Causation ? Tim Wiemken, PhD MPH CIC Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville, Kentucky
1. Testing for an Association 3. Confidence Intervals 2. Other Measures of Association Overview
3. Confidence Intervals 2. Other Measures of Association Overview 1. Testing for an Association
Null hypothesis: There is no association Alternative hypothesis: There is an association 1. Develop hypothesis Testing for Association
1. Develop hypothesis Testing for Association
What P-value will you consider statistically significant? Usually arguments for bigger/smaller 2. Choose your level of significance α value Testing for Association
Call your statistician. A bad test gives bad results. A good test may give bad results (bad data?). A good statistician may tell you if the results are bad, but cannot always tell you if the data were bad. 3. Choose Your Test Testing for Association
Will tell you if there is an association between two variables Chi-squared Test Testing for Association
Will tell you if there is an association between two variables Chi-squared Test Testing for Association Measures observed versus expected counts in study groups
Will tell you if there is an association between two variables Chi-squared Test Testing for Association Measures observed versus expected counts in study groups Must have adequate sample size
2x2 table – categorical data Chi-squared Test Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Testing for Association
Example Research question: Does HIV impact mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia?
Hospitalized CAP Patients HIV+ HIV- Dead Alive Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In-Hospital Mortality? Example
Hospitalized CAP Patients HIV+ HIV- Dead Alive Predictor Variable: ? Example
Hospitalized CAP Patients HIV+ HIV- Dead Alive Outcome Variable: ? Example
Significance Level Null Hypothesis What Test? Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In-Hospital Mortality? Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? + HIV, - died: - HIV, - died: + HIV, + died : - HIV, + died : Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? How many patients died in- hospital? Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? How many patients died in- hospital? n=27 Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? How many patients had HIV? Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? How many patients had HIV? n=30 Example
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV+ HIV- Example n=27 n=30 n=100
=countifs(b2:b101, 1, z2:z101, 1) Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? How many patients with HIV died? Example count the number of cases of deaths (column b, in_hosp_mort=1) that had HIV (column z, hiv=1)
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV+11 HIV- Example n=27 n=30 n=100
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV+11 HIV = 16 Example n=27 n=30 n=100
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV = 19 HIV = 16 Example n=27 n=30 n=100
Check this! Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV = 19 HIV = 16 Example n=27 n=30 n=100 =countifs(b2:b101, 0, z2:z101, 1)
Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV = 19 HIV = – ( ) = 54 Example n=27 n=30 n=100
Plug the data into your excel stats program Does HIV Have an Effect on Patient In- Hospital Mortality? Dead +Dead - HIV = 19 HIV = – ( ) = 54 Example
Do they? Example
No! P=0.154 P>0.05 Do they? Example
Where to publish? Example
Example Maybe those without HIV are older than those with HIV, so the mortality ends up the same
Example How do we check this?
Null Hypothesis: Example Alternative Hypothesis:
Null Hypothesis: The age of patients with and without HIV are NOT different. Example Alternative Hypothesis: The age of patients with and without HIV ARE different.
Is age different in patients with and without HIV? patients? Example
Back to your dataset! Total cases of HIV mean age HIV SD age HIV Total cases of non-HIV mean age non HIV SD age non HIV Example
Total Cases Total cases of HIV =countif(Z2:Z101,1) Total cases of non-HIV =countif(Z2:Z101,0) Example
Average Age =averageif(Z2:Z101,1,AN2:AN101) Example =averageif(Z2:Z101,0,AN2:AN101) HIV+ HIV-
Standard Deviations… not as easy. =stdev(if(Z2:Z101=1,AN2:AN101)) Example Need to use an Array and a nested IF HIV+ DON’T HIT ENTER!!!!!!!!!
Standard Deviations… not as easy. =stdev(if(Z2:Z101=1,AN2:AN101)) Example Need to use an Array and a nested IF HIV+ ON WINDOWS: Control+Shift+Enter ON MAC: Command+Enter
Back to your stats program! Total cases of HIV = 30 mean age HIV: 50.3 SD age HIV: Total cases of non-HIV = 70 mean age non HIV: 56.5 SD age non HIV: Example
Is it? Example
NO! P>0.05 Do they? Example BUT IT IS SOOOOO CLOSE!
3. Confidence Intervals 1. Testing for an Association 2. Other Measures of Association Overview
Used for cohort studies or clinical trials Gold standard measure for observational studies 1. Risk Ratio Answers: How much more (less) likely is this group to get an outcome versus this other group? Measures of Association
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not admitted to the ICU? Example Use the 2x2 Totals Tab Total with outcome: Total without outcome:
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not admitted to the ICU? Example Use the 2x2 Totals Tab Total with outcome: =countif(B2:B101,1) n=27 Total without outcome: 100 – 27 n=73
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not admitted to the ICU? Example Total with outcome in the ICU: Total without outcome in the ICU:
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not admitted to the ICU? Example Total with outcome in the ICU: =countifs(B2:B101,1,I2:I101,1) n=9 Total without outcome in the ICU: =countifs(B2:B101,0,I2:I101,1) n=7
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not in the ICU? Example Dead +Dead - ICU+97 ICU-?? P=0.004
Do those admitted to the ICU die more than those not in the ICU? Example Dead +Dead - ICU+97 ICU = 1873 – 7 = 66 P=0.004
How much more likely are those admitted to the ICU to die? Example Risk of death in ICU group: 9/ 9+7= 56.3% Dead +Dead - ICU+97 ICU-1866
How much more likely are those admitted to the ICU to die? Example Risk of death in ICUgroup: 9/ 9+7= 56.3% Risk of death in non ICU group: 18/ 18+66= 21.4% Dead +Dead - ICU+97 ICU-1866
How much more likely are those admitted to the ICU to die? Example Risk of death in ICUgroup: 9/ 9+7= 56.3% Risk of death in non ICU group: 18/ 18+66= 21.4% Dead +Dead - ICU+97 ICU-1866 Risk Ratio: 0.563/0.214 = 2.63
Interpret the Risk Ratio Example Who wants to interpret a risk ratio of 2.63?
Interpret the Risk Ratio Example Patients admitted to the ICU are 2.63 times more likely to die than those patients not admitted to the ICU.
Example
CAP Patients Empiric Atypical Pathogen Coverage No Empiric Atypical Pathogen Coverage Dead Alive Does Empiric Atypical Pathogen Coverage Have an Effect on Patient Mortality? Example
Assuming a cohort study… Do those patients who have empiric atypical pathogen coverage die less often than those without atypical coverage? + Atypical : Atypical : Atypical + died : Atypical + died : 110 Example
Assuming a cohort study… Do those patients who have atypical pathogen coverage die more often than those without atypical coverage? Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Example
Assuming a cohort study… Do those patients who have empiric atypical pathogen coverage die less often than those without atypical coverage? + Atypical : Atypical : Atypical + died : Atypical + died : 110 Example
Assuming a cohort study… Do those patients who have atypical pathogen coverage die more often than those without atypical coverage? Outcome +Outcome - Predictor Predictor Example
Anyone?? Interpret the Risk Ratio Example
Interpret the Risk Ratio Example Those with atypical coverage are 42% less likely to die as compared to those without atypical coverage
Remember your baseline risk. What does that mean? Assuming 8% of CAP patients die, what is the risk of death with empiric atypical pathogen coverage? Example
What does that mean? Example 8% x 0.58 = 4.64 Just multiply original risk by the risk ratio!
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat 1/Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) ARR = Unexposed Risk – Exposed Risk
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat ARR = Unexposed Risk – Exposed Risk ARR = Risk w/out atypical coverage – Risk w/atypical coverage
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat 16.7 = unexposed risk
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat 9.8 = exposed risk
Even Better: Example Number Needed to Treat 1 / (16.7 – 9.8) = 15 (round up!) Need to treat 15 patients to save 1
Used for case-control studies Is an approximation of the risk ratio 2. Odds Ratio Answers: How much more (less) likely are those with the outcome to have been in this group versus this other group? Measures of Association
Only a good approximation when the outcome is rare Can be an extremely bad approximation 2. Odds Ratio Can correct with a formula Zhang, J., & Yu, K. F. (1998). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA, 280(19), Measures of Association
Acinetobacter outbreak You gather information from 100 patients with Acinetobacter and 200 patients without. Example Need to identify the risk factors Measures of Association Select sample based on the outcome (Acinetobacter)
Key: Example Measures of Association Because the sample was selected based on the outcome (a subset of everyone who might get the outcome in your population), you can never know the actual incidence of the outcome in everyone who was exposed.
Cohort Study Sample Example Measures of Association Everyone Exposed Everyone Not Exposed Outcome
Case-Control Study Sample Example Measures of Association Subset with Outcome Subset without Outcome Exposure Status
Case-Control Study Sample Example Measures of Association Subset with Outcome Subset without Outcome Exposure Status Cannot know everyone exposed who gets the outcome
Example Analyze a number of risk factors to see if they are associated with Acinetobacter infection Measures of Association
+ Acinetobacter : Acinetobacter : Acinetobacter + wound : 55 - Acinetobacter + wound : 10 Outbreak Investigation: Was having a traumatic wound associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infection? Example
Assuming a case-control study… Outbreak Investigation: Was having a traumatic wound associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infection? Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Example
+ Acinetobacter : Acinetobacter : Acinetobacter + wound : 55 - Acinetobacter + wound : 10 Outbreak Investigation: Was having a traumatic wound associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infection? Example
Assuming a case-control study… Outbreak Investigation: Was having a traumatic wound associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infection? Acinetobacter +Acinetobacter - Wound Wound Example
Anyone?? Interpret the Odds Ratio Example
Those with Acinetobacter have a 23 times higher odds of having a nonsurgical wound compared to those without Acinetobacter. Interpret the Odds Ratio Example
What? Interpret the Odds Ratio Outcome +Outcome - Predictor + Predictor - Order of interpretation: Example
Risk: Know the incidence of the outcome. So what’s the difference? How you choose your population Odds: Don’t know the incidence of the outcome. Risk Versus Odds
So what’s the difference? How you choose your population You can’t identify the likelihood of someone with a predictor getting an outcome because you don’t know who all had the outcome Risk Versus Odds
Correct the Odds Common Outcomes = Odds is a poor approximation of Risk Risk Versus Odds
Even Chuck Norris Hates Odds. So what’s the difference? How you choose your population Risk Versus Odds
Used for Time-to-event data As good as the risk ratio 3. Hazard Ratio Answers: How much more (less) likely are those in this group to get the outcome versus this other group at any given time? Measures of Association
1. Testing for an Association 2. Other Measures of Association 3. Confidence Intervals Overview
Patients in the Universe Patients in the Sample Sampling Generalizing Confidence Intervals
Uses an arbitrary cutoff (0.05) Doesn’t give info on precision P-value is not good. Doesn’t help you generalize Confidence Intervals Fix: Use Confidence Interval
You are 95% confident that the risk (odds) of the patients in the universe is between that interval. Definition – 95% CI Confidence Intervals
You are 95% confident that the risk (odds) of the patients in the universe is between that interval. Definition – 95% CI “Universe” is not everyone in the world – it is everyone you can generalize back to. Confidence Intervals
You are 95% confident that the risk (odds) of the patients in the universe is between that interval. Definition – 95% CI “Universe” is not everyone in the world – it is everyone you can generalize back to. Confidence Intervals If the CI includes 1, that measure of association is not statistically significant (like a P-value >0.05)
You are 95% confident that the risk (odds) of the patients in the universe is between that interval. Definition – 95% CI “Universe” is not everyone in the world – it is everyone you can generalize back to. Confidence Intervals ‘Tighter’ CI = more power, more precision, larger sample If the CI includes 1, that measure of association is not statistically significant (like a P-value >0.05)
Caveat Confidence Intervals Since CI gets tighter with more people in the sample, every measure of association (except exactly 1) will eventually be significant with a large enough sample size.
Is this risk ratio statistically significant? Dead +Dead - Bacteremia Bacteremia Confidence Intervals
No – 95% Confidence Interval includes 1 Is the RR from the bacteremia example statistically significant? Risk Ratio: % CI: (0.83, 1.72) Confidence Intervals
Using the same proportions of Predictors and Outcomes What happens as we increase the sample size? Dead +Dead - Bacteremia Bacteremia Example
Yes – 95% CI does not include 1. Now is the RR from the bacteremia example statistically significant? Risk Ratio: 1.19 (Same as before) 95% Confidence Interval: (1.05, 1.36) Sample Size
The confidence interval becomes tighter What happens as we increase the sample size? Sample Size
The confidence interval becomes tighter What happens as we increase the sample size? Assuming the proportion of patients in each group stays the same, the risk ratio eventually becomes statistically significant. Sample Size
The confidence interval becomes tighter What happens as we increase the sample size? Assuming the proportion of patients in each group stays the same, the risk ratio eventually becomes statistically significant. Sample Size This is because the power you have to detect that effect size has increased.
The larger your sample, the closer you are to actually sampling the entire universe. What happens as we increase the sample size? Sample Size Therefore, your confidence interval is tighter and closer to “the truth in your universe.”
This makes sense. What happens as we increase the sample size? Sample Size The more people in your study, the closer you are to having the universe as your sample. Therefore your statistic should be pretty close to the ‘truth in the universe’.
Patients in the Universe Patients in the Sample Sampling (easy) Generalizing (hard) Confidence Intervals
Patients in the Universe Patients in the Sample Sampling (hard) Generalizing (easy) Confidence Intervals