Modeling volcanic and marine emissions for Hawaii Air Quality Forecast 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel Tong*, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Mo Dan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constraining Anthropogenic Emissions of Fugitive Dust with Dynamic Transportable Fraction and Measurements Chapel Hill, NC October 22, 2009 Daniel Tong.
Advertisements

Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
THE IMPACTS OF TRANS-BOUNDARY TRANSPORT OF AEROSOLS ON THE REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: A case study of Mexican wildland fire on May 1998 Hee-Jin In 1, Daewon.
The Contribution of Marine Organic Emissions to Coastal Air Quality Brett Gantt Advisor: Nicholas Meskhidze Co-Author: Annmarie Carlton (EPA) North Carolina.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Evaluation of Real-time Air Quality Forecasts from WRF-NMM/CMAQ and NMMB/CMAQ Using Discover-AQ P-3B Airborne Measurements Youhua Tang 1,2, Jeffery T.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Transitioning CMAQ for NWS Operational AQ Forecasting Jeff McQueen*, Pius Lee*, Marina Tsildulko*, G. DiMego*, B. Katz* R. Mathur,T. Otte, J. Pleim, J.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
Air Resources Laboratory Yunsoo Choi 12, Daewon Byun 1, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 1, Ariel Stein 12, Daniel Tong 12, Hyun-Cheol Kim 12, Fantine Ngan 13,
(#694) Monitoring the Hawaii Volcano Plume From Satellite By John Porter School of Ocean Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu,
A Case Study Using the CMAQ Coupling with Global Dust Models Youhua Tang, Pius Lee, Marina Tsidulko, Ho-Chun Huang, Sarah Lu, Dongchul Kim Scientific Applications.
Modeling and measurements of oxygen isotope tracers of sulfate formation: Implications for the sulfur budget in the marine boundary layer Becky Alexander,
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory | Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division| A Tale of Two Models: A Comparison.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Air Resources Laboratory CMAS meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina Yunsoo Choi 1,2, Hyuncheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 3, Ariel.
Evaluating ammonia (NH 3 ) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in situ aircraft measurements William Battye,
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
Adaptation and Application of the CMAQ Modeling System for Real-time Air Quality Forecasting During the Summer of 2004 R. Mathur, J. Pleim, T. Otte, K.
Evaluation of modeled surface ozone biases as a function of cloud cover fraction Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Fong Ngan 1,2, Youhua Tang 1,2, Hye Lim.
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
Comparison of CMAQ Lightning NOx Schemes and Their Impacts Youhua Tang 1,2, Li Pan 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Jeffery T. McQueen 4, Jianping Huang 4,5, Daniel Tong.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
1 Air Quality : National AQ Forecasting Capability surface O 3 and PM 2.5 Presented By: Pius Lee (OAR/ARL) Contributors: Jeffery McQueen, Jianping Huang,
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Comparison of NOAA/NCEP 12km CMAQ Forecasts with CalNEX WP-3 Measurements Youhua Tang 1,2, Jeffery T. McQueen 2, Jianping Huang 1,2, Marina Tsidulko 1,2,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Satellite Observation and Model Simulation of Water Turbidity in the Chesapeake.
How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.
Global high-resolution marine isoprene emission derived from VIIRS-SNPP and MODIS-Aqua ocean color observations 1/25/2016Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel.
Air Resources Laboratory 1 Comprehensive comparisons of NAQFC surface and column NO 2 with satellites, surface, and field campaign measurements during.
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Hyun-Cheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 2, Daewon W. Byun 2 1, Earth Resources Technology, Laurel, MD 2, NOAA OAR/ARL, Silver.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
1 RAQMS-CMAQ Atmospheric Chemistry Model Data for the TexAQS-II Period : Focus on BCs impacts on air quality simulations Daewon Byun 1, Daegyun Lee 1,
The Impact of Lateral Boundary Conditions on CMAQ Predictions over the Continental US: a Sensitivity Study Compared to Ozonsonde Data Youhua Tang*, Pius.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
On the Verification of Particulate Matter Simulated by the NOAA-EPA Air Quality Forecast System Ho-Chun Huang 1, Pius Lee 1, Binbin Zhou 1, Jian Zeng 6,
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Updates to model algorithms and inputs for the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) model Jesse Bash, Kirk Baker, George Pouliot, Donna Schwede,
Ship emission effect on Houston Ship Channel CH2O concentration ——study with high resolution model Ye Cheng.
Daniel Tong NOAA Air Resources Lab & George Mason University
Potential use of TEMPO AOD & NO2 retrievals to support wild fire plume & O3 & PM2.5 forecast in National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) Pius.
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Potential Performance differences of the National Air Quality Forecasting Capability when upgrading the Chemical Transport Model Pius Lee1, Youhua Tang1,2,
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

Modeling volcanic and marine emissions for Hawaii Air Quality Forecast 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel Tong*, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Mo Dan, Ariel Stein, Daewon Byun NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL), Silver Spring, MD Xiaoming Liu and Kent Hughes NOAA Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), Camp Spring, VA Andrew Jeff Sutton, Tamar Elias, James Kauahikaua USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, Hawaii National Park, HI * Acknowledge: Jianping Huang of NCEP for helps with model simulations; US EPA and CSC for providing emission inventories and spatial surrogates; NOAA ARL AQUEST group for technical support and discussion.

Hawaii Air Quality Forecast 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory2 Hawaii domain: area, mobile, point; biogenic emissions; Sea-salt emissions; Volcanic emissions? Marine emissions?

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory3 More details at Anthropogenic Emission:  Area, mobile, and point emissions based on EPA NEI 2005 Natural Emission:  Biogenic emissions by BEIS 3.14 and USGS LULC data (H. Kim);  Sea-salt emissions along coast lines (B. Wang); Anthropogenic & biogenic Emission in Hawaii

A Review of Approaches for Marine Isoprene Emissions 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory4  Shaw et al. (2003):  Palmer & Shaw (2005):  Gantt et al. (2009): E iso - Isoprene emission; [Chl-a] - Isoprene emission; V – euphotic water volume; EF – Emission factor; k AS – exchange coeff.; C W – isop. conc. in water H – Henry’s law constant; C A – isop. conc. in the air P – isoprene production; H max – euphotic zone height; Z ML – mixing layer height; k i – chemical reaction rate for oxidant i; k bio – bacterial loss rate; L MIX – loss due to downward mixing;

Estimating marine Isoprene Emissions 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory5  Overall emission flux into the atmosphere (Palmer and Shaw, 2005):  Determine C W: (Palmer and Shaw, 2005)(Revised based on Gantt et al.)  Derive H max: (Gantt et al. 2009) I 0 – ground radiatioin; K490 – defuse attenuation coefficient in water

6 Chlorophyll-a and K490  Sensor/Satellite: Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on Aqua  Data Processing Levels (NOAA CoastWatch : - Level 1: NOAA obtains data from NASA GSFC in 5-minute granules, and process to geolocated, calibrated radiances - Level 2: Processed to derived MODIS data products (Chl-a, K490, nLw, etc.) - Level 3: Products are mapped to the CoastWatch geographic regions  Algorithms (NOAA CoastWatch): – Chlorophyll-a concentration: OC3 Algorithm – Diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm (K490): J. Mueller Algorithm Chlorophyll -aK490

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory7 Sensitivity to input parameter: K 490 Raw Daily [Chl-a] and K 490 K 490 cut-off (= 0.016)

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory8 Sensitivity to input parameter: [Chl-a] Daily [Chl-a] and K 490 Monthly [Chl-a] and K 490 Using monthly, instead of daily, average [Chl-a] and K 490 reveals larger source area for marine isoprene emissions.

Terrestrial vs. marine isoprene emissions 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory9 Land EmissionMarine Emission (Preliminary Results)  Monthly [Chl-a] and K 490 ;  K 490 cut-off (= 0.016);  Hourly ground radiation (I 0 );

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory10 A pulse of magma moving through Kīlauea's east rift zone Volcano SO 2 Emissions in Hawaii

Kilauea Volcano over the Hawaii Island 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory11 (Source: Hawaiian Volcano Observatory:

Methodology for Modeling Volcanic Emissions 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory12 In-Situ SO 2 Measurement Daily web update Hawaiian Volcano Observatory Emission Processing Pre- processor NOAA Air Resources Lab  SO 2 measurement Correlation Spectrometer (COSPEC);  Simple plume rise: Distributed from ground to 100 m above;

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory13  Multiple and moving emitting points;  Emitting point below surface;  Dynamic magma movement;  Difficult to implement plume rise algorithms, such as Briggs (1972). ~130 m Plume Rise of Volcanic Emissions Make it simple since we know so little about it…

Kilouea SO 2 Emissions 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory14 (Source: Hawaiian Volcano Observatory:

Model Configurations 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory15  CMAQ  CB05-AQ-AERO4 gas, aqueous and aerosol chemistry  Domains  80 x 52 grid cells  Horizontal resolution : 12x12 km 2  Vertical level : 22 layers  Meteorological inputs  NAM WRF- NMM 12 km  Lateral boundary conditions (Fantine Ngan)  GEOS-Chem precursors with Hilo monthly mean ozonesonde  Volcano SO2 emissions (July 24 – 29, 2010):  Summit Emissions: tons/day;  East Rift Zone: ~400 tons/day;

10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory16 Effects on Air Quality SO 2 O3O3 SulfateNitrate H2O2H2O2

Concluding Remarks 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory17  Methods to estimate near real-time emissions from two additional natural sources: volcano and marine phytoplankton.  Due to its unique emission pattern and reliable measurements, SO 2 emissions from Kilauea volcano can be incorporated into the NAQFC system;  In comparison, marine phytoplankton emissions are more challenging to estimate due to both input data quality and lack of knowledge on how to deal with these uncertainties.