Usability at Duke Libraries Debra Hanken Kurtz Digital Projects Department Webcom Presentation October 29, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SLA PNW Regional Conference October 2006 D. L. Cohen Information Services Special Libraries Association Northwest Regional Conference.
Advertisements

Enhancing Graduate Education ARL/CNI Fall Forum Joan K. Lippincott Coalition for Networked Information ARL/CNI Fall Forum Joan K. Lippincott Coalition.
A SWAT team Approach to User Studies Erin Mayhood University of Virginia Library July 31st, 2008.
Traditional Usability Testing of Library Mobile Websites Kimberly Pendell & Michael Bowman 1.
Providing feedback with SETU Student Evaluation of Teaching and Units (SETU)
Performance Indicator 4.08
Qualitative Research Focus Groups Usability studies Web 2.0 Innovation: Add This.com Kumar Percy Jayasuriya
User Studies With Camtasia Internet Librarian, Monterey, California.
Observing users Chapter 12. Observation ● Why? Get information on.. – Context, technology, interaction ● Where? – Controlled environments – In the field.
Web Site Redesign: Perspectives from the Field What do they want? Usability Testing Robin Leech Head, Digital Initiatives LITA National Forum Cincinnati,
Graham McCarthy Sally Wilson Digital Odyssey, June 11, 2010.
Task #2: In the post Main Library services environment, what services will be offered in the future and how will they be offered.
Changes in Library Usage, Usability, & User Support Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie.
2009 Library Technology Plans Analysis and Summary by eiNetwork May 2009.
Greg Vogl and Dennis Ogg Research and Development Services Colorado State University Libraries January 6, 2010.
Customer: Rosalva Gallardo Team members: Susan Lin Buda Chiou Jim Milewski Marcos Mercado November 23, 2010.
Identifying Best Practices for Social Media Work Kamaria Campbell, Usability Auditor, ForeSee State of Michigan World Usability Day November 10, 2011.
CS CS 5150 Software Engineering Lecture 12 Usability 2.
 In years past librarians noticed the decline in reference services and library instruction.  Faculty members noticed a decline in the quality of student.
River Campus Libraries Location, Location, Location … Inserting Library Resources into the Course Syllabus Stephanie Frontz, University of Rochester ARLIS/NA.
The IMLS Graduate Student Study: A Mixed-Methods Approach C. Todd White Staff Anthropologist Report to the Library Staff Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 C. Todd White.
Observing users.
Welcome!. Project Insight Principles Student Focused Enhancing services to students to enrich the learning experience is at the core of the decisions.
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists Brad Hemminger School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Digital Capture for Usability Testing…and more! Janet Yanosko and Sara Memmott University of Michigan-Dearborn.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Morae Software for Usability Studies: A Tool for Designing, Observing, and Analyzing Usability.
ONLINE FOCUS GROUPS: A HOW-TO GUIDE IN 8 STEPS. Online Focus Groups: Definition What’s an online focus group?
Course Title. Website Usability Testing Is Your Website Leaving Money on the Table? How to Find & Fix Problems with Your Website Michael Newman Michael.
A User-Focused Approach to Redesigning a Library Webpage for a Targeted Audience Start The International and Area Studies Library (IASL) website was developed.
Public 4-Year Dashboard and the Usability Lab Melissa Beard (OFM) and Wendy Wickstrom (DES) ERDC Conference May 21, 2014.
Howto.gov/firstfridays Survey of Federal Government UX Practices Conducted by: Jonathan Rubin DigitalGov User Experience Program (GSA) Jean Fox Bureau.
Usability Testing – Part II Teppo Räisänen
Usability Testing. Testing Methods Same as Formative Surveys/questionnaires Interviews Observation Documentation Automatic data recording/tracking Artificial/controlled.
Company LOGO GET ACEC2012-USING REMOTE INTERNET- BASED LECTURE-CAPTURE TO IMPROVE TEACHING PERFORMANCE Dr. Loren B. Naffziger, Dr. Kenneth Fawson, and.
1 Usability of Digital Libraries Sanda Erdelez & Borchuluun Yadamsuren Information Experience Laboratory University of Missouri – Columbia USA Libraries.
Tech Council College of the Siskiyous Tuesday October 29 th 2002.
Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed.
Market Research Techniques for Libraries An Infopeople Workshop Presented by Joan Frye Williams
 A Little About Me  Why are we here  Some Quick Statistics  Why those stats matter  Leveraging the Web and Its related Technologies  Connect with.
Put it to the Test: Usability Testing of Library Web Sites Nicole Campbell, Washington State University.
Partnering with an Evaluator Presented by Joanne Kahn 1.
MAC Fall Symposium: Learning What You Want to Know and Implementing Change Elizabeth Yakel, Ph.D. October 22, 2010.
Survey tools, focus groups and video as a means of capturing student experience and expectations of e-learning Dave.
For Primary Teachers. What is Action Research? Why Conduct Action Research? How do we Conduct Action Research?
WHAT CAN USABILITY REALLY TELL US? Kirstin Dougan Music User Services Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign MWMLA Annual Meeting Kansas.
UX in the Real World Scarlett Sidwell. UX Agenda What is it? Why do we care? How do we convince other people to care?
Class #7, March 11, 2010 Online Fundraising Leah Kopperman,
MARKET RESEARCH Lesson 1.2. Market Research A process designed to identify solutions to a specific marketing problem by systematically gathering and analyzing.
Partnering with an Evaluator Presented by Joanne Kahn 1.
1 Evaluating the Quality of the e-Learning Experience in Higher Education Anne Jelfs and Keir Thorpe, Institute of Educational Technology (IET), The Open.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Digital Reference Services in the Public Library Nancy O’Neill Santa Monica Public Library
Observing users. The aims Discuss the benefits & challenges of different types of observation. Describe how to observe as an on-looker, a participant,
Tuition & Fees Proposal Automated Services and Library Resources Fees John H. Frederick November 4, 2015.
Testing onthe Tablet Usability of an Academic Library’s Mobile Site Junior Tidal Multimedia & Web Services Librarian New York City College of Technology,
By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.
Campus Master Plan Online Survey Summary. Survey: Faculty, Staff & Students.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
Toy Design Project.  Primary Research  Original research conducted by you (or someone you hire) to collect data specifically for your current objective.
Can Students Find What They Need?: Painless Website Usability Testing
Hikuwai 2016 Weekend School, Whangārei
Data Collection and Beyond Assessment at the U.Va. Library
The User Experience: Online and IRL
Observing users.
Enacted: Generating data in research events
Committee # 10: Educational Resources:Information Resources/Library
The online Subject Experience Survey (SES)
Grace Esteban Crash Course Grace Esteban
Presentation transcript:

Usability at Duke Libraries Debra Hanken Kurtz Digital Projects Department Webcom Presentation October 29, 2009

Statistics  Sawmill  Google Analytics

Heatmaps

On-line Input  Blogs collections/category/website-redesign/ collections/category/website-redesign/  Comment Forms

Surveys

Focus Groups

Low-tech/low barrier usability  Interviews  Cardsorting  Circlemapping  Notable

Staff Resources Needed  4-5 staff to design instrument  1 to conduct test  2-3 to analyze data  average about 5-10 hours staff time per participant

Other Resources Needed  Participants  Students  Faculty  Staff  Incentive  Money and gift cards  Food  Stakeholders in success

Process Solicit input from staff Review stats and chat logs for possible problems Write instrument Test instrument Conduct test Analyze data Report

Library Usability Resources  On-site lab  Morae software  Observation room  Mobile unit  Morae software  laptops

How it works

Record  Preset Studies (most traditional usability)  Two camera recordings  Autopilot unmoderated testing  Surveys

Observe

Analyze and Report

Challenges  Staff buy-in  Incentive  Recruiting right participants

Questions??? Twitter.com/debra