Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Retention and Destruction of Inter-Jurisdictionally.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Records Management and the NHS Code of Practice (Foundation) Information Governance Policy Team NHS Connecting for Health.

Advertisements

AS PER FLORIDA STATUTE (1B (10))ALL LOCATIONS MUST ENSURE THAT DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS IS CONDUCTED IN A MANNER THAT SAFEGUARDS THE INTERESTS OF THE.

Records Management and the NHS Code of Practice (Foundation) Information Governance Policy Team NHS Connecting for Health.

Identification and Disposition of Official University Records University of Texas at Arlington Records Management.

How Can Vital Statistics Remain Vital for Measuring Health Status in the U.S.? Charles J. Rothwell Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National.

Separating Active from Inactive Records

Recordkeeping for Good Governance Toolkit

Review Questions Business 205

Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.

Tribal Health 101 State Perspective. NAPHSIS History Formally organized in 1933 to represent the State Registrars in all 57 vital records jurisdictions.

Training Session January 7,  Background on the Policy (Juan)  Policy Roll-out Process (Pattie)  Records Management Self-Assessment (Amanda and.

Birth and Death Data Release and Re-release Laws, Regulations, Policies and Procedures: State Survey Results 8 June, 2004 NAPHSIS – Portland, OR Mark Flotow,

Interjurisdictional Exchange Update, Workshop, and Discussion: We’ve done the work … so why are you not exchanging the data? (just kidding – sort of)

RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION October 30, 2013.

EFFECTIVE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Indiana Commission on Public Records Indiana SHRAB Conference April 13, 2010 Government Records Indianapolis, IN.

DATA SECURITY Social Security Numbers, Credit Card Numbers, Bank Account Numbers, Personal Health Information, Student and/or Staff Personal Information,

1 Information Security for HIPAA Second Meeting for Researchers Michael Caputo February 18, 2003.

RECORDS MANAGEMENT City of Oregon City “ That was then… this is now!”

Fe Angela M. Verzosa1 Vital Records Management. 2 Vital Records Management The objective is to prevent the loss of information which is critical to the.

Created May 2, Division of Public Health Managing Records What is a Record? What is a Records Retention & Disposition Schedule? Why is this Important?

Washington State Archives Presented by: Leslie Koziara Electronic Records Management Consultant Part 1: Managing Your Records.

Records Management Overview. Why? It’s the Law It’s the Law It’s University Policy It’s University Policy Fiscal and Legal Compliance Fiscal and Legal.

Basic Records Management. What we’ll cover Virginia Public Records Act Definitions Understanding and using the LVA General Schedules The schedule cover.

2008 NAPHSIS Annual Meeting Celebrating 75 Years of Excellence Orlando, Florida June 1–5, 2008 STEVE – Data Preparation Steps.

Everything You Ever Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Hear! The Ohio Public Health Association The World of Vital Statistics: Data Collection and Application.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STEVE Leesa Shem-Tov STEVE Project Manager.

Rachel Brooks, CPP. 3 is 4 4 is 3 OSHA is 5  FLSA requires certain records to be kept by covered employers for all employees and retained for either.

Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 9/19/2015 Record Management.

Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Information/Records Management.

Records Liaison Training City of Oregon City. The Role of Records Liaisons As Records Liaison you will:  Be your department’s “point person” for records.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE NAPHSIS SECURITY GUIDELINES MANUAL

Principle of Protection By C’Les Jensema About ARMA International and the Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles® ARMA International (

And Record Retention Janessa Biagi, CPP February 8, 2014.

Grateful Shred Day Wednesday, July 22 City of Oregon City.

Ecords Management Records Management Paul Smallcombe Records & Information Compliance Manager.

Patricia W. Potrzebowski, Ph.D. Executive Director National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems January 25, 2012 Vital Statistics.

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Use of Vital Records for Research: What’s.

D5240 Document Retention System 8/20/ District 5240 The Rotary Foundation Grants Document Retention System Rotary Year

Records Management 101 The Basics Archival and Records Management Services Division.

An introduction to records management at Clemson University Records Management Office 139 Anderson Hwy, Suite 100 Clemson, S.C

1 st Choice Document Destruction th Avenue, Milaca, Minnesota Office: Cell:

Washington State Archives Presented by: Russell Wood – State Records Manager Kerry Barbour – Digital Archivist Electronic Records Retention & The Digital.

Recordkeeping for Good Governance Toolkit Workshop PARBICA 14 Evidence and Memory in the Digital Age.

Managing the Paper Mountain Kaushika Patel, Rockland BOCES Maureen McCarthy, Lower Hudson Regional Information Center.

SCHOOLS FINANCE OFFICERS MEETINGS Records Management, “Paper-Lite” Environments and Procedures when a school closes Elizabeth Barber.

