Problem Statement: On-site Sewage Disposal Systems (OSS) are routinely implicated as the primary contributor of non-point sources of pollution that threaten.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY June 17, 2013.
Advertisements

1 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 A UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE PARTNERSHIP SHIRLEY.
PROMOTING A COORDINATED GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR LAGOS STATE: WAY FORWARD By PROFESSOR E.O. LONGE, PhD FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL.
Principles of Standards and Measures
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
On-site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Trends in Texas
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
OSTDS Management: An overview of EPA management models, case studies, and financing options Jaime Boswell Environmental Scientist Charlotte Harbor National.
April EMS is Environmental Management System. It is the environmental component of the Jefferson Lab ISMS. The System comprises a tiered series.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
POWTS Maintenance WCCA Fall Conference November 3, 2006 Pete Tarnowski Manitowoc County.
A Systematic Approach to Tackling Blight in Small-Town America A Systematic Approach to Tackling Blight in Small-Town America Mary Helen Smith, MPH, CPH,
Water School June 20, 2013 Loretta M. Bates, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension San Diego County.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Printed by DEVELOPING A NON-PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA Scott A. Uhlich, MCP Georgia Department of Human.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Lancaster County Property Transfer Code John Chess REHS, MPA, Water Quality Supervisor Lincoln Lancaster County Health Department Doug Smith REHS, Environmental.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Development of a Comprehensive Educational Program to Increase Compliance Among Dry Cleaners Dawn Marie Prandi, REHS Environmental Health Coordinator Somerset.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
1 Innovative Use of Administrative Order Authority Management, Operation and Maintenance (MOM) Program.
Presented by Dwain Butler District Director of Environmental Health Southeast Health District Waycross, Georgia.
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Environmental Issues and Cancer Prevention Strategies.
AANDC Presentation at the OFNTSC Southern Tribal Council Meeting Chippewas of Rama, Ontario October , 2012.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
Introduction Illegal dumping and littering of solid waste continues to be a problem for many communities nationwide. Monterey County has seen an increase.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLANNING Public Information Session August 29, 2013 Town of Clinton, CT Water Pollution Control Commission.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
May 5, 2015 Water Resources Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
Child Care and Septic Systems….Be in the Know When Kids Have to Go Lisa A. Carpenter, M.B.A., R.E.H.S., Michaela N. Horn, M.S., R.S., and Nicole DeFrank,
Developing Indicators
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world 1 © COPYRIGHT 2010 ERM.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
HOARDING Tackling the Broader Issues The Task Force Approach to Service Delivery.
Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
What are some ways to reduce the risks to public health in drinking water from Salinas Valley? Andrew Mims Nitrates In Groundwater Presentation ENSTU 300.
Factory Farming & EPA: Running Up The White Flag On Waste In Our Waterways.
1 Large On-site Sewage Systems Maryanne Guichard May 16, 2008.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
WATER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 Experiences of the Common Implementation Strategy From the Perspective of a new Member State – Cyprus Christodoulos Artemis,
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
Public Hearing on Water Pollution and Water Challenges Date: 04 th June 2008 Venue: Ground Floor, NCOP Building.
Central Valley Salinity Coalition Developing a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan for the Central Valley.
September 11, 2012 Water Resources Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan A. Yepbayeva, Director of Production Statistics and Environment Department.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Resolution: Protect King County Waters from Failing On-Site Septic Systems Darrell Rodgers, PhD Public Health - Seattle & King County Environmental Health.
Environmental Health Service Learning and Water Quality in Gales Point, Belize International Health and Human Service Learning Program Belize 2009 College.
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
Septic Re-inspection Programs
Cross Connection Survey Training
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Compliance
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
Results from the Field:
Tuscarawas County Health Department Operation Permit
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
BAT Work Group.
