Online Universal Screening/Progress Monitoring to Measure Response to Social Skills Intervention 2012 National PBIS Leadership Forum Oct 19 10:55-12:10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Training in Instructional Consultation, Assessment & Teaming Todd A. Gravois, Ph.D. Edward Gickling, Ph.D. & Sylvia Rosenfield, Ph.D.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Parent Tutoring (PT) An Individualized Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Reading Problems Study 1 Duvall, Delquadri, Elliott & Hall (1992) Study 2.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
Elementary Social Behavior Assessment: Integrating Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring to Measure Behavioral Response to Intervention Jeffrey Sprague,
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Innovation Configurations Daniel J. Reschly, Ph.D., and Susan.
K ILLING 2 B IRDS WITH 1 T RIANGLE R T I & PBIS Dean Richards, OrRtI Sarah Crane-Simpson, UMESD.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
SPDG Implementation Conversations Show-Me Implementation September 14, :00 PM – 4:00 PM, EDT.
Implementing First Step to Success: A Tier 2 Behavioral Intervention Helen Jarvis – Reading Specialist Morgan Kraus - Classroom Teacher Bartley Elementary,
1 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 1 Report September 22, 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Research and Policy Support Group FOR PRESS OFFICE.
Enhanced Implementation of CDC Guidelines for School Tobacco Programs: Results of a Statewide Evaluation Shelly A. Greller, MS Wisconsin Department of.
TITLE SLIDE Professor Kurt Lambeck, President, Australian Academy of Science.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
RTI Essential Components Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto National Consultant, Learning Forward, President, Learning Forward Oregon Leadership.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Response to Intervention Guidance Overview November 6, :00 am Our session will start momentarily. While you are waiting, please do the following:
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
© 2011 Commonwealth Corporation 1 Review of Pilot 1 (2011) Assessment Navjeet Singh, Vice President of Applied Research & Evaluation
Michelle Hinzman Barbara Pline Chamoni DeLong Pamela Fields Functional Assessment of Academic Performance How to select, assess, and provide interventions.
The Kirkpatrick Model organizational change Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Priority Initiative for KSDE Multi Tiered System of Support.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
School Climate Transformation Grant. SSAISD Learner Profile ▪Reflects to set personal goals ▪Is an accomplished reader ▪Employs digital skills ▪Is an.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Welcome to Eagleview RTI Reading & Math.
Universal Design for Learning
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Data-Based Decision Making
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
Presentation transcript:

Online Universal Screening/Progress Monitoring to Measure Response to Social Skills Intervention 2012 National PBIS Leadership Forum Oct 19 10:55-12:10 Jeffrey Sprague, Ph.D., Principal Investigator, University of Oregon ∙ Calli Dean, Behavior Specialist, Thurston School District, Springfield Oregon ∙ Jessie Marquez, Instructional Designer Pamela Yeaton, Co-Investigator Brion Marquez, Principal Investigator IRIS Educational Media, Eugene, OR

E fficient and engaging delivery of evidence-based social skills lessons combined with universal screening and continuous progress monitoring will result in better student outcomes and improved teacher efficacy and effectiveness in early elementary school settings. –Walker, Marquez, Yeaton et al; in press –Marquez, Marquez, Vincent, Pennefather, Yeaton, Sprague; in press

Purpose of presentation R eport on an K-3 social/behavioral intervention that used online screening and progress monitoring (irisPMT™) in conjunction with media-based social skills instruction (We Have Skills!). This intervention was developed by IRIS Educational Media with support from a grant by the Institute of Education Sciences.

T he following slides contain links to videos that describe: The social skills intervention: We Have Skills! The universal screening and progress monitoring tool—irisPMT™.

T his introductory video provides an overview of the social skills curriculum and the tool that measures student response to the curriculum.

T he premise of We Have Skills! is that students can learn social skills through direct and explicit instruction. We recommend that teachers first use the program as universal classroom instruction as shown in this video.

T his video shows how universal screening for behavioral skills gives teachers valuable information about what students have learned, who needs more help, and what areas of instruction to target.

Watch how targeted instruction (Tier II support) ensures that each student gets the level of support that they need.

S tudents who are being progress monitored receive targeted support provides teachers with data about student learning.

Development We Have Skills! and the irisPMT™ were developed using an iterative process that involved practitioners, students, parents, school personnel, and research scientists. Technology applications were tested for usability. In 2010, we conducted an evaluation of We Have Skills! with the irisPMT™

Evaluation Randomized waitlist controlled trial with 70 K-3 classrooms, randomly assigned to condition, including 1616 students (Marquez et al., 2012). Intervention group received training and access to intervention components; control group conducted business as usual and received the intervention at the end of the study. Teachers in the intervention condition taught one social skills lesson a week for 8 weeks. Teachers in both conditions used the irisPMT™ to screen students’ social skills.

Measures Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale-Short Form (TSES; Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). Teachers completed a pre and post-intervention universal screening of their students using the irisPMT™ Additional student measures at posttest included the Brief Behavior Rating Scale (BBRS; Gresham et al., 2010).

Measures (continued) Teacher attitudes, Stages of Concern (SOC; Hall, George, & Rutherford, 1986) User satisfaction (Rusby, Taylor, & Marquez, 2004) Technology acceptance (TAM; Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989).

Results Improved student social skills. – Students in the intervention condition (M = 32.8) scored significantly higher than students in the control condition (M = 32.2, F (1,58) = 6.97, p =.011). –Students in the intervention condition improved by an average of 3.5 points on the PMT universal screening assessment while students in the control condition improved by 1.7 points.

Results (continued) Improved teacher self efficacy. –Teachers in the intervention condition reported greater gains (M =.54) in self-efficacy, measured by the TSES, than teachers in the control condition (M =.13; F (1, 67) = 4.82, p =.032 ).

Results (continued) Consumer satisfaction on We Have Skills! –Teachers were very satisfied with the student materials, with a mean consumer satisfaction score of 5.39 out of 6. –100% of teachers said they would recommend the overall program to other teachers (56% said strongly recommend) and 100% said they were likely to use the program in the classroom (59% reported the highest likelihood). Consumer satisfaction on the irisPMT™ –Overall satisfaction with out of 6; significantly higher than neutral (3.5), t(34) = 2.615, p <.05.

Results (continued) PMT Scale Analysis –The PMT demonstrated strong internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha =.95). –Student post-intervention PMT scores significantly correlated with the BBRS (r = -.766; F (1, 1547) = , p <.001) –Another study with 187 elementary school students also demonstrated a significant correlation of the PMT (r =.83, F (1,185) = 423.5, p <.001) with the Walker McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment (Walker & McConnell, 1995).

For more information Click on We Have Skills!We Have Skills! Click on irisPMT™irisPMT™ Providing school communities with research-based training and tools that support positive educational outcomes.