Slide 1© 2006 Human Factors Solutions ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N 251 2007-04-23 DocumentPresentation Type.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henri Barthel Sophia Antipolis, 30 April History 1990: Bar coding and horizontal applications 2002: AIDC Technologies 2009: Re-launch of CEN/TC225.
Advertisements

ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
System Integration Verification and Validation
"Safe and Secure Solutions for Smarter Cities" The value of standardization and certification in planning and managing Smart Cities 12/05/2014Euralarm.
International Standards for Software & Systems Documentation Ralph E. Robinson R 2 Innovations.
1 Current International IT Accessibility Standards Activities ISO/IEC JTC 1 SWG on Accessibility Sheffield, United Kingdom, April 2005 Richard Hodgkinson.
1 ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: Presentation Title: IT Accessibility Standardization.
Chapter 2 – Software Processes
FIPS 201 Personal Identity Verification For Federal Employees and Contractors National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory.
Update on European Citizen Card: Part 4 Kristina Unverricht Consumer Council of DIN, Germany Chairperson of ANEC Information Society Working Group October.
0 ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type:Presentation Title:Information on Fast Track.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All ETSI Standardization Activities on M2M communications Joachim Koss, ETSI Board Member Document No:
1 Design for All Shaping the end-users’ Tel- eEurope ETSI’s involvement in laying the foundation for an all-inclusive eEurope Knut Nordby Chairman ETSI.
ISO/IEC JTC1 SC37 Overview
The Software Quality Star: A conceptual model for the software quality curriculum Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology,
Software Requirements
Software Quality Matters Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing Dublin Institute of Technology.
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
Software testing standards ISO/IEC and 33063
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
1 Standards Australia and accessibility standards Irene Hagstrom Standards Australia.
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
Defence and Security Division SC37 Paris status report CEN Biometric Focus Group Brussels January 26th 2005.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: SWG-A Meeting Document Title: Task Group 2/Break.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: Report Title: CEN BT/WG 185/CENELEC BT/WG
About CEN TC 224 WG 6 Convenor Adam Balfour ©HFS 2005 JTC 1 SWG-A N 002.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: National Body Activity Report Title: Korean Standards.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type:Presentation to JTC 1 Plenary Meeting Title:SWG-A.
US Workshop Sep 04 CEN TC 278 WG3 SG5 Interoperable Fare Management System Architecture David Sentinella Department for Transport David Sentinella Department.
OBJECT ORIENTED SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN. COURSE OUTLINE The world of the Information Systems Analyst Approaches to System Development The Analyst as.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.
DICOM and ISO/TC215 Hidenori Shinoda Charles Parisot.
Getting the most out of ArcGIS Web Application Templates
1 This Presentation is printed on recycled materials.
JTC 1 SWG-A N 110 replaces SWG-A N 086 November 29, 2005 Title: Report of the Task Group 1 Breakout on Domains (replaces SWG-A N 086) Jennifer… Can you.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type:Presentation Title:IT Accessibility Standardization.
International Telecommunication Union Committed to connecting the world ITU/EBU Workshop Accessibility to Broadcasting and IPTV ACCESS for ALL, 23 – 24.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All ICT Accessibility Standardization Dr. Jim Carter, ISACC Document No: GSC16-PLEN-57r2 Source: ISACC.
1 ISO/IEC JTC1/SC37 Standards A presentation of the family of biometric standards October 2008.
SC 37 “Biometrics” and correlations with JTC1 Special Working Group on Accessibility Ing. Mario Savastano IBB (CNR) and DIEL (Federico II University of.
Systems Development Life Cycle
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: Report Title: Report on W3C Web Accessibility.
Chapter 2 – Software Processes Lecture 1 Chapter 2 Software Processes1.
Foundations of Information Systems in Business. System ® System  A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit.
Software Engineering, COMP201 Slide 1 Software Requirements BY M D ACHARYA Dept of Computer Science.
SE513 Software Quality Assurance Lecture12: Software Reliability and Quality Management Standards.
Update from the United States Standards and Conformity Assessment Work in the Sub Committee on Standards and Conformance.
1 CURRENT PRACTICES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES IN METHODS VALIDATION – NEW AREAS OF APPLICATION THE POINT OF VIEW OF AN ACCREDITATION BODY EURACHEM Workshop.
SQA project process standards IEEE software engineering standards
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 Working Group 42 - Architecture Johan Bendz
ISO Smart and Sustainable Cities developments
SQA project process standards IEEE software engineering standards
SG-EEDC N Title: Draft Presentation from the JTC 1 Study Group on Energy Efficiency of Data Centres (EEDC) to the November 2011 JTC 1 Plenary.
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
Setting Actuarial Standards
HIGHLIGHTING THE KEY CHANGES
Accessibility of Self-Service Terminals in Norway
ETSI Activities related to Accessibility Issues
CEN/ISSS DATSCG Luc Van den Berghe CEN/ISSS DATSCG
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – June 2014
How will the future European standard (EN) on Electronic Invoicing benefit public entities and service & solution providers? December 1, 2016 Andrea Caccia,
Adaptable User Interfaces It’s so easy with SNAPI!
CS310 Software Engineering Lecturer Dr.Doaa Sami
ISO Smart and Sustainable Cities developments
The contribution of European Standardization to e-Accessibility
ETSI Activities related to Accessibility Issues
ETSI Activities related to Accessibility Issues
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1© 2006 Human Factors Solutions ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N DocumentPresentation Type : Title:CEN TC 224 WG 6 Presentation on Universal Access for Self Service:Options for New Work Item Source:Mr. Adam Balfour, CEN TC 224 WG 6 Convener RequestedFor consideration at the April 2007 SWG-A meeting. Action: JTC 1 SWG on Accessibility Secretariat ITI/INCITS 1250 Eye Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC

Setting tomorrow’s human factors standards, today © 2006 Human Factors Solutions Universal Access for Self Service: Options for New Work Item Adam Balfour, Knut Lindelien and Andrew Lilley

Slide 3© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Goals and Agenda Goals  Inform you about CEN TC 224 WG 6/ understand ISO SWG  Ask for advice NWI - Which approach? What exists already? What work is ongoing - could be deployed in short term?  Invite collaboration Agenda  CENTC 224 WG 6 - Background /Scope, Deliverables & Work Items  NWI - 3 Approaches  Your views CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 4© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Self Service Society - User interface CEN TC 224 WG 6 Person - person Replaced by Man- Machine: Challenges to communication / user interface

Slide 5© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Key societal services: self service CEN TC 224 WG 6 Consequences - cannot use system? Voluntary vs complusory ?

Slide 6© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Input devices CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 7© 2006 Human Factors Solutions UI Elements: Physical Accessibility CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 8© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Lack of standardised users ! CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 9© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Scope Scope TC 224 Identification Card Systems ”cross border, inter-sector interoperability - smart cards and card reading devices” Scope WG 6 ”Human System Interface” Standardise ” Man-Machine Interface” to make it accessible BY EVERYONE CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 10© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Deliverables TC 224 WG 6 CEN TC 224 WG 6  EN User interface Dialog design principles  EN Location & dimensions of a Tactile Identifier  EN Keypads  EN Coding of user requirements  EN Tactile marking - services  Technical Specification “Access”  Technical Specification “eURI”

Slide 11© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Approaches - User requirements CEN TC 224 WG 6 What we have:  Detailed design specifications  Principles  Adaptable user interfaces What we do not have:  Design Process  Test methods  Usability

Slide 12© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Areas future work  Security at the Man-Machine Interface  Validation and Verification in realtion to design process  Presentational techniques of HMI of card operated devices  Biometrics  Icons, symbols, pictograms for Biometrics  Multi-application cards / convergence  Contactless cards  Micro payments  Smart media and tokens  Route identification for transport applications CEN TC 224 WG 6

