The New Peralta ESL Curriculum …coming to colleges near you Fall 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards
Academic English for Success in Content and Literacy Let Academic English take center stage in your classroom K-6 ESL/ELD Program.
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Career & College Promise Career & Technical Education Conference July 17, 2014.
Curriculum and Education Update May Framework for Curriculum Review ReviewDevelopImplementMonitor.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Grants Pass High School Four Year Plan Tracking System Celena Shouse-Bland.
Richard Roy, Associate Chair of ESL/Languages and Cultures
PEAC Peralta ESL Advisory Council Implementing Our NEW Accelerated ESL Model Dr. Sedique Popal College of Alameda November 16, 2012.
Special Education Class Options. Special Education Classes  Placement determined by IEP team  IEP team determines specific courses. Case Manager needs.
Teaching ESL Students What You Need to Know.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
WorkReady Workplace Literacy. WorkReady! Literacy Texas and the South Texas Literacy Coalition announce the initiation of the WorkReady! Workplace literacy.
Lockland district’s goal for all students Move to college or a skilled job upon graduation.
University Core- Minimum 44 Credits 1.FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS To help students achieve competency in a variety of communication & quantitative skills.
English Language Instruction for College (ELIC) MJC Academic ESL Program Redesign.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
New Jersey ESL Summit May 1, 2015 Leo Kazan Kathleen Kelly Robert Salvato Passaic County Community College.
Art Department Curriculum Overview Report to Curriculum Council March 21, 2013.
Professional Development Update February 12, 2013 Prepared by: Lisa Schwartz.
Model Standards English as a Second Language OACE Integrated Programs Planning Project Summer 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Adult Education Program.
Everyone needs a device (or share) Open internet (Wifi: marriot conference success13 OR 4G fine) Socrative student m.socrative.com YOU ARE A STUDENT room.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Saunders & Marcaletti. Thompson Issues in the Development of AMAOs Understanding second language acquisition should be a prerequisite to setting.
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
California’s Common Core Content Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
SIOP Overview Humble ISD Sara Smith-Frings. ELLs in Humble I.S.D. Fall 2001 ELL 1226 Fall 2002 ELL 1438 Fall 2003 ELL 1578 Fall 2004 ELL 1750 Fall 2005.
Our district’s goal for all students Move to college or a skilled job upon graduation.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
English-as-a-Second Language Programs
ESOL/HILT Programs and Services WORKSHOP FOR PARENTS September 2010 Arlington Public Schools Department of Instruction.
English Language Arts Program Update Lisa M. White, ELA Coordinator School Committee Meeting March 5, 2012.
Transforming the classroom for lower levels of ESL Kim Chapman & Adria Katka North Seattle College SBCTC: May 2014 Project I-DEA.
TECHNOLOGY AND TEXTBOOKS: Cutting- Edge Early Literacy Technology By Kari Miller.
Implementation of the Student Success Task Force Recommendations Wheeler North, Treasurer, ASCCC Michelle Pilati, President, ASCCC.
BUILDING STUDENTS’ LITERACY SKILLS Rosanne Zeppieri Teaching World Languages: Elementary.
DR. ELKE SCHNEIDER (PHD) DR. KELLY M. COSTNER (PHD) PROJECT FUNDED BY A US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL.
Curriculum and Instruction Council November 12, 2009.
College Literacy in Content Areas Victoria Appatova University of Cincinnati CRLA Conference, Houston, TX November, 2012.
Minnesota State Graduation Requirements Lincoln International High School Graduation Requirements.
Alignment of Course Standards and Assessments Overview of CTE Task Group.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
World Language Assessment Team What have we been up to and how can we help you?
English Language Proficiency Standards  The English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), as required by 19 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 74,
SADDLEBACK COLLEGE The Reading Program Program for student success.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
COURSE SELECTION NIGHT DUXBURY HIGH SCHOOL
FALL 2015 MIRAMAR COLLEGE LAURA MURPHY COLLEGE- WIDE OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FACILITATOR ISLO Assessment Summary.
Welcome As you arrive, please find the posters on the wall... Write your name and institution on the poster with the title that best describes the role.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
Coventry Public Schools
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Modifications For EL Learners in the Regular Education Classroom
The Reading Program for student success
English as a Second Language Program.
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
French 0520.
German 0525.
Suggested TALKING POINTS:
Mandatory Placement for English as a Second Language (ESL) Courses
Presentation transcript:

The New Peralta ESL Curriculum …coming to colleges near you Fall 2012

PEAC’s One-Year Process of Curriculum Redesign August 2010: district discipline meeting with administrator March 2011: district-wide ESL meeting to agree on components of new curriculum June/August 2011: mapped out levels and strands August February 2012: wrote 24 new course outlines, entered in Curricunet, and passed them through all relevant committees

Why the change? Some issues with the current curriculum: Vulnerable to arbitrary class cuts that destroy program integrity based on scheduling, enrollment, other factors not in our control Lockstep 5-6 levels not responsive enough to individual rates of progress, both faster and slower “Cafeteria Model” resulted in students taking too many units at lower levels and getting “stuck,” running out of financial aid, not getting enough reading, etc. College/career skills not consistently scaffolded through the levels/skill areas

What’s new about the new curriculum? Responds strategically to program cuts by changing unit values to prioritize our core classes while still offering a variety of electives Offers a flexible, accelerated progression to better meet individual student needs Streamlines pathways to student goals by consolidating course offerings and integrating more reading into the writing classes Scaffolds U.S. college/career skills more consistently at all levels

Overview of Main Features 4 level A/B system for flexible acceleration Core classes offered at each level: – Reading & Writing (6 units) (adv. level transferable) – Listening & Speaking (4 units) (adv. level transferable) – Grammar (4 units)

Overview of Main Features 5 strands of transferable skills in addition to language objectives run through all core courses at all levels:  US College, Classroom, and Study Skills  Information Literacy: Computer Skills/Research  Intercultural Communication and U.S.  Sentence-Level Accuracy  Comprehension (Reading/Listening) and Production (Writing/Speaking) Processes  Critical Thinking

Overview of Main Features Existing electives still offered (vocabulary, CTE, Writing Workshop, etc.) Other new electives (reading topics, U.S. culture, content support, and more) under development

Change: 6 Levels to 4

4-Level A/B plan at a glance: READING/ WRITING 6 UNITS 285 A 285 B222 A 222 B 223 A 223 B52 A 52 B LISTENING/ SPEAKING 4 UNITