1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T0 offline status Alla Maevskaya Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow 8 October 2007 ALICE offline week For T0 group.
Advertisements

T-979: SiPM Time Resolution with DRS4 Readout Anatoly Ronzhin, Fermilab, AEM March 12, 2012 Team: Mike Albrow, Sergey Los, Pasha Murat, Erik Ramberg, Fermilab.
DCS meeting, CERN, 17 June 2002Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Forward Detectors DCS Forward Detectors (FWD): T0- quartz Cherenkov V0 - plastic scintillator.
JWG, 14 October, 2009, Vladislav Manko Status of work and plans of the Russian group in the ALICE Collaboration as of October, 2009.
Status of MRPC-TOF Wang Yi Department of Engineering Physics Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 1.
02/10/2004 Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator Counters (MBTS) for early ATLAS running M.Nessi ATLAS week, Freiburg.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Large Area, High Speed Photo-detectors Readout Jean-Francois Genat + On behalf and with the help of Herve Grabas +, Samuel Meehan +, Eric Oberla +, Fukun.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Investigation for Readout Electronics of WAC in LHAASO Shubin Liu University of Science & Technology of China April 22nd, 2009.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
Mauro Raggi Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326 Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
LHCC, V0, Sept The V0 detector (Mexico Lyon collaboration)  Segmentation  Simulated performances secondaries / beam-gas  Counters design 1 /
PHOBOS TOF Construction Status
Time of Flight Counter BESIII International Review Sep. 16, 2002 Heng Yuekun
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Denis Kuleshov Valday, February 3, 2015.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
QIE10 Issues Tom Zimmerman Fermilab Oct. 28,
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting June 8, 2005.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
PANDA FTOF Prototyping Anton A. Izotov, Gatchina
T0 status1W.H.Trzaska HIP Jyväskylä Status of T0 project ALICE Comprehensive Review IV March 23, 2004.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
29/ Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, NBI, Forward Detectors TDR FMD, T0, V0 Editorial team: I.G. Bearden (NBI) H. Bøggild (NBI) C.Holm (NBI)
CERN November 22, 20041W.H.Trzaska HIP Jyväskylä T0 answers Meeting with LHCC referees CERN, November 22, 2004.
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March Preparing for the V0 TDR (Lyon-Mexico project)  The V0 detector in 3 chapters  1 - Tests and simulations of detection.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
Status of TRD Pre-trigger System K. Oyama, T. Krawutschke, A. Rausch, J. Stachel, P. von Walter, R. Schicker and M. Stockmeier for the T0, V0, and TRD.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept and status of the PSD temperature control - Concept of the PSD analog part.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
CERN September 29, 20041W.H.Trzaska HIP Jyväskylä T0 – TDR 22 nd LHCC meeting; Open Session CERN, September 29, 2004 W.H.Trzaska (for T0 collaboration)
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Problems with PSD in Be runs - Modification of cooling system - New temperature control - Upgrade of HV control system - MAPD.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept of the PSD temperature stabilization and control - Upgrade of HV control system.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
CERN PH MIC group P. Jarron 07 November 06 GIGATRACKER Meeting Gigatracker Front end based on ultra fast NINO circuit P. Jarron, G. Anelli, F. Anghinolfi,
SDHCAL. outline  SDHCAL concept, validation and construction  Test Beam and technological prototype performance  Perspectives and Conclusion  SDHCAL.
SP- 41 magnet ZDC RPC (TOF) DC ST Target T0 detector MPD / NICA and / Nuclotron Experiments Picosecond Cherenkov detectors for heavy ion experiments.
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
V0 present status of the V0 project at CERN A. Sandoval, R. Alfaro.
Trigger system for setup 2016 V. Rogov, V. Yurevich,D.Bogoslovski, S.Sergeev, O.Batenkov* LHEP JINR *V. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
Event reconstruction for the RICH prototype beamtest data 2014
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
Alternative FEE electronics for FIT.
F.Guber, A.Ivashkin INR, Moscow
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
Timing Counter Sept CSN I, Assisi 2004 Giorgio Cecchet.
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
X. Zhu1, 3, Z. Deng1, 3, A. Lan2, X. Sun2, Y. Liu1, 3, Y. Shao2
Development of hybrid photomultiplier for Hyper-Kamiokande
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Evolution of T0 detector concept Initial proposal (TP, MoU) one detector does it all (MCP) cost ~1.5 MCHF (Greece, Russia) Fall 2000 split of FMD into 3 sub.detectors:  Si FMDV0  Si FMD, V0 and T0  T0 (cost ~200 kCHF) Spring 2001 Choice of PMT-based T0 (worked-out by a Russian team) Spring 2002 Finland commits 200 kCHF to T0 and joins the T0 collaboration

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 must work for all ions and for all energy densities central minimum bias

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Main requirements: Precise timing (50 ps) also on-line Main LVL0 trigger Rough on-line vertex (1.5 cm) Beam – gas suppression Pre-trigger for TDR Event spacing 25 ns (pp) Provide backup for V0 and FMD Operates in the magnetic field (0.5 T) Huge dynamic range (almost 1:1000)

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 – the final configuration: Two arrays of 12 PMTs with quartz radiators T0 Right ( m) T0 Left ( m) Two shoe boxes of fast electronics inside the magnet (+5 m and –5 m) Few creates of electronics outside the magnet Laser calibration system also outside the magnet

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Output signals: T0 = (t r +t l )/2+t d T0 v = t r -t l (ON/OFF adjustable during run) T0-L, T0-R, Coinc Time and energies (all 24 PMTs) 3 levels of sum energy Low Medium High

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 Left & T0 Right arrays: T0 L -5 <  < -4.5 T0 R 2.9 <  < 3.3

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Mechanics – T0 Right

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 Left

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0-Right 1:1 prototype: T0-Right 1:1 prototype:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Front view:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Back view:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March End-cups on the base side:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Mounting of the optical fibre (  0.4 mm)

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March PiLaser PiLaser 400 nm pulse width <40ps roughly 400mW optical peak out of the fibre

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Possible location of shoe boxes: Box 50 W Box 50 W 12 PMT full current <15 W

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Inside the shoe box: Dual CFD Unit Dual CFD Unit

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Characteristics of the Dual CFD Unit

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Pre-TDR timetable Production completed by July 2005 Fully assembled T0 Tests before shipment to CERN Oct Shipment to CERN – November 2005 Final tests – December 2005 Installation in ALICE – March 2006

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Pre-TDR financing 200 kCHF from Finland Sufficient to cover the detector and front- end electronics Readout electronics and integration with DAQ Collaboration with TOF group Greek contribution

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Highlights of 2002: Completion of the first draft of TDR (100 pages!) Mechanical prototype of T0 Right Final multiplicity resolution simulations Electronic prototypes: Dual CFD Unit (2 prototypes) Mean timer Circuit for generating T0 V signal Choice of laser and the layout of the laser calibration system

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Still to be chosen: Final choice of time discriminators (test CERN in July 2003) Final configuration of readout electronics, DAQ and trigger collaboration with TOF discussions with the Greek team

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Measured performance of CFDU (JYFL) prototype 5.3 ps/ch Jitter = 25 ps (fwhm)

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March The third option: T0T0 T logA

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Mean timer prototype

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 V DC Fast digitiser for T0 V signal Range of coded time intervals ±2.5 ns Digitisation step 20 ps (for 8-bit) Dead time not more than 25 ns TAC + Flash ADC

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March T0 V DC performance Delay [ns] vs. channel number Calibration spectrum

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Cables and connection from L3 HV cables 2 x 12 Coaxial cables Thresholds2 x 12 Bunch crossing2 x 1 Time individual2 x 12 Output Amplitudes2 x 12 TRD wake up2 x 4 T0 right/left2 x 1 Optical fibre 2 x 12

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March General, preliminary readout scheme for T0:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Layout and connections:

W.H.T.LHCC Comprehensive Review, March Large change compared to the previous version of PYTHIA: Efficiency of registration of p-p collisions