Know Your Septic Systems Check it, Fix it, Maintain it
Presentation transcript:

Problem Statement: On-site Sewage Disposal Systems (OSS) are routinely implicated as the primary contributor of non-point sources of pollution that threaten ground and surface waters, and the functional status of most OSS remains unknown. ABSTRACT : The importance of routine operation and maintenance (O&M) for on-site septic systems (OSS) has long been recognized. Since 1995, Washington State’s on-site septic system regulations have required routine O&M. The responsibility for carrying out this task was split between the OSS owner and local health officer. A number of hurdles prevented smaller rural health jurisdictions from fully enacting the intent of these regulations. In Grays Harbor County, the O&M program is limited to performing loan reports upon request, conducting existing system evaluations before issuing building permits, requiring pumpers to submit a list of properties pumped, inspecting food service facilities with OSS on an annual basis and providing educational materials to OSS owners. While this method of O&M allows a number of systems to be inspected, it does not ensure that all systems are inspected on a periodic basis. Of the approximately 10,000 OSS in Grays Harbor County, approximately 100 (or 1%) are physically inspected annually under the current O&M program. In recent years, a number of concerns relating to the impact of OSS on the environment have been raised, including increases in the number of alternative systems being permitted, increased contamination risk to potable water supplies, and growing classification downgrades in shellfish harvesting areas. These examples reinforce the immediate need for a comprehensive and systematic O&M program to be initiated by the County. By using a systems thinking approach to explore and define the nature of present limitations and by developing an action plan to implement corrective actions, the County is enhancing and expanding the O&M program. By implementing the 10 Essential Services in Environmental Health Grays Harbor County is ensuring a meaningful and sustainable program. Numerous challenges still remain in enacting an expanded O&M program. Political, economic and social barriers must be overcome before an expanded program can become a reality. Harnessing support from local stakeholders and educating both top decision makers and OSS owners are essential in implementing a successful O&M programs in smaller health jurisdictions with limited resources and where the public health significance of failing OSS is not readily recognized. Goals and Objectives Program Goal: The goal of this project is to address community concerns associated with non-point source pollution by assuring that septic systems are properly operating and maintained. The gap between our current reliance on enforcement activities for OSS in obvious failure and our ability to implement a systematic O&M program is widening. Health Problem: Grays Harbor is currently listed under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act as not meeting water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria because of inadequate controls of point or nonpoint sources. 1 Elevated fecal counts and/or nutrient loading in water (Surface and ground) has resulted in the temporary closer of shellfish harvesting areas, advisory posting at coastal recreational areas, building development delays, and a number of other events due to concerns with the effects on human health. Outcome Objective: To better ensure the reduction of human exposure to untreated wastewater on the surface of the ground, in surface water, groundwater, and food sources. Determinants : Number of OSS inspected in a given period of time. Number of OSS in failure as defined by Washington Administrative Code Section A Levels of fecal coliform bacteria in surface and/or groundwater. Nitrate Levels in groundwater. Number of OSS owner’s educated in the proper operation and maintenance of their OSS. Impact Objective: To reduce fecal loading in local waterways and to halt the elevation of nitrate levels in sensitive ground waters by addressing inadequately operating OSS, and to educate owners on the proper operation and maintenance of their OSS. Contributing Factors: Increase the number of OSS physically inspected by trained personnel on an annual basis. To identify OSS in failure to and to the extent necessary ensure that systems are properly repaired. To work within the current political climate by educating decision makers and developing capacity and resources. Process Objectives: Create a local ordinance and associated policy(s) in order to expand the current O&M program. Develop a database for tracking O&M activities and to provide a central location where program effectiveness can be reviewed. Conduct trainings, send mailings or otherwise increase the awareness of OSS owners on the importance and procedures of proper O&M. Develop a system for acquiring resources ensuring adequate capacity. Systems Analysis Approach The “Shifting the Burden” archetype demonstrates a reliance on an easy fix that provides instant gratification and demonstrates the tension between the long term solution which more appropriately addresses the underlying problem. Future Outcomes The value of a comprehensive systematic O&M program is to proactively protect human health by ensuring the reduction of exposure to inadequately treated wastewater. By achieving the project objectives of increasing the number of systems inspected on an annual basis and decreasing the fecal loading into surface water and nitrates into groundwater, a known non-point source of pollution will be better understood locally and associated concerns adequately addressed. The ultimate outcome is the safe and reliable operation of all OSS in Grays Harbor County. References 1.Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Assessment Program. Grays Harbor Fecal Coliform Total Maximum Daily Load Study. Olympia, WA. June Available at: Acknowledgements Robbin Rose, MPH, REHS Mentor, Washoe County District Health Department (retired) F. Paul Easter Director of Public Services, Grays Harbor County Mike Burnheine Environmental Health Specialist, Grays Harbor County Special Thanks to Leaders Without Borders