Join the Revolution: Project RED Learning Community Presented by: The Leader in K-12 Technology Implementation Research September 13, 2012
Which best describes you? 1.Central office and board are investigating technology options. 2.District is interested in 1:1, but we are still in the early planning phase. 3.Our infrastructure is in place and we are planning for our full rollout. 4.We have already implemented, but we are looking at improving or expanding our program.
Agenda Review and discuss elements needed for successful 1:1 implementation Define action steps to develop a successful foundation What’s next…
The Project RED Team Thomas Greaves, CEO, The Greaves Group, Co-Author, America’s Digital Schools, Jeanne Hayes, President, The Hayes Connection, Co-Author, America’s Digital Schools, Leslie Wilson, CEO, One-to-One Institute, Co-Author, A Guidebook for Change, Michael Gielniak, Ph.D., Director of Programs and Development, Co-Author, A Guidebook for Change, One-to-One Institute,
Revolution
Second-order Change
The Problem The Perfect Storm
The Problem + = $100 Billion
The Problem Source: Project RED Team members from various inspirational sources
The Problem
Do More with Less
Is there a solution?
Project RED Vision
2 x learning Revenue Neutral
The Research Project RED: Research on Two Major Issues Project RED seeks to define technology models that lead to improved student achievement. Improving student achievement Project RED identifies cost savings, cost avoidance, and revenue enhancements. Evaluating the financial impact of technology on budgets
The Research 997 schools, representative of the U.S. school universe 11 diverse Education Success Measures (ESMs) 136 independent variables in 22 categories Comparison of findings by student/computer ratios (1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, or more) Comprehensive demographic data correlated to survey results
Technology Integration in intervention classes Principal training in 2 nd order change Change management leadership by principal Online collaboration Technology integration in core subjects Online formative assessments Student/computer ratio Virtual field trips Search engines Key Implementation Factors (KIFs)
Where do you rank? Percentage of Schools Employing Key Implementing Factors
1:1 Works When Properly Implemented Pct. of Respondents Reporting Improvement Proper 1:1: Those schools practicing the top 4 Key Implementation Factors (13 schools). Intervention Classes Every Period, Principal Leads Change management, Online collaboration Daily, Core Curriculum weekly
1:1 Schools Have Greater Savings Pct. of Respondents
RESEARCH PRACTICE From Research to Practice
Implementation Components Are you collaborating? Are all components being addressed? Are your learning goals driving these?
The Project RED Learning Community
Signature Districts Charleston County, SC Clark County, NV East Noble, IN Ferndale, WA Huntsville, AL Joplin, MO Kent, WA Natick, MA Owensboro, KY Poway, CA Quakertown, PA Reeds Spring, MO Richland District 2, SC Salisbury, PA Sioux City, IA Southern Lehigh, PA Springfield, NJ Sunnyside, AZ
Signature Districts Charleston County, SC Clark County, NV East Noble, IN Ferndale, WA Huntsville, AL Joplin, MO Kent, WA Natick, MA Owensboro, KY Poway, CA Quakertown, PA Reeds Spring, MO Richland District 2, SC Salisbury, PA Sioux City, IA Southern Lehigh, PA Springfield, NJ Sunnyside, AZ
Project RED Learning Community Increase your chances of success by: Following the Project RED Design™ methodology Participating in online discussions, webinars and in-person institutes Connect in meaningful ways with other community members Sharing your experiences and successes
Project RED Website Tools
REDHub: Social Networking Portal
Implementation Timeline
Project Plan Sample Excerpt from Project RED Design™ Methodology
1:1 Cost Savings Calculator Put in Image
Questions
Join US Facebook.com/ProjectRED.org
Thank You Thank you to our sponsors and supporters!