Rigid Plastic Packaging Container(RPPC) Recycling Rates Board Meeting April 13, 2004 Cal/EPA California Integrated Waste Management Board Waste Prevention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan Development and Implementation; MPCA Priorities Presentation before the Solid Waste Management Coordinating.
Advertisements

Structuring and Implementing a Truly International ERO Kevin Kelly Director, Policy Analysis and Rulemaking Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates Federal.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Contractor’s Report Framework for Evaluating End-of-Life Product Management Systems in California Presented.
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
Challenges for Non-Bottle Rigid Container Molders to Comply With PCR Legislation May 2000.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Biennial Review Process.
TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc.1 Presented by Miriam Zimms, Senior Consultant TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc. Tampa, Florida Pollution Prevention Conference.
WHAT’s NEXT 15 TH OCTOBER DAVID CARTER PRESIDENT PACKAGING COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND ACCORD? AFTER THE PACKAGING.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Allison Jordan Executive Director. Agenda CA Sustainable Winegrowing Program background Certified California Sustainable Winegrowing Lessons Learned.
California Integrated Waste Management Board. 58 Percent Diversion Generated 94 Million Tons Disposed 39.6 Million Tons Diverted 53.5 Million Tons California.
Department of Public Works Zero Waste Strategic Plan October 20, 2014.
Organics Policy Roadmap  Sub-directive 6.1: 50% reduction of organics in waste stream by 2020  Need additional capacity to process 15 million tons per.
Waste Reduction and Pollution Prevention in Solid Waste and Construction and Maintenance “Putting Waste in its Place” Steve Brachman UW- Extension Solid.
California Venue and Event Recycling Legislation Review of AB 2176 Model Ordinance For Waste Reduction at Venues and Events.
New LEA Orientation 101 8th LEA/CIWMB Conference 2005 Anaheim, CA Presenters: Robyn Browne - Lake County LEA Bill Prinz - City of San Diego LEA.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tools and Models for Jurisdictions’ Implementation of AB 2449 Market Development and Sustainability Committee.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
PSI Forum/NW NAHMMA Conference Tuesday, June 2, 2009 Product Stewardship Framework Legislation Sego Jackson Snohomish County Solid Waste Division, Principal.
Initiating a Zone Designation Cycle in 2006 Committee Item H (Board Agenda Item 17) March 7, 2006.
1. Overview  Goals  Benefits  Requirements  Local and State Resources 2.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 General Extended Producer Responsibility Policy Options September 11, 2007 Presentation by CIWMB Staff to.
Policy Drivers AB % diversion requirement for jurisdictions AB % reduction, recycling, composting statewide goal by 2020 Not transformation.
Plastic Trash Bag Program  Report to the Legislature –Originally due October 2001 –Delayed pending results of Plastics White Paper –Report updated to.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Meeting, January 13, Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Plastic Recycling Rates.
Oregon Rigid Plastic Containers Oregon Rigid Plastic Container Law Recycling Rate Decline Plastics Interested Party Meeting California Integrated Waste.
Tom Brady City of Glendale ZERO WASTE BEYOND RECYCLING Rethink, Reduce, Reuse.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Oregon’s Rigid Plastic Container Law William R. Bree Oregon Department of Environmental Quality California Rigid Plastic Packaging Container Conference.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Update – May 2007 PSI National Product Stewardship Forum California Integrated Waste Management Board – Glenn Gallagher.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Scope Of Work, Contractor, And Augmentation Of Contract Allocation For The At-Store Recycling.
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Informational Update Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting February 17, 2009.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting Agenda Item 18 Sue Ingle June 04, 2007.
A Better Way: Product Stewardship. Report to CIWMB: Framework for Evaluating End-of-Life Management Systems Case Studies 1.Rechargeable Battery Recycling.
1 Diversion Rate Measurement System April 4, 2006.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 California Integrated Waste Management Board Meeting Agenda Item 1 Michael Leaon November.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tire Flow Study Along the California-Mexico Border Region Special Waste Committee Meeting California Integrated.
Universal Waste Action Plan February 8, 2006 February 8, 2006.
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container Regulations Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Presented by: Neal Johnson March 8, 2009.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Update on the Paint Product Stewardship Initiative March 17, 2009 Emily Wang Agenda Item 4
1 Public Meeting to Update the Board on Mandatory Commercial Waste Recycling October 21, 2011.
Solid Waste Management Plans Update Webinar Training March 5, 2014.
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container(RPPC) Recycling Rates Workshop February 5, :00 am – 1:00 pm Cal/EPA 1001 “I” Street Sacramento, CA Sierra.
Update On Landfill Long-Term Financial Assurances Activities For Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action.
Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation October 20, 2011.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration of Model Programs and Procedures for the Collection and Proper Disposal of Pharmaceutical.
Board Workshop: Overview Of CIWMB Waste Characterization Studies and Tools May 9, 2006.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Informal Rulemaking Jerry Berumen Permitting and.
Discussion of Priority Activities for Next Eighteen Months Action Plans.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Sustainability & Market Development: Committee Meeting Plastic Collaborative Efforts Agenda Item 19 Mike.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Update And Request For Direction On The Determination Of The Co- Mingled Recycling Rate For The At-Store.
1 CIWMB E-Waste Update CIWMB Working Group December 2001.
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container(RPPC) Recycling Rates Workshop February 5, :00 am – 1:00 pm Cal/EPA 1001 “I” Street Sacramento, CA Sierra.
Consideration of Plastic Trash Bag Manufacturer Requests for an Exemption from the Plastic Trash Bag Law for the 2002 Reporting Period.
Introduction: April 2004 Board meeting Consideration Factors –Beverage containers drive the rates –Rates don’t measure effectiveness of the law –Staff.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Adoption Of Emergency Regulations To Implement Statewide Recordkeeping And Reporting Requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation September 18, 2014 California Air Resources Board.
Community Stakeholders Group Workshops A GENDA I TEM 7.1 UPDATE: Single-Use Bag Waste Reduction.
Virginia DEQ Update G. Stephen Coe Office of Pollution Prevention Recycling Programs May 5, 2009 Virginia Recycling Association Conference.
Status Report Of The Large Venues And Events Waste Diversion Program Presented by: Diversion Planning and Local Assistance.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Allocation Proposals To Be Funded From The Integrated Waste Management Account And/Or To.
Southern California Emerging Waste Technologies Forum July 27, 2006 Conversion Technology 101.
CONSIDERATION OF THE RIGID PLASTIC PACKAGING CONTAINER (RPPC) ALL- CONTAINER AND POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET) RECYCLING RATES, TO BE USED FOR COMPLIANCE.
Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.
2/10/05 California Integrated Waste Management Board1 Consideration Of A Report to the Legislature: Plastic Trash Bag Program And A Comprehensive Approach.
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
California’s Direction: 75% Source Reduction, Recycling and Composting Goal UVWMA Board Meeting November 16, 2015.
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Presentation transcript:

Rigid Plastic Packaging Container(RPPC) Recycling Rates Board Meeting April 13, 2004 Cal/EPA California Integrated Waste Management Board Waste Prevention & Market Development Plastic Recycling Technologies Contact: Sue Ingle or

ALL of the following: made entirely of plastic; relatively inflexible, capable of maintaining its shape; Between eight ounces and five gallons Definition of an RPPC

Rigid Plastic Packaging Containers Regulated:Non-Regulated: - soap, detergent- soda, beer, water - clamshell packaging- food, drugs, (non-food) cosmetics -oil, gas additives- hazardous materials, pesticides, floral

RPPC Compliance Methods 1. 25% All Container Recycling Rate 2. 55% PET Container Recycling Rate 3. 25% Post Consumer Resins (PCR) used in manufacture of container 4. 10% Source Reduction (SR) of resins in manufacture of container 5. Container meets criteria for Reuse or Refill [Title 14 CCR (3)]

Use of Existing Methodology No Longer Feasible Data Adjustment Issues: – Data sources now include Canada and Mexico – Differences in use of RPPCs by region Data not published in format or timeframe: – Can not accurately disaggregate for RPPCs – No import data – Not published in time to meet commitment to provide advance notice

Board Directed Workshop February 5, 2004 Workshop! Objectives: 1. Understand Methodology limitations 2. Forum for discussing solutions 3. Obtain stakeholder feedback

Methodology Criteria: Methodology Criteria:  Based on independent sources of California specific data,  Accurate, precise and independently verifiable,  Measure effectiveness of the law,  Cost effective

Stakeholder Feedback Stakeholder Feedback 1.Remove Recycling Rates: – Support: 5 (Recyclers/Environmental Groups) – Oppose: 7 (Industry, Manufacturing Lobbyist) 2.Oregon’s Methodology – Support: 10 (Industry, Manufacturing Lobbyist) – Oppose: 5 (Recyclers/Environmental Groups) 3.Other Recommendations: 1. Disposal-Base Calculation 2. All-Plastic Recycling Rate 3. Landfill Ban

Rating by Methodology Criteria: Criteria Rating: Option 1Option 2 Option 3Option 4 CA Specific Data N/AYes Accurate, Precise N/AYes No Measures Law N/ANoYesNo Cost Effective YesNo Statutory Change YesNoYes Certifications YesMaybeYesMaybe

Option 1: Eliminate the All-container and PET recycling rates as com- pliance options and pursue statutory changes to existing RPPC law. Pros: Cost and resource effective Supports intent RPPC law Streamlines implementation of RPPC law Doesn’t depend on data collection Supported by recycling community Cons: Requires statutory change Eliminates recycling rates as compliance options Not supported by industry (annual certifications)

Option 2: Adopt “Oregon’s” Methodology for calculating Recycling Rates. Pros: No statutory change needed California specific, accurate and precise rates Supported by industry Maintains historical recycling measurement Cons: Very costly Staff intensive Doesn’t measure effectiveness of RPPC law Opposed by recycling community

Option 3: Adopt “Oregon’s” Methodology for calculating the All- container and PET recycling rates for Regulated containers Pros: Effectively measures RPPC law California specific, accurate and precise rates Maintains historical recycling measurement Cons: Very costly Staff intensive Requires Statutory Changes Opposed by recycling community

Option 4: Adopt Methodology using a disposal based methodology, similar to calculation as used by local jurisdictions for AB 939 diversion Pros: Uses Ca. data Cons: Very costly & staff intensive Requires statutory Changesc Requires a base year to measure disposal changes Not precise nor accurate Doesn’t measure effectiveness of RPPC law

Costs and Task Analysis: Annual CostsOption 1Option 2Option 3Option 4 Add. Staff$0 $100,000 $50,000 PR Survey$0 $40,000 $0 RC Study$0 $100,000 $0 WC Study$0 $150,000 TOTAL $0 $290,000$400,000 $ 200,000

CONCLUSION CONCLUSION Staff can not calculate accurate and timely rates under the current methodology. – Data problem has been ongoing Based on Criteria- staff recommends the Board Adopt Option 1, and support current legislation to eliminate the “all container” and PET recycling rates from the RPPC law.

Recycling Rates