Washington State Children’s Safe Product Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revision of the toy safety directive will children really be safe from hazardous chemicals in toys? European Parliament Brussels, 3 September.
Advertisements

1 CEHAPE 1. Dec Sascha Gabizon, European Eco-Forum / WECF Developing NGO action.
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Presented by the New Brunswick Lung Association In partnership with Health Canada.
Chlorpyrifos ENV H 572 Hilary Zetlen. Chlorpyrifos  Organophosphate pesticide  Marketed by Dow Chemical since 1965  Domestic and agricultural uses.
Risk Assessment.
Carcinogen Classification Criteria Patricia Richter Ph.D., DABT Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee June 8, 2010.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classification of Radio Frequency (RF) Summary – May 2011.
Original draft date was October 11, 1976 Major amendments occurred in 1986, 1988, 1990, and 1992 National law Matt Carroll Per. 3.
Environmental Health What is the relationship between the health of the planet and our own health?
Cody Ford.  Once classified as a Carcinogen, but removed due to lack of evidence.
Chemicals Inventory Management as a Tool to Check Compliance with Restricted Substances Regulations Ursula Schumacher.
OPHA RESOLUTION ON THE NON-ESSENTIAL USE OF CHEMICAL PESTICIDES ON PUBLIC & PRIVATE LANDS Presented to alPHa - Feb 1/02 by: Helen Doyle, representing the.
PBT Initiative and PCBs Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Holly Davies, Ph.D. April 24 th, 2013.
Port Ludlow Workgroup Report Precautionary Principle 2003 NW HW Conference, Pasco, WA June 1-6 Marni Solheim Washington Department of Ecology Solid Waste.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
MZC1© 2005 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Unit II: Public Health Principles in Community Health Nursing Chapter 10 Environmental Health and Safety.
Risk Assessment in the Environment. What is the difference between hazard and risk? Risk: probability that an event or effect will occur and  Combination.
1. Pthalates 2. Bisphenol A 3. Perfluorochemicals 4. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
Alex Stone, Sc. D. Safer Chemical Alternative Chemist WA Dept. of Ecology Exposure Science Community of Practice Teleconference May 11,
Washington Toxics Reduction Strategy PPRC Roundtable October 24, 2012 Holly Davies, PhD Washington State Department of Ecology.
Dangers of Plastic By: Kara Doane. Why Should You Care We often hear about plastic pollution in the environment, yet because we are not witnessing the.
TOXIC BOTTLES? CHAPTER 3 INFORMATION LITERACY
APES Get out Ecological Footprint Assignment. Chapter 17 Environmental Hazards & Human Health.
Environmental Issues and Cancer Prevention Strategies.
Corporate Sustainability For the benefit of business and people Presented by Betsy Hausler Director, Analytical Services Bureau Veritas Consumer Products.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
A growing number of diseases in children from rural and urban areas are linked to unsafe, degraded environments. However, many health care providers are.
Alex Stone Chemist, WA Dept. of Ecology EPA Prioritization Workshop April 6-7,
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
Slide 1 of 24 EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Use of Exposure Data in Priority Setting Bill Wooge Office of Science Coordination and.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 8: Environmental Health Progress Review February 2, 2007.
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Chapter 14 Toxicology Objectives: Know what the endocrine system is. Know what hormones are. Know the four major types of chemical toxins. Know what endocrine.
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
Moving past one-at-a-time chemical “de-selection”.
Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1. CHEMICAL HAZARDS A hazardous chemical can harm humans or other animals because it may: –Be flammable –Be.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 by: Bjorn Bookser period 2.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Regulatory Chemical Risk Assessment From Superfund to Contaminants of Emerging Concern Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Patrick Gwinn November.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
State Responses to BFRs Towards an Integrated Chemicals Policy Ken Geiser University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Topic 22: Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1.
NAHMMA Conference - PBT Rule September 22, Developing a PBT Regulation in Washington State Mike Gallagher, Washington State Dept. of Ecology 20 th.
Toxic Substances Introduction
1 Harmful/Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke Tobacco Product Constituents Subcommittee Meeting July 7, 2010 Corinne.
Environmental Hazards and Human Health. Are Baby Bottles & Food Cans Safe To Use? 1.Some synthetic chemicals act as hormone mimics and disrupt the human.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (1974, 1984, & 1996) By: Cat Pittard, APES.
Alberta Region Winnie Cheng Sr. Risk Manager Safe Environments Program Aboriginal Children Health & Environment Workshop February 25, 2010 Your health.
Vivian Pham Period 2. Info Draft Year: March 16, 1976 Law passed on: October 11, 1976 Enacted by the 94 th United States Congress Became effective on:
Use of Borates in Swimming Pools: Consideration of Health Effects
Jiří Palát Modern Methods for Analyses of Organic Pollutants
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
What we all need to know about the powers that be!
Upholstered Furniture Flammability Standards: -A Challenge to Public Health and Safety American Public Health Association Washington, DC November 7,
Chapter 17 Human Health and Environmental Risks
Module 57 Toxicology and Chemical Risks
Reporting of priority substances in Norway
Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976
Addressing Policy Barriers to Green Chemistry
Laying a Foundation for Working Effectively with EPA and ATSDR
Lead as a chemical of concern across product sectors
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Presentation transcript:

Washington State Children’s Safe Product Act Holly Davies, PhD Senior Scientist Reducing Toxics Threats

Children’s Safe Product Act Washington Legislation Passed in April 2007 Limited concentrations of lead, cadmium and phthalates in children’s products Required identification of chemicals of high concern to children Included process on how to identify these chemicals Random chemicals du jour part (whack a mole) More holistic approach part Dave wants me to include how important it is for us to lead the country on this Since our law was passed, there have been other state and federal laws

Federal Legislation Federal legislation passed in August 2007 Preempted state authority to regulate lead, cadmium, and phthalates Did not preempt Washington’s authority to require reporting on chemicals of high concern to children in products sold in WA Ecology currently working on list of chemicals of high concern to children for reporting First part of the law is preempted (section 3) Powerful reporting list remained (section 4,5) and section 6 education campaign

‘High Priority Chemicals’ (HPCs) (from legislation) One or more of the following criteria: Developmental toxicity Cause: Cancer Genetic damage Reproductive harm Endocrine disruptor Damage: Nervous system Immune system Organs or other systemic toxicity PBT vPvB (very persistent & very bioaccumulative) ‘High priority chemical’ as identified by: State agency Federal agency Accredited research university Other scientific evidence deemed authoritative Section 2 Definitions- What is meant by toxic

United States: Federal International: Europe International: Canada HPC Sources: United States: Federal United States: State EPA PBT Prop 65-Total EPA TRI PBT Chemicals Prop 65 Cancer EPA VCCEP Prop 65 Developmental Nat. Waste Min. Prg. Priority Chem. Prop 65 Female Nat. Tox Prg. Reproduction Prop 65 Male Nat. Tox Prg. Carcinogens-Known WA PBTs Nat. Tox Prg. Carcinogens-Suspected International: Europe IRIS Total EU Endocrine Disruptors Cat 1 IRIS 1986 Category A (known) EU Endocrine Disruptors Cat 2 IRIS 1986 Category B1 (probable-humans) EU SVHC (Substances of Very High Concern) IRIS 1986 Category B2 (probable-animal) EU PBTs IRIS 1986 Category C (possible) EU Chemicals identified for Risk Assessment IRIS 1996 Known/likely OSPAR Chemicals of Concern IRIS 1999 Carcinogens OSPAR 1997 Chems for Priority Action IRIS 2005 Suggestive Evidence IARC Group 1 Known Carcinogens IRIS Oral RfD Critical Effects IARC Group 2a Probable Carcinogens IARC Group 2b Possible Carcinogens Other International: Canada Grandjean Neurotoxins (developmental toxins) Canadian PBiT list

‘Chemicals of High Concern to Children’ (CHCCs) (From legislation) Section 4: Identifying high priority chemicals of high concern for children after considering a child’s or developing fetus’s potential for exposure to each chemical. One or more of the following criteria: Chemicals found in biomonitoring studies: Humans Umbilical cord blood Breast milk Urine Other bodily tissues or fluids Chemicals found in: Household dust Indoor air Drinking water Elsewhere in the home Added or present in consumer product used or present in the home Monitoring Exposure or potential exposure No levels- just presence

Biomonitoring & Potential Exposure Lists Established lists of chemicals in the four exposure areas: Biomonitoring Indoor air and dust Drinking water Products Children’s products Consumer products in general Bill specified consumer products Governor focused on “chemicals likely to be found in children’s products” in her veto message

Biomonitoring & Potential Exposure Lists Chemicals added to lists from: Authoritative Sources CDC’s NHANES for biomonitoring California Air Resources Board for indoor air & dust EPA’s drinking water program for drinking water Danish Environmental Protection Agency and Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority for products Original research published in peer-reviewed, scientific journals Gov mentioned CA and EU

High Priority Chemicals: From authoritative sources With specific toxicities Biomonitoring & Exposure Lists: Chemicals found in: Humans Indoor Air and Dust Drinking Water Products Unprioritized (CHCCs): Intersection of two groups Reporting in section 5 – notice that the product contains a HPC Governor veto message- 50 chemicals, no 2010 deadline

Reporting Prioritize 50 chemicals Reporting in section 5 – notice that the product contains a HPC Governor veto message- 50 chemicals, no 2010 deadline Section 6 is the DOH education campaign

Contacts: Carol Kraege Toxics Coordinator (360) 407-6906 ckra461@ecy.wa.gov John Williams CSPA Coordinator (360) 407-6940 jowi461@ecy.wa.gov Alex Stone Chemist (360) 407-6758 alst461@ecy.wa.gov Holly Davies Senior Scientist (360) 407-7398 hdav461@ecy.wa.gov