Public Information Meeting Draft 2009 Long-Range Transportation Plan for the State of Connecticut (2009-2035) March 2009 March 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
State of Connecticut Department of Transportation PUBLIC LISTENING SESSION Planning for Connecticuts TransportationFuture September 2003 Beyond Ten… A.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
CONNECTICUT FY FY 2017 BIENNIUM GOVERNOR’S BUDGET DANNEL P. MALLOY, GOVERNOR February 26, 2015.
Public Listening Session Long-Range Transportation Plan for the State of Connecticut ( )
Tribal Transportation Improvement Program (TTIP) Tribal Transportation Planning U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration November,
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Public Transit Division Discretionary Grant Programs.
Public Participation Advisory Committee February 25, 2015.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Transportation Disadvantaged Training and Technology Conference July 14, 2010.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
State of Connecticut Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT The Transportation Planning Process June 2007.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OVERVIEW, WORKPLAN & PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR ALACHUA COUNTY Energy Conservation Strategies Commission February 18,
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DOT Livability Initiative Smart Mobility Framework Workshop June 16, 2009 Presented by:
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Presented by Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning and Capital Programming Funding Prioritization Process Chapter 725 January 2016.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Public Information Meeting Draft 2009 Long-Range Transportation Plan for the State of Connecticut ( ) March 2009 March 2009

Roxane M. Fromson Supervising Transportation Planner Bureau of Policy and Planning Connecticut Department of Transportation Speaker and Moderator Draft 2009 LRP

Outline of Discussion  PURPOSE OF LRP & FEDERALLY MANDATED FACTORS  THE PLANNING PROCESS  ISSUES, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS  INFLUENCING FACTORS & NEW DIRECTIONS Draft 2009 LRP

Purpose of LRP  A federally mandated policy document (23 U.S.C. Sec. 135)  Prepared by the State of Connecticut’s Department of Transportation  The federally recognized transportation plan for the State of Connecticut  Updated every 3 to 5 years and submitted to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)  Covers at least a 20-year future time horizon  Must address 8 specific factors factors Draft 2009 LRP: Purpose & Federally Mandated Factors

Federally Mandated Factors  Emphasize the preservation and the most efficient use of the existing transportation system  Promote efficient system management and operation  Support the economic vitality of the United States, the States, and metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas  Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users  Enhance transportation security for motorized and nonmotorized users Draft 2009 LRP: Purpose & Federally Mandated Factors

Federally Mandated Factors  Increase the accessibility and mobility options  Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes  Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns Draft 2009 LRP: Purpose & Federally Mandated Factors

Outline of Discussion  THE PLANNING PROCESS  Information Considered  Participants in the Transportation Planning Process Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Relationships of the LRP to Other Planning Documents Statutes & Public Acts Various Studies & Reports 2007 & 2009 MTPs ConnDOT STIPs Regional LRPs and TIPs 2004 Plan of C & D TSB Report (January 2007) 2011 MTP ConnDOT STIPs Regional LRPs and TIPs Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Documents Considered: Regional Long-Range Transportation Plans  Mandated by Section 134 of title 23 U.S. Code & Section 8 of title 49 U.S. Code  Prepared by designated Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) (There are 11 in Connecticut.)  Submitted to Federal Highway Administration  Must cover a future 20-year period  Must address the same 8 factors listed for statewide LRP  Must be updated at least every 3 years (All were updated in 2007)  Must be developed through a proactive public involvement process Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Documents Considered: Transportation Strategy Board Report  Mandated by Public Acts 01-5 &  Prepared by the Transportation Strategy Board  Proposes a transportation strategy to guide the State for the next 20 years  Proposes actions and tactics to achieve those strategies during the next 10 years  Must include a prioritized list of projects to implement strategy  Estimates capital and operating investments to implement those actions  Suggests the revenue sources to fund those investments Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Documents Considered: TSB Report TSB Guiding Principles  Guiding Principles:  A balanced transportation system that provides mobility for people and goods in a way which meets the needs of users, businesses and commerce is essential.  Transportation system must be multi-modal and provide options to the single passenger automobile.  Transportation system must be maintained and preserved.  Transportation policy must also reflect the economic, social and environmental needs and policies of the state. Planning of transportation infrastructure and improvements must support both economic development and a sustainable environment. Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Documents Considered: Transportation Strategy Board Report  Guiding Principles:  Transportation system must be flexible and responsive enough to meet the transportation needs of a wide variety of customers, including those with special needs  The provision of accurate, timely information about transportation systems and services is essential to the success of the state’s transportation system. It must leverage innovation and advances in technology in order to improve service and control costs Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process  Transportation and development investments must support responsible growth, transit-oriented development and the State Plan of Conservation and Development  Transportation planning, at all levels, must be comprehensive, inclusive and visionary and must maximize the options available to decision makers. Cooperation between local, state and federal organizations must be encouraged. Whenever possible, transportation investments should be coordinated with similar planning and investments in neighboring states

Documents Considered: State Plan of Conservation & Development (C & D Plan)  Required by State statute (CGS Section 16a-24)  Prepared by State Office of Policy & Management  A statement of the State’s growth, resource management and public investment policies  Updated every 5 years  Provides framework for administrative & programmatic actions and capital & operational investment decisions of state government which influence future growth & development of Connecticut Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Documents Considered: Other Pertinent Plans and Documents  Environmental Reports  Connecticut Climate Change Action Plan 2005  Connecticut Clean Diesel Plan (January 2006)  Governor’s Energy Plan (September 2006)  Safety and Modal Reports  Strategic Highway Safety Plan (September 2006)  Connecticut Statewide Airport System Plan (June 2006)  Connecticut Public Transportation Commission’s Annual Report (Dec. 2007)  Connecticut Rail Commuter Council’s Annual Report (2008)  Connecticut Maritime Commission’s Annual Report (2008)  Transit for Connecticut’s “Bus Transit Analysis Needs Study”  Transit for Connecticut’s “Responsible Growth Task Force Report 2008”  Other Planning Reports  Regional Plan Association’s report, Northeast Megaregion 2050: A Common Future (Nov. 2007)  Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission (Dec. 2007) Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Participants in the Process Coordination with Other Entities CitizensCitizens Affected Public AgenciesAffected Public Agencies Reps of Users of Public TransportationReps of Users of Public Transportation Reps of Public Transportation EmployeesReps of Public Transportation Employees Freight ShippersFreight Shippers Private Providers of TransportationPrivate Providers of Transportation Reps of Users of Pedestrian Walkways & Bicycle FacilitiesReps of Users of Pedestrian Walkways & Bicycle Facilities Reps of the DisabledReps of the Disabled Federally Recognized Indian TribesFederally Recognized Indian Tribes Other Interested PartiesOther Interested Parties Cooperatives State & Local Planning Efforts Connecticut Department of TransportationConnecticut Department of Transportation Other State AgenciesOther State Agencies Transit DistrictsTransit Districts Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs)Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs) Local Governments & Local Community OrganizationsLocal Governments & Local Community Organizations General Policy, Planning, Requirements, & Funding Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Federal Transit Administration (FTA)Federal Transit Administration (FTA) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Participants in the Process: Public Involvement OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT  Prior to Preparation of Draft LRP  7 Listening Sessions in Nov. & Dec in Nov. & Dec  Public Comment Period from Sept. 20 – Dec. 31, 2007 from Sept. 20 – Dec. 31, 2007  Comments could be presented orally or in writing at any of orally or in writing at any of the Listening sessions, or the Listening sessions, or mailed or ed to CTDOT mailed or ed to CTDOT  Comments received prior to January 1, 2007, were considered January 1, 2007, were considered when preparing the Draft LRP when preparing the Draft LRP Draft 2009 LRP: Planning Process

Outline of Discussion  ISSUES, STRATEGIES & ACTIONS  Statutory Responsibilities  Mission Statement  Influencing Factors  Major Needs & Issues Draft 2009 LRP: Issues Strategies & Actions

