Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Information Technology Update Aaron Smallwood Manager, IT Business & Customer Services.
Inadvertent Gain Overview February Introduction Why we are here –Original Inadvertent Gain (IAG) Task Force (2004) Creation of Retail Market.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
RMS Update to TAC August 7, RMS Update to TAC ► At July 9 RMS Meeting:   RMS Voting Items:
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
RMS Update to TAC May 8, RMS Update to TAC ► At April 9 RMS Meeting:  Antitrust Training  RMS Voting Items: ► NPRR097Changes to Section 8 to Incorporate.
1 MIMO/Stacking (Including Tx SET Version 2.0) Post Implementation Success Report.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott May 13,
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
June 22 and 23,  The information and/or flow processes contained in this Power Point presentation: ◦ Were created to allow interested parties to.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday February 14 th, 2007.
ERCOT SCR745 Update ERCOT Outage Evaluation Phase 1 and Phase 2 TDTWG April 2, 2008.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
June 10, 2009 RMS PR90006, Commercial Systems Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) Hope Parrish, ERCOT.
ERCOT Project Update ERCOT Outage Evaluation Phase 2 (SCR745) TDTWG May 7, 2008.
Mandy Bauld ERCOT October 9, 2012 RTM SETTLEMENT TIMELINE.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
1 C urrent Market Release TX SET V2.0 / Solution to Stacking.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Texas SET Version 3.0 Production Implementation Plan.
1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.
Retail Transaction Processing Year End Review and Recent Issues RMS January 2007.
Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
MARS Advanced Metering – ERCOT Market Facing Changes Jackie Ashbaugh Manager Data Integrity and Administration 3/9/2009.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
Information Technology Report Trey Felton Manager, IT Service Delivery October 2011 ERCOT Public.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update Kathy Scott April 9, 2013Commercial Operations Subcommittee 1.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
February 10, 2010 RMS ERCOT 1/24/10 Production Issue Overview and Lessons Learned Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
ERCOT Service Availability Metrics and Retail Systems Update April 2007.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Information Technology Service Availability Metrics Trey Felton IT Account Manager COPS/RMS January 2010.
Update to RMS June 3, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B High Level Timeline  Planning Phase - complete  Execution/Development - complete  Testing.
Information Technology Service Availability Metrics March 2008.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
Information Technology Update Aaron Smallwood Manager, IT Business & Customer Services.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
1 Texas Data Transport & MarkeTrak Systems (TDTMS) Update to RMS March 1, 2016 Jim Lee (AEP) – Chair Monica Jones (NRG) – Vice Chair.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday May 6, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.Reviewed Service Availability 3.Reviewed.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 TDTWG Report to RMS SCR Addressing ERCOT System Outages Tuesday, May 10.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
PWG Demand Response Follow Up Jackie Ashbaugh October 23, 2007.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Stacking Implementation Plan
ERCOT SCR745 Update ERCOT Outage Evaluation Phase 1 and Phase 2
Demand Response – ERCOT discussion items
Presentation transcript:

Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008

Contents Definitions Background ERCOT Findings Customer Impacts CR Impacts TDSP Impacts Next Steps

Definitions Impacted Customer – Customer that had a Move-In or Move-out transaction scootched by the TDSP due to transactions being held by ERCOT past the 5:00 pm daily cut-off window Impacted Transaction – Transaction that did not meet the ERCOT Performance Metrics in place for 1Q 2008 MVI Process – entire transaction chain of a customer move-in (814_16, 814_04, 814_05, etc.) MVO Process – all transactions and responses tied to the base 814_24 transaction request Scootching – Process in which the TDSP forwards the requested date on transactions to the next business day after the original requested date when the transaction is received after 5:00pm two business days prior to the original request date

Background On March 12 th, 2008 and again from March 18 th through 20 th, 2008 various CRs saw an unusually large number of MVI and MVO transactions scootched by the TDSPs During the period market participants experienced greater than normal performance issues with MarkeTrak, TML, Data Extracts, and Reporting Upon review of available data it was discovered that transactions were taking significantly longer to process through ERCOT to the TDSPs once the transactions were delivered by the CRs (Mean processing time increased by 100%, Maximum processing time increased by 500%) Market Impact Assessment Task Force formed to gain greater understanding of what happened at ERCOT and to assess impacts to all market segments

ERCOT Findings Period 1: March 1, 2008 to March 11, 2008 Retail Processing Outages: 3/2/08 8am to 8pmPlanned Maintenance 3/2/08 – 3/3/088pm to 6:05amUnplanned Maintenance over-run 3/8/08 – 3/9/0812pm to 2:30pmPlanned Release (SCR 745 Phase 2) Out of Protocol Transactions: Switch:814_ %Total Switch1.77% MVI:814_ % 814_ % 814_ % 867_ %Total MVI4.59% PMVIAll in protocolTotal PMVI.63% MVOAll in protocol CSAMVI814_ %Total plus MVO1.82% Total out of protocol transactions: Switch-MVI-PMVI-MVO-CSA-MVI = 3.20%

ERCOT Findings Period 2: March 12, 2008 to March 21, 2008 Retail Processing Outages: 3/12/083am to N/AUnplanned (867 Pickup Process error) 3/12/089:08am to 10:15amUnplanned San Failure 3/19/089:35am to 12:02am Unplanned San Failure 3/20/088:20am to 10:02amUnplanned San Failure 3/20/083:55pm to 5:40pmUnplanned (SCR 745 Issues)

ERCOT Findings Period 2: March 12, 2008 to March 21, 2008 Out of Protocol Transactions: Switch:814_ % 867_ % 867_ %Total Switch2.64% MVI:814_ % 814_ % 867_ % 867_ %Total MVI4.91% PMVI:814_ % 814_ % 814_ % 867_ %Total PMVI14.91% MVO:814_ % 814_ % 814_ % 867_ %Total MVO21.39% Total out of protocol transactions: Switch-MVI-PMVI-MVO-CSA-MVI = 10.86%

ERCOT Findings Period 3: March 22, 2008 to March 31, 2008 Retail Processing Outages: 3/22/088am to 12:00pmPlanned Maintenance (Rollback SCR 745 2) 3/30/088am to 9:30amPlanned Maintenance Out of Protocol Transactions: All Transactions within Protocol Total out of protocol transactions: Switch-MVI-PMVI-MVO-CSA MVI =.07%

ERCOT Findings Details on impacted transactions: ERCOT determined that the retail transaction processing issues, which occurred on March 12, 2008, were the result of human error. A slow-down on the application server was being investigated and was believed to be a hardware issue. During the investigation, a Retail process was mistakenly restarted while one was already running. This caused errors with the transaction processing and corrupted log files. This caused the validity of the exception queries that run against the logs to be in question and delayed the identification of impacted transactions. At the time ERCOT notified the Market that this effort continues to be a challenge due to the volume of data and the anomaly of the problem that occurred with log files being corrupted or missing as a result.

ERCOT Findings Details on impacted transactions: On March 18, 2008 ERCOT identified with the support of the Market: Multiple 997 transactions required reprocessing transactions required reprocessing 867 transactions for 2 TDSPs required reprocessing for a total of 116,485 transactions On March 20, 2008 ERCOT identified and additional subset of 867s that required reprocessing. 867 transactions for an 3rd TDSP were identified that required reprocessing for an additional 19,628 transactions.

ERCOT Findings Details on impacted transactions: On April 9, 2008 ERCOT was made aware of additional impacts due to the retail transaction processing outage that occurred on March 12, Some 867_03 files were not processed. The files were received by ERCOT and acknowledged but were not included in the files created for data loading into the Settlements and Billing application. Both IDR and NIDR files were among those affected. ERCOT at that time advised that as a result of reprocessing, Market Participants may receive duplicate 867_03 forwards. ERCOT reprocessed 1 NIDR file with 12,504 transactions. ERCOT reprocessed 15 IDR flies with 117 transactions.

ERCOT Findings Details on impacted transactions: On April 10, 2008 ERCOT identified and addition 16 files requiring reprocessing ERCOT reprocessed 16 IDR files with 130 transactions On April 15, 2008 ERCOT identified an additional 26 files requiring reprocessing. ERCOT reprocessed 26 additional files with 184 transactions.

Customer Impacts MVI/MVO Request Scootched –3/12/2008 for 3/14/2008 Action Scootched 3 days 3/14/2008 was a Friday; Monday 3/17/2008 the next available business day –3/18/2008 for 3/20/2008 Action Scootched 4 days 3/20/2008 was a Thursday; due to Good Friday Holiday on 3/21/2008; Monday 3/24/2008 was the next available business day –3/19/2008 for 3/24/2008 Action; and 3/20/2008 for 3/25/2008 Action Scootched 1 day

Customer Impacts MVI Request Scootched –Customers with no Power for day/weekend/holiday weekend –Customers with Power under another customer/REP agreement MVO Request Scootched –Customers billed for usage on days after their requested MVO date Missing/Late Usage Transactions –Delayed Billing MarkeTrak/TML Degradation –Delayed enrollment and issue resolution

CR Impacts MVI Request Scootched –Customers with no Power for day/weekend/holiday weekend CR initiates manual MarkeTrak Cancel with Approval process followed by PMVI request to get power on as requested –CR pays PMVI fee and does not pass through to the customer CR pays for customer to stay at hotel, meals until power is energized at premise CR invokes Emergency Manual spreadsheet enrollment process with TDSPs to ensure customers receive power –Customer served power under previous customer’s account Previous customer/CR billed for usage period resulting in lost revenue for both current and previous CR –Increase Safety Net monitoring and submission to TDSPs MVO Request Scootched –Customers billed for usage on days after their requested MVO date Loss of revenue tied to customer disputed/unpaid usage from scootched MVO dates Missing/Late Usage Transactions –Delayed Billing

CR Impacts MarkeTrak/TML degradation –FTE’s not able to perform job functions while TML/MarkeTrak are degraded or not available –Loss of customer enrollment due to inability to complete enrollments while TML degraded or not available for ESIID Lookup Other Impacts –Manual processes implemented to monitor and identify delayed transactions for special handling FTE cost related to performing manual process as well as cost of normal jobs assigned to FTE’s not being completed –Increased call center activity by impacted customers around missed dates, lack of power, and/or incorrect bills –Ongoing FTE cost to resolve any out of synch issues caused by invoking of manual processes –Loss of customers due to customer dissatisfaction for missed MVI date request

CR Impacts Participating CRs reported per Impacted Customer an average cost of $24.41 Participating CRs reported that an average Impacted Customer rate of 15% of total transactions Using ERCOT provided data for March 2008, 15% of MVI, PMVI, and MVO transactions is 1592 Impacted Customers per day of an Outage 1592 x $24.41 = $38,860 in average cost to the CR community on each of the 3 impacted days

TDSP Impacts MarkeTrak DEV Issues for synchronization Reconciliation of 867_03 (149,000+ transactions both NIDR and IDR) Opportunity Costs on FTE's dedicated to manual processes Increase of Safety Net requests MarkeTrak outage cause issues in meeting market timelines Possible reconciliation of some MarkeTrak issues Manual monitoring & managing of processes significantly increased Increased call volumes from CRs Based on input from 3 TDSPs the deemed average impact was estimated to be $1466 per TDSP

Next Steps Additional Data to be added to the ERCOT Outage Incidence Log –Per Outage an additional tab will be added to show the ERCOT Performance Metrics for that day –In the Market Impact Column of the Log the total out of protocol for the SWI, MVI, PMVI, and MVO processes will be displayed Input in SLA changes/updates via TDTWG Further steps to be determined by Market Participants as appropriate