WHAT STATE LEADERS CAN DO TO SUPPORT MIDDLE GRADES LITERACY ACHIEVEMENT COMMENTS FROM ALABAMA Middle Grades Literacy Forum September 28-29, 2006 Phoenix,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Advertisements

AIM for Literacy Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia Presented by Rebecca Derenge Terry Reale, WVDE Office of Instruction
Instructional Leadership: Focus on Literacy
When Students Can’t Read…
Effective Literacy Today
Bridging Project Vermont Reads Institute at UVM. Consultants  Nancy Woods, Coordinator  Pam Chomsky-Higgins  Sue Biggam  Loralyn LeBlanc  Gayle Moskowitz.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 This multimedia product and its content are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: Any public.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Preparing our students for the 21 st century OVEC's Literacy Vision.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Creating a Culture of Literacy
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Creating a Culture of Literacy
2006 Broad Prize for Urban Education Finalist. The Jersey City Public School District is strongly committed to high expectations for achievement by all.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
AMERICAN HIGH SCHOOL POLICY CONFERENCE “On the Ground” Panel.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
1 Literacy The Key to High School Success. 2 Adolescent Literacy School Improvement Cycle Increased Student Achievement Committed Instructional Leadership.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Healthy Schools Leadership Program Findings and Lessons Learned.
Marshall Public Schools World’s Best Workforce September 2014.
Presented by Nicole Dalton HB 3233—STUDENT- CENTERED TEACHING AND LEARNING MODELS PROFICIENCY-BASED TEACHING AND LEARNING GRANT THE WEBINAR WILL BEGIN.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Essential Question What is literacy?. Assessment Liaison Spring Dates: April 19, 20.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Persistently Low Achieving Schools Update September 14, 2010 Board of Education Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Local District B Reading First Principals’ Presentation April 2, 2003.
Chris Hamiel a framework for SCHOOL CHANGE and INCREASED LITERACY.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Mission: To ensure successful literacy achievement for every child. Source: Lesley University, Cambridge, MACompiled by: Hope Stuart.
CCRESA Rubric Presentation Jeni Corn, Malinda Faber, Friday Institute, NC State University.
Elementary Middle School Expectation and Goal Setting Meeting June 26, 2009.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Buckhorn High School. 1998: Launch of ARI 1999:Buckhorn becomes an ARI Site.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
IES Recommendations Explicit vocabulary instruction
Model Demonstration Projects
Colchester Public Schools
Oregon Leadership Network Spring Institute April 9, 2008
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

WHAT STATE LEADERS CAN DO TO SUPPORT MIDDLE GRADES LITERACY ACHIEVEMENT COMMENTS FROM ALABAMA Middle Grades Literacy Forum September 28-29, 2006 Phoenix, Arizona

Alabama’s Literacy Efforts CONTEXT 2

WHAT IS THE ALABAMA READING INITIATIVE? A statewide movement Anchored by reading research Aimed at ultimately achieving grade-level reading for all of Alabama’s public school students 3

HOW IS IT ACHIEVING ITS GOAL? Through intensive teacher development efforts and ongoing support for coaches and principals that are the heart and soul of the initiative. 4

THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE PROVIDED FUNDING 16 schools in $ 1,500,000 (Private Sources) 81 schools in $ 6,000, schools in $10,000, schools in $11,300, schools in $12,500, schools in $12,500, schools in $40,000, schools in $56,000, schools in $56,000,000 5

90 Middle Grades (4-8, 4-12, 5-7, 5-8, 6-7, 6-8, 7-8, 7-9, K-7, K-8) 18 Bonafide High Schools (9-12 or 10-12) 9 Grades 6-12, Grades K-12 (If we add intermediate schools, the total would be 135.) Schools with Grade 7 and Higher SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ARI

HOW WERE READING INITIATIVE SCHOOLS INITIALLY SELECTED? It was voluntary Schools were selected from a pool of applicants that made seven commitments 7

SEVEN COMMITMENTS OF ARI SCHOOLS 1. Set 100% literacy as a goal. 2. Achieve commitment of at least 85 percent of faculty. 3. Attend an intensive training program. 4. Be led by the principal. 8

SEVEN COMMITMENTS OF ARI SCHOOLS 5. Adjust their reading instruction accordingly. 6. Model research-based reading instruction for other schools. 7. Be evaluated by an outside evaluator. 9

INITIAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SECONDARY SCHOOLS SECONDARY SCHOOLS Day 1- Conceptual Framework: What interferes with reading comprehension? Formal Assessment : What does the data say about students at our school? Faculty Meeting: What does the research say about struggling readers? How do we anticipate serving struggling readers? Day 2- Informal Assessment Faculty Meeting: What is our plan for informally assessing struggling readers? Day 3- Vocabulary Development 10

Day 4 - Comprehension Instruction Day 5 - Comprehension Instruction Faculty Meeting: How can we organize schoolwide to give struggling readers what they need to be successful? Day 6- Content Area Reading Day 7- Reading/Writing Connection Day 8 - Reading/Writing Connection Faculty Meeting: What policies and practices need to be in place to increase the amount of reading and the amount of writing? Day 9- Content Area Writing Day 10- Faculty Meeting: What is our plan for serving struggling readers? 11

12

NCE Points Relative to Non-ARI Schools ElementaryMiddleHigh ARI Schools Stanford 9 Reading Scores Average Reading Comprehension Gains, by Grade Level Chart 3 13

not YEAR 5 EVALUATION 14

AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH STUDY 2004 Findings 1.Differentiate the models used for implementing primary/elementary and intermediate/secondary literacy initiatives. 2.Create a community of learners in which teachers, coaches, and administrators work as a team. 3.Provide secondary schools with consistent support from specialized staff. 4.Be attentive to the local, state, and national policy environment to maintain emphasis on secondary literacy. 15

WHAT HAS ADOLESCENT LITERACY LOOKED LIKE FROM 2002 TO 2006? 30 secondary schools used local funds to become ARI schools 4 Regional Reading Coaches supported 135 intermediate, middle, and high schools ARI studied recent research and updated model for secondary schools ARI wrote Striving Readers grant but did not submit ARI released RFP, seeking to reignite adolescent literacy effort 16

WHAT MADE SPARKS FLY AGAIN? Reading Next: A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy Biancarosa, G., and Snow, C.E. (2004) 17

THE FIFTEEN ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE ADOLESCENT LITERACY PROGRAMS Instructional Improvements 1.Direct, explicit comprehension instruction 2.Effective instructional practices embedded in content 3.Motivation and self- directed learning 4.Text-based collaborative learning 5.Strategic tutoring 6.Diverse texts 7.Intensive writing 8.A technology component 18

THE FIFTEEN ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE ADOLESCENT LITERACY PROGRAMS Infrastructural Improvements 9. Ongoing formative assessment of students 10. Extended time for literacy 11. Professional development 12. Ongoing summative assessment of students and programs 13. Teacher teams 14. Leadership 15. A comprehensive and coordinated literacy program 19

LAUNCHED ARI-PAL Released an RFP to 130 LEAs (April, 2006) Anticipated forming 8-10 partnerships with selected LEAs 20

THE PARTNERSHIP ARI Professional Development and Weekly Support LEA Leadership and Financial Support 21

THE QUESTIONS 1. What does it take? 2. What is the cost? 22

LAUNCHED ARI-PAL (Cont.) Received 30 proposals (May, 2006) Selected 14 partners (May, 2006) Trained 14 faculties (Summer, 2006) Purchased GRADE for a common informal measure Provided $140 per student to assist intervention ($25,000 - $140,000) 23

WHAT WILL WE DO IN THE MONTHS AHEAD? We will study the ARI-PAL implementation and results and make any adjustments needed to increase effectiveness. We will continue to seek incentives to motivate LEAs to invest resources in practices that have proven effectiveness for adolescent literacy. We will make use of 14 ARI-PAL pilot schools as demonstration sites that can partner with other LEAs. We will seek other partners (LEAs, business community, legislature) who can increase the resources available for expansion. 24

CONTACT INFORMATION Katherine A. Mitchell, Assistant State Superintendent of Education for Reading Director, Alabama Reading Initiative Director, Alabama Reading First Initiative Phone: Reeda Betts Secondary Specialist, Alabama Reading Initiative Phone: