Essential knowledge and skills for effective participation in the Child Outcome Summary Process Be able to describe and differentiate the three child outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cost of Authoring with a Knowledge Layer Judy Kay and Lichao Li School of Information Technologies The University of Sydney, Australia.
Advertisements

Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
E-Portfolio July2014 Managing Multi-source Feedback.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Lecturette 1: Culturally Responsive Progress Monitoring: Universally Designed Classroom Assessment.
Module 4 Providing Opportunities for Students with Disabilities.
Using the Online Data System for Infant and Toddler IGDIs Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project,
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
N.C. Division of Public Health, Early Intervention Branch, January 2010 Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) Professional Development.
Observing Learning Helen Bacon and Jan Ridgway Inclusion Support Services.
Assessing Student Learning
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Professional Development Training. The Big Picture The Hermes Model – Slide 3 Your Role as an On-Site Facilitator – Slide 4 What is Asynchronous Learning?
Welcome to the Island Teacher Information
California Teaching Performance Assessment (CA TPA)
The Child Outcomes Summary Competency Check (COS-CC) Amy Nicholas, Naomi Younggren, Siobhan Colgan & Kathi Gillaspy 2013 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes.
ESL Phases & ESL Scale Curriculum Corporation 1994.
1 Birth to 3 Child Outcomes Maryland’s Approach to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories August 28, 2007 Deborah Metzger
QWERTYtown Typing Program
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
A collaborative venture among state agencies, the Governor’s Office, and state and local organizations.
Alternate Assessment Attainment Task Part 2.1 Click here to download the Administration Guide Required for completion of this training Overview/Attainment.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
OnlineInset.net Ltd is a non-profit training company limited by guarantee that develops training courses to teach people who support children.
Administrator – Employee Overview September, 2011.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1.  Apply your knowledge of the COS process  Use materials important to the COS process  Simulate sharing information with parents  Learn from each.
1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
PRESENTER’S GUIDE The purpose of the following presentation is to help you to share Khan Academy with the parents in your classroom. Anecdotally, we know.
Performance Development System Web Enhancement Training pds.temple.edu.
Chapter 3 Teaching with Instructional Software Indiana Wesleyan University Former Student (used by permission)
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHILD OUTCOMES SUMMARY RATING PROCESS 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Automated Assessment Management System. The Assessment Cycle Trainee | Learner Dashboard Trainer Dashboard Employer Dashboard Verifier Dashboard Assessor.
Health and Food Technology CPD Presentation Objectives This presentation will help you to : understand the purpose of Verification prepare for Verification.
Session 2: Overview of the COS Process Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module.
1 Requirements Engineering From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications Axel Van Lamsweerde.
RECOGNITION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES WORKING GROUP 3.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
EDUPHORIA: PDAS Jaime Morales October 17, 2014 EDTC 3332 Instructional Technology.
IllinoisJobLink.com Training Video Creating a Resume Copyright © 2015, America’s Job Link Alliance–Technical Support (AJLA–TS) All rights reserved. This.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
KARORI NORMAL SCHOOL We encourage our children to be the best they can be “Tino pai ake” 2016 Reporting Cycles Information.
Johnson, J., Rahn, N., and Bricker, D., 2015 ECSE 672 Fall 2015 ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH TO EARLY INTERVENTION.
New Assessment Arrangements at Old Cleeve. No more Levels? This academic year the Government abolished the use of levels (eg 3C, 4A etc) in school as.
Special Needs Program Stacey Warren. IEP The IEP is a: legal document teaching instrument road map for students The IEP must be: developed within 30 days.
Child Care Subsidy Program Online Billing Provider Training Spring 2016.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
What are the DCC-413 and DCC-414 and how do they pertain to me? The STARS Interim Report.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Competence by Design (CBD) Foundations of Assessment.
Microsoft Customer 2 Partner Connector Quick Reference Guide
Bloom, Assessment & Aims and Objectives Module: ES204 Lecturers – Dr Justin Rami.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
OTLA Report Writing Training
Teaching with Smart Response Systems
Making the most of the assessment cycle and template
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Employee Performance Management System
Data Updates.
OTLA Report Writing Training
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
OTLA Report Writing Training
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Presentation transcript:

Essential knowledge and skills for effective participation in the Child Outcome Summary Process Be able to describe and differentiate the three child outcomes Know the criteria for each of the 7 points and what differentiates one from another. Understand the meaning of the progress question. Know the difference between assessment information that is functional versus discrete/skill specific (this may be application

Understand the difference between domains and functional outcomes (could be matching). Know how to extract meaningful information from assessment tools for each of the three outcomes. (matching assessment items with three outcomes. Be able to age anchor a child’s functioning using child development resources. Describe/identify/recognize a quality COS team process, including families

Be able to provide the rationale for a rating. Know how to review COS documentation for quality. Know the specifics of the process correct for prematurity how to rate with AT how to take the child’s culture into account.

Features Would like to include videos to go with child examples Adaptable for state use (desired) Database will allow state staff to generate reports of who has taken and results (sign on privileges)

Verification Process Each segments to average minutes long Web-based (specify minimum system requirements) Structure: screener (to ensure have basic knowledge) and main assessment Not a teaching tool – assessment of essential knowledge and skills for effective participation in the child outcomes measurement process Make knowledge and skills public (list of competencies to be assessed)

Registration process that includes entering a name, state and an address to which results should be sent (we’ll set it up so that will send results to that ) Database behind the system so that we‘ll know who has taken it, when, and results (including how many times have taken) – results not written over if take multiple times Data base that could serve as an item bank to be able to assess items (see how people do, if items are chronically missed) and switch them out or edit as needed. Database will allow ECO staff to generate reports of who has taken and results

Saves responses as you go – people have the ability to go in and out as needed. Responses will be saved for 7 days before system starts you over. No feedback given within the assessment– wait until the end As much as possible want to assess application of knowledge rather than rote knowledge (screener can include the rote knowledge) Interactive and engaging Assessment

Need multiple versions for different age ranges (at least 2 each for 0-3 and 3-5). Consider rotating items rather than versions. Minimum wait period of two weeks before retake between attempt 1 and 2, and again from attempts 2 &3. Mechanism to keep people out for minimal time if fail (doesn’t allow access)

Immediate p/f response at the end Standard (what are they measured against) Minimum # to pass Generates certificate for printing if passed

Phase 1 Factual knowledge, perhaps a mandated number of questions (i.e. 10) that would have to be passed in order to move on. If someone doesn’t pass them, they would have a list of recommended training and/or resources that would need to be explored and mastered before returning to try again.

Phase 2 Application using a case study. This section would need sufficient time for people to read through and then take the assessment, and needs to include ample opportunity to show their knowledge Four children, various abilities Two at each age grouping