Boat Densities and Carrying Capacities. Boat Density and Carrying Capacity What are they? Why do I care? What does this have to do with relicensing?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY RESULTS -PROGRAMMATIC ACTIONS- Presentation to the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009.
Advertisements

Town of Dryden, NY :: Hamlet of Varna – Community Development Plan Public Workshop Project Scoping/Issues Identification December 1, 2010.
WARD LAKE MASTER PLAN Public Input Workshop #1 July 14, 2011.
BC Hydros: Reservoir Archaeology Program CRT facilitated workshop Nov 19, 2013.
Technical Committee Training Prof Richard Mackay, AM June 2012 & Management of Tourism Carrying Capacity.
Airport planning.
Bartlett River Salmon Escapement: a case study in wilderness fisheries management Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve.
Claytor Lake Project No. 739 Recreation Assessment & Angler Use Survey Study Kickoff Meeting January 24, 2007.
The Saline County Study Knowledge-Based Community Decision Making.
Addressing Deer Vehicle Accidents at the Community Scale Elizabeth I. Rogers, Ph.D. Dean B. Premo, Ph.D. White Water Associates, Inc. Amasa, MI.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting March 6, 2008.
Ecosystem Vulnerability Profile. Ecosystem Resources Vulnerability Profile What values and benefits do natural resources provide? What natural resources.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Martin Informational Meeting. May 24, 2007Martin Informational Meeting2 Agenda 9:00 – 9:30 AM Welcome & Overview of the January Issues Identification.
RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE CHIKLY ISLAND AND SURROUNDINGS (TUNIS) María José VIÑALS Imma MARTÍNEZ Aida ABDENNADHER Maryland MORANT.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
STATE AND FEDERAL POLICIES CONCERNING OUTDOOR RECREATION
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Building a Legacy: Integrated Water Resource Management in Damascus, Oregon Oregon Water Conference May 25, 2011 WBG PDX GS
Lake Lure Boat Management Prepared for L.L.L.O.A
Lake Apopka Restoration Proposed projects for Legislative Appropriation.
Applying Social Science to Outdoor Recreation Management Diane Kuehn SUNY ESF.
Delaney Forestry Services Matt Delaney Albany, Oregon
3.03 Discuss the environmental impact of tourism.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting February 19, 2008.
Mississippi Lake Association Annual General Meeting June 1, 2013 Lynn Preston, Centre for Sustainable Watersheds.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
Coastal Management Issues and Strategies: State and Municipal
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Federal and State Coastal Zone Management Laws Introduction to Coastal Management.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
EXAMPLE 5 Solve a real-world problem SOLUTION SCIENCE As part of an environmental study, you need to estimate the number of trees in a 150 acre area. You.
Our Vision for Management of TVA’s Public Lands Sandra K. Goss Executive Director TCWP August 16, 2006 Keep Public Lands in Public Hands.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
OPEN FIELDS & WATERS PROGRAM A PUBLIC ACCESS PROGRAM FOR HUNTERS AND ANGLERS OFFERED BY THE NEBRASKA GAME & PARKS COMMISSION OFFERED BY THE NEBRASKA GAME.
Implementing Wave Energy Process and Permitting Issues Presented by Therese Hampton February 20, 2008.
Recreation Assessment Study Report Quarterly Public Meeting April 19, 2007.
IMPACT OF TOURISM 3.03 Discuss the environmental impact of tourism.
Estimated Cost for Appendix K Compliance Biological Surveys Marie Campbell President, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. December 15, 2011.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Where is tourism headed? An alternative to mass tourism.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Chapter 9 Commercial Recreation and Tourism. Welcome to the World of Commercialism in Recreation _____________________________________ _____________________________________.
Canine Commons Dog Park City Council Meeting October 2, 2013 Larkspur Park & Rec Department & Public Works Department.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 3 – NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE ELEMENTS 1/09/2014.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Water Supply Municipal Water Demand Civil Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering and Technology The University of Jordan Instructor: Ghada Kassab,
Tourism Master Plan A master plan for tourism destinations usually incorporates concerns that includes all aspects of Tourism development process. Factors.
Performance (function)-based Decision Making
New Environmental Science-based Regulations on Pleasure Craft
Savannah River Projects
Research Cycle Carrying Out an Investigation decide on a focus
Parks and Recreation Commission
Optimal Capacity of Malletts Bay to Accommodate Boating Activity
Continuing Authorities Program
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
2017 BCGWA Regional Meeting Environmental Flow Needs (EFNs)
Martin Informational Meeting
A Company Perspective on Linking Science, Management and Policy for Addressing Issues of the Delaware Estuary. Ralph G. Stahl, Jr., Ph.D., D.A.B.T. DuPont.
Presentation transcript:

Boat Densities and Carrying Capacities

Boat Density and Carrying Capacity What are they? Why do I care? What does this have to do with relicensing?

