S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative All Hands Meeting 10/7/11

Agenda Announcements Summary of Weekly Accomplishments WG Updates Workstream Updates 4

Announcements  Face-to-Face Meeting Overview/Agenda  Scheduled Call Changes  LDAP/HPD workstream call for 10/11/2011 is cancelled  Use Case 1 SWG call for 10/10/2011 rescheduled for 10/12/2011 3

Provider Directories - Summary of Weekly Accomplishments Use Case 1 Sub-Workgroup Accomplishments Use Case 2 Sub-Workgroup Accomplishments Use Case 2 Sub-Workgroup Accomplishments 4  Achieved Consensus on Recommendation  Finalized Implementation Guide Template  Designated section writing leads for Implementation Guide  Reached informal consensus on 95% of response data set definitions  Reached informal consensus on 80% of Data Object Sets  Mapped data elements to LDAP X.500/HPD and X12N 274 standards

Use Case 1 - Sub-Workgroup Update Accomplishments  Completed consensus voting for Proposed Harmonization Statement for Query for Digital Certificate Use Case for Direct Project  Googledoc created for writing Implementation Guide  Section writing leads began drafting Implementation Guide content Next Steps  Review draft Implementation Guide content 5

Use Case 2 - Sub-Workgroup Update Accomplishments  Group reached informal consensus on 36 out of 38 response data set definitions (95%)  Group reached informal consensus on 40 out of 50 data elements in data objects (78%)  Group reached informal consensus on 12 out of 28 data elements in query data set definitions (43%) Next Steps  Continue review of data elements in data objects  Define Electronic Service Information data object  Refine definitions and examples for Provider Directory data elements 6

Use Case 2 - LDAP X.500/IHE HPD Workstream Accomplishments  Workstream mapped data elements to HPD standards  Group reached informal consensus on 35 out of 47 HPD mappings (74%) Next Steps  Continue to review data element mappings at F2F 7

Use Case 2 - X12N 274 Workstream Accomplishments  Workstream met with SWG to clarify understanding of data definitions  Group reached informal consensus on 23 out of 26 query data element mappings (88%)  Group reached informal consensus on 36 out of 47 response data element mappings (77%) Next Steps  Continue to review data element mappings at F2F 8

Virtual Round Questions, Comments, concerns? 9