Slide 13© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Status/background - NWI  Public procurement - requirements for universal access - now - support legislation (development ongoing)  Need to specify what is required - wrt universal access  Problem: What is required - context sensitive  Need to verify appropriate involvement + documentation of end users in design process  Need to objectively validate solutions - universal access - transparent - holistic  Choice of approach - based on Norwegian Standards (NORSOK) experience from another industry (Oil + Gas)  Initiative by Standards Norway + Convenor WG 6

Slide 14© 2006 Human Factors Solutions NWI - possible approaches 1.Design process 2.Design guidance 3.Evaluation methods 4.CIF Usability 5.Combination

Slide 15© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 1: Design process Content:  Rationale for adopting universal design process  Principles for universal design  Planning the universal design process  Universal access design process activities:  Understand and specify context of use  Specify user and organisational requirements  Produce design solutions  Evaluate designs against requirements  Annex: Sample procedure for demonstrating conformance to this standard

Slide 16© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 1: Design process Advantages:  Emphasis on design process – getting the framework in place for appropriate design and evaluation  Design process tailored to self service systems  Separate document is easier to work with Disadvantages:  General design process is already covered in depth in ISO  Design guidance and evaluation methods for self service systems are either in separate standards or are not available

Slide 17© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 2: Design guidance Content:  Rationale and benefits of implementing accessibility  Characteristics of those with special requirements  Design guidance:  Software  Hardware

Slide 18© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 2: Design guidance Advantages:  Design guidance is specific to self-service devices – both software and hardware  Separate document is easier to work with Disadvantages:  Accessibility guidance is covered in ISO 9241 Parts 20 and ETSI TC HF documents  Software side of the design (for general interfaces) is covered in ISO  Design process and evaluation methods for self service systems are either in separate standards or not available

Slide 19© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 3: Evaluation methods Content:  Planning for evaluation  Methods  Why  When  What  Involvement of end users  Annex: Example structure of usability evaluation report

Slide 20© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 3: Evaluation methods Advantages:  In-depth description of the methods available  Methods tailored to design of self service systems  Separate document is easier to work with Disadvantages:  Methods are already covered in other standards (e.g. ISO 16982, ISO 13407)  Choice of methods/ performance requires expertise  Design process and design guidance for self service systems are either in separate standards or are not available  Evaluation needs to be seen in design process context

Slide 21© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 4: CIF for usability test report  Common Industry Format (CIF) for usability test report, tailored to self service and universal access  Similar to ISO/IEC 25062, which is general  Standardises the information recorded and reported  Improves understanding between supplier and customer  Simplifies supplier’s task  Template provides standard structure for contents

Slide 22© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 4: CIF for usability test report Standard used by:  Supplier:  Usability professionals to create reports in format required by customers  Customer:  Usability professionals to evaluate accessibility of product  Technical managers and decision makers

Slide 23© 2006 Human Factors Solutions  Advantages:  Tailored to self service and universal access  Disadvantages:  Goes against the principle of ISO/IEC which is the industry standard Option 4: CIF for usability test report

Slide 24© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 5: Combined Content:  Rationale for adopting universal design process  Principles for universal design  Planning the universal design process  Universal design process activities  Rationale and benefits of implementing accessibility  Characteristics of those with special requirements  Design guidance  Evaluation methods  Annex: Sample procedure for demonstrating conformance to this standard  Annex: Example structure of usability evaluation report

Slide 25© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Option 5: Combined Advantages:  A ‘one-stop’ standard – all information in one place  Methods tailored to design and evaluation of self service systems Disadvantages:  Standard could be large and difficult to manage  Time to market for standard  Process and methods are already covered in other standards (e.g. ISO 16982, ISO 13407)

Slide 26© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Your views?  Which approach?  What exists already?  What work is ongoing - could be deployed in short term?  Establishment of liaisons/ input/ collaboration

Slide 27© 2006 Human Factors Solutions Contact details of the CEN TC 224 WG 6 convenor: Adam Balfour HUMAN FACTORS SOLUTIONS Jernbaneveien Ski Norway CEN TC 224 WG 6 Contact details