WESEP REU June 3, 2013 Iowa State University Electric Power Industry Overview James D. McCalley Harpole Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Advertisements

Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
Impact of Variability on Control Performance Metrics James D. McCalley Harpole Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Iowa State University 1.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Citizens League Electrical Energy: Affordability and Competitive Pricing Working Team Electric Transmission.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Session 4 Discussion of Alternatives and Implementation Activities for Real- Time.
Electricity Infrastructure: Overview and Issues (2) H. Scott Matthews February 19, 2003.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Electric Power Infrastructure: Status and Challenges for the Future Mark Lauby Director, Reliability Assessments and Performance Analysis.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
REU on Wind Energy Science, Engineering, & Policy Summer 2012 Iowa State University Electric Power Industry Overview, Power System Operation, and Handling.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
REU on Wind Energy Science, Engineering, & Policy Summer 2011 Iowa State University Electric Power Industry Overview, Power System Operation, and Handling.
ENGR 340 Fall 2011 Iowa State University Electric Power Industry Overview James D. McCalley Harpole Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering.
Overcoming Challenges To Integrating Renewable Energy Resources May 16, 2013 Paul Roberti, Commissioner Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
J. McCalley Wind, Markets, and Capacity. Outline 1.Basics of electricity markets 2.Wind and markets 3.Dispatchable intermittent resources (DIR) 2.
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
Leader-Follower Framework For Control of Energy Services Ali Keyhani Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
How the Transmission System Works Really William F. Reinke.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Announcements Homework 8 is 11.19, 11.21, 11.26, 11.27, due now
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM)
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
EE/Econ 458 Market Overview: Time-Line and SCUC, RAC, SCED J. McCalley 1.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
This module will dig deeper into Smart Grid implementation issues. It will focus on two key issue of particular interest to the PNW: 1)How the Smart Grid.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Wind Management at MISO
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
penetration of wind power
Module 4 Smart Grid Implementation Issues
Solar Energy Commercialization
Presentation transcript:

WESEP REU June 3, 2013 Iowa State University Electric Power Industry Overview James D. McCalley Harpole Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering

Outline 1.The electric power industry 2.Control centers 3.Electricity markets 2

Organizations comprising the Electric Power Industry Investor-owned utilities: 239 (MEC, Alliant, Xcel, Exelon, …) Federally-owned: 10 (TVA, BPA, WAPA, SEPA, APA, SWPA…) Public-owned: 2009 (Ames, Cedar Falls, Muscatine, …) Consumer-owned: 912 (Dairyland, CIPCO, Corn Belt, …) Non-utility power producers: 1934 (Alcoa, DuPont,…) Power marketers: 400 (e.g., Cinergy, Mirant, Illinova, Shell Energy, PECO- Power Team, Williams Energy,…) Coordination organizations: 9 (ISO-NE, NYISO, PJM, MISO, SPP, ERCOT, CAISO, AESO, NBSO), 7 are in the US. Oversight organizations: Regulatory: 52 state, 1 Fed (FERC) Reliability: 1 National (NERC), 8 regional entities Environment: 52 state (DNR), 1 Fed (EPA) Manufacturers: GE, ABB, Toshiba, Schweitzer, Westinghouse,… Consultants: Black&Veatch, Burns&McDonnell, HD Electric,… Vendors: Siemens, Areva, OSI,… Govt agencies: DOE, National Labs,… Professional organizations: IEEE PES … Advocacy organizations: AEWA, IWEA, Wind on Wires… Trade Associations: EEI, EPSA, NAESCO, NRECA, APPA, PMA,… Law-making bodies: 52 state legislatures, US Congress 3

4 Big changes between 1992 and about 2002….

/2000 G G G G G G G G Transmission Operator Independent System Operator Transmission Operator Transmission Operator Today GGG G G G GG Transmission and System Operator Vertically Integrated Utility Independent System Operator 5

