Mechanisms and Counter Mechanisms Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st Proposition Speech 1.Statement of the Resolution 2.Definition of Essential Terms (should be clear to the average person) 3.Outline Arguments/Pillars.
Advertisements

(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
International Relations debates Because the world is a big place.
Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Doesn’t Solve the.
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment,
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
Hard and Soft Models & Some First Principles. How you are going to implement the motion The job of the first speaker to outline clearly The level of depth.
The World Schools Format  2 teams, 1 proposing the topic (or motion) and 1 opposing it  Each team has three speaking members, one of whom speaks twice.
Building Government Cases. Preliminary Steps Follow critical decision making. –Analyze the proposition. Look at all alternatives with as much knowledge.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
1 Fourth and Fifth Amendments Police State – country where military or law enforcement are in power and abuse power Warrant – document that gives law enforcement.
Social Choice Session 20 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Topicality. Our Focus Significance Harms Inherency Topicality Solvency.
Constructing a Case for a Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Warm Up: 12/03/13 1.List 3 specified powers of the President. 2.What are the four factors that have enabled the President to expand power informally? 3.What.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
Economics Organized Labor Union Collective Bargaining Strike Mediation Arbitration.
Topic Lecture Resolved: On balance, students in grade benefit when their schools offer interscholastic sports. David Childree & Donny Peters.
Human Rights. Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have equal access.
National Government I will: Discuss the benefits of living in a democratic society and the importance of voting. Know how a government is elected and run.
2014 Georgia Debate Institutes. RESOLUTION OF FACT  Resolutions that you should assume is a fact. The purpose of the debate is to prove whether or not.
© 2012 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Criminal & civil recovery mechanisms to recover the proceeds of corruption a common law.
Left or Right? Caterpillar: “And what are you?” Alice: “ I…I hardly know, sir, just at present—at least I know who I was when I got up this morning, but.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Chapter 21 Supporting Your Views
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
What are they? Why do we have them?
Process of a Bill Parliamentary Law Making – Legislative Process © The Law Bank Parliamentary Law Making Process of a bill 1.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Happy Constitution Day!. The Basics The Constitution is the highest law in the United States. All other laws come from the Constitution. It says how the.
Legal Issues. Overview Standard Contract Terms of Social Networking Sites Government Content on a Third-Party Site Competitive Procurement Issues First.
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
DEBATING BASICS Tuesday, August 25, IMPORTANT VOCAB  Resolution: A debate topic specifically worded to make for fair debates.  Affirmative: The.
 Part of your education in “civics” – this is how democracy works.  Great way to learn History – if you can debate it, you have to know a lot about.
The U.S.A. a Country Without a Budget Presented by Teresa Larson.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2002 An Introduction to Human Services: Policy and Practice Self Determination §This multimedia product and its contents are.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
“Content Generation” Training Session 17 Oct 2014.
Debating Rules, Roles & Regulations Sponsored by:.
The Criminal Justice System has 3 main components Law Enforcement (Police and other agencies) Judicial System/Courts Corrections –There are several different.
Plan 1.Introducing the team 2.Case: Theme; actuality; importance Definitions Criteria Arguments + explanations + support/evidence (examples, statistics,
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
swing me over to your beliefs
 What is the mission of law enforcement in protecting a democratic society:  To _______ _______  To _______ and ________  To promote public _________.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
News Marie’s book Scotland’s Inclusion Institute Twitter: Campaign - tweet Facebook: Campaign - like - join
First: The legislative power The legislative branch of government is responsible for making and enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
CROSS-EXAMINATION DEBATE: THE AFFIRMATIVE CASE
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Debate: The Basics.
Negative Strategies.
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Policy Analysis in Cross-ex Debate
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Functions and Purposes of Government
Debating Who What How long? Prop Presentation Proposition
Negative Attacks.
National University Debating Championship Kopertis IV 2019
Building Affirmative Case Template
Getting To Know Debate:
National University Debating Championship LLDIKTI XII 2019
Presentation transcript:

Mechanisms and Counter Mechanisms Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.

