L(1405)/S(1385) Photoproduction in SLH2 Deuk Soon Ahn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polarization Observables in Hyperon Photoproduction with CLAS Craig Paterson University of Glasgow Eurotag Workshop Glasgow, 1 st September 2008.
Advertisements

Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
 photoproduction with linearly polarized photons at SPring-8 SENDAI03 16 th June, 2003 Tsutomu Mibe (Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka univ.,
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
1 K* Photoproduction off the proton at CLAS via Ishaq Hleiqawi OHIO UNIVERSITY NSTAR2005 Oct. 12, 2005.
C x and C x for K + Λ and K +  o Photo-production R. Bradford Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester R. Schumacher Department of.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
Radphi Analysis at I.U. Dan Krop 9/06/02. Overview BGV Callibration Using Gradphi Monte Carlo PWA Formalism for Spin 1 Beam Moments of the Angular Distribution.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Coherent  -meson Photo-production from Deuterons Near Threshold Wen-Chen Chang Wen-Chen Chang for LEPS collaboration Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica,
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Φphotoproduction from nuclear targets T.Sawada LEPS Collaboration Meeting in Academia Sinica,
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Sevil Salur for STAR Collaboration, Yale University WHAT IS A PENTAQUARK? STAR at RHIC, BNL measures charged particles via Time Projection Chamber. Due.
Exclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in Two-Photon Interactions Bertrand Echenard University of Geneva on behalf of the LEP collaborations Hadronic Physics.
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
Evidence for a Narrow S = +1 Baryon Resonance in Photoproduction from the Neutron [Contents] 1. Introduction 2. Principle of experiment 3. Experiment at.
K +  photoproduction with the Crystal Ball at MAMI T.C. Jude The University of Edinburgh New method of K + detection with the Crystal Ball Extraction.
1 Inclusive Photoproduction of ρº, K*º and φ Mesons at HERA Andrei Rostovtsev (ITEP) ‏ on behalf of H1 Collaboration Published in H1 Collab., Phys. Lett.
News on ZEUS Leading Baryon analyses Roberto Sacchi Università di Torino and INFN DIS2004 Workshop Slovakia, April 14-18, 2004 Introduction Study of the.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Motivation. Why study ground state hyperon electroproduction? CLAS detector and analysis. Analysis results. Current status and future work. M. Gabrielyan.
Nucleon resonance studies in π + π - electroproduction off protons at high photon virtualities E. Isupov, EMIN-2009.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
K +  and K +  0 photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS Mizuki Sumihama Department of physics Osaka Univ. for LEPS collaboration 1. Introduction 2. Experiment.
Dynamical coupled-channels analysis of meson production reactions at Hiroyuki Kamano (Excited Baryon Analysis Center, Jefferson Lab) in collaboration.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Heuijin LimICHEP04, Beijing, Aug. 1 Leading Baryons at HERA Introduction Diffractive structure function measured in events with a leading proton.
Differential cross sections for K + photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS. Mizuki Sumihama Department of physics Tohoku university For LEPS collaboration JPS.
MC Check of Analysis Framework and Decay Asymmetry of  W.C. Chang 11/12/2005 LEPS Collaboration Meeting in Taiwan.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
Kaon Production on the Nucleon D. G. Ireland MENU Rome, September 30 – October 4, 2013.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
A First Analysis of the 3 He Test Beamtime CB Meeting Mainz, March 9, 2010 Patricia Aguar Bartolomé Alexander Mushkarenkov.
**PhD Dec (CLAS Analysis Note). OZI evading/respecting process 49.2 ± 0.6 % 34 ± 0.5 % Experimentally this decay mode is (15.3 ± 0.4) % mode is.
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
Photoproduction of the  (1385) resonance at LEPS K. Hicks & D. Keller, Ohio U. LEPS Collaboration Meeting May 1, 2008.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
Georgie Mbianda 1 for the Baryon (E01-002) Collaboration 1 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Exclusive Electroproduction of π + and η mesons.
J-PARC でのシグマ陽子 散乱実験の提案 Koji Miwa Tohoku Univ.. Contents Physics Motivation of YN scattering Understanding Baryon-Baryon interaction SU(3) framework Nature.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Compton Data Analysis Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Fabien Zehr Double π photoproduction Glasgow 28 March 2006 Double π photoproduction at threshold and in the second resonance region With Crystal Ball and.
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Recent Results from TOTEM
Analysis Report Haiyun Lu.
L*(1520) Photoproduction off Proton and Neutron from CLAS eg3 data set
I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
Hypernuclear spectroscopy using (K-stop,p0) and (e,e’K+) reactions
M. Miyabe, K. Horie, S. Shimizu, W. C. Chang and LEPS collaboration
Electroproduction of φ Mesons in CLAS
Photoproduction of poh pairs on the proton
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Report on p0 decay width: analysis updates
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Experiment (Jlab Exp : CLAS eg3)
L*(1520) Photoproduction in gppK+K- from the g11 data set
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

L(1405)/S(1385) Photoproduction in SLH2 Deuk Soon Ahn

t-channel dynamics dominance Basic assumption: At E γ ≈ 2 GeV, the γ p → K + π 0 Λ and γ p→K + π Σ reactions in the region of the Σ(1385) and the Λ(1405) resonances are largely driven by the K - t-channel exchange. 1.t- channel dynamics, to gain understanding of the K-p-> π 0 Λ and of the K-p-> πΣ amplitudes below the KN thereshold, where they are dominated by the Σ(1385) and Λ(1405) resonances. 2. Ingoing photon dissociates into real K+ and virtual K-, the off-shell K-scattering subsequently off the proton target to the dsigma/dt with increasing |t|. (t means the square of the 4 momentum transfer from the proton to the L(1405)and S(1385)) 3. Theoretical differential cross sections for the γ p → K + (π 0 Λ) and γ p → K + (πΣ) reactions in the region of the Σ(1385) and the Λ(1405) resonances.(double kaon pole term contribution is large.) Nucl. Phys. A 748 (2005) 499

Old data: Production of hyperons by virtual photons T. Azemoon et al. NP B95 (1975) 77 e - p →e - K + Y Y = Λ, Σ, Σ(1385), Λ(1405), Λ(1520) Rapid fall-off suggesting a t-channel exchange process

w = (π Y) total center of mass energy The γ p → K + π 0 Λ and γ p → K + π Σ cross sections as functions of the total π Y center of mass energy for different values of E γ

W=1.415 W=1.425 W=1.405 W=1.395 W=1.435 Double pole term single pole term

Event Selction CutHORIVERTHORI+VERTComments Analyzed Event ntag= Itagc.f> ~4.6% increased ntrk> K+ PID (3sigma) DecayInFlight e+e- bar <vtz< Vtz w/Cu cut ~2.5% decreased npl(1)=0.or.npl(2)= <Eg<1.93,2.27<Eg<

MissingMass –Z-vertex CutZ-vertex, X-Vertex X-vertx, Y-vertex in the target region for double track events. Coming from target cell. Because of extended size of photon beam (especially in Hori) part of photon beam hit the target cell(Cu) and events produced from there <vtz< <vtz< <vtz< <vtz< <vtz< <vtz<-1000

Photon energy spectrum for ntag=1or2 events by kato’s itagc.f Rejected events by tagcut using npl Shieding materials are placed in High electron E of tagger(corresponding Low photon energy). There remains possibility that recoil electron with high energy outside the range of tagger. Or produce the shower at the material. npl1=0or npl2=0 is the number of hits which is not associated in PL. (selected event for which is no other hit than recoil electron, at least one of two. Because of a few dead stripes in SSD layer. We allow there is no hit in these strips to save tracks passed these area.

MissingMass & momemtum transfer MissingMass|t|-|t|min Counts

0<|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min<0.60

MissingMass(GeV/c^2) Counts/5MeV MissingMass –E18bins (E )

Photon Energy |t|-|t|min K+MissingMass L(1116) S(1193) S(1385)/ L(1116) L(1520)nonresont

Eg(GeV) MMp(g,K+) – all T &T1-T5 cut All |t|-|t|min 0.<|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min< <|t|-|t|min<0.50

Differential cross section Minimum momemtum transfer |t|min varies drastically when photon energy changed. -> t’ = |t|-|t|min is introduced. ds/dt’ =a (exp(-bt)) b : slope ; The yield which is corrected acceptance is fitted with exponential function Photon normalization not included yet. dt A * (N K + - B) dd N B * N T * dt =

Yields of L(1116) as function of|t|-|t|min, Data |t|-|t|min Counts

Acceptance of L(1116) as function of |t|-|t|min, MC |t|-|t|min

dsigma/dt (Abr.Unit.) |t|-|t|min Differential Cross Section :Acceptance corrected yield|t|-|t|min distribution on L(1116)

Energy dependence of slope parameter b

Yields of L(1405)/S(1385) |t|-|t|min, Data |t|-|t|min Counts

Acceptance of L(1405) |t|-|t|min, MC |t|-|t|min

dsigma/dt (Abr.Unit.) |t|-|t|min Differential Cross Section of L(1405)/S(1385)

Energy dependence of slope parameter b

Yields of L(1520) |t|-|t|min, Data |t|-|t|min Counts

Acceptance of L(1520) |t|-|t|min, MC |t|-|t|min

dsigma/dt (Abr.Unit.) |t|-|t|min Differential Cross Section of L(1520)

Energy dependence of slope parameter b

Acceptance-corrected t’ ; 1.35<MM<1.44(9 MMslice)&E1-E9 1.35<MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM<1.41

1.41<MM< <MM< <MM<1.44

Energy dependence of slope parameter b 1.35<MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM<1.41

1.41<MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <MM< <Eg< <Eg< <Eg< b parameter