Overview of the M2M Partnership and Canadian Activities in the Oil & Gas Subcommittee Michael Layer June 18, 2010 Natural Resources Canada Regina, SK

2 Overview  Methane to Markets Background  Importance of Addressing CH 4 Emissions  Global Opportunities and Co-Benefits  Obstacles to Addressing CH 4 Emissions  Methane to Markets and the Oil & Gas Subcommittee  Examples of Canada-US Project Collaboration  Summary

3 Methane to Markets Partnership  M2M was launched November 2004 to reduce global methane emissions in order to, among other things: reduce emissions of greenhouse gases improve air quality  The partnerships has more than 30 member states which include some Kyoto signatories and some APP members

4 Importance of Addressing Methane Emissions  One of the 6 GHG substances covered by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)  IPCC GWP twenty five times that of CO 2 –Significant carbon credit or off-set potential  Often highly cost effective to control or reduce  Emerging global recognition that CH 4 management can complement climate change and clean energy policy objectives –Most notably in jurisdictions interested in Kyoto based CDM and JI carbon credits

5 Projected Methane Emissions Increases by 2020 Global anthropogenic methane emissions are projected to increase by 23 percent to 7,904MMTCO 2 E by 2020

6 IPCC Integrated Radiative Forcing for Year 2000 Global Emissions year Time Horizon

7 Integrated Radiative Forcing for Year 2000 Global Emissions – 20 Tear Time Horizon IPCC Methane has a much larger impact, almost EQUAL TO CO 2, when considered over a 20 year time horizon

8 Global Opportunities  An estimated 100 billion cubic meters of natural gas is vented or lost through fugitive emissions from the oil and gas sector world wide each year  As methane is 25 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO 2, these emissions add more than 1000 MM tons of CO 2 Equivalent to the atmosphere annually – Global flaring in the oil and gas sector results in 400 MM tons of CO 2 to the atmosphere annually  It is estimated that over 30% of these emissions could be captured at a profit and therefore billions of dollars are lost annually  While in some cases, market and infrastructure barriers exist, technologies do exist today to detect, measure, capture and use vented or fugitive methane emissions.

9 Air Quality Co-benefits  Methane contributes to background ground-level ozone levels by: –Serving as an ozone precursor –Increasing summer afternoon temperatures through climate change  Evidence confirms that reducing methane emissions reduces mortalities associated with air pollution! Avoided global mortalities based on a 65 Mt/yr reduction in methane emissions starting in 2010 (West et al, 2006)

10 Obstacles to Addressing Methane Emissions  Jurisdictional –Methane emissions reductions have not been effectively linked to domestic or global climate change policy –Where CH 4 reduction project results exist, they are often not legitimized within existing climate change objectives (e.g., CCS based climate change planning groups) –Regulatory uncertainty as domestic and international climate change policy develops reluctance by industry to take early action before caps, credits or offsets are determined

11 Obstacles to Addressing Methane Emissions  Within Industry –Lack of awareness about emissions sources, volumes and/or mitigation options –Companies tend to be more focused on E&P projects –Perception that opportunity costs are too high for project implementation; incremental economics….especially within highly integrated companies –Lack of consideration to methane emissions reduction objectives as part of operational incentive Project implementation is a significant cost and resulting increased sales volumes are often not monetized

12  Canada supports M2M oil and gas objectives through activity of the Upstream Petroleum Air Issues Research Initiative (UPAIRI) Program  UPAIRI funding in excess of $1.6 million since  UPAIRI research develops technologies & standardized science based methodologies to verifiably reduce energy and emissions intensities from UOG activity Significant methodology gaps currently limit broad inclusion of fugitive CH 4 emissions reduction in existing or emerging domestic or international emissions Cap & Trade mechanisms Technologies to provide ongoing monitoring for third party verification of reduced emissions are also lacking Canadian Contributions to Methane to Markets Oil and Gas Activities Oil and Gas SubcommitteeOil and Gas Subcommittee

13 Canadian Contributions (cont’d)  UPAIRI domestic and international results to date indicate significant jurisdictional opportunities to: Reduce average energy intensity by: 15% for fuel gas consumption 9% for electricity demands Reduce average fugitive emissions by: 70% for CH 4 from equipment leaks Results can vary dramatically between individual facilities Oil and Gas SubcommitteeOil and Gas Subcommittee

14 M2M Oil & Gas Activity  Through Case Studies, develop recognition that CH 4 emissions reduction must be core to: Government and industry policy objectives Day-to-day operational activity  The US EPA and Canada have collaborated internationally under M2M to develop detailed Case Studies in: Mexico with government regulators and PEMEX China with government regulators and CNPC

15 Case Studies Canada & US EPA Project Collaboration Mexico Project Summary With US EPA and Canadian funding since 2005, Canadian specialists have been evaluating representative PEMEX facilities for energy and methane emissions intensity reduction opportunities. Sufficient PEMEX greenhouse gas reduction data from these reports led to the Mexican government announcement of a 13 MMT CO 2 e near term annual reduction objective for PEMEX With Canadian and US EPA help, PEMEX is currently developing: A GHG emissions inventory Detailed marginal methane abatement curves for all emission sources at oil and gas facilities- on shore and off shore Oil and Gas SubcommitteeOil and Gas Subcommittee

16 Case Study Canada & US EPA Project Collaboration China Project Summary In 2007, the China NDRC announced it would legislate energy and emissions intensity reduction targets for the Chinese energy sector With US EPA and Canadian funding, Canadian specialists evaluated ( ) representative CNPC facilities for energy and methane emissions intensity reduction opportunities A project is currently underway to engage with CNPC staff, to develop pre-engineering studies of field data to identify opportunities for CDM projects US EPA, Canada and CNPC are also collaborating to develop corporate and technical guidance to institutionalize the M2M derived knowledge Oil and Gas SubcommitteeOil and Gas Subcommittee

17 Project Based Conclusions  Methane emissions reductions are a highly effective near term opportunity to reduce GHG emissions to complement medium & long term CCS objectives  Uptake of existing, and ongoing development of new solutions can help industry and regulators put climate change policy into immediate and measureable global action  Awareness of implementable emissions reduction solutions can also support effective development of “achievable GHG emissions reduction policy”

18 Summary  M2M Partnership has provided significant international opportunities for Canadian researchers, Provincial Regulators (ERCB) and service providers  Alignment with US priority objectives  International case studies provide significant opportunities for industry and government domestically as Clean Air and Climate Change Regulatory Agendas mature –Base developing policy upon knowledge of what is achievable