The Evolving Repository Landscape: Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration Ayla Stein Metadata Librarian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.

Advertisements

1 QA Focus – Supporting JISC's Digital Library Programmes QA For Metadata: Conclusions Brian Kelly and Amanda Closier UKOLN Gareth Knight AHDS

Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections OAPEN-NL #oapenuk.

Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections & Ellen Collins, Research Officer, Research Information #oapenuk.

TDL Labs Partnerships for Exploration Luis Francisco-Revilla, Unmil P. Karadkar School of Information The University of Texas at Austin.

TRAC / TDR ICPSR Trustworthy Digital Repositories.

Building Digital Library using DSpace Dr. M.Krishnamurthy, Librarian Indian Statistical Institute 8 th Mile Mysore Road R.V.College Post Bangalore

Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.

Current Thinking on Digital Preservation: Role of Metadata Oya Y. Rieger Coordinator, Library Office of Distributed Learning Cornell University Library.

Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.

How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services

Digital Repository Service ___________________________ Yale University Library Audrey Novak, Head IS&P 7 March 2007.

Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,

SUNY and Ongoing Changes to Scholarly Communication John Schumacher SUNY Office of Library and Information Services.

The Role of a SUNY-wide Digital Repository in Improving Scholarly Communication John Schumacher SUNY Office of Library and Information Services.

Scholar Services at the University Library: The Scholarly Commons Report.

MDR Implementation: Drivers & Challenges Julie Smiley Director, Product Management for BioPharma Akana PhUSE SDE - May 14, 2015 Introductions.

Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.

WORLD BANK Publications The reference of choice on development The Promise, and Challenge, of Implementing Open Access at the World Bank Carlos Rossel.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Implementing DSpace at NASA Langley Research Center 1 Greta Lowe Librarian NASA Langley Research Center

DAMS: An Overview July 13, 2011 Karen Estlund Head, Digital Library Services.

MIRA to TDIL Workflows Alicia Morris October 2, 2014.

1Hydra Connect 2: Working Group Framework Empowering the Community through a Framework for Interest Groups and Working Groups Robin Ruggaber University.

Considering Dynamic Non-Textual Content when Migrating Digital Asset Management Systems AYLA STEIN SANTI THOMPSON.

Making Grey Literature Available through Institutional Repositories LeRoy J. LaFleur, Social Sciences Bibliographer Nathan A. Rupp, Metadata Librarian.

Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University Digital Library Program.

A Glimpse Into the Past and a Roadmap for the Future: University of Oregon Digital Collections Presented by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library.

Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University

Choosing Delivery Software for a Digital Library Jody DeRidder Digital Library Center University of Tennessee.

A Chicken or An Egg? Planning Your Digital Project Presentation to the Saskatchewan Libraries Conference Digitization 101 Pre-Conference Workshop May 3,

A survey based analysis on training opportunities Dr. Jūratė Kuprienė Framing the digital curation curriculum International Conference Florence, Italy.

Optimizing Resource Discovery Service Interfaces in Statewide Virtual Libraries: The Library of Texas Challenge William E. Moen, Ph.D. Texas Center for.

The Evolving Repository Landscape: Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration Ayla Stein Metadata Librarian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

1 1 Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition an initiative of the Association of Research Libraries Institutional Repository.

Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative.  9:00-9:45 - Session 1: Digital Preservation Overview  9:45-11:00 - Session 2: Policy & Planning Overview.

Document Management Services Jim Metzger, Harland FS John Liston, ASC.

Implementing UP 17 February Project Phases Analysis Implementation Evaluation Development Design.

Extending Access To Information Resource Discovery Service William E. Moen, Ph.D. Kathleen R. Murray, Ph.D. School of Library and Information Sciences.

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.

Fedora at the National Library of Scotland James Toon IS Development Manager

DRS 2 Project (2008 – Present!) Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library Digital Preservation Management Workshop, MIT June 13, 2013.

Digitization – Basics and Beyond workshop Interoperability of cultural and academic resources New services for digitized collections Muriel Foulonneau.

Fedora Content Modeling for Improved Services for Research Databases Open Repositories 2009 Mikael Karstensen Elbæk Alfred Heller Gert Schmeltz Pedersen.

Oct 12-14, 2003NSDL Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata Kurt Maly, Michael Nelson, Mohammad Zubair Digital Library.

UWA Library Strategic Directions for “ Mariette of 1915” by Charting our course and setting.

Overviews of the Library of Texas & ZLOT Project Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.

A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.

ZLOT The Z Texas Implementation Component of the Library of Texas Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.

Mary Miller Director of Collection Management & Preservation University of Minnesota Libraries Jennifer Teper Head, Preservation Services University of.

Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.

Data Wrangling: Developing Local Best Practice for Born Digital Metadata Tracy Popp, Digital Preservation Coordinator Ayla Stein, Metadata Librarian University.

LYRASIS Leadership Forum 2016 Welcome wifi MoMIEducation, MuseumEducation Your hosts: Robert Miller, Jay Schafer, Michele Kimpton, John Herbert, Celeste.

Automating the Audit: Updates from the Metadata Upgrade Project at the University of Houston Libraries Andrew Weidner, Metadata Librarian Santi Thompson,

5/29/2001Y. D. Wu & M. Liu1 Content Management for Digital Library May 29, 2001.

CENTRAL/WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS AUTOMATED RESOURCE SHARING Digitization GOALS & THEIR LOGISTICS Michael J. Bennett Digital Initiatives Librarian C/WMARS,

A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.

Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.

A Chicken or An Egg? Planning Your Digital Project

Building A Repository for Digital Objects

Motivations for DAMS Migration

CAPT One-year Review Content Access Policy and Technology Committee

VI-SEEM Data Repository

The State and University Library, Aarhus

Library Technology Conference: Building Exhibits

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II

Compiling an IR Policy Institutional Repository Workshop 1 – 3 April 2009 Presented by Each university or institution also needs to.

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III

Objectives, activities, and results of the database Lituanistika

Institutional Repositories

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II

Presentation transcript:

The Evolving Repository Landscape: Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration Ayla Stein Metadata Librarian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Santi Thompson Head of Digital Repository Services University of Houston Libraries

Presentation Overview ◈ Background ◈ Literature Review ◈ Methodology ◈ Results ◈ Discussion ◈ Lessons Learned & Next Steps ◈ Conclusion Goydenko Liudmila/gettyimages

Why do this study?

Research Questions ◈ What motivations prompt institutions to migrate from one DAMS to another? ◈ In what directions are institutions moving? For example, are institutions moving from proprietary systems to open source systems?

Literature Review ◈ Selecting Initial DAMS ◈ Policy & Planning ◈ Evaluation Criteria ◈ Needs Assessments ◈ Case studies on DAMS Migration ◈ Dissatisfactions ◈ Wants & Needs

Methodology ◈ Eligibility ◈ Evaluation topics ◈ Topic selection ◈ Survey design

Eligibility ◈ Respondents have completed the migration process from the “Old DAMS" to the "New DAMS“ ◈ Respondents are currently migrating from the “Old DAMS” to the “New DAMS“ ◈ Respondents have selected a “New DAMS” but have not started the migration process

Evaluation Topics ◈ Implementation & Day-to- Day Costs ◈ User Administration ◈ Organizational Viability ◈ Technical Support ◈ System Administration ◈ Extensibility ◈ Information Retrieval & Access ◈ Content Management ◈ Preservation ◈ User Interface Customization ◈ Interoperability ◈ Reputation ◈ Metadata Standards

Survey Design ◈ Question Formats ◈ Demographic information ◈ System Movement ◈ Selection & Ranking of Motivations

Results Overview ◈ Survey Demographics ◈ Top 5 Topics ◈ Priority Rankings ◈ Highlights from Top 5 Topics - Visualized

Priority Rank ◈ Rank 1: Implementation, Preservation, Extensibility ◈ Rank 2: User Customization, Content Management, Technical Support ◈ Rank 3: Content Management, Extensibility ◈ Rank 4: Content Management, Preservation, Information Retrieval, System Administration ◈ Rank 5: Metadata Standards, Technical Support, User Interface, Interoperability

Content Management Results

Metadata Results

Extensibility Results

Preservation Results

UI Customization Results

Technical Support Results

Discussion ◈ What needs and/or factors prompt institutions to migrate? ◈ What “direction” are institutions migrating? ◈ Overall theme

Self Control ◈ Content Management: Scalability ◈ Metadata: Multiple Schema & Flexibility ◈ Extensibility: Local Development ◈ UI Customization: Local Design Decisions

Third Party Support ◈ Technical Support: a role for governing organizations, vendors, and communities

Inconclusive ◈ Digital Preservation: Contradictory Results

System Movement

Limitations & Next Steps ◈ Limitations ◈ Future Research ◈ Institutional/ Data Repositories

Works Cited ◈ California Digital Library, “Glossary” (2014) Retrieved March 30, 2015 from

Images Cited 1. By Kathryn Greenhill [CC BY-SA 2.0 ( via Wikimedia Commons 2. All other images used courtesy of gettyimages Charts created by Ayla Stein and Santi Thompson