What are the North American Interconnections? “Synchronized” 6

What is NERC? NERC: The North American Reliability Corporation, certified by federal government (FERC) as the “electric reliability organization” for the United States. Overriding responsibility is to maintain North American bulk transmission/generation reliability. Specific functions include maintaining standards, monitoring compliance and enforcing penalties, performing reliability assessments, performing event analysis, facilitating real-time situational awareness, ensuring infrastructure security, trains/certifies system operators. There are eight NERC regional councils (see below map) who share NERC’s mission for their respective geographies within North America through formally delegated enforcement authority Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO) Southwest Power Pool (SPP) Texas Reliability Entity (TRE) Reliability First Corporation (RFC) Southeast Electric Reliability Council (SERC) Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) 7

What is FERC? An independent agency that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil. It does the following: Regulates transmission & wholesale sales of electricity in interstate commerce; Regulates all wholesale natural gas transmission; Reviews mergers/acquisitions /corporate transactions by electricity companies; Can review some siting applications for electric transmission projects; Licenses and inspects private, municipal, and state hydroelectric projects; Protects the reliability of the high voltage interstate transmission system through mandatory reliability standards; Monitors and investigates energy markets; Enforces FERC regulatory requirements via civil penalties/other means; Oversees environmental matters related to natural gas/hydroelectric projects; Administers accounting/financial reporting regs+conduct of regulated companies FERC does not: Regulate retail electricity and natural gas sales to consumers; Regulate activities of municipals or federal power marketing agencies; Regulate nuclear power plants (NRC does this); Address reliability problems related to failures of local distribution facilities; Consider tree trimmings near local distribution power lines in residential neighborhoods 8

Regional Transmission Organizations/Independent System Operators The regional system operator: monitors and controls grid in real-time The regional market operator: monitors and controls the electricity markets The regional planner: coordinates 5 and 10 year planning efforts They own no electric power equipment. None of them existed before They are central to electricity production and transmission today. 9

Energy Control Centers Energy Control Center (ECC): SCADA, EMS, operational personnel “Heart” (eyes & hands, brains) of the power system Supervisory control & data acquisition (SCADA): Supervisory control: remote control of field devices, including gen Data acquisition: monitoring of field conditions SCADA components: »Master Station: System “Nerve Center” located in ECC »Remote terminal units: Gathers data at substations; sends to Master Station »Communications: Links Master Station with Field Devices, telemetry is done by either leased wire, PLC, microwave, or fiber optics. Energy management system (EMS) Topology processor & network configurator State estimator and power flow model development Automatic generation control (AGC), Optimal power flow (OPF) Security assessment and alarm processing 10

Energy control centers 11

Substation Remote terminal unit SCADA Master Station Communication link Energy control center with EMS EMS alarm display EMS 1-line diagram 12 ECCs: EMS & SCADA

13 ECCs: SCADA, Telemetry, EMS, RT, DA Markets EMS Real-time market Intra-day & day- ahead reliability unit commitment (RAC) Day- ahead market Automatic Generation Control (AGC) is a feedback control system that regulates the power output of electric generators to maintain a specified system frequency and/or scheduled interchange.

14 Balancing authorities Performs AGC within designated area. 105 BAs in N. Am.: 67 in EI, 38 in WI, 1 in Texas. Every ISO is a BA. Not every BA is an ISO.

15 Basic market design used by all ISOs today. Schedules entire “next- day” 24hr period. Schedules interchange for entire “next-day” 24hr period, starting at current hour, optimizing one hour at a time (1 value per hr) Computes dispatch every 5 minutes.

16 Balancing Systems NETWORK AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL SYSTEM REAL-TIME MARKET 1 sol/5min gives 1 oprtng cdtn DAY-AHEAD MARKET 1 sol/day gives 24 oprting cdtns ENERGY & RESERVE SELL OFFERS ENERGY BUY BIDS FREQUENCY DEVIATION FROM 60 HZ ENERGY BUY BIDS REQUIRED RESERVES ENERGY & RESERVE SELL OFFERS REQUIRED RESERVES min ΣΣ z it {Cost(GEN it )+Cost(RSRV it )} sbjct to ntwrk+status cnstraints min ΣΣ {Cost(GEN it )+Cost(RSRV it )} sbjct to ntwrk cnstraints LARGE MIXED INTEGER PROGRAM LARGE LINEAR PROGRAM BOTH CO-OPTIMIZE: energy & reserves

17 Basics of electricity markets 1.Locational marginal prices (LMPs), $/MWhr, indicate the energy price at each bus. 2.Markets compute LMPs via an internet- based double auction that maximizes participant benefits. The LMPs are computed from SCED every hour in the DAM and every 5 minutes in the RTM. 3.The DAM and the RTM are 2 separate settlement processes.

