Current problems in dust collision physics  No approved model for single-grain collision  lab data (e.g. Poppe et al. 2000 for µm particles): sticking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proto-Planetary Disk and Planetary Formation
Advertisements

Dust Growth in Transitional Disks Paola Pinilla PhD student Heidelberg University ZAH/ITA 1st ITA-MPIA/Heidelberg-IPAG Colloquium "Signs of planetary formation.
Raw water Treated water
Non-steady-state dust formation in the ejecta of Type Ia supernovae 2013/08/06 Takaya Nozawa (Kavli IPMU, University of Tokyo) Collaborators: Takashi Kozasa.
Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Energy-based Modeling of Tangential Compliance in 3-Dimensional Impact Yan-Bin Jia Department of.
3 – Fracture of Materials
REBOUNDS WITH A RESTITUTION COEFFICIENT LARGER THAN UNITY IN NANOCLUSTER COLLISIONS Hiroto Kuninaka Faculty of Education, Mie Univ. Physics of Granular.
Neal Turner Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Protostellar Disks: Birth, Life and Death National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Planet Formation Topic: Dust motion and coagulation Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond.
Particle Settling Velocity Put particle in a still fluid… what happens? Speed at which particle settles depends on: particle properties: D, ρ s, shape.
Foundations of Physics Workshop: The Momentum Collider.
1Notes  Reference  Witkin and Baraff, “Physically Based Modelling” course, SIGGRAPH 2001  Link on the course website.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of VLF Waves for Space Applications W.A. Scales Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech.
Planetesimal Formation gas drag settling of dust turbulent diffusion damping and excitation mechanisms for planetesimals embedded in disks minimum mass.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Impact for Particles The focus of this class is particle impact. We will not discuss impact for rigid bodies. Terminology: Central Impact: The incident.
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
The formation of stars and planets
Dusty Plasmas M. Coppins M. Bacharis C. Willis T. Zimmermann J. Allen Z. Ehsan.
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
March 13, CCLDAS Particle-in-Cell Simulations of the Lunar Dusty Plasma Environment A. Poppe & M. Horányi Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
Comets as test cases for planetesimal- formation scenarios Jürgen Blum Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik Technische Universität Braunschweig.
Event selection at lower incident energies Exists a strong correlation between all impact parameter dependent observables. Possible to exclude peripheral.
Identified and Inclusive Charged Hadron Spectra from PHENIX Carla M Vale Iowa State University for the PHENIX Collaboration WWND, March
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
Dust emission in SNR 1987A and high-z dust observations Takaya Nozawa (Kavli IPMU) 2013/10/24 〇 Contents of this talk - Introduction - Our ALMA proposals.
A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Carsten Güttler & Jürgen Blum Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik, TU Braunschweig,
- Mid-rapidity emission in heavy ion collisions at intermediate energies - Source reconstruction - Free nucleon multiplicities - Neutron/proton ratio of.
Buffering Capacity of Granular Matter to Impact Force State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment Dalian University of Technology.
Peter Young* George Mason University, VA Uri Feldman Artep Inc, MD *Work funded by NSF and NASA.
MODELING FORMATION OF SELF- GRAVITATING DUST CONDENSATIONS AND ORIGINAL PLANETESIMALS IN A PROTOPLANETARY DISK A. B. Makalkin, I. N. Ziglina, Schmidt Institute.
The modeling of the channel deformations in the rivers flowing into permafrost with an increase in ambient temperature E. Debolskaya, E. Zamjatina, I.Gritsuk.
Dusty Plasmas in the Laboratory and Space Bob Merlino April 2003 APS Meeting Philadelphia, PA.
Detecting Cool Dust in SNRs in LMC and SMC with ALMA Takaya Nozawa (Kavli IPMU) and Masaomi Tanaka (NAOJ) 2012/6/11 Targets ・ SN 1987A: our proposal for.
Cratering on Nix and Hydra William Bottke (SwRI).
The Kinetic Molecular Theory of Matter Describe each word to define: Kinetic Molecular Theory Matter.
Synergism in magnetosphere- exosphere-ice interactions enhances gas trapping and radiation chemistry Raúl A. Baragiola University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out.
Numerical Modeling in Astronomy By Astronomers who sleep at night.
Astronomy in Heidelberg. ZAH-ITA ZAH-ARI ZAH-LSW MPIA MPIK HITS Altstadt HdA.
Spectator response to participants blast - experimental evidence and possible implications New tool for investigating the momentum- dependent properties.
Pp and d-Au at RHIC Contents: Interesting data from RHIC High parton densities pp and d-Au results Conclusion Fuming LIU (IOPP, Wuhan), Tanguy Pierog,
Reaction studies with low-energy weakly-bound beams Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud NN 2015Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Planetesimal dynamics in self-gravitating discs Giuseppe Lodato IoA - Cambridge.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Are transition discs much commoner in M stars? Recent claim that 50% of discs around M stars are in transition (Sicilia-Aguilar et al 2008) CAREFUL! For.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
QM2008 Jaipur, India Feb.4– Feb. 10, STAR's Measurement of Long-range Forward- backward Multiplicity Correlations as the Signature of “Dense Partonic.
HIF2004 Atomic physics-HEDM  N°1 good news : US will focus on HEDM physics !  N°2 good news : SIS-100 will be funded : HEDgeHOB collaboration, 38 institutions,
Chun-Wang Ma( 马春旺 ) Henan Normal University 河南师范大学 (
Dust formation theory in astronomical environments
Star and Planet Formation
C70 and C60 colliding with slow highly charged ions – a comparison
Filtration and Coil Fouling
Three-dimensional collision analysis of millimeter-sized dust aggregates R.Weidling and J. Blum, IGEP, TU Braunschweig
P4 : Stellar system formation and life appearance conditions
The Kinetic Molecular Theory Of Gases
Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Improving Estimates of Tsunami Propagation Speed
Coulomb’s Law.
Daniel D. Durda (Southwest Research Institute)
Dust Evolution & Planet Traps: Effects on Planet Populations
Dust formation theory in astronomical environments
The Formation of Planetesimals – the Laboratory Perspective
On the non-steady-state nucleation rate
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference,
Presentation transcript:

Current problems in dust collision physics  No approved model for single-grain collision  lab data (e.g. Poppe et al for µm particles): sticking threshold, coefficient of restitution, charging  transition from elastic to plastic particle interaction at what displacement?  new MD approach by H. Tanaka  Retention of small grains in PPDs (talk by Henning)  are we treating the dust collisions incorrectly and are we, thus, missing the fragmentation-induced release of small dust particles?  or are we missing a fundamental (transport?) process?  if meter-size aggregates exist, Schräpler & Blum (ApJ, subm.) can explain retention of µm-size grains close to the midplane (see also Paraskov et al. 2006)  Bouncing or not bouncing? (talks by Güttler, Wada, Seizinger)  Bouncing of aggregates in MD simulations by Wada only observed for unrealistically dense aggregates (C.N. > 6)  does the bouncing barrier really exist? (Wada vs Güttler/Blum/Seizinger)  what is the difference between experiments and model (e.g. particle/monomer size)?  are we missing or mis-matching a model parameter?  is (micro-) sintering important?  can new calculations on GPUs help solve this discrepancy (Seizinger talk)?  first bouncing observed! Good agreement with quasi-static compression experiments!  SPH does show bouncing (Güttler et al. 2009; Geretshauser et al. 2010)! Why? 2:1 (at half-time)

Current problems in dust collision physics (cont’d)  Growth or erosion at high impact velocities?  growth with mm-sized projectiles (on large targets) (talk by Wurm)  erosion with µm-sized particles (experiments by Schräpler & Blum, subm. to ApJ)  we need self-consistent model !  but maybe turbulence-caused collision velocities much smaller (talk by Klahr)!  Does onset of fragmentation cause new growth mode? (talks by Güttler and Wurm; work by Zsom et al., in prep.)  self-consistency of fragmentation-agglomeration hypothesis needs to be checked  earlier simple models by Dullemond, Brauer, Birnstiel, … need to be re-calculated with new laboratory data  “Stickiness” of ice  Do ice particle stick at higher velocity than silicates (talks by Wada and Arakawa)?  new experiments with ice agglomerates by Wurm and by Arakawa  sticking, bouncing, fragmentation observed; qualitatively similar to silicates  sintering is important for impact strength  no experiments for non-sintered ice  no experiments at T<150 K yet  Role of charging for dust growth?  is there a “freeze-out” of dust aggregates due to electrostatic repulsion (talk by Okuzumi) ?  how do dust aggregates charge in mutual collisions (talk by Muranushi) ?  role of lightnings in PPDs?

Current problems in dust collision physics (cont’d)  Porosity matters! (talks by Güttler and Wurm)  we are getting more and more data on the role of porosity and the porosity evolution in dust collisions  High-speed collisions (talks by Nakamura and Krivov)  detection of very small ejecta (down to ~ µm) in Aerogel  very steep ejecta size distribution  still problems for plastic-covered solid impactors (role of nylon?)  critical fragmentation energy at dust sizes unknown (talk by Krivov) Anybody interested in a coordinated Japanese-German program on Dust Collisions in Astrophysics ?  There have recently been the first three German- Japanese research groups funded through DFG/JST