FP420/AFP Timing Two types of Cerenkov detector are employed: QUARTIC – two QUARTIC detectors each with 4 rows of 8 fused silica bar allowing up to a 4-fold.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

T958! Fermilab Test beam experiment to study fast timing counters for FP420 MOU between UTA, Alberta, Louvain, Fermilab (Brandt spokesman) Data taking.
AFP QUARTIC Fast Timing System James L Pinfold University of Alberta.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
QUARTZTOFMike Albrow CMS-FP420 April 28 th 2008 QUARTZTOF An isochronous & achromatic Cerenkov Counter Making Cerenkov light parallel  point focusing.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Photodetector Timing Resolution Burle Micro-Channel Plate Photo Multiplier Tubes (MCP-PMTs) H. Wells Wulsin SLAC Group B Winter 2005.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Study of GEM-TPC Performance in Magnetic Fields Dean Karlen, Paul Poffenberger, Gabe Rosenbaum University of Victoria and TRIUMF, Canada 2005 ALCPG Workshop.
1 QUARTIC, A TOF for ATLAS/CMS Forward Protons You didn’t know that ATLAS+CMS had forward protons? FP420 = Forward Protons 420m downstream of CMS & ATLAS.
The UC Simulation of Picosecond Detectors Pico-Sec Timing Hardware Workshop November 18, 2005 Timothy Credo.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
1 QUARTIC: UTA Update Andrew Brandt, Chance Harenza, Joaquin Noyola, Pedro Duarte Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time resolution.
Groups Involved University of Alberta, University of Texas at Arlington, University College London. Prague, Saclay, Stoneybrook, Giessen, Manchester,
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
LHC Fast Timing Detector R&D Use arrival time difference between protons to measure z- vertex compared with the central tracking primary vertex Purpose:
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Fast Timing Workshop Krakow, Nov 29 - Dec 1 st 2010 Part 2b.
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
1 Fast Timing via Cerenkov Radiation‏ Earle Wilson, Advisor: Hans Wenzel Fermilab CMS/ATLAS Fast Timing Simulation Meeting July 17,
Blair Ratcliff2 nd Workshop on SuperB, Frascati, March Status Update: the Focusing DIRC Prototype at SLAC Blair Ratcliff Blair Ratcliff Representing:
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
Performance of the PANDA Barrel DIRC Prototype 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt 2 Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Marko Zühlsdorf.
ATLAS Forward Proton Electronics Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington 1 AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream.
1 QUARTIC Update Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL), Jim Pinfold (Alberta) Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time.
The primary goal has been to have the AFP timing system fully defined for the AFP Technical Proposal by December The end result should be a system.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,
Andrew BrandtSept 13 th 2005FP420/Cerenkov Intro 1 Location of LHC in France and Switzerland, with lake Geneva and the Alps in the background The ATLAS.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
Mike AlbrowSept 14 th 2006Time-of-Flight with GASTOFs im Test Beam 1 Fast Timing Counters for FP420/CMS and Test Beam Particle ID Mike Albrow, September.
Fast Timing Mtg April 15 th 2009 Mike Albrow Fast Timing studies at Fermilab : Test beam plans notes from meeting April 15 th 2009 MTest May Wed 27 th.
Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya) Ljubljana, Hawaii, Cincinnati and PID group - R&D status - Structure design - Prototype study - Beam test - Photon.
T979 QUARTIC Timing detectors for HPS240 M.Albrow, A.Ronzhin, S.Malik, Sergey Los, A.Zatserklyanyi, E.Ramberg, Heejong Kim New physics channels for CMS.
Mike AlbrowAll Experimenters, June 8 th 2009T979: Tests of Precision Timing MTest 1 Tests of Fast Timing Detectors in the Meson Test Beam (T979)
1 10 Psec Workshop April 28 at UTA Follow up on visit to SLAC to meet Jerry Va’vra and very successful Pico-Second Timing Hardware Workshop at University.
1992PH.D. UCLA/CERN (UA8 Experiment discovered hard diffraction) Post-doc and Wilson Fellow at Fermilab -Discovered hard color singlet exchange.
Beam Halo Monitor : Q-bars+SiPMMike Albrow, 26 Aug 2010 A Beam Halo Monitor for the LHC based on Quartz Cherenkov Counters Mike Albrow (Fermilab) Features:
Scan ~100 bar entry positions with laser diode measures transmitted intensity (relative to reference intensity) determine attenuation length (Λ) by aiming.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Amir Farbin, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate.
1 Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike’s concept for a fast time resolution Cerenkov counter: proton Microchannel plate PMT Initial design uses 2 mm 2 rods,
Module-0 of AFP ToF Detector Libor Nozka on behalf of ATLAS Forward Proton Group Palacky University 1.
Overview of detector requirements Purpose: To put today’s session into context. Steve Watts and Krzysztof Piotrzkowski.
FP420/AFP Fast Timing Stage I: LHC luminosity 2 x10 33  t < 20 ps (
Pileup Background Rejection Ex, Two protons from one interaction and two b-jets from another Fast Timing Detectors for FP420 z=c(TR-TL)/2  z (mm) =0.21.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
AFP Fast Timing System Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington in collaboration with Alberta, Giessen, Stony Brook, and FNAL, Louvain, LLNL (CMS)
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
A Barrel DIRC using radiator plates AntiProton ANnihilations at DArmstadt Study of QCD with Antiprotons Charmonium Spectroscopy Search for Exotics Hadrons.
FORWARD ATLAS {major contributions from Per Grafstrom (CERN), Michael Rijssenbeek (Stonybrook), Brian Cox (Manchester} Andrew Brandt Luminosity measurement.
10 picoseconds original design goal (light travels 3mm in 10 psec!) gives large factor of background rejection; Phase I: lum up to several  t
PROJECT X PHYSICS STUDY WORKSHOP (PXPS 2012) Working Group on Time of Flight Conveners: Mike Albrow (FNAL) & Bob Wagner (ANL) New directions in fast timing:
Mike Albrow, FermilabHPS Comments, Manchester 20l0 Some random HPS comments Mike Albrow HPS is accepted in CMS as an R&D project : Physics case is accepted.
Reed Research Reactor reactor.reed.edu/pictures.html reactor.reed.edu/pictures.html 1 Moriah Tobin Modeling Quartz Cherenkov Detectors.
Time resolution for the full detector system: 1. Intrinsec detector time resolution 2. Jitter in PMT's 3. Electronics (AMP/CFD/TDC) 4. Reference Timing.
Mike AlbrowHPS – Nov 25thQUARTICs : Tests and Plans 1 May-June Fermilab beam tests The next QUARTICs Test plans … unfortunately delayed SiPMs …. Wavelet.
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington
HPS: R&D issues Krzysztof Piotrzkowski (UCLouvain/CERN)
Test Beam Studies for FP420 Fast Timing
Jim Pinfold & Yushu Yao Mar. 27, 2007
Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL),
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Variable distance from beam.
Presentation transcript:

FP420/AFP Timing Two types of Cerenkov detector are employed: QUARTIC – two QUARTIC detectors each with 4 rows of 8 fused silica bar allowing up to a 4-fold improvement over the single bar 40 ps measurement GASTOF – a gas Cerenkov detector that makes a single 10 ps measurement Both detectors use Micro Channel Plate PMTs (MCP-PMTs) 17/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim Andrew Brandt (University of Texas, Arlington)

Overall ATLAS Timing Project Goals 1) Develop, fund, build, and install a fast timing detector system capable of <20 ps measurement in early ) Develop, fund, build, and install a fast timing detector system capable of <10 ps measurement and operation at high luminosity in early 2013 (this adds rate, lifetime, and multiple proton timing concerns) Note to Mike: For AFP (220 m +420 m detectors) need to time all protons in event over a 25 mm x 25 mm area! (if only doing 420 m, area is smaller and multiple proton timing is less important) 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim2

Simulation Goals 1) Produce an accurate simulation of timing detectors for detector development 2) Include a baseline detector in full simulation for studies of background in detector 3) Focus and coordinate effort where possible to minimize duplication of effort and maximize usefulness 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim3

Simulation Organization On the ATLAS side the overall software coordinator is Mario Campanelli. Anatoli Astvatsatourov will be coordinating the ATLAS timing detector simulation effort. I am hoping to fade into the background and have Anatoli take over running these meetings and get back to detector development after kick starting this effort. If CMS would like to propose a counterpart to Anatoli to help coordinate this effort, please do. 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim4

Detector Design Tools 1) Imagination 2) Ray tracing simulation (custom or Cyber Ray) 3) GEANT Simulation 4) Laser test stand 5) Test beam 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim5

UTA Ray Tracing Simulation of QUARTIC 15 mm bar/75 mm aluminized air light guide 20 ps ~ 5 pe’s accepted in 20 ps 7/17/20096Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim

QUARTIC 90 mm bar/0 mm guide 40 ps ~ 10 pe’s accepted in 40 ps 7/17/20097Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim

2008 QUARTIC Prototype Testing long bars 90 mm (HE to HH) and mini bars 15 mm (HA to HD) Long bars more light from total internal reflection vs. losses from reflection in air light guide, but more time dispersion due to n( ) HE HH HC Note: prior to June 2008 test beam, results marginal for QUARTIC 15mm bar: 80 ps/bar 80% efficient; allows you to reach close to 20 ps, but not 10 ps 7/17/20098Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim

Dt QUARTIC Timing 2008 CERN TB 56.6/1.4=40 ps/bar including CFD! Time difference between two 9 cm quartz bars after Louvain constant fraction discrimination is 56 ps, implies a single bar resolution of 40 ps for about 10 pe’s (expected 10 pe’s from simulations). N pe =(area/rms) 2 9

10 FNAL Beam tests give ps resolution from Quartz bar, this is consistent with CERN TB results ~40 ps total for bar +Burle MCP-PMT combined with UTA Laser tests which show ~30 ps from Burle MCP-PMT. (30+30=40!) C B A Includes electronics (~3 ps) and 2 mm beam width smear (A,B) Δt = 2 mm x (10 ps/2 mm)

Questions that simulation combined with laser/test beam can address How many accepted pe’s as a function of bar cross section area, length, and angle Time and wavelength distribution of pe’s What photocathode is optimal Is filtering light in a certain wavelength range beneficial Can we use quartz fibers, or some other lower index fiber instead of quartz bars—could improve binning and rate/lifetime issues, lead to other designs How do different MCP-PMT’s respond to light that arrives at different times (UTA laser guys are working on this as we speak) 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim11

Conclusions Simulation is important-lets get coordinated Better to simulate first and build later (often we get this backwards) Combining simulation with laser and test beam efforts would optimize fast timing effort 7/17/2009Andrew Brandt (UTA) FP420 Tim Sim12