that is complemented with SGV distributions. e.g., –Performing exposure analyses, health risk assessments –Performing grid model evaluation –Weight of Evidence –RRF/DV(C&F) analyses for SIPS

The End Thank you for your attention Disclaimer: The research presented here was performed under the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and under agreement number DW This work constitutes a contribution to the NOAA Air Quality Program. Although it has been reviewed by EPA and NOAA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect their policies or views.