MTAC 117 Performance Based Verification Sept 17, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® Mail Entry Roadmap 1. Roadmap Location  Located on RIBBs at Ribbs.usps.gov 2.
Advertisements

® MTAC Payment and Acceptance February 19, ® Agenda ME&PT Organization Task Team #23 Communications Update Scorecard/Assessment Update Full Service.
Intelligent Mail ® Full-Service MTAC May 19, 2010.
® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
1 Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Overview and Value of Intelligent Mail ®
Mail Entry Roadmap National PCC Week Lance Bell Program Manager, Business Mailer Support HQ.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 February 16, 2011.
Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
® Mail Entry Roadmap 1. Roadmap Location  Located at Ribbs.usps.govRibbs.usps.gov 2.
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss. Agenda Overview of how Addressing, Automation and Presort earn postal discounts Addressing Requirements:
1 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Bringing It All Together Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008.
Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) Task Team 2 General Session Presentation November 16, 2010.
Progress with the Postal Act of 2006 November 18, 2009.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Postal/MTAC Update.
® New MTAC User Groups/Work Groups/Task Teams Work Group #167: Solutions for Pieces Excluded from Service Measurement Start date: 1/21/2015 Target Completion.
Full Service and The Future of Mail Acceptance Anthony Loera Supervisor, Business Mail Entry 1.
Mail Entry and Payment Technology MTAC Pritha Mehra VP Mail Entry & Payment Technology February 17, 2011.
Mail Entry & Payment Technology Agenda  Benefits of IMpb  IMpb Requirements Unique Barcode Shipping Services File (SSF)  Postal Wizard Enhancements.
1 MTAC Workgroup 117 October 22, 2007 Washington DC.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP 111 Status Update Nov 1, Work Group 111 Charter Issue Statement: Identify gaps, define solutions, highlight benefits, and improve.
1 Pritha Mehra Vice President, Mail Entry and Payment Technologies Mail Entry and Payment Initiatives.
® 0 MicroStrategy Enhancements – August ® 1 New look for Mailer Scorecard launch page Mailer Scorecard.
PostalOne! ® Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
PostalOne! ® System Presented by:. 2 Agenda What is Business Mail? What is the PostalOne! System? What Does PostalOne! Do? What Are the Benefits? How.
® Great Lakes Area Focus Group Meeting February 3,
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
® MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement USPS Service Measurement Capability July 31, 2007.
Seamless Acceptance Pilot February 20, Agenda Pilot Status Pilot Findings Business Entity Identifier (BEI) Assessment Approach Feedback Options.
Mailers Technical Advisory Committee John Sadler Manager, Business Mail Acceptance August 2001 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee John Sadler Manager,
® 1 MTAC 138 April 23, 2014 MTAC 138 October 22, 2014.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
Acceptance and Induction: The Mailing Industry’s Digital Revolution IDEAlliance Print Distribution April 22, 2007 Debbie Cooper.
May 17, 2006 MTAC Workgroup 99 Streamline Acceptance / Verification of Periodicals and Postage Payment Postage in PostalOne!
1 Presentation Topics Agenda  January Release  BMA Channel Strategy –eDropship –Expanded Start-the-Clock  MTAC Workgroups.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 2, 2006.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
® Intelligent Mail Update. ® 2 Agenda  Program Update  Move Update  Requirements Reminders  Issues  Release 3 (what’s coming)  Full Service Verification.
Intelligent Mail February Vision Provide end-to-end visibility and a seamless process for mail acceptance and delivery, using standardized intelligent.
® MTAC 143 September 11, ® Agenda  Release 38, Known Issues Impacting Reports  Release 38, MicroStrategy Report Updates  Questions 2.
1 Gary Reblin and Jan Caldwell Intelligent Mail & Address Quality Intelligent MAIL ™ in the U. S. Postal Service MTAC February 5, 2004.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
Mail Acceptance and Induction Seamless Mailing with Intelligent Mail Barcodes Debbie A. Cooper Quebecor World Logistics.
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
® Intelligent Mail® and Start-the-Clock (101) Presented by Pritha Mehra, Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 10, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail May 16, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
1 MTAC eVS®/PTS User Group Thursday November 10, 2011.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
Confirm/PLANET Codes  MTAC Summary Confirm Program Office
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation February 6, 2003.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Bundle Breakage Blitz Results July 22 – August 5, 2005.
1 November, 2008 Intelligent Mail® Readiness. 2 Agenda Intelligent Mail® Readiness  Full Service Project Schedule/Infrastructure  Recap Full Service.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
1 Seamless Acceptance, Performance- Based Verification Implementation, Benefits, Obstacles and Feedback Ty Taylor, JC Penney Pritha Mehra, USPS MTAC 117.
November, 2006 MTAC Workgroup 99 Streamline Acceptance / Verification of Periodicals and Postage Payment Postage in PostalOne!
1 Move Update February Move Update Nov. 23, 2008  Move Update required for mailpieces claiming Presorted or Automation prices for First-Class®
1 MTAC Workgroup 117 October 12, 2007 Washington DC.
Streamlining Verification MTAC Workgroup Mission Statement: –Collectively determine how the USPS and the Industry can leverage existing, or guide.
® Webinar #10 Commercial First-Class Mail and Standard Mail Measurement Presented by Tom Day Senior Vice President, Intelligent Mail and Address Quality.
1 Intelligent Mail Barcodes Mail Preparation MTAC November 8, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation May 8, 2003.
Simplifying the Commercial Mailing Experience Heather Dyer Program Manager Major Mailer Support HQ.
Postage Statement Wizard Mail.dat Web Services Presented by: (insert name here) The 1, 2, 3 of Electronic Postage Documentation.
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
Presentation transcript:

MTAC 117 Performance Based Verification Sept 17, 2007

2 Agenda Verification Process –Current –Objective –Process Quality Improvement –Mailing Quality Feedback –Reports; Types and Features –Mail Exception – Bulletin Board Test Results

3 Current Verification Process Mail Verification Activities –Barcode Quality, Presort,, Mailpiece Count, Address Quality, Correct Meter, Bundle Integrity, Weight Verification Mail Verification Approach –MERLIN & Manual (Sample-Based) –Labor/Time Intensive Verification Rules –Every mailing > 10,000, 1 in 6 < 10,000

4 Current Verification Rules No consideration for mailer performance Size-based (solely on total volume of mailing) Current rule’s matrix Pieces per Mailing < 10,000≥ 10,000 All Mailers 1 in 61 in 1

5 Objective – Optimize Verification Process Establish more effective rules –Mail quality performance –Mailing characteristics (size, process category, discount) Create a more efficient process –Standardize procedures –Cost intelligent –Resource intelligent Benefits –Reduce mail entry time –Standardize processes –Focused workload management –Improved mailing quality Performance Based Verification

6 Objective – Performance Based Based on the following factors: –Quality performance of mail preparation » Location specific » Error types » Error type occurrence –Mailing characteristics » Volume, preparation mix, processing categories » Manufacturing process (i.e. staged, continuous) –Results from previous verifications » Previous failure triggers next mailing –USPS cost to perform verification Change the Rules / Improve the Process

7 Process Postage Statement data drives verification activities –Automation checks –Bundle integrity –Weight verification –Additional as required Verification frequency/size system determined Details and results collected and provided online –Barcode quality –Address quality –Presort quality –Additional as conducted Mail quality feedback available

8 Mail Quality Feedback Provide enhanced feedback to mailers regarding their quality of mail preparation –24-hour online access to centralized information via PostalOne! –Ability to sort and view information in multiple ways –Provide increased visibility of mail quality across acceptance locations –Allow mailers to track their quality of mail preparation over time (i.e. ability to analyze trends) –Ability to drill down to detailed levels

9 Mail Quality Feedback – Error Types Information on the following error types will be available in the proposed Mail Quality Reports –Barcode –Presort –Bundle Integrity –Postage –Tap Test –Digit String –Delivery Point Validation –Move Update

10 Mail Quality Feedback – Report Structure Search Criteria –Mail Class or Processing Category –Date Range –Location (Mail Preparer View) –Mail Preparer (Mail Owner View) Types of Reports –Mail Exception Bulletin Board –Mail Exception Details –Summary of Errors –Error Details –Sub-Error Details –Trend Analysis

11 Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Provides quick access to verification or processing and delivery errors that were found during the past 30 days

12 Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Provides details of the mailings that had verification errors (accessed through Mail Exception - Bulletin board)

13 Mail Quality Feedback – Customer Views Allows Mail Preparers to view information by one or all locations Search Criteria

14 Mail Quality Feedback – Customer Views Allows Mail Owners to view information by one or all Mail Preparers Search Criteria

15 Mail Quality Feedback – Summary of Errors Provides overview of error types by processing category or class View by Area, District, Local Location, or Individual Customer Drills down to detailed error information per specific mailing Processing Category

16 Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Presents specifics regarding barcode error types for a specified timeframe Shows the magnitude (in percentage) of each specific error type View by error type categories (Presort, Postage, Bundle Integrity, etc.) Barcode Errors

17 Provides the details of all presort errors found during verification or processing and delivery Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Presort Errors

18 Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Provides detailed error information Identifies the POSTNET Barcode or Intelligent Mail Barcode of the mail pieces in the mailing. Identifies only the addresses that contained errors Drills to specific error problem specifics such as invalid delivery point, missing suite numbers DPV Analysis

19 Mail Quality Report – Error Type Details Provides detailed error information such as last time the address received a move update request Move Update Analysis

20 Summary Verifications will be customized based on past performance –Fewer verifications will be performed on mailers with good quality of mail preparation Mail Quality Reports provide a 24-hour electronic access to mail quality information

21 Testing Current Pilots –Portland, Maine BMEU (Began June 8, 2006) –Suburban, Maryland BMEU (Began July 20, 2006) –Detached Mail Unit, Rockville, Maryland DMU (Began Jan 3, 2007) Results –Fewer verifications are being performed on mailers with good quality of mail preparation –The amount of time spent at the acceptance location has been reduced for mailers that have good quality of performance –National deployment will start after pilot testing and field impact study has been completed