Customers and Their Expectations The Mn/DOT Maintenance Perspective By Mark Wikelius MQA Peer Exchange, October 12 th, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACEC Conference March 5, 2012 Trudy Elsner P.E., Metro Maintenance, Engineering Services Sheila Johnson P.E., Metro Maintenance, Traffic Services.
Advertisements

* 07/16/96 Guide Sign Design June 18-19, 2013 Arden Hills, MN *
Maintenance October 5, District 11 Overview Safety and Move Over Law Adopt-A-Highway Maintenance TOPICS.
Maintenance Rating Program Training 2014 KYTC Division of Maintenance Tracy Nowaczyk, P.E.
DANIEL PETERSON Transportation Operations Supervisor II Alexandria Sub Area MN/DOT Performance Measures: Integrated Roadside Vegetation Management.
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
To Pave or Not to Pave? Making Informed Decisions on When to Upgrade a Gravel Road.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
Steve Varnedoe Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to the Joint.
Rural roads are made up of different types of materials 82% of road in U.S are rural Rural roads are made up of different types of materials.
Mississippi DOT Roadsides, Drainage & Vegetation Management Standards.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
1  Automated Performance Measures for Snow & Ice Results Ron Beane, Performance Measurement Administrator Office of Maintenance, Iowa DOT Highway Division.
MDSS Stakeholder Meeting June, COMPUTING A BETTER WAY TO PLOW IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA Kwasi D. Amoah, Graduate Student, MSEM University of.
WINTER OPERATIONS COALITION Bill Hoffman, P.E. Nevada Department of Transportation - US Chief Maintenance & Operations Engineer
Lec 26, Ch.7, pp : Islands and turning roadways (Objectives) Know the functions of islands Know the functions of islands Be familiar with minimum.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Signs, Signals, and Markings. Shapes of Signs Octagon – Always means stop. Downward Pointing Triangle – Yield Sign ONLY Pennant – No Passing Warning Signs.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Multiple Performance Measures for Snow and Ice Control Rico Baroga Washington State Department of Transportation.
MoDOT’s Inventory Systems and Measures for Pavement Marking and Roadway Signing Jim Carney State Maintenance Engineer October 2004.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Guide Sign Design June 17-18, 2015 Arden Hills, MN.
SECTION 3. Centerline and Edge Line Final Rule DECEMBER 1999.
PAVEMENT MARKINGS, TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHTS,
October 9 th COMPLETE pg. 26 #2-4 Have Rules of the Road book out on desk BE PREPARED TO TAKE NOTES in 5 min.
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations Application Guidelines Warning Signs Signing Plan Design (At-Grade) June 20, 2012.
M aintenance Efficiency & Cost Effectiveness Initiative Robert M. Peda, P.E. Director, Bureau of Maintenance & Operations, PennDOT MQA Peer Exchange October.
CRICOS No J Road Safety in Queensland: Successes and challenges Professor Barry Watson Road Safety Decade of Action: Queensland Launch – 11 May 2011.
Market Research Presentation Template [Date] FINCA [Subsidiary]
Hearing the Silence : Putting Maintenance First (A semiosis)
Executive Summary Snow and Ice Materials, equipment and labor were consumed to meet Department Target Regain Times for the five maintenance.
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
Putting Market Research to Work! Chris McMahon Mn/DOT St. Paul, MN July 22, 2010.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
The Highway Transportation System Moving People and Goods from Place to Place Safely and Efficiently.
Jean Wallace January 15, SP&R Part II Funding Distribution – FY2014.
Speed Limits, Speed Control and Stopping Regulations.
AASHTOTECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION GROUP TOWPLOW Clearing the Way to Keep America Moving Presenter Title Affiliation Event Session Title Date.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Subcommittee on Maintenance Activity Report October 15, 2013 Carlos Braceras Chair, Subcommittee on Maintenance.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Section 3 Overview: Additional Asset Management Classes Connie Sorrell Chief of System Operations.
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Mn/DOT Winter Performance Measures Performance Measures Maintenance Quality Assurance Peer Exchange October 12, 2004.
MoDOT’s Tracker System 2010 AASHTO Right of Way & Utilities Subcommittee Meeting April 2010 Joyce Musick Missouri Department of Transportation.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Types of Work Zones Stationary Work Areas Moving Work Areas
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
86 th Annual Meeting January 24,2007 2:30 - 4:00, Hilton.
User perceptions of highway roughness
Passing Statistics  Most accidents occur on a two lane highway when vehicles collide head-on.  Most deaths are caused by improper and careless passing.
Snow and Ice Report Mn/DOT Operations Division Meeting June 2008.
Driver Education Rural Driving 82% of all miles in the U.S. are Rural Roads. Collisions in rural areas are equal to 2 x as many highway deaths as in.
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
Public Works Overview of Winter Salt Usage. Our Equipment The City of Mankato's Public Works Department plows 432 lane miles and uses an average of 2,400.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
5/12/2006 District Engineer Presentation Pavement Marking Activities and Performance.
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
Do Now Questions 1. When parking downhill on a street with a curb, the vehicles wheels should be? 2. The most common type of parking on city streets and.
AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
Snow & Ice Event/Bare Lane Training
Asecap member Autostrade per l’italia Spa speaker: gianmarco angeletti
Maintenance Rating Program Training
NAVIGATING THE WINTER WITH THE ILLINOIS TOLLWAY
lesson 15.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF RURAL DRIVING Rural roads account for
Presentation transcript:

Customers and Their Expectations The Mn/DOT Maintenance Perspective By Mark Wikelius MQA Peer Exchange, October 12 th, 2004

Overview Maintenance management modelMaintenance management model Market researchMarket research Targets/performance measuresTargets/performance measures

Maintenance Business Planning Measuring quality from the customers viewpoint customers viewpoint Decisions supported by data

Business View of the Maintenance Function

Maintenance Products and Service Clear roadways Smooth pavements Available bridges Attractive roadsides Safety features Highway permit/regulations Motorist services

Market Research Qualitative research Qualitative research Test our hypothesis of customer based products Test our hypothesis of customer based products Quantitative research Quantitative research Rank products and services by importance Rank products and services by importance Rate current level of performance Rate current level of performance Determine trade-offs between products and services Determine trade-offs between products and services

Market Research Re-check with the customer Re-check with the customer –importance, performance, trade-offs Seasonal impact - summer/winter Seasonal impact - summer/winter Customer opinions of roadside maintenance changes Customer opinions of roadside maintenance changes

Market Research Current customer expectations Current customer expectations –Importance –Performance Compare expectations & perceptions with 1994, 1996 results Compare expectations & perceptions with 1994, 1996 results

Importance and Performance

2000 Importance Ratings Safety Issues Driving/Roadway Conditions Roadside Environment

2000 Performance Ratings Safety Issues Driving/Roadway Conditions Roadside Environment

Omnibus Since mid-80’s –Economical, –Fairly quick –Multi-topic 800 statewide, representative and random phone interviews Balanced to Metro and GM

Maintenance Variables Measured Since ‘94 Road maintenance Clearing roads of snow and ice Keeping road surfaces smooth and comfortable Eliminating weeds Making highway signs clearly readable Making road stripes and markings clearly visible Removing litter and trash Keeping the plants, grasses and flowers looking good

Maintenance Trending Data (Statewide) Overall 7.3 Clear Roads (I&S) 7.6 Surface Smooth 6.7 Weeds Roadsides 7.1 Signage 8.3 Striping 7.5 Litter Removal 7.6 Plants & Flowers

1999 Snow and Ice Market Research Focus groupsFocus groups Level of service Level of service Acceptable/ Expected Acceptable/ Expected

Methodology Licensed drivers 16 years + Had to drive in the winter in Minnesota Saw videotapes of various winter driving road conditions - 2 Lane - 4 Lane divided - Interstate (Metro only)

2-Lane Road Greater Minnesota

2-Lane Road Metro

4-Lane Divided Greater Minnesota

4-Lane Divided Metro

Bare Lane Definition All driving lanes are free of snow and ice between the outer edges of the wheel paths and have less than 1 inch of accumulation on center of the roadway. All driving lanes are free of snow and ice between the outer edges of the wheel paths and have less than 1 inch of accumulation on center of the roadway. This is the condition at which most drivers feel safe and comfortable when driving at posted speeds. This is the condition at which most drivers feel safe and comfortable when driving at posted speeds.

BARE LANE INDICATOR GUIDELINES ClassificationAADTTarget Regain TimeBare Lane Description Super Commuter Urban Commuter Rural Commuter Primary Secondary Over 30,000 10,000 – 30,000 2,000 – 10, – 2,000 Under 800 hrs. 1-3 hrs. 2-5 hrs. 4-9 hrs hrs hrs Bare Lanes are defined the same for all classifications as follows: All driving lanes are free of snow and ice between the outer edges of the wheel paths and have less than 1 inch of accumulation on the center of the roadway (See Figure 1, , Bare Lanes – Indicator Value). This is the condition at which most drivers feel safe and comfortable when driving at posted speeds. The Bare Lane Regained date and time should be logged when this condition is obtained. ClassificationAADTTarget Regain TimeBare Lane Description Super Commuter Urban Commuter Rural Commuter Primary Secondary Over 30,000 10,000 – 30,000 2,000 – 10, – 2,000 Under 800 hrs. 1-3 hrs. 2-5 hrs. 4-9 hrs hrs hrs Bare Lanes are defined the same for all classifications as follows: All driving lanes are free of snow and ice between the outer edges of the wheel paths and have less than 1 inch of accumulation on the center of the roadway (See Figure 1, , Bare Lanes – Indicator Value). This is the condition at which most drivers feel safe and comfortable when driving at posted speeds. The Bare Lane Regained date and time should be logged when this condition is obtained.

Statewide Notes: See Executive Summary

Statewide Compare Notes: See District Summaries

Thank You