Charter 2011  5.4 When suggesting parameters to the debate, or proposing particular models or criteria to judge it by, the Proposition must ensure such parameters, models or criteria are themselves reasonable. They must be ones that the ordinary intelligent person would accept as applicable to the debate.  The Proposition‘s ability to set reasonable parameters to a debate does not provide a licence to restrict the motion arbitrarily.  When the motion requires the Proposition to propose a solution to a problem and the Proposition has to set out the details of its proposed solution to prove its effectiveness, the Proposition must ensure that the detailed solution given (the Proposition‘s ‗model‘ or ‗plan‘) is a reasonable one, such that the ordinary intelligent person would accept it is applicable to the debate. Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.

WSDC Notes the Adjudicator by Christopher Erskine  7.4 In responding to the proposition case, the opposition team may produce a positive choice of its own, or merely attack the case presented by the proposition. If it chooses to produce a positive case of its own, it must in fact produce that case through its speeches, and not concentrate solely on attacking the case presented by the proposition. Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.

Opposition Strategies Counterproposals:  Must be mutually exclusive  If it is equally as good it is not a reason to reject the proposal; must be net beneficial

When to use a mechanism Some say mechanisms are usually warranted when the motion says THW and criteria is warranted when THB but…  This House believes that political parties should receive state funding  This House would use affirmative action in response to historical injustice  This House believes that education policy should be the responsibility of local authorities  This House would negotiate with terrorists  This House believes that African problems require African solutions.

What goes into a Mechanism? MECHANISM Funding Enforcement Mandates Agent of Action

“define who is to operate the Affirmative plan…In many cases, the Affirmative is content to rely on a status quo agency…” Plan:Introduction to Policy Debate 2002 John R. Prager

Mandates “are the basic provisions of what the plan should accomplish….They are the reforms that the Affirmative team is proposing; they are the actions that will put the Affirmative resolution into effect.”  Plan:Introduction to Policy Debate 2002 John R. Prager

Enforcement provisions  “… the penalty…for violating any laws proposed by the Affirmative’s mandates; these planks may also specify what agencies will prosecute cases…”  Plan:Introduction to Policy Debate 2002 John R. Prager

Funding$  “Not all plans need funding, but most need some source of money to put the mandates into effect.” Plan:Introduction to Policy Debate 2002 John R. Prager

How about this mechanism?  THAT DOCTORS SHOULD REPORT EVIDENCE OF MARITAL ABUSE TO THE POLICE  Mechanism:  Dr.’s would report suspected abuse to the police  Prosecution would follow normal means  Convicted abusers would be given a choice of jail time or rehabilitation.  Normal means would be used for enforcement and funding (Nothing new is needed but the law)

Counter Mechanism Theory: Same as the mechanism: Requirement 1 Mandates Funding Agency Enforcement

Requirement 2: Non-Topical  THW require welfare recipients to pass a drug test.  Proposition Mechanism  All recipients of welfare or public assistance will be subject to monthly drug testing in order to receive their benefits.  Opposition Counter Mechanism  Only recipients with a past drug history would be tested to receive public assistance.  Should not be representative of the motion or else it grants the Proposition the debate.

Requirement 3: Mutually Exclusive  The Counter Mechanism is a test of opportunity cost, otherwise it is NOT an attack on the Proposition. THW ban affirmative action.  The model is to phase out affirmative action in all universities and job placement.  The Counter-Mechanism would use only economically based affirmative action policies. They have big advantages!  Permutation Theory!  Can do the plan and counter plan at the same time? If so, is it a test of opportunity cost. BUT you must also pass one more test!

AND/OR Net Beneficial  C/Mechanism > Mechanism  If not, then maybe there is an opportunity cost but not better than the one we have  C/Mechanism > Mechanism + C/M  If the permutation is feasible, then the counter mechanism must be able to still outweigh the mechanism and the counter mechanism together!

THBT THAT WE SHOULD SUPPORT MILITARY INTERVENTION IN SOMALIA  Mechanism was to bring NATO Forces into Somalia to bolster the two countries that had African Union peacekeepers so they could overcome Al Shabab  Counter Mechanism was  To give jobs to the jihad fighters who wanted jobs (Good ev they wanted them)  Allow govt forces to fight their own fight against Al Shabab (good ev against Western forces, good ev that the government had been bolstered by Somali forces trained in Kenya) Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.