18 Internet-based two-sided auction markets Internet System B1 B2 B3 S1 S2 Sellers submit offers to sell in terms of Price ($/MWhr) Quantity (MWhr) Buyers submit bids to buy in terms of Price ($/MWhr) Quantity (MWhr) Price at which seller is willing to sell increases with amount (cost of producing 1 more energy unit increases as a gen is loaded higher) Price at which buyer is willing to buy decreases with amount (first unit is used to supply most critical needs and after those needs are satisfied, next units of energy are used to satisfy less critical needs) Offers to sell 1 MWhrBids to buy 1 MWhr S1S2B1B2B3 $10.00 $70.00 $25.00 $50.00 $70.00$ $65.00$70.00$65.00$ $70.00 $ ∞∞000 ∞∞000 ∞∞000 This table orders offers and bids for each agent.

19 Internet-based two-sided auction markets Offer/bid order Offers to sell 1 MWhrBids to buy 1 MWhr SellerPriceBuyerPrice 1S1$10.00B1$ S2$10.00B1$ S1$50.00B2$ S2$50.00B1$ S1$65.00B1$ S2$70.00B2$ S1$70.00B2$ S2$70.00B3$25.00 This table orders offers and bids for each agent (same as previous slide) This table orders offers and bids across all selling and buying agents, respectively. Offers to sell 1 MWhrBids to buy 1 MWhr S1S2B1B2B3 $10.00 $70.00 $25.00 $50.00 $70.00$ $65.00$70.00$65.00$ $70.00 $ ∞∞000 ∞∞000 ∞∞000

20 Market clearing price Computed as the price where the supply schedule intersects the demand schedule. SUPPLY DEMAND Price ($/MWhr) Quantity (MWhr) L. Tesfatsion, “Auction Basics for Wholesale Power Markets: Objectives and Pricing Rules,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, July, 2009.

21 Market clearing price Computed as the price where the supply schedule intersects the demand schedule. Price ($/MWhr) Quantity (MWhr) SUPPLY DEMAND L. Tesfatsion, “Auction Basics for Wholesale Power Markets: Objectives and Pricing Rules,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, July, 2009.

Security-constrained economic dispatch (SCED) 22 Subject to  We allow offers and bids to be made on energy and reserves.  This problem is solved for a single operating condition. The operating condition is representative for a certain time period (either 1 hour or 5 minutes). Max demand Σ d i +w i <DMAX i for all i(9) The above is a simplified version. The MISO Business Practice Manual BPM-002-r11, Chapter 6, provides a detailed description of the SCED. See SCED obj fnct also includes regulation term, separating reg-up from reg-down. 2. “Value” terms in obj fnct can be set by stepped curves established by ISO.

Security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC) 23 Subject to  We allow offers and bids to be made on energy & reserves. This problem is solved across multiple time periods, usually 24 hrs (1 hr at a time) but sometimes fewer (e.g, 4 or 6) and sometimes more. Max demand Σ d i +w i <DMAX i for all I,t(13) The above is a simplified version. The MISO Business Practice Manual BPM-002-r11, Chapter 4, provides a detailed description of the SCUC. See SCUC obj fnct also includes regulation term, separating reg-up from reg-down. 2. “Value” terms in obj fnct can be set by stepped curves established by ISO.