Responsibilities & Mission Statement Our Responsibilities… The agency shall be responsible for all aspects of the planning, development, maintenance and improvement of transportation in the state. (Section 13b-3CGS) Our Mission… to provide a safe and efficient intermodal transportation network that improves the quality of life and promotes economic vitality for the State and the region to provide a safe and efficient intermodal transportation network that improves the quality of life and promotes economic vitality for the State and the region Draft 2009 LRP Issues, Strategies & Actions

Department Responsibilities Draft 2009 LRP: Issues Strategies & Actions Policy & Planning Oversees inventory of state highway data and performs travel forecasting; conducts and administers various planning studies; and prepares environmental documents, permits and various transportation plans and administers various transportation safety programs. Aviation & Ports Manages airport and waterway facilities in Connecticut. Engineering & Construction Oversees highway design, construction, and maintenance as well as highway safety programs. Highway Operations Oversees highway operations and highway and bridge maintenance programs and activities Public Transportation Oversees rail and bus services as well as other ridesharing functions.

Factors that Influence Transportation in Connecticut & ConnDOT LRP Overview: Issues, Strategies & Actions

Transportation Financing Capital Program Future Directions and Influencing Factors Capital Program Budget (SFY2009) Total = $960 Million Source: Bureau of Finance & Administration. Data based on State Fiscal Year. These figures do not include the governor’s transportation initiatives of 2005 & Graphic revised in August Federal 65% Appropriations 2% State Bond 33%

AIRPORT FACILITIES & EQUIPMENT PROGRAM U.S. Congress Federal Funding Source Future Directions and Influencing Factors VISION 100 (FFY ) SAFETEA-LU (FFY ) Airport & Airway Trust Fund Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Trust Fund AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGH HAZARD ELIMINATION PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPOR- TATION PROGRAM WATER TRANSPOR- TATION STUDIES, SERVICES, & PROJECTS BRIDGE PROGRAMS INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE NAT’L HIGHWAY SYSTEM CONGESTION, MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL GOV’T

State Government - CT General Assembly Special Transportation Fund (STF) LRP Overview: Resource Needs Source: Bureau of Finance & Administration. Data based on State Fiscal Year. Graphic revised in June Estimated SFY2009 Special Transportation Fund Motor Fuel 44% MV Receipts 20% Oil Company 12% LPF 14% CT DMV Sales 6% Interest 4% FTA 0.0% SFY 2009 Estimated Revenue = $1,157 Million

Relationships of Influencing Factors: Spheres of Influence LRP Overview: Issues, Strategies & Actions Public Needs & Wants Political Interests Transportation Users Transportation Providers New Information & Technology Unforeseen Events Demographics U.S. Congress State Legislature Federal Agencies State Agencies (ConnDOT)

Key Issues Land Use Environment Travel Delays Safety & Security Aging Population FundingPriorities Draft 2009 LRP: Issues, Strategies & Actions

Key Issues & Recommendations Identified in Regional Long-Range Plans  Key Issues & Recommendations  Increase Funding  Improve mobility and quality of life and encourage economic development while increasing options available for transit and ridesharing  Encourage walking and biking  Increase bus service and frequency while improving bus shelters, clearly marked and consistent use and design of stop signs  Expand elderly and para-transit service Draft 2009 LRP Issues, Strategies & Actions

Key Issues & Recommendations Identified in Regional Long-Range Plans  Common Key Issues & Recommendations  Focus new growth in already developed areas  Improve interconnectivity between modes and public transportation links between growth centers  Preserve the existing system  Provide improvements to link these investments with growth centers and other transportation modes to  Provide better fluidity within regions and the State as a whole Draft 2009 LRP: Issues, Strategies & Actions

Various Plans & Reports Considered & Referenced Draft 2009 LRP: Issues, Strategies & Actions  Connecticut Statewide Airport System Plan (June 2006)  Connecticut Public Transportation Commission’s Annual Report (2007)  Transit for Connecticut’s Bus Transit Analysis Needs Analysis  Connecticut Rail Commuter Council’s Annual Report (2008)  Connecticut Maritime Commission’s Annual Report (2008)  Transit for Connecticut’s “Responsible Growth Task Force Report 2008”

Strategic Five-Point Action Plan Draft 2009 LRP: Issues, Strategies & Actions Preservation – Maintain the Existing System in a State of Good Repair Preservation – Maintain the Existing System in a State of Good Repair System Modifications – Safety & Modernization System Modifications – Safety & Modernization System Productivity – Efficiency System Productivity – Efficiency Economic & Environmental Impact – Quality of Life Economic & Environmental Impact – Quality of Life Strategic Capacity Improvements Strategic Capacity Improvements

Preserving & Maintain the Existing Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system

Managing & Operating the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Promote efficient system management & operation

Ensuring Safety on the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Increase the safety of the transportation system for users of motorized and non-motorized modes of transportation

Securing the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Increase the security of the transportation system for users of motorized and non-motorized modes

Reduce Energy Use & Negative Impacts to Quality of Life & the Environment Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned growth and economic development patterns

Improving Accessibility & Mobility within the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight

Integrating & Connect the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Enhance the integration & the connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes throughout the state, for people and freight

Promoting Economic Vitality with the Aid of the Transportation System Issues, Strategies & Actions Federal Mandate: Support the economic vitality of the United States, the states, nonmetropolitan areas, and metropolitan areas, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency

Outline of Discussion  New Directions & Areas of Emphasis Draft 2009 LRP: New Directions & Areas of Emphasis

Paradigm Shift  Paradigm Shift  Management of its transportation system  Condition of infrastructure  Waning resources to pay for much needed repairs and improvements  Altering character and preferences of the traveling public  Broader focus on mobility needs  Importance of land use planning  Integration of and connectivity among modes of transportation  Greater transparency  New partnerships Draft 2009 LRP: New Directions & Areas of Emphasis

2004 LRP vs. Draft 2009 LRP: Key Differences  2009 LRP:  Includes a 5-point Strategic Investment Plan  Emphasizes greater interagency and interstate coordination  More emphasis on coordination of land use planning and transportation  Greater emphasis on addressing the needs of pedestrians and cyclists  Stresses accountability and transparency and incorporates performance measures LRP Overview

Opportunities for Public Review & Comment  Draft LRP (Published in Fall 2009)  4 Public Information Meetings March 31, 2009, at ConnDOT Admin. Building, Conference Room A in Newington (1-3 p.m.)March 31, 2009, at ConnDOT Admin. Building, Conference Room A in Newington (1-3 p.m.) March 31, 2009, at Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments in in Norwich (7 – 9 p.m.)March 31, 2009, at Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments in in Norwich (7 – 9 p.m.) April 1, 2009, at Chase Municipal Building, 1st Floor Conference Room in Waterbury (7 – 9 p.m.)April 1, 2009, at Chase Municipal Building, 1st Floor Conference Room in Waterbury (7 – 9 p.m.) April 2, 2009, at Bridgeport City Hall, Common Council Chambers in Bridgeport (7 – 9 p.m.)April 2, 2009, at Bridgeport City Hall, Common Council Chambers in Bridgeport (7 – 9 p.m.)  45-Day Public Review & Comment Period runs from March 17, 2009 – April 30, 2009  Orally present comments at a meeting, or mail or your comments by April 30, comments to: comments to: For your convenience, the Input, Ideas and Comments sheet is also available on the Department’s web site with other related LRP materials as a user-friendly form with a button for submitting comments by . Mailing address: Roxane Fromson, Transportation Supervising Planner, Conn. Dept. of Mailing address: Roxane Fromson, Transportation Supervising Planner, Conn. Dept. of Transportation, Bureau of Policy and Planning, P.O. Box , Transportation, Bureau of Policy and Planning, P.O. Box , Newington, CT Newington, CT  Draft document is available for review in selected locations and on the Department’s web site at under “Publications”  Final LRP (Anticipated Publication Date: June 2009)  Document will be made available on Department’s web site, at selected locations & upon request. Draft 2009 LRP

Department’s Web Site and Contact Information Navigate as follows:   Click on “Publications” (from banner at top of page)   Click on “Plans, Projects, Studies”   Click on “ConnDOT Plans”   Click on “Long-Range Transportation Plan” Opportunities for Public Input