Sept., 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 1 Plan for a Value Engineering Study T. Lackowski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Wrap-up Module 5 Project Wrap Up
Advertisements

Project Management Concepts
Lisa Brown and Charles Thomas LAWNET 2002 Taking the Mystery Out of Project Management.
The Re-Start Meeting Warren County School Strategic Planning Process Action Team Leaders September 25, 2013.
Culture and Leadership
Lesson 15: Coaching Skills
Aug. 22, 2007 Americas CF&S Kick Off Meeting 1 Overview of Value Engineering Program T. Lackowski.
Manager Performance Evaluation
CEM-512 Value Engineering Highway Project: South Interchange.
Interpersonal skills & Communication Edina Nagy Lajos Kiss Szabolcs Hornyák.
“Pollution Prevention Basics: The Road to Cost Savings”
Evaluation and Reporting ENTC 4060 Project Scheduling.
Nov. 19, 2008 ILC08 Global Design Effort 1 Status Report Alternative Siting and Tunnel Design Tom Lackowski.
Copyright 2009  Develop the project charter: working with stakeholders to create the document that formally authorizes a project—the charter  Develop.
When a group is struggling through a difficult period, four-box analysis is a method it can use to regain direction and a sense of purpose. This technique.
Chapter 9 The Program Plan Russell & Jamieson.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
Occupational Health and Safety Program Management Based on OSHA’s Four Point Workplace Safety Program Management Guidelines.
Value Engineering. Definition Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Operations Management.
INFO 637Lecture #31 Software Engineering Process II Launching & Strategy INFO 637 Glenn Booker.
Cultivating CM/Teacher Relationships in a Teacher Team.
Project Management : Techniques and Tools (60-499) Fall 2014 / Winter 2015.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Status and Overview.
TQM TECHNIQUES BENCHMARKING Target key areas for improvement within operations – Increase productivity, competitiveness, and quality – Quality results.
Recap from last week Understand organizations, including the four frames, organizational structures. Explain why stakeholder management and top management.
Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of step 7 of the UFE checklist and to “level.
ADVANCED DESIGN APPLICATIONS UNIT 4 - MANUFACTURING © 2015 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, Learning Cycle Three – Looping.
Specialty Crop Block Grant Program –Farm Bill CFDA –
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
Participate in a Team to Achieve Organizational Goal
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
ARA Conference March 28, 2012 | 1DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 27 March SR case # 12-S-1515 applies Nicholas.
Lecture 3 Title: Information Technology Project Methodology By: Mr Hashem Alaidaros MIS 434.
Project Management Planning Minder Chen, Ph.D. CSU Channel Islands
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
1 Global Design Effort TILC08 - WG1 Summary WG-1: Cost Reduction Studies J. Carwardine, T. Shidara, N. Walker (For WG-1 participants)
Slide B-1 Case 1 You have just received surprising information that requires your group to take a new approach right away. You know the group members are.
TDR Status of Asian CFS Team Part II: The ILC Baseline Reference Ch.SectionSubsectionsAuthor1 st draft 112: Asian Region Siting Studies Overview Location.
DMAIC 1. (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) is a process for continual improvement. It is a systematic and fact based approach to plan, sequence.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
Global Design Effort - CFS AD & I Meeting - DESY AD & I Meeting - DESY 1 AD&I Meeting CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Main Linac Tunnel.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Lecture 2. An Overview of Engineering Design JANUARY 2016 GE105 Introduction to Engineering Design College of Engineering King Saud University.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
April 5, 2005 PPD Informal FLARE Review T. Lackowski 1 FLARE Conventional Civil Construction.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December.
INFO 638Lecture #91 Software Project Management Conclude Adaptive Project Framework INFO 638 Glenn Booker.
Unit 1. Introduction Creativity: The production of an idea, concept, creation or discovery that is new or original to its creator or a new combination.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
Continuous Improvement Projects
Effective Meetings Chapter 8.
(Additional materials)
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December 10, 2007 Acknowledgment: Jerry Aarons, Clay Corvin, and Esther Kweon Fred Asiri.
ILC Value Management Workshop
Choosing to Save Essentials
Value Management.
Project Management MBAX 6440 Project Planning.
PLANNING.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005
Increased Competition = Lower Cost to Taxpayers
Understanding the Problem
Project Management syst4080 Project Planning.
Lecturette 2: Planning Change
Presentation transcript:

Sept., 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 1 Plan for a Value Engineering Study T. Lackowski

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 2 What is Value Engineering? Value Engineering (VE) is defined as an organized effort directed at analyzing the functions of systems, equipment, facilities, services, and supplies for the purpose of achieving the essential functions at the lowest life-cycle cost consistent with required performance, quality, reliability and safety. VE is a technique directed toward analyzing the functions of an item or process to determine “best value,” or the best relationship between worth and cost. In other words, “best value” is represented by an item or process that consistently performs the required basic function and has the lowest total cost. Source: OMB Circular A-131, Value Engineering, May 23, 1993

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 3 Potential Benefit Returns vs. Project Life Cycle

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 4 Overall Steps Select facilitator / schedule meeting Develop Charge w/ facilitator Select participants / invite participants Develop and distribute Information packets – 2 weeks before meeting. Hold VM Study (2 ½ to 3 days) –Information Phase –Function Analysis Phase –Speculation Phase –Analysis Phase Development Phase – Depending on level of effort, new work packages may be required. Presentation Phase

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 5 VM Study Scope The scope of the study should allow the meeting portion of the process to be completed in 1 ½ to 3 days. Information and project requirements needs to extend beyond the study focus area in order that the root functions and requirements can be understood and therefore challenged. The number of participants should be kept to less than 30 people

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 6 Developing the Charge Determining the scope that the study will focus on is important to its usefulness. –If the focus area is too narrow, say just Process Water, “best value” ideas may not be presented; Impacts on other areas may not be realized. –Too large a focus area may not allow the required in-depth analysis that is desired. Suggest we focus on the power and cooling systems and their impacts on the tunnels, caverns, shafts, surface areas including buildings, utilities and impacts on the surrounding communities.

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 7 Participants (Team Members) Facilitator: US Corp of Engineers has a department (Ovest) that is trained/certified to facilitate VM studies. (Currently booked until December 07) Large A&E firms such as Parsons also have certified / experienced VM facilitators. Participants need to have broad enough experiences to generate new and interesting ideas. Participants need to be realistic but have an open mind to look at new ways to solve old problems. (deal with the nay-sayers in the development phase)

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 8

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 9 Information Phase – Presentations that describe the current baseline designs for the accelerator and conventional facilities –This should be about one hour Function Analysis Phase - Presentations are made to define the accelerator requirements and how those requirements have been converted to the criteria for the Conventional Facilities, and particularly the functions of the power and cooling systems. –This phase may take 4 to 6 hours with presentation and question and answers

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 10 Speculation Phase – lead by the facilitator the group uses brainstorming to generate ideas –This phase will take place for the rest of the first day and most if not all of the second day Analysis Phase – Once the brainstorming is over, the group reviews the ideas; combining, eliminating and discussing their value potential –This should take 3 to 4 hours

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 11 Development Phase – While the bulk of the work to develop the ideas that survived the analysis phase will occur in the weeks and months after the meeting, responsible parties and schedules need to be determined. New work packages and design costs are discussed. –This phase can be accomplished in a few hours Presentation Phase – Some items may have impacts that require change control, others may be distributed via to affected parties. If the development phase is done correctly there should be no surprises.

Sept, 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 12