Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.
Advertisements

2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, and Nicolas Gengler Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD, USA, and Gembloux Agricultural U., Belgium
TEMPLATE DESIGN © John B. Cole 1,*, Kristen L. Parker Gaddis 2, Francesco Tiezzi 2, John S. Clay 3, and Christian Maltecca.
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Quality Department Chaussée de Namur, 24 – 5030 GEMBLOUX - Tél :++ 32 (0) 81.
Extension of Bayesian procedures to integrate and to blend multiple external information into genetic evaluations J. Vandenplas 1,2, N. Gengler 1 1 University.
Principal Components Approach for Estimating Heritability of Mid-Infrared Spectrum in Bovine Milk H. Soyeurt 1,2,*, S. Tsuruta 3, I. Misztal 3 & N. Gengler.
M. Dufrasne 1,2, V. Jaspart 3, J. Wavreille 4 et N. Gengler 1 1 University of Liège, Gembloux Agro Bio-Tech, Animal Science Unit - Gembloux 2 F.R.I.A.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
December 2014 Proof Changes
Capitalizing on mid-infrared to improve nutritional and environmental quality of milk H. Soyeurt *,§, F. Dehareng **, N. Gengler *, and P. Dardenne **
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD 2011 Avoiding bias from genomic pre- selection in converting.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
Innovation on Milk Recording New Management Indicators Decision Making and Profitability Pregnancy, Embryo loss, Ketosis, Acidosis, Methane, Energy Balance...
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) 2001 Variance of effects of lactation stage within herd by herd yield N. Gengler 1,2, B. Auvray *,1, and G.R. Wiggans 3 1.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Dr BE Mostert Geneticist SA Stud Book The Genetics of Longevity… A Quantitative Perspective.
2007 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
R. L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Historical.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Using.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
2006 Paul VanRaden, John Cole, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2008 ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting Indianapolis, July 7-11 Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Estimated by Test-Day Model.
36th ICAR Session and Interbull Meeting Niagara Falls, June 2008 Potential Estimation of Minerals Content in Cow Milk Using Mid- Infrared Spectrometry.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
Interbull Meeting – Dublin 2007 Genetic Parameters of Butter Hardness Estimated by Test-Day Model Hélène Soyeurt 1,2, F. Dehareng 3, C. Bertozzi 4 & N.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
 Milk fat composition varies with the season (summer vs. winter) but also with the milking time (AM vs. PM).  These observations could allow the diversification.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD What direction should.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
Strategies to Incorporate Genomic Prediction Into Population-Wide Genetic Evaluations Nicolas Gengler 1,2 & Paul VanRaden 3 1 Animal Science.
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Predicted by MIR Spectrometry : MIR Spectrometry + Quantitative Models.
J. Vandenplas 1,2 and N. Gengler 1,2
The influence of nutrition and metabolic diseases on milk composition
S. Naderi1, R. R. Mota1, S. Vanderick1, N. Gengler1
Methods to compute reliabilities for genomic predictions of feed intake Paul VanRaden, Jana Hutchison, Bingjie Li, Erin Connor, and John Cole USDA, Agricultural.
Estimating the nutritional quality of milk fat in cow milk
S. Vanderick1,2, F.G. Colinet1, A. Mineur1, R.R Mota1,
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Development of Genomic GMACE
Presentation transcript:

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Context  Changing breeding goals over last forty years  From yields only  Over type (morphologie)  Towards functional traits (e.g., fertility, longevity)  Limited interest in milk composition except  Always: fat and protein content  Mostly: somatic cell count (udder health)  Also: urea and lactoses (management)  Recently: nutritional quality

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Milk Quality Traits  Milk fat composition as example  Important variability (3% to 7%) in milk  Composed mostly of fatty acids (FA)  3 classes:  Saturated (SAT): 70%, Unsaturated (UNSAT): 30%  Monounsaturated (MONO): 25%  Polyunsaturated (POLY): 5%  However far from optimal (human health)  SAT: 30%  MONO: 60%  POLY: 10%

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Genetic variability exists for FA Previous, next speaker But implementing Animal Breeding more complexe process

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium However Implementing Animal Breeding  Different Steps 1.Making data available 2.Adapting models 3.Implementing routine computation of breeding values 4.Updating breeding goals and creating and using adapted selection indices 5.Continuing this ongoing development process towards most advances methods as genomic selection  Presentation will follow this outline

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Making Data Available - I  Animal breeding needs phenotypes  Until recently difficult to obtain FA composition easily  Based on gas chromatography  Expensive, not in routine  Recent advances based on use of mid- infrared (MIR) spectrometry data  Calibration to predict FA  Similar to predicting fat and protein content

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Making Data Available - II  What is MIR spectral data ? Milk sampling (e.g., milk recording) MIR spectrometer Spectral data

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium  MIR absorption correlated to vibration of specific chemical bonds  MIR spectral data ‘represents’ global milk composition (Sivakesava and Irudayaraj, 2002) 1700 – 1500 cm -1 : N-H 1200 – 900 cm -1 : C-O cm -1 : C-H cm -1 : COOH Making Data Available - III

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Predicted milk components - Traditional (e.g., fat, protein) - New (e.g., FA) Making Data Available - IV  Using MIR spectral data Milk sampling (e.g., milk recording) MIR spectrometer Spectral data

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Making Data Available - V  Routine milk recording  Currently certain traits available  Major FA (e.g., SAT, MONO, Omega-9) limitation: minor FA  Lactoferin  Minerals  Others under development  Storing MIR spectral data now  Predicting other traits later

Dosage des AG SD= Standard-deviation; SEC= Standard error of calibration; R²c= Coefficient of determination of calibration; SEcv= Standard error of cross-validation; R²cv= Coefficient of determination of cross-validation; RPDcv= SD/SECV

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Adapting Models - I  Data specific modeling needs:  Longitudinal data: data at every test-day  Multitrait: many (up to 8 and more) milk quality traits that are correlated  Multilactation: less data, more interest to use all available lactations, also linked to absence of historical data  Absence of historic data for new traits: need to use historic correlated traits, e.g., milk yield, fat and protein contents

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Adapting Models - II  Data specific modeling needs:  Trait definition: some new spectral traits only indicators for chemical traits (low RPDcv)  Trait definition: meta-traits  Ratio SAT/UNSAT: linked positively to nutritional and technological properties  Ratios product / substrate: Δ9 indices (next talk)  Potentially adapting models for new fixed effects  E.g., nutritional influence on FA well-known  Heterogeneous variances  Nature of traits  Intra-herd variability  feeding practices

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Adapting Models - III  Consequence: more complex situation compared to traditional yield test-day models  Advances computing strategies:  Handling of massive missing values  data augmenting techniques  Handling of highly correlated traits  data transformation techniques  Numerous other issues

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Adapting Models - IV  Also complex situation to estimate (co)variance components:  Multitrait: many correlated milk quality traits, (co)variances needed  Not even nature of traits: different prediction equations different RPDcv, weighting of records  Some spectral traits only indicators for chemical traits: interest to predict inside the model, needs (co)variance between “chemical” and “spectral” traits  Correlations between milk quality and old traits but also other new traits: e.g., those linked to animal robustness as lactoferine

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Adapting Models - V Consequence: large research needs !!!

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Implementing Routine Computations - I  Integration of acquisition of new traits inside genetic evaluation system data flow  Interest to store spectral data on a large scale  Example (known to us):  Southern Belgium (Walloon Region): cows  Luxembourg: cows  Already generates nearly records a year

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Implementing Routine Computations - II  Needed (co)variance components first results become available  Some daily heritabilities (J. Dairy Sci 91: )  Milk (kg/day):0.27  Fat (%):0.37  Protein (%):0.45  FA:  SAT (g/100 g milk):0.42  MONO (g/100 g milk): 0.14  Same publication also some needed (co)variances

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Implementing Routine Computations - III  Currently few component evaluations  Most genetic evaluations for yields (few exceptions as France)  Milk quality inside evaluation for milk components  E.g., fat, protein  Those traits also needed  As historical correlated data to avoid as much as possible selection bias

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Implementing Routine Computations - IV  Expressing genetic results, various possibilities:  Daily base, lactation base  Individual traits: e.g., SAT, UNSAT, MONO  Meta traits: e.g., ratios  Estimate breeding values for all animals  However results for other effects huge potential for management advice:  Not subject of this talk

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Updating Breeding Goals and Selection Indices - I  Determine “economic” weights, not easy task  Economic:  better milk price  Some dairy companies start to move on this  Health related:  social value of more healthy milk  economic value of more healthy milk, reduction of health costs  Other elements, as reputation of milk as healthy product?

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Updating Breeding Goals and Selection Indices - II  Breeding for improved nutritional quality of bovine milk  not at the expenses of other traits  Therefore:  Need to know correlations to traditional traits  E.g., yields, type and functional traits  Also, correlations to other new traits  In particular to robustness traits  However other specific issues to nutritional quality traits

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Updating Breeding Goals and Selection Indices - III  Specific issues of nutritional quality traits  Large number of traits:  Which traits to choose and how to choose?  Potential difference between breeding goal traits and index traits:  Breeding goal traits:“chemical traits”  Index traits:“spectral traits”  Doubts that one index fits all situation:  Differentiated index per market as former cheese merit (CM$) and fluid merit (FM$) in USA

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Updating Breeding Goals and Selection Indices - IV Also still large research needs !!!

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Near Future: Genomic Selection - I  Genomic selection≠QTL detection (previous talk)  Based on dense marker maps ( SNP)  Linking phenotypic variability to genomic variability  New idea  However under development in nearly all countries  Current implementations mostly  Training population  older reliable sires  Predicted population  young untested sires

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Near Future: Genomic Selection - II  Milk quality traits on first hand interesting for genomic selection (prediction)  However  Current implementation needs reliable breeding values from many animals (sires) for training, but genetic evaluations not able to provide this  Genomic selection multitrait setting not yet clear  Nevertheless interesting idea  Why?

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Near Future: Genomic Selection - III  Genomic information natural way to avoid some current shortcomings:  Few ancestors recorded, risk of selection bias  sires (maternal grand sires) could be genotyped  Only recent data, low reliabilities even for older sires  larger interest to improve using genomic information  Therefore nutritional quality traits  Ideal candidates for genomic selection  Question: How?

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Near Future: Genomic Selection - IV  How?  Next generation genomic prediction: single step  Recent advances, idea equivalent model  Genomic relationship matrix G reflecting genomic variability replaces (or augments) pedigree based relationship matrix A  Many details under development, progress on  Computing G, inverting G  Combining G and A, potentially on an inverted scale

Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Belgium 2 National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium Thank you for your attention Acknowledgments SPW – DGA-RNE different projects FNRS: F (2) F FRFC