Getting Ready for STEVE Mapping Tools for STEVE William R. Bolton, Jr. State Registrar and Director Division of Vital Records Administration New Hampshire.

STEVE….A Vital Message Secure Electronic Exchange for Vital Records Leesa Shem-Tov NAPHSIS Project Manager.

An introduction to records management at Clemson University Records Center is located at the Library Depot 103 Clemson Research Blvd Anderson, S.C

2008 NAPHSIS Annual Meeting Celebrating 75 Years of Excellence Orlando, FL June 1 st – 5 th, 2008 Florida’s E-Vault Print System: Applications for Surveillance.

Grant Management Seminar Session 3 1 Session 3 Oversight and Reporting 10/13/2012.

Recordkeeping and Record Retention KATHLEEN L. MIZEJEWSKI, CPP, GBA March 20, 2010.

Records Management at East Carolina University Application of Records Retention and Disposition Schedules.

The Importance of STEVE COMING…AND GOING LIKE NAPHSIS, IT’LL GET YOU…

Surveying and Scheduling Records of OCIO Presented by Jennifer Wright Smithsonian Institution Archives Records Management Team February 16, 2005.

Surveying and Scheduling Records of SCEMS Presented by Ginger Yowell & Mitch Toda Smithsonian Institution Archives Records Management Team October 2, 2007.

Records Management and University Archives at Clemson University.

RECORDS MANAGEMENT TRAINING. WHAT HAS RECORDS MANAGEMENT GOT TO DO WITH ME? Records management is everyone’s responsibility. The three examples which.

University Retention Schedule Training. Introduction to the University Retention Schedule.

State Records Center About the Facility Constructed and designed for records storage Located outside of flood plain with drainage system Fixed shelving.

Records Management Maintaining District Records. Agenda  Role as Department Records Liaison  Records Management Basics  Transferring Records to Records.

3 is 4 IRS, IRC 4 is 3 FLSA, FMLA OSHA is 5  FLSA* requires certain records to be kept by covered employers for all employees and retained for either.

 The laws vary from state to state. The California Medical Association website states:  There is no general law requiring a physician to maintain records.

Records Management Program Records Management 101.

Disposal of University Records LRC Network 23 rd March 2011.

University of Kentucky Records Management Tutorial Taking responsibility for the records you create and managing their life-cycles.

UW-Madison Guidelines for Managing the Records of Departing Employees*

Records Retention NYS Magistrates’ Association

Records Management and University Archives at Clemson University

Presentation transcript:

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Retention and Destruction of Inter-Jurisdictionally Exchanged Vital Records

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 What? Why? Inquiry from concerned jurisdiction IJE Agreement has no mention of record security or retention IJE Committee surveyed itself, focused on paper records Fourteen states and Statistics Canada responded

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Record Retention Time: Statistical Data Files Minimum: records are destroyed as soon as annual statistical data file is created Maximum: records are retained permanently as paper or are scanned or microfilmed

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Record Retention Time: Death Roster Records Minimum: as soon as birth certificates have been annotated “deceased” Maximum: records are retained permanently as paper or are scanned or microfilmed

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Storage/Security of Records No policy Locked or key-coded environment State archives Locked filing cabinets (fireproof) behind pass-code protected doors Vital records vault

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Destruction of Records Not specified or no policy Kept permanently Shredded on-site or off-site Shredding is often by contractor

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Responsible Person Vague, various, not specified, none Security chief Named individuals/roles Named organizational units Same as recipient?

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Who should receive info? Good: NCHS – Judy Barnes monthly lists. May be more current, but you may pick the wrong recipient. Better: NAPHSIS website, IJE section – lists contacts for paper vs. electronic records based on IJE Agreements. Contact NAPHSIS if your contacts change!

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Summary of Current Policies Security is most often similar for exchanged and local records, sometimes set by law Record destruction is unique to exchanged records, some jurisdictions have no policy

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Constraints, Exceptions Roster information may be needed for proof or location of death If destruction of roster records is not possible, an alternative storage method is best (e.g. scanned images, microfilm), securely stored Remember, don’t issue copies of another jurisdiction’s records

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Suggested Best Practices Destroy records for statistical file as soon as file is complete and edited Destroy roster records as soon as crossmatch/annotation is complete Store and shred paper records using same security as own local records Exchange electronically (STEVE)

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Relevant NAPHSIS Projects Draft of new Model Law stipulates that IJE Agreement include retention and disposition instructions Security Guide (under development) will provide guidance for our best practices

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Electronic Records STEVE exchange process is secure Storage is more likely to be secure Electronic records have less “street value” Destruction can be complete and easy

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Next Steps Develop a policy consistent with Model Law and Security Guide Distribute “Best Practices” Incorporate requirements into next IJE Agreement Continue STEVE roll-out for electronic exchange

Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 IJE Committee and NAPHSIS Staff Contacts Me: Leesa: Bill: