Internal Subject Review Training Tuesday 9 th November 2010 Slaveya Angelska, Associate Trainer Sareta Puri, Development Advisor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.
Advertisements

ENQA seminar:First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies – lessons learned Panel discussion: Practicalities and challenges of self and external.
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
Curriculum Development and Course Design
The SEDA Teacher Accreditation Scheme James Wisdom Visiting Professor in Educational Development, Middlesex University
Training the Teacher Trainers Generic Session G1 Teaching, Training and the Current Context.
Professional Recognition: Gain the recognition you deserve
Getting Ready for your College Review Welcome and introduction Eve Lewis, Head of sparqs.
Welcome The challenges of integrating service user and carer experiences into the Health and Social Care curriculum Reflections on an Open University.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Implementation of a Vertical Teaching Model Tom Randell, Steve Glautier, and Doug Bernstein University of Southampton.
Transforming lives through learning Preparing for your college review HMI Jan Davidson Student Team Member – Szabolcs Kotek.
Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) LEG regional training workshop on national adaptation plans (NAPs) for eastern and southern Africa, in collaboration.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of Quality Enhancement School of Medical Education University of Liverpool.
Review How we bring the Review systems together. Linking AHC and SAER Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 AHC SAER Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9 Year10 AHC SAER.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Improvement Coach The purpose of this session is to introduce participants to the role of the improvement coach and prepare for.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
Induction Course for Newly Appointed PE Panel Chairpersons Roles of PE Panel Chairpersons 31 October 2003 Ms. YUEN Jacqueline Physical Education Section.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
@sparqs_scotland Introductory Level Course Rep Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
A new approach to appraisals within the University of Kent Liz Shrives working with: Melissa Bradley and Helena Torres.
DEVELOPING AND SHARING RESOURCES Embedding Learning Development to enhance student experience.
Academic mobility within a department What happens when French and German specialists work on an Italian distance course Elodie Vialleton & Dr Uwe Baumann,
Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.
IHEQN Conference October 2006 IHEQN “AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”? CASE STUDY OF COLLABORATION 1. Engineers Ireland and University College Cork Denis.
Institutional Led Review Training. Course Objectives By the end of the course you will:  Be able to explain the purpose of an Institution-Led Review.
@sparqs_scotland Course Rep Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
Approaches to quality assurance TIPA’s perspectives Fatmir Demneri.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Primary Inspection Models 14 September Overview of today’s briefing Revisions to the overall effectiveness conclusion Revisions to the performance.
Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
LEADING LEARNING CONFERENCE 5 June Leading Learning 1November 2005Management of complex change. The Knoster model. Leading Learning 2April/May 2006Developing.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Self Evaluation Document and Programme Specifications (SED) Planning and preparation meeting(s) Use of reference points (Benchmark Statements/Code of Practice)
QAA Review Incorporating the GOsC Recognised Qualification (RQ) Renewal.
Intermediate Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Academic Approval and Periodic Review Staff Development for Chairs and Secretaries of Approval and Periodic Review Events.
1 Staff Review and Development (SRD): Practical for those reviewing others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division Personal and Professional.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Work Package 3.2 – Quality Assurance Training November 2015, Yerevan #espaqproject Quality Assurance Training Welcome! Բարի՜ գալուստ : ESPAQ 3.2.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
Leading Effective Intervention Objectives To give subject leaders an overview of the Strategy’s plans to refresh and develop intervention and targeted.
Foundation Programme Curriculum: Key Changes for 2016 David Kessel Chair AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee New Improved ?
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 6 Performance Management.
GMC Approval of trainers in the UK Enid Rowland and Patricia Le Rolland.
true potential An Introduction to the First Line Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
School A80% School B80% School C78% School D77% School E77% School F77% * From the School Report Card, Virginia Department of Education.
Self-Evaluation and Curriculum Change
HEA Associate fellowship application
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Presentation transcript:

Internal Subject Review Training Tuesday 9 th November 2010 Slaveya Angelska, Associate Trainer Sareta Puri, Development Advisor

Learning Outcomes By the end of today you should have: Developed your understanding of the nature, purpose and process of Internal Subject Reviews Familiarised yourself with the self-evaluation document Developed an understanding of the skills required in undertaking reviews and how to develop these skills

Why did you become a reviewer? Why is it important to involve students in internal subject reviews?

Background of Internal Subject Reviews

Background Quality Enhancement Framework Guidance from the Scottish Funding Council Behind the words… → Internal → Subject → Review

Behind the words… INTERNAL → Institution-specific → Institution-led SUBJECT → Specific subject/overall discipline/school/faculty → Taught courses and research → Support services REVIEW → Evaluates the student experience → Good practice and areas for enhancement

Student learning experience Student Learning Experience 1. Curriculum 2. Learning resources and their deployment 3. Learning and teaching 4. Assessment and achievement 5. Student progression and outcomes 6. Quality and standards

Scope All provisions bearing credit Linkages between research and curriculum development Student support services All students Assurance and enhancement Annual monitoring Mobility of learning journey

Student Feedback

Its workings

Stages of the review Preparation Timetable Documentation (self-reflective report) Review team meeting Review meetings Staff Students Conclusions Meeting Writing up

How will the review be conducted? 1 day  3 to 4 days Bulk: review meetings How long Management and teaching staff Students Support services staff Who ALL provisions ALL students Non learning and teaching dimensions What

Variation in leadership and responsibility Follow-up Session with students Meetings Role of the student member Student Learning Experience Supervision and support from the chair of the team

Questions and answers?

Analysis and Interpretation

Types of documentation Outline programme List of panel membership Briefing document for the review Institutional background information Previous review reports Self-evaluation document Programme specifications Module descriptors Other background information

Self-evaluation document Skim and scan reading → Get the gist → Obtain specific information SQ3R method KWL method  Refer your reading to the student learning experience

Self-evaluation document  What is the structure of the document?  How are you going to prioritise the sections?  How would you assess your current knowledge on the different sections?  What questions have you got at this stage?

Lunch

Effective communication

Effective listening

Effective questioning

The A,B,C,D of Effective feedback Effective

Facilitation

Practice communication Examine the data and formulate questions according to principles of effective communication

Break

Planning your ISR

Learning Outcomes By the end of today you should have: Developed your understanding of the nature, purpose and process of Internal Subject Reviews Familiarised yourself with the self-evaluation document Developed an understanding of the skills required in undertaking reviews and how to develop these skills