FASTER SORTING using RECURSION : QUICKSORT 2014-T2 Lecture 16 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Algorithms Quicksort
Advertisements

Garfield AP Computer Science
Algorithms Analysis Lecture 6 Quicksort. Quick Sort Divide and Conquer.
Stephen P. Carl - CS 2421 Recursive Sorting Algorithms Reading: Chapter 5.
Chapter 4: Divide and Conquer Master Theorem, Mergesort, Quicksort, Binary Search, Binary Trees The Design and Analysis of Algorithms.
Efficient Sorts. Divide and Conquer Divide and Conquer : chop a problem into smaller problems, solve those – Ex: binary search.
ISOM MIS 215 Module 7 – Sorting. ISOM Where are we? 2 Intro to Java, Course Java lang. basics Arrays Introduction NewbieProgrammersDevelopersProfessionalsDesigners.
Sorting. “Sorting” When we just say “sorting,” we mean in ascending order (smallest to largest) The algorithms are trivial to modify if we want to sort.
CSC2100B Quick Sort and Merge Sort Xin 1. Quick Sort Efficient sorting algorithm Example of Divide and Conquer algorithm Two phases ◦ Partition phase.
Introduction to Algorithms Chapter 7: Quick Sort.
QuickSort The content for these slides was originally created by Gerard Harrison. Ported to C# by Mike Panitz.
Sorting Algorithms and Average Case Time Complexity
CMPS1371 Introduction to Computing for Engineers SORTING.
CS 171: Introduction to Computer Science II Quicksort.
CS 162 Intro to Programming II Quick Sort 1. Quicksort Maybe the most commonly used algorithm Quicksort is also a divide and conquer algorithm Advantage.
Sorting21 Recursive sorting algorithms Oh no, not again!
Quicksort. 2 Introduction * Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice * Average case: O(N log N) * Worst case: O(N 2 ) n But, the worst case seldom.
Quicksort.
Chapter 7 (Part 2) Sorting Algorithms Merge Sort.
Sorting II/ Slide 1 Lecture 24 May 15, 2011 l merge-sorting l quick-sorting.
1 Data Structures and Algorithms Sorting. 2  Sorting is the process of arranging a list of items into a particular order  There must be some value on.
CIS 068 Welcome to CIS 068 ! Lesson 9: Sorting. CIS 068 Overview Algorithmic Description and Analysis of Selection Sort Bubble Sort Insertion Sort Merge.
1 Time Analysis Analyzing an algorithm = estimating the resources it requires. Time How long will it take to execute? Impossible to find exact value Depends.
A review session 2013-T2 Lecture 16 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus Frean.
FASTER SORTING using RECURSION : QUICKSORT COMP 103.
Computer Science 101 Fast Searching and Sorting. Improving Efficiency We got a better best case by tweaking the selection sort and the bubble sort We.
HKOI 2006 Intermediate Training Searching and Sorting 1/4/2006.
Merge Sort. What Is Sorting? To arrange a collection of items in some specified order. Numerical order Lexicographical order Input: sequence of numbers.
Peter Andreae Computer Science Victoria University of Wellington Copyright: Peter Andreae, Victoria University of Wellington ArraySet and Binary Search.
CS 61B Data Structures and Programming Methodology July 28, 2008 David Sun.
Sorting. Pseudocode of Insertion Sort Insertion Sort To sort array A[0..n-1], sort A[0..n-2] recursively and then insert A[n-1] in its proper place among.
An introduction to costs (continued), and Binary Search 2013-T2 Lecture 11 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington.
SORTING 2014-T2 Lecture 13 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus Frean.
2011-T2 Lecture 21 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington  Marcus Frean, Lindsay Groves, and Peter Andreae, VUW.
1 CSE 373 Sorting 3: Merge Sort, Quick Sort reading: Weiss Ch. 7 slides created by Marty Stepp
More about costs: cost of “ensureCapacity”, cost of ArraySet, Binary Search 2014-T2 Lecture 12 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University.
Review 1 Selection Sort Selection Sort Algorithm Time Complexity Best case Average case Worst case Examples.
Big-O and Sorting February 6, Administrative Stuff Readings for today: Ch Readings for tomorrow: Ch 8.
FASTER SORT using RECURSION : MERGE SORT 2015-T2 Lecture 15 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus.
2015-T2 Lecture 17 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington  Marcus Frean, Lindsay Groves, Peter Andreae, John Lewis,
Computer Science 101 Fast Algorithms. What Is Really Fast? n O(log 2 n) O(n) O(n 2 )O(2 n )
QUICKSORT 2015-T2 Lecture 16 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus Frean.
Data Structures - CSCI 102 Selection Sort Keep the list separated into sorted and unsorted sections Start by finding the minimum & put it at the front.
ICS201 Lecture 21 : Sorting King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals College of Computer Science & Engineering Information & Computer Science Department.
Peter Andreae Computer Science Victoria University of Wellington Copyright: Peter Andreae, Victoria University of Wellington Fast Sorting COMP
Sorting divide and conquer. Divide-and-conquer  a recursive design technique  solve small problem directly  divide large problem into two subproblems,
Divide and Conquer Sorting Algorithms COMP s1 Sedgewick Chapters 7 and 8.
Sorting Algorithms Merge Sort Quick Sort Hairong Zhao New Jersey Institute of Technology.
PREVIOUS SORTING ALGORITHMS  BUBBLE SORT –Time Complexity: O(n 2 ) For each item, make (n –1) comparisons Gives: Comparisons = (n –1) + (n – 2)
Today’s Material Sorting: Definitions Basic Sorting Algorithms
Sorting Ordering data. Design and Analysis of Sorting Assumptions –sorting will be internal (in memory) –sorting will be done on an array of elements.
CS 367 Introduction to Data Structures Lecture 11.
FASTER SORT using RECURSION : MERGE SORT COMP 103.
Sorting – Lecture 3 More about Merge Sort, Quick Sort.
329 3/30/98 CSE 143 Searching and Sorting [Sections 12.4, ]
CMPT 238 Data Structures More on Sorting: Merge Sort and Quicksort.
INTRO2CS Tirgul 8 1. Searching and Sorting  Tips for debugging  Binary search  Sorting algorithms:  Bogo sort  Bubble sort  Quick sort and maybe.
Introduction to Analysing Costs 2013-T2 Lecture 10 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington  Marcus Frean, Rashina.
FASTER SORT using RECURSION : MERGE SORT
Sorting Chapter 13 presents several common algorithms for sorting an array of integers. Two slow but simple algorithms are Selectionsort and Insertionsort.
COMP 103 SORTING Lindsay Groves 2016-T2 Lecture 26
Chapter 7 Sorting Spring 14
COMP 103 Sorting with Binary Trees: Tree sort, Heap sort Alex Potanin
More complexity analysis & Binary Search
Fast Sorting "The bubble sort seems to have nothing to recommend it, except a catchy name and the fact that it leads to some interesting theoretical problems."
CSE 143 Lecture 23: quick sort.
Chapter 4: Divide and Conquer
Unit-2 Divide and Conquer
QuickSort Previous slides based on ones by Ethan Apter & Marty Stepp
slides adapted from Marty Stepp
Presentation transcript:

FASTER SORTING using RECURSION : QUICKSORT 2014-T2 Lecture 16 School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington COMP 103 Marcus Frean

2 RECAP-TODAY RECAP  MergeSort  cost O(n log n) TODAY  QuickSort ANNOUNCEMENTS  Test on Thursday – 4pm RoomsFROMTO  MCLT103Abubakr  Geuze  HMLT002Gibb  Jones  HMLT205Julian  Pappafloratos  KKLT303Patel  Zhu sorting algorithms put to music: (quicksort is at 38 sec)

3 MergeSort Cost (analysis order) LEVEL 1 (two mergesorts) LEVEL 1 (merge) LEVEL 2 (two mergesorts) LEVEL 2 (merge) LEVEL 3 (two mergesorts) LEVEL 3 (merge) LEVEL 4 (two mergesorts) LEVEL 4 (merge)

4 Divide and Conquer Sorts To Sort:  Split  Sort each part (recursive)  Combine Where does the work happen ?  MergeSort:  split is trivial  combine does all the work  QuickSort:  split does all the work  combine is trivial Array Sorted Array Split Combine SubArray SortedSubArray Sort Split Combine SubArray Sort SortedSubArray Split Combine SubArray Sort SortedSubArray

5 QuickSort  uses Divide and Conquer, but does its work in the “split” step  split the array into parts, by choosing a “pivot” item, and making sure that: all items < pivot are in the left part all items > pivot are in the right part  Then (recursively) sort each part Here's how we start it off: public static void quickSort( E[] data, int size, Comparator comp) { quickSort (data, 0, size, comp); } “wrapper” version starts it off recursive version carries it on (and on...) note: it won’t usually be an equal split

6 QuickSort – the recursion public static void quickSort(E[ ] data, int low, int high, Comparator comp){ if (high-low < 2) // only one item to sort. return; if (high - low < 4) // only two or three items to sort. sort3(data, low, high, comp); else { // split into two parts, mid = index of boundary int mid = partition(data, low, high, comp); quickSort(data, low, mid, comp); quickSort(data, mid, high, comp); }

7 QuickSort: simplest version 1. Choose a pivot: pivot Use pivot to partition the array: not yet sorted

8 QuickSort: in-place version 1. Choose a pivot: pivot Use pivot to partition the array: low high left (gets returned) not yet sorted

9 QuickSort: coding in-place partition /** Partition into small items (low..mid-1) and large items (mid..high-1) private static int partition(E[] data, int low, int high, Comparator comp){ E pivot = int left = low-1; int right = high; while( left <= right ){ do { left++; // just skip over items on the left < pivot } while (left<high &&comp.compare(data[left], pivot)< 0); do { right--; // just skip over items on the right > pivot } while (right>=low && comp.compare(data[right], pivot)> 0); if (left < right) swap(data, left, right); } return left; } data[low];// simple but poor choice! median(data[low], data[high-1], data[(low+high)/2], comp);

10 QuickSort data array : [p a1 r f e q2 w q1 t z2 x c v b z1 a2 ] indexes : [ ] do : [p a1 r f e q2 w q1 t z2 x c v b z1 a2 ] p ->6 : [a2 a1 b f e c w q1 t z2 x q2 v r z1 p ] do 0..6 : [a2 a1 b f e c ] c ->4 : [a2 a1 b c e f ] do 0..4 : [a2 a1 b c ] b ->3 : [a2 a1 b c ] do 0..3 : [a2 a1 b ] done 0..3 : [a2 a1 b ] do 3..4 : [ c ] done 0..4 : [a2 a1 b c ] do 4..6 : [ e f ] done 4..6 : [ e f ] done 0..6 : [a2 a1 b c e f ] do : [ w q1 t z2 x q2 v r z1 p ] q2 ->8 : [ p q2 t z2 x q1 v r z1 w ] do 6..8 : [ p q2 ] done 6..8 : [ p q2 ]

11 Quick Sort do : [ w q1 t z2 x q2 v r z1 p ] : [ p q2 t z2 x q1 v r z1 w ] do 6..8 : [ p q2 ] done 6..8 : [ p q2 ] do : [ t z2 x q1 v r z1 w ] ->12: [ t r v q1 x z2 z1 w ] do : [ t r v q1 ] ->10: [ q1 r v t ] do : [ q1 r ] done : [ q1 r ] do : [ v t ] done : [ t v ] done : [ q1 r t v ] do : [ x z2 z1 w ] ->13: [ w z2 z1 x ] do : [ w ] do : [ z2 z1 x ] done : [ x z2 z1 ] done : [ w x z2 z1 ] done : [ q1 r t v w x z2 z1 ] done : [ p q2 q1 r t v w x z2 z1 ] done : [a2 a1 b c e f p q2 q1 r t v w x z2 z1 ]

12 QuickSort public static void quickSort (E[ ] data, int low, int high, Comparator comp) { if (high > low +2) { int mid = partition(data, low, high, comp); quickSort(data, low, mid, comp); quickSort(data, mid, high, comp); } } Cost of Quick Sort:  three steps: partition: has to compare (high-low) pairs first recursive call second recursive call

13 QuickSort Cost:  If Quicksort divides the array exactly in half, then:  C(n) = n + 2 C(n/2)  n log(n) comparisons = O(n log(n)) (best case)  If Quicksort divides the array into 1 and n-1:  C(n) = n + (n-1) + (n-2) + (n-3) + … = n(n-1)/2 comparisons = O(n 2 ) (worst case)  Average case ?  very hard to analyse.  still O(n log(n)), and very good.  Quicksort is “in place”, MergeSort is not

14 Stable or Unstable ? Faster if almost-sorted ?  MergeSort:  Stable: doesn’t jump any item over an unsorted region ⇒ two equal items preserve their order  Same cost on all input  “natural merge” variant doesn’t sort already sorted regions ⇒ will be very fast: O(n) on almost sorted lists  QuickSort:  Unstable: Partition “jumps” items to the other end ⇒ two equal items likely to reverse their order  Cost depends on choice of pivot.  simplest choice is very slow: O(n 2 ) even on almost sorted lists  better choice (median of three) ⇒ O(n log(n)) on almost sorted lists

15 Some Big-O costs revisited Implementing Collections:  ArrayList: O(n) to add/remove, except at end  Stack:O(1)  ArraySet:O(n) (cost of searching)  SortedArraySetO( log(n) ) to search (with binary search) O(n) to add/remove (cost of moving up/down)  O( n 2 ) to add n items O( n log(n) ) to initialise with n items. (with fast sorting)

16 the test this Thursday  20% of final grade, and takes 45 mins RoomsFROMTO  MCLT103Abubakr  Geuze  HMLT002Gibb  Jones  HMLT205Julian  Pappafloratos  KKLT303Patel  Zhu  Please be on time, and bring your ID card.  “Exam conditions”: sit in alternate rows, so someone can walk right along every 2 nd row sit in alternate seats put your ID card where it can be seen (but no need to leave bags at the front as happens in final exams)  What’s in? everything up to now no complex coding questions on recursion or the fast sorts old tests are a guide for what to expect