IMPACT OF MOBILITY IN DENSE LTE-A NETWORKS WITH SMALL CELLS M. Bruno Baynat (Université Pierre et Marie Curie – LIP6) Mme. Raluca-Maria Indre (Orange Labs) M. Narcisse Nya (Université Pierre et Marie Curie – LIP6) M. Philippe Olivier (Orange Labs) M. Alain Simonian (Orange Labs) 1
PLAN Context Motivations Goal Network Model Network assumptions Modeling assumptions Markovian Model Fixed Point approximation Performance results Conclusion and future works 2 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
CONTEXT Constant increase of data in mobile networks Massive deployment of small cells Increase the proportion of mobile users Impact of this increase on the performance of LTE-A 3 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
MOTIVATIONS Evaluate and quantify the impact of mobility on the performance of small cells 4 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
GOAL Simple analitical models Influence of mobile users on the performance of static users Amount of generated handovers 5 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
NETWORK MODEL 6 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
Macro Cell NETWORK MODEL 7 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
NETWORK MODEL 8 Macro Cell IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
ASSUMPTIONS 9 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
10 NETWORK ASSUMPTIONS Cell with constant capacity C Two types of users Static users Mobile users Equitable ressources sharing : Round-Robin Each users download data of size Σ Full transmission for static users Mobile users remain in the cell for a limited time θ IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
11 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS Requests for transmission is generated according to Poisson processes Rate λ s for static users Rate λ m for mobile users Exponential distribution of service time Exponential remaining sojourn time of an active mobile user θ Exponential distribution of data to download Σ IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
MARKOVIAN MODEL 12 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
MARKOVIAN MODEL 13 n s, n m 13 n s, n m +1 n s +1, n m n s -1, n m n s, n m -1 Inverse of mean sojourn time Arrival rate of static users’ requests Arrival rate of mobile users’ requests Service rate of the cell IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
MARKOVIAN MODEL 14 The model is exact Stability condition Does not depend on the mobile users Numerical resolution Truncating both dimensions of state space Gauss-Seidel or Least mean square IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
MARKOVIAN MODEL 15 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Mean time to transfer the average volume E(Σ) Performance indicators of interest Average throughput obtained by any user Propotion of handover
MARKOVIAN MODEL 16 Limitations of the model : Exponential distribution of mobile users sojourn time Exponential distribution of data to transmit Resolution complexity Scalability IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION 17 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
18 FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION 18 Capacity of the cell Average size of the downloaded file Average size downloaded by a mobile user ? Two classes of users with different service rate Multi-class Processor-Sharing queue with two classes of customers IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
19 FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION 19 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Stability condition Multi-class PS queue Thus necessary that For this system is sufficient
20 FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION 20 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 How to calculate ? Depends on sojourn time and average throughput of the user If the parameter is known Standard results for the stationary multi-class processor sharing
21 FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION 21 Knowing the distribution of Σ Fixed point Throughput of the user given by the PS queue If is known IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
FIXED POINT APPROXIMATION Performance indicators of interest Average throughput obtained by any user handover probability Exponential distribution of and and 22
PERFORMANCE RESULTS 23 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
24 PERFORMANCE RESULTS Θ and Σ are both exponentially distributed The Markovian model is exact IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Static users throughputMobile users throughput
25 PERFORMANCE RESULTS Θ and Σ are both exponentially distributed The Markovian model is exact IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
26 PERFORMANCE RESULTS Impact of sojourn time distribution IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
27 PERFORMANCE RESULTS Impact of key parameters User throughput with differrent cell size User throughput with different speed IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
CONCLUSION & FUTURE WORKS 28 IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015
29 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Markovian model Exponential distribution of θ and Σ Resolution complexity Not extensible Exact
30 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Fixed point approximation Approximate model Very simple Easily extensible
31 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS IDEFIX MEETING Mars 2015 Future Works Macro-cell with several coding zones Several neighboring cells
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION