Nigel Koay, Pavandeep Kataria, and Radmilla Juric, Dipl.-Ing. University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom. 2010 Telemedicine and e-Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 23, 2004OWL-S straw proposal for SWSL1 OWL-S Straw Proposal Presentation to SWSL Committee May 23, 2004 David Martin Mark Burstein Drew McDermott Deb.
Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
E-Science AHM, Nottingham. September 20 th, Glen Dobson: An OWL Ontology for QoS Glen Dobson (Russell Lock, Ian Sommerville)
The 20th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2008) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
Semantic Web Thanks to folks at LAIT lab Sources include :
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 8 Slide 1 System modeling 2.
Requirements Engineering n Elicit requirements from customer  Information and control needs, product function and behavior, overall product performance,
Recommender Systems – An Introduction Dietmar Jannach, Markus Zanker, Alexander Felfernig, Gerhard Friedrich Cambridge University Press Which digital.
Chapter 12: Expert Systems Design Examples
ASNA Architecture and Services of Network Applications Research overview and opportunities L. Ferreira Pires.
The Semantic Web Week 13 Module Website: Lecture: Knowledge Acquisition / Engineering Practical: Getting to know.
SWE Introduction to Software Engineering
7M701 1 Software Engineering Software Requirements Sommerville, Ian (2001) Software Engineering, 6 th edition: Chapter 5
Software Requirements
Marakas: Decision Support Systems, 2nd Edition © 2003, Prentice-Hall Chapter Chapter 1: Introduction to Decision Support Systems Decision Support.
Solutions for Personalized T-learning Alberto Gil Solla Department of Telematic Engineering University of Vigo (Spain) EuroITV 2005: the 3rd European Conference.
Kmi.open.ac.uk Semantic Execution Environments Service Engineering and Execution Barry Norton and Mick Kerrigan.
1 CSC-3324: Chapter 4 Title: What is a requirement? Mandatory reading: Sommerville 6, 7 th ed., Chap.: 7.
EdScene Brainstorming Barry, Shakeel, Andy, Hugh.
Semantic Mediation & OWS 8 Glenn Guempel
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Requirements engineering l The process of establishing the services that the.
Intelligent Tutoring Systems Traditional CAI Fully specified presentation text Canned questions and associated answers Lack the ability to adapt to students.
Amarnath Gupta Univ. of California San Diego. An Abstract Question There is no concrete answer …but …
BiodiversityWorld GRID Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh – 30 June and 1 July 2005 Metadata Agents and Semantic Mediation Mikhaila Burgess Cardiff University.
Requirements Analysis
Social Computing Networks: A New Paradigm for Engineering Pervasive Software Systems Naeem Esfahani Sam Malek 32th International Conference on Software.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Provenance Metadata for Shared Product Model Databases Etiel Petrinja, Vlado Stankovski & Žiga Turk University of Ljubljana Faculty of Civil and Geodetic.
11 C H A P T E R Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
Development of Front End Tools for Semantic Grid Services Dr.S.Thamarai Selvi, Professor & Head, Dept. of Information Technology, Madras Institute of Technology,
Asset Accumulation Series Webinar 7 of 7: Analyze Your Client Base September 24, 2014.
Supporting Civil-Military Information Integration in Military Operations Other than War Paul Smart, Alistair Russell and Nigel Shadbolt
Chapter 9 요구사항 모델링: 시나리오 기반 방법론 Requirements Modeling: Scenario-Based Methods 임현승 강원대학교 Revised from the slides by Roger S. Pressman and Bruce R. Maxim.
Ontology Summit 2015 Track C Report-back Summit Synthesis Session 1, 19 Feb 2015.
AVI/Psych 358/IE 340: Human Factors Interfaces and Interaction September 22, 2008.
Page 1 WWRF Briefing WG2-br2 · Kellerer/Arbanowski · · 03/2005 · WWRF13, Korea Stefan Arbanowski, Olaf Droegehorn, Wolfgang.
Streaming Knowledge Bases Onkar Walavalkar, Anupam Joshi Tim Finin and Yelena Yesha University of Maryland, Baltimore County 27 October 2008.
Semantic Web - an introduction By Daniel Wu (danielwujr)
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Database Development Supertype, Subtype, and Business Rules Powered by DeSiaMore 1.
Semantic Web Constraint Language complement and the editor development in Protégé Piao Guangyuan.
Computing Ontology Part II. So far, We have seen the history of the ACM computing classification system – What have you observed? – What topics from CS2013.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Information architecture (basics for app building)
Translating User Preferences into Fuzzy Rules for the Automatic Selection of Services Ioana Sora, Doru Todinca, Catalin Avram Department of Computers Politehnica.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
16/11/ Semantic Web Services Language Requirements Presenter: Emilia Cimpian
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary and WGs Meetings Jeju, Korea, June 25, 2009 Jeong-Dong Kim, Doo-Kwon Baik, Dongwon Jeong {kjd4u,
Service Brokering Yu-sik Park. Index Introduction Brokering system Ontology Services retrieval using ontology Example.
Formal Specification: a Roadmap Axel van Lamsweerde published on ICSE (International Conference on Software Engineering) Jing Ai 10/28/2003.
® Forging new generations of engineers. Design Process Review.
An Ontology-based Approach to Context Modeling and Reasoning in Pervasive Computing Dejene Ejigu, Marian Scuturici, Lionel Brunie Laboratoire INSA de Lyon,
Chapter 7 K NOWLEDGE R EPRESENTATION, O NTOLOGICAL E NGINEERING, AND T OPIC M APS L EO O BRST AND H OWARD L IU.
Architectural Considerations for Semantic Support Group Name: WG5 Source: Martin Bauer (NEC), Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
Enable Semantic Interoperability for Decision Support and Risk Management Presented by Dr. David Li Key Contributors: Dr. Ruixin Yang and Dr. John Qu.
1 SWE Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 14 – System Modeling.
Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.
Sharing personal knowledge over the Semantic Web ● We call personal knowledge the knowledge that is developed and shared by the users while they solve.
26/02/ WSMO – UDDI Semantics Review Taxonomies and Value Sets Discussion Paper Max Voskob – February 2004 UDDI Spec TC V4 Requirements.
A Context Framework for Ambient Intelligence
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Semantic Web Technologies
Ontology.
Knowledge Based Workflow Building Architecture
Informatics 121 Software Design I
Ontology.
Collaborative Smart House Environment Computer Science Department University of Cyprus Contact: Christodoulou Eleni.
Decision Support Systems
Presentation transcript:

Nigel Koay, Pavandeep Kataria, and Radmilla Juric, Dipl.-Ing. University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom Telemedicine and e-Health

Remote patient monitoring systems To give an objective measure of the patient’s status at any given time To interpret data generated by remote monitoring mechanisms to patients and healthcare professionals To assist patients in terms of informing, advising, alerting, and making decisions locally To assist the healthcare professional in their role as healthcare providers

To give an objective measure of the patient’s status at any given time monitor patients in terms of measuring a variety of conditions, experiences, feelings, disabilities, and situations specific for such patients The monitoring should be personalized for a particular patient and should include a set of devices that fit the personalized picture of patient’s needs →which ones of the devices satisfy specific criteria for creating a particular RPMS

Semantic management means exploiting the semantics stored in the scenario Ontological engineering semantic Web tools and languages → 4 Steps of process

Create ontological concepts based on the semantics from the scenario Req-ONTO stores semantics related to a particular patient and the way he uses the RPMS Dev-ONTO stores the semantic applicable to any device that may or may not be a part of the RPMS Exploit the ontological models through domain and range constraints, OWL restrictions, and assertions to strengthen the relationships between semantics stored in both ontology

Perform the alignment process between Req- ONTO and Dev-ONTO to find matches between semantically related concepts of ontologies The first match M1 is between User Preferences to Device Constraints The second match M2 is between User Disability and Device Purpose We manipulate the discoveries of these matches M1 and M2 through high-level reasoning into new ontological concepts that contain the answer to our question

Rule 1 makes a match between user’s preferences and a device that accommodates the preferences Rule 2 makes a match between a disability and a device that monitors the disability

Rule 3 runs on top of rules 1 and 2. It takes the results of both rules and incorporates additional preferences, specified by the user. The result will be a device deemed to be the best choice

Our semantic modeling of the RPMS environment allows any classification from the Diagnosis-Related Group systems to become a part of Req-ONTO Further, our proposal can be extended into any environment that depends on taking an ‘‘objective measure’’ of the patient’s status at any given time In other words, our idea is reusable in case management, where a particular patient’s ‘‘situation’’ determines what is to be measured

we explore ontologies and Web semantic tools when managing nonfunctional requirements in e-healthcare We have created two ontologies: Req-ONTO and Dev-ONTO, which store semantics of nonfunctional requirements imposed on our RPMS and the characteristics of devices our idea to use ontological environments in systemizing unstructured nonfunctional requirements proved to be a good starting point in building personalized pervasive e-health services