Definitions ▲ Boat density - The number of boats per unit area. May include type of boat/activity, and may address shoreline configuration and availability of open water ▲ Carrying capacity – The type and level of visitor use that can be accommodated while sustaining the desired resource and social objectives (NPS, 1997)

Boat Density ▲ Shows where people are boating ▲ Improves understanding of how and where a lake is used ▲ Provides input on shoreline management decisions  Identifies where new private, commercial, and/or public development may be accommodated without detracting from use on the water

▲ Boat density is a building block used to estimate carrying capacity ▲ Other building blocks might include number/type of public access sites, shoreline development, sensitive resources, water quality….and the list goes on

Compared… Carrying Capacity May include… ▲ Accident data (on the water) ▲ Aquatic and submerged habitats ▲ Boat density ▲ Commercial access & development ▲ Cultural & historical properties ▲ Flora and fauna ▲ Private / residential access & development ▲ Public access & development ▲ Public or user preferences ▲ Shoreline configuration ▲ Shoreline erosion ▲ Shoreline habitats ▲ Special events (tournaments, regattas) ▲ Water quality Boat Density May Include… ▲ Number of boats per acre ▲ Type of boat or activity ▲ Shoreline configuration ▲ Volume of use (user expectations based on proximity to population and shoreline development)

Carrying Capacity ▲ Provides an estimate of a number of boats (or people) that can be accommodated physically and socially by a specific area of water USE WITH CAUTION! Remember, usually a FERC licensee does not control boating on the water. Carrying capacity estimates can guide management decisions, but are generally not used by licensees to limit boating activity. A licensee will not count boats daily and start evicting boaters from a lake when the number of boats exceeds an estimated carrying capacity!

First… ▲ Typically, a licensee is responsible for managing recreational use and related development within its Project Boundary on the shoreline or submerged lands. ▲ Usually, a state agency or agencies are responsible for managing activity on the water at FERC-licensed projects.  Fishing, boating, etc.

Second…Avoid Duplication of Effort Shoreline Management Plan ▲ Aquatic and submerged habitats ▲ Boat density ▲ Commercial access & development ▲ Cultural & historical properties ▲ Dredging ▲ Flora and fauna ▲ Permitting ▲ Private / residential access & development ▲ Public access & development ▲ Public or user preferences ▲ Shoreline erosion ▲ Shoreline habitats ▲ Water quality Carrying Capacity Study ▲ Accident data (on the water) ▲ Aquatic and submerged habitats ▲ Boat density ▲ Commercial access & development ▲ Cultural & historical properties ▲ Flora and fauna ▲ Private / residential access & development ▲ Public access & development ▲ Public or user preferences ▲ Shoreline configuration ▲ Shoreline erosion ▲ Shoreline habitats ▲ Special events (tournaments, regattas) ▲ Water quality

Examples ▲ Entergy Arkansas, Inc. for the Carpenter- Remmel Project (1999) ▲ Duke Energy Corp. for the Nantahala Area Projects (2003) ▲ GRDA for the Pensacola Project (2006)

The sample was distributed within each month proportionate to the total number of days in each month. A total of 40 days were sampled at each impoundment. Within each month, sample days were stratified by day type (weekdays, weekend days, and holidays) and time of day. Aerial counts of boaters (including anglers, jet skiers (PWC), water skiers, tubers, pleasure boaters, tour boats, and on the river there are anglers, floaters, and surfers) were completed on a sample of days for a one year period. Entergy’s Lake Hamilton and Lake Catherine study…

Nanatahala Weekend Crowding

What Can We Learn? ▲ Identify areas of unique uses ▲ Identify areas of crowding ▲ Identify where use can be spread out to help protect/manage other resources ▲ Inputs into shoreline management decisions ▲ Identify information needs ▲ Identify needed expansions at facilities to address user needs

Licensee Considerations ▲ Avoid setting a carrying capacity number that will require restrictions on public access ▲ FERC does not advocate restricting access to project waters. Tailor decisions based on all resources and remember, environmental and social considerations are dynamic: management plans should be too. ▲ Determine the metrics that you will consider before starting data collection ▲ There’s nothing more frustrating than finding out that the data collected will not answer the question asked. ▲ Be comfortable with agencies and stakeholders – know where your responsibilities begin and end ▲ A licensee’s responsibility is to provide and manage access to project waters. It may not include management of activity on the water. ▲ Work with agencies and stakeholders. ▲ You may need them to provide information (data, expertise, etc) or implement some of the resulting recommendations. Cooperation and buy-in from stakeholders will always result in a more accepted and workable management plan.