Two markets - comments 1.Two markets: “Energy & operating reserve” are 2 different markets, 1 for buying/selling energy, 1 for buying/selling operating reserve. 2.Co-optimization: The first “SC” in SC-SCED/SC-SCUC stands for “simultaneous co-optimized” referring to the fact that both energy & operating reserve markets are cleared within 1 optimization formulation. 3.Reserves: Regulation reserve supplies minute-by-minute variation in net- demand via AGC. Spinning/supplemental reserve provide backup for contingencies (gen loss). Spinning is inter-connected, supplemental need not be; both must be available within 10 mins of a request. 4.Use of SC-SCED: In DAM, SC-SCUC solves once per hour and then for that hour, SC-SCED is also solved. RTM uses the RT commitment as input to SC- SCED in computing RT dispatch every 5 minutes. 5.LMPs: SC-SCUC gives hourly commitment & dispatch, but no nodal prices (LMPs). SC-SCED (given a commitment) gives dispatch & nodal prices. 6.Contingencies: Transmission security constraints for SC-SCUC are enforced via a predefined constraint list for the SCUC and a simultaneous feasibility testing (SFT) function iterating with SCED. 24

25 Electricity “two settlement” markets Day-Ahead Market (every day) Real-Time Market (every 5 minutes) Energy & reserve offers from gens Energy bids from loads Internet system Which gens get committed, at roughly what levels for next 24 hours, and settlement Internet system Energy offers from gens Energy bids from loads Generation levels for next 5 minutes and settlement for deviations from day-ahead market Generates 100 mw; paid $100. Generates 99 mw; pays $1.

26 Locational marginal prices 1.Units are $/MWhr 2.One for each bus in the network. 3.If the network is lossless, transmission capacity is infinite, then all buses have the same LMP, λ. In this case, λ is the increase in system cost if total load increases by 1 unit (corresponds to simple market we will see). 4.With a lossy and congested network, LMP k is the increase in cost of bus k MW load increases by 1 unit.

27 MISO and PJM balancing areas

28 RT LMPs in the MISO and PJM balancing areas 7:20 am (CST) 9/8/2011 Source: MISO - PJM Interconnection Joint and Common Market Web site, previously at but not maintained.

29 RT LMPs in the MISO and PJM balancing areas 7:40 am (CST) 9/8/2011 Source: MISO - PJM Interconnection Joint and Common Market Web site, previously at but not maintained.

30 Average annual locational marginal prices

31 Locational marginal prices – effect of transmission.

32 6:00 am-noon (CST) 8/28/2012 RT LMPs in the MISO and PJM balancing areas - temporal variation for four different nodes

33 March 4, 2013, 10:20 CST RT LMPs in the MISO balancing area ketData/Pages/RealTimeMarketData.aspx

34 March 4, 2013, 10:20 CST Ancillary services in the MISO balancing area ketData/Pages/RealTimeMarketData.aspx

35 Market prices - Energy Real-Time 8:25 am (CST) 6/4/2013

36 Market prices – Ancillary Services Real-Time: 8:25 am (CST) 6/4/2013 Day-ahead: hour ending 9 am (CST) 6/4/2013

37 Day-ahead LMPs in ISO-NE balancing areas For hour ending 11:00 am (EST) 9/8/2011 New England ISO website, at but no longer available.

38 RT LMPs in the ISO-NE balancing areas 10:25 am (EST) 9/8/2011 New England ISO website, at but no longer available.

39 RTAncillary service prices in ISO-NE bal areas 10:25 am (EST) 9/8/2011 Regulation clearing price is $5.11/MW. Load Zones: Connecticut (CT), Southwest CT (SWCT), Northeast Massachusetts/Boston (NEMABSTN) TMSR=10min spinning rsrv TMNSR=10min non-spinning rsrv TMOR=30min operating rsrv New England ISO website, at but no longer available.

Market time line Ref: A. Botterud, J. Wang, C. Monteiro, and V. Miranda “Wind Power Forecasting and Electricity Market Operations,” available at 40

Base point calculation via real-time market 41 Source: Y. Makarov, C. Loutan, J. Ma, and P. de Mello, “Operational impacts of wind generation on California power systems,” IEEE Trans on Power Systems, Vol. 24, No. 2, May Focus on interval 2, { t+5, t+10}. For interval 2, a short-term net load forecast is made 7.5 min before interval 2 begins, at t-2.5, and generation set points are computed accordingly via SCED. At t+2.5, which is 2.5 minutes before interval 2 begins, the units start to move. The units are ramped at a rate which provides that they reach the desired base point at t+7.5 min, which is 2.5 min after the interval begins. ADS: automatic dispatch system DOT: dispatch operating target Key point: The base point is computed from a net load forecast. There is error in this forecast, which typically increases as wind penetration increases. This error contributes to power imbalance and therefore frequency deviation.

42 How did wind participate in markets? Demand schedule without wind Supply schedule without wind Quantity (MWhr) Price ($/MWhr) Point X “Old” approach Participates in day-ahead energy market Does not participate in day-ahead AS market Does not participate in RTM Wind generates what it can (self-scheduled/price-taker) No deviation penalties Paid based on computed LMP without wind, Point X below Marginal unit backed off Does not affect supply curve! An excellent summary of wind and markets for all North American ISOs (as of Oct. 2011) can be found at

43 How does wind participate in markets? “New” Midwest ISO approach: Dispatchable intermittent resource (DIR) Participates in day-ahead energy Makes offer into RT market like any other generator. But one unique DIR feature: Instead of capacity max offered in by other generation resources, the forecasted wind MW is used as the operation capacity maximum; Units are expected to follow the dispatch signal; Units missing “schedule band” of 8% on either side of dispatch instruction for four consecutive 5-min periods are penalized. What are implications?

44 How does wind participate in markets? What are implications?  Wind is dispatchable! Forecasting is key! DIRs are expected to provide rolling forecast of 12 five- minute periods for the Forecast Maximum Limit. If forecast not submitted in time, MISO forecast is used. Each 5 minute dispatch optimization uses Forecast Maximum Limit based on the following order 1. Participant submitted Forecast for the interval Must be less than or equal to the Feasibility Limit Must have been submitted less than 30 minutes ago 2.MISO Forecast Must be less than or equal to the Feasibility Limit Must have been created less than 30 minutes ago 3.State Estimator

45 How does wind participate in markets?

46 Midwest ISO’s wind forecasting accuracy?

47 Why is DIR beneficial? (from MISO document) 1. The entire market benefits when more resources are fully integrated into the Energy Market. Specifically, operational efficiency and market transparency will be improved, since fewer manual wind curtailments will be necessary, and LMPs will reflect each resource that impacts a constraint(s). For these reasons, registration as DIR is consistent with Good Utility Practice. 2. The automated dispatch for DIRs will be more efficient than the manual curtailment process currently in place for Intermittent Resources. This will lead to more optimal economic solutions that utilize wind more completely than a manual process. 3. The make -whole provisions of the tariff apply to DIRs, whereas they do not apply to Intermittent Resources. If a DIR is unprofitably dispatched above its Day- Ahead position, it is eligible for the RT Offer Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee (RSG) Payment provisions of the tariff. If a DIR is dispatched below its Day-Ahead position, and does not maintain its Day-Ahead margin, it is eligible for the Day Ahead Margin Assurance Payment provisions of the Tariff. This provides DIRs with assurance that dispatches, both upward and downward, will be economical. See

48 Why is DIR beneficial? Inclusion of the DIRs in the RT dispatch provides that DIR offers are optimized by SCED. This provides more flexibility to manage constraints. Therefore, there will be fewer manual curtailments, which benefits wind for increased MWhrs produced, and benefits others because it can be predicted (improves transparency). Benefits to system because wind offers low and therefore affects all time periods some (has very large effect during peak periods) – see next slide. Why does wind offer low when its LCOE is high? How then, can wind energy be profitable in the long-term, if it is offering prices that are lower than its LCOE?. Because markets incentivize agents to offer their marginal cost (cost of producing the next MW) to be dispatched. This is the value for which they break-even in the short-term. Since wind requires no fuel, its marginal costs are mainly maintenance- related and subsequently low compared to marginal cost of fuel-based units. It is because markets settle at the clearing price, i.e., (assuming infinite transmission & no losses), everyone gets paid the clearing price, not their offer price

49 Why is DIR beneficial? Difference in prices with (solid) and without (dashed) wind. Slanted lines are demand curves for night, day, and peak. Without wind, prices are slightly higher at night, significantly higher during the day, and much higher during the peak. “Wind energy and Electricity Prices: Exploring the “merit order effect”,” a literature review by Poyry for the European Wind Energy Association, April, 2010., available at