International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for Changes in the Treatment of US Patents Chinh H. Pham Greenberg Traurig Thomas A. Turano K&L Gates MassMedic March 6, 2008.
Advertisements

WHY?WHAT?HOW?WHERE? Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.19/02/2007 Patents in the Electronic (and IT) Industries Olivier Sacroug European Patent Attorney Katzarov.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
_1 STRATEGIC USE OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY Samson Helfgott Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York, NY WIPO Services and Initiatives Princeton,
Prepared by the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) July 2010 Three-Track Examination Proposal: IPO’s Concerns Douglas K. Norman, IPO President.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program Patents – Past, Present and Future.
Foreign Investment and IP Protection in China Presented by: Julia Zhu Allan Law Group/Alpha Leader Group U.S. Los Angeles May 14, 2008 © Allan Law Group.
CONFIDENTIAL PATENTS What You Need To Know Robert Benson Office of Technology Development Harvard University Brandeis University – October 20, 2005.
Monetizing Ideas What Inventors should know about making money from patents Shmuel Ur ur-innovation.com.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
Google Online Marketing Challenge (GOMC)
Introduction to University Tech Transfer Fall Columbia Technology Ventures
Critical Success Factors for the Korean Generic and API Industry in a post FTA Environment DAVID HARDING SEOUL JUNE 28-29, 2007.
Intellectual Property
USPTO PCT Task Force Public Hearing January 13, 2010 Lawrence T. Welch Assistant General Patent Counsel Eli Lilly & Co.
© 2014 Foley Hoag LLP. All Rights Reserved. International Patent Protection for Emerging Companies WIPO Program on International IP Protection Suffolk.
The New USPTO Rules and their Impact on Biomedical Patent Prosecution Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer.
TOPIC #6 Importing and Exporting Goods and Services.
University Startup Best Practices Presentation for Technology Transfer Tactics April 15 th, 2009.
Q3 2008/09 presentation, 27 August 2009 By CEO Lars Marcher and CFO Anders Arvai.
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
© Kolisch Hartwell 2014 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 Oregon Best Fest September 2014 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch Hartwell, P.C.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Protecting Intellectual Property Around The World 6 th Annual The Security Summit Mitchell P. Brook Partner, Luce Forward
The Patent Prosecution Highway: Strategic Considerations in Accelerating U.S. and Foreign Patent Prosecution ACC Quick Hits June 13, 2012 Dr. John K. McDonald.
Inventing the Future – The Role of Patents and Utility Models in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Ron Marchant CB FRSA Implementation.
PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
1 IP Regime and its Effect on Knowledge-Economy : South Korean IP Perspective October 2013.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
Feasibility Study.
Proprietary and Confidential Why Commercialize Intellectual Property And Technology? Looking at the Larger Picture Yalcin Suer February 3, 2005.
Nadya Reingand, PhD Washington DC, USA © Copyright. All rights reserved. Патентование в США Patent Hatchery LLC
Protection of Intellectual Property in Canada George Jackowski, Ph.D., KCTJ October 19 th, 2015 Chairman of NAVA Corp.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Nadya Reingand, Washington DC, USA From Science to Business © Copyright. All rights reserved.
Avoiding Common Pitfalls: Intellectual Property and Exports Guriqbal Singh Jaiya, Director, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Intellectual Property as Integral Part of S&T Strategy Dr. Nadya Reingand Patent Hatchery LLC Washington DC, USA © Nadya Reingand.
1 IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO Ken-Ichi MOROOKA The Japan Patent Office Fordham IP Conference April 29, 2011.
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 1 of International Financial Management Prepared by: Michel Paquet SAIT Polytechnic ©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Harmonization! Biotech/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting December 9, Mark R. Powell Special Advisor to the Commissioner for Patents.
Marketing Plan.
ثبت بين المللي اختراعات 1 تبريز - مهر ماه دكتر حميد عزيزي.
Competitor Analysis  Direct competitors  Offer the same products and services  Customers often compare prices, features and deals among these competitors.
Presentation by Dr. Andreas O. Tobler September 1, 2011 Tento projekt je spolufinancován Evropským sociálním fondem a státním rozpočtem České republiky.
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 Palette Border Color: 39 C7 C Cтратегии.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
So you’ve invented something?
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
Patent application procedure (…and costs)
Enforcement in China.
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
IMPI’s Role in the International Arena
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Welcome to the World of IPR
IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO
Patent Prosecution Highway(PPH)
2019 Hagerstown Technology Showcase March 21, 2019
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010

