PHENIX Simulation System 1 December 7, 1999 Simulation: Status and Milestones Tarun Ghosh, Indrani Ojha, Charles Vanderbilt University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHENIX Simulation System 1 August 11, 1999 Simulation Work-in-Progress: ROOT-in-PISA Charles Maguire Vanderbilt University August ‘99 Software.
Advertisements

Software Summary Database Data Flow G4MICE Status & Plans Detector Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM24 - 3rd June 2009.
Simulation Project Major achievements (past 6 months 2007)
Beamline Takashi Kobayashi 1 Global Analysis Meeting Nov. 29, 2007.
MSIS 110: Introduction to Computers; Instructor: S. Mathiyalakan1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
Database System Development Lifecycle Transparencies
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
Database Planning, Design, and Administration Transparencies
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Overview of the Database Development Process
Shuei MEG review meeting, 2 July MEG Software Status MEG Software Group Framework Large Prototype software updates Database ROME Monte Carlo.
Olof Bärring – WP4 summary- 6/3/ n° 1 Partner Logo WP4 report Status, issues and plans
PHENIX Simulation System 1 July 7, 1999 Simulation Progress and ROOT-in-PISA Charles Maguire Vanderbilt University July ‘99 Software Meeting.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
BES Ⅲ Detector Description and Event Display Zhengyun YOU, Yajun Mao School of Physics, Peking University Jan.10th, 2006.
As of 28 Juni 2005Getting Starged with GEM - Shuei Yamada 1 Getting Started with GEM Shuei YAMADA ICEPP, University of Tokyo What is GEM? Before you start.
Database Planning, Design, and Administration Transparencies
Database System Development Lifecycle 1.  Main components of the Infn System  What is Database System Development Life Cycle (DSDLC)  Phases of the.
N ATIONAL E NERGY R ESEARCH S CIENTIFIC C OMPUTING C ENTER Charles Leggett The Athena Control Framework in Production, New Developments and Lessons Learned.
ATLAS and GridPP GridPP Collaboration Meeting, Edinburgh, 5 th November 2001 RWL Jones, Lancaster University.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
DPA follow-up review, Malargüe, Nov/2000 DPA Data Processing and Analysis Task Follow-up Review Malargüe, November 14, 2000.
9 February 2000CHEP2000 Paper 3681 CDF Data Handling: Resource Management and Tests E.Buckley-Geer, S.Lammel, F.Ratnikov, T.Watts Hardware and Resources.
Status of the LHCb MC production system Andrei Tsaregorodtsev, CPPM, Marseille DataGRID France workshop, Marseille, 24 September 2002.
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
Status report from T2K-SK group Task list of this group discussion about NEUT Kaneyuki, Walter, Konaka We have just started the discussion.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
CC-J Monthly Report Shin’ya Sawada (KEK) for CC-J Working Group
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
February 28, 2003Eric Hjort PDSF Status and Overview Eric Hjort, LBNL STAR Collaboration Meeting February 28, 2003.
Nov. 8, 2000RIKEN CC-J RIKEN CC-J (PHENIX Computing Center in Japan) Report N.Hayashi / RIKEN November 8, 2000 PHENIX Computing
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Introduction What is detector simulation? A detector simulation program must provide the possibility of describing accurately an experimental setup (both.
PHENIX Simulation System 1 January 12, 2000 Simulation: Status for VRDC Tarun Ghosh, Indrani Ojha, Charles Vanderbilt University.
TB1: Data analysis Antonio Bulgheroni on behalf of the TB24 team.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition 1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
PHENIX and the data grid >400 collaborators 3 continents + Israel +Brazil 100’s of TB of data per year Complex data with multiple disparate physics goals.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.
STAR C OMPUTING Plans for Production Use of Grand Challenge Software in STAR Torre Wenaus BNL Grand Challenge Meeting LBNL 10/23/98.
Computing R&D and Milestones LHCb Plenary June 18th, 1998 These slides are on WWW at:
MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.
Nov 1, 2002D0 DB Taking Stock1 Trigger Database Status and Plans Elizabeth Gallas – FNAL CD (with recent help from Jeremy Simmons, John Weigand, and Adam.
November 10, 1999PHENIX CC-J Updates in Nov.991 PHENIX CC-J Updates in Nov New Hardware - N.Hayashi / RIKEN November 10, 1999 PHENIX Computing Meeting.
Simulation Status for Year2 Running Charles F. Maguire Software Meeting May 8, 2001.
Separate distribution of the analysis code (and more) P. Hristov 19/03/2014.
SPI NIGHTLIES Alex Hodgkins. SPI nightlies  Build and test various software projects each night  Provide a nightlies summary page that displays all.
Pavel Nevski DDM Workshop BNL, September 27, 2006 JOB DEFINITION as a part of Production.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
Preservation of LEP Data There is still hope Is there? Marcello Maggi, Ulrich Schwickerath, Matthias Schröder, , DPHEP7 1.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
ONCS Subsystem Status Chris Witzig (BNL), Stephen Pate (NMSU) DC Meeting PHENIX Collaboration Week 22-June-1998 Chain Test Software Subsystem Support Tests.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Ganga/Dirac Data Management meeting October 2003 Gennady Kuznetsov Production Manager Tools and Ganga (New Architecture)
Why do F77 always spoil the landscape ?. Several ideas … slide 2.
PHENIX Simulation System 1 September 8, 1999 Simulation Work-in-Progress: ROOT-in-PISA Indrani Ojha Banaras Hindu University and Vanderbilt.
MONTE CARLO TRANSPORT SIMULATION Panda Computing Week 2012, Torino.
Update on CHEP from the Computing Speaker Committee G. Carlino (INFN Napoli) on behalf of the CSC ICB, October
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
MICE Computing and Software
(CMS GEANT4 simulation)
OO-Design in PHENIX PHENIX, a BIG Collaboration A Liberal Data Model
Use of Geant4 in experiment interactive frameworks AliRoot
Preparations for Reconstruction of Run7 Min Bias PRDFs at Vanderbilt’s ACCRE Farm (more substantial update set for next week) Charles Maguire et al. March.
Working with HADES WebDB HADES analysis workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 31 January - 1 February 2012 Ilse Koenig, GSI Darmstadt Outline: Version management.
Presentation transcript:

PHENIX Simulation System 1 December 7, 1999 Simulation: Status and Milestones Tarun Ghosh, Indrani Ojha, Charles Vanderbilt University December ‘99 Software Review Meeting

PHENIX Simulation System 2 December 7, 1999 Presentation Plan Scope of Simulation Current Status High Level Summary for Day 1 Readiness Human Resources Relative Priorities of Tasks Remaining Milestones before Day 1 Activities after Day 1

PHENIX Simulation System 3 December 7, 1999 Scope of Simulation Manage global event generator software CVS repository for all to check out Contact with theorists to obtain latest and best event generators: HIJING, VNI, Ultra-RQMD, … Interface event generator output into program PISA99 First had a ZEBRA-formatted interface (old BNL version) Moving to a ROOT-formatted interface (for event browsing) Support PWG developed signal generators We don’t write them, but we do interface them to PISA99 Manage GEANT simulation for PHENIX PISA99 Support interface between PISA99 and PHOOL Support the evaluation of the reconstruction Correlation of GEANT information with event algorithm results

PHENIX Simulation System 4 December 7, 1999 Current Status At work since 1992 PISA used worldwide on almost every known Unix platform Concentrating on Linux since 1998 Converted to ROOT-formatted output in Summer-Fall 1999 Interfaced successfully to PHOOL in late 1999 Massive events generation at three times, and now again 10K for internal challenge in K for MDC1 and MDC2 in 1998 and K proposed internal challenge in Dispersal mode in Massive events generation to be done off-site (CC-J, …) User tools for PWGs to do their own events generation

PHENIX Simulation System 5 December 7, 1999 High Level Summary of Tasks What is needed for Day-1 Analysis? Match simulation geometry to what is on the floor consistent with a GEANT3 volume description Access PHENIX geometry database to set up the detector subsystem (replace phnx.par file) Develop scripts to automate the geometric acceptance and the efficiency simulations

PHENIX Simulation System 6 December 7, 1999 Human Resources C. F. Maguire: supervisor responsible for core software in PISA99 Tarun Ghosh: responsible for scripts and tools for users Indrani Ojha: responsible for event generator interface software Heavy reliance on subsystem programmers to do their jobs Formerly had graduate students in-house (doing Ph.D.’s now) and also have had summer undergraduates Looking forward to another graduate student for simulation support, or one year-duration undergraduate

PHENIX Simulation System 7 December 7, 1999 Relative Priorities of Current Tasks Highest priority tasks (soonest accomplished) Event mixing for PISA + PISA and for PRDF + PRDF Introduce 3D magnetic field map (post-VRDC) “Publication” of event generator scripts and tools High priority (accomplished over longer time) Revise geometry description of PISA99 to use database tools Get next generation of event generators (stuck at ) Lower priority task (for year 2000) Move out of GEANT3 and into GEANT 4

PHENIX Simulation System 8 December 7, 1999 Milestones Until Day 1 VRDC start on December 15, and go to January 15 PISA99 and PRDF files generation (must freeze libraries before) Approximately 100K events to be processed Will also do signal file mixing as in MDC2 (start December 20) 3D map file in place by February 15 PRDF+PRDF mixing by February 29 (needs subsystem work) Reconfiguration of geometry installation (DB) May 1 Requires the most subsystem programmer interaction Di-lepton generator “cocktail” from Stony Brook group Interface to PISA99 the work done by Ralf Averback Update PISA99 documentation ROOT usage, new make file system Specialized scripts for event generation and retrieval

PHENIX Simulation System 9 December 7, 1999 Milestones After Day 1 GEANT4 consideration CERNLIBS may become more problematic with age Need to monitor how well GEANT4 is doing in real world Switchover must not damage analysis of Year 1 data Target date of completion to GEANT4 is not yet known Fast Monte Carlo Facilitation Simulation group to provide Fast MC options in PISA99 Development of Fast MC modules is PWG responsibility Testing of Fast MC against slow MC is PWG responsibility Simulation to maintain library of slow MC outputs to compare