Overview Emory Statistics General Patent Filing Overview Licensee Issues Nationalization and Regionalization Examples and Strategies Conclusion 10/24/20152Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Overview of Filing Practices About 200 ID’s per year File about provisional patent applications per year Focused in healthcare 10/24/20153Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Overview of Filing Practices International Filings 10/24/20154Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Overview of Filing Practices International Filings – past EPO 10/24/20155Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Initial Filing Decisions For Emory Focused in technology areas with long ramp up times – Ready for filing vs must publish – Almost all provisional applications When publication imminent – – Do you need European rights?? Keep grace periods in mind – Canadian Example Publication Diagnostic test (unlikely to enter foreign) Canadian company interested – 1 year general grace period 10/24/20156Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Initial Filing Decisions For Emory Does international filing make sense? – Emory ex-US filed technologies – overall income >$720M (>$190M without royalty sale) ( ) – Other, non-ex-US filed revenue ~$20M – Example – Largest royalty stream - >60% from ex-US sales since /24/20157Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Conversion Decisions PCT vs US only – Historical filing strategies – PCT and US – PCT only – US only – Technology Type – Device – Software – Pharma » Therapeutics » Diagnostics 10/24/20158Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Speed of Prosecution PCT filing delays prosecution USPTO examination tracks – Accelerated Examination Claim limits and ESD – Patent Prosecution Highway programs If favorable examination in “office of first filing”, get claims accelerated in other PTOs – Currently: Australia, Canada, Denmark, EPO, Japan, Korea, Singapore – Triple Tier Examination Proposal Fast track (no ESD), regular, slow track 10/24/20159Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Technology Timing How long does it take to get to “Proof of Principle” Prototyping - <1 year Drug Discovery 10Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Licensing Issues Timing of License – Technology type and effect on licensing – 2009 Cancer Institute Study 50% of licenses executed in 3 years from first filing and >90% by 8 years Emory – ~45% by 3 years, ~90% by 8 years Later deals in pharma – potential higher royalties, better up fronts Support longer development times 10/24/201511Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Licensee Needs What purpose does patent serve? – For litigation, where are potential infringers? Market size Manufacturers (without US import) Competitors – For ‘value add’, is there high perceived value in industry? 10/24/201512Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Licensee Issues What do licensees expect – Technology type decisions Will the license get done? How will it affect the deal terms? – Cost-benefit analysis International filing costs: EPO alone >20K, overall >100K to be expected Expect at least 20-40K before reimbursement - will you increase deal value by that? 10/24/201513Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Nationalization Decisions Licensed vs unlicensed case Examples – 75-80% nationalization decisions – unlicensed Examples – Inflammatory disorders – ex-US; – Quantum dot coating – US only Strategies for cost reduction Keep your eye on the ball!! 10/24/201514Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Nationalization Decisions Special problems with start ups – Largely immune to costs – Floating debt – Want broad filings to ‘increase value’ Strategies for cost reduction – Budget, budget, budget – Watch the bottom line – Do not lose control 10/24/201515Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Validation Decisions Licensed vs Unlicensed – Where does one typically validate – Why do you care where a licensee validates – Validating on your own dime “Sunk Cost” issue Will you enforce? Costs – Translations – London Agreement – What are the claims?? Example of claim limitations 10/24/201516Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products

Strategies Keep goal in mind – – Don’t undermine global opportunity, but cost-benefit differs depending on opportunity Take control!! – Get budget and watch it – Shop for alternative options – Delay high costs until license – Watch costs for risky licensees 10/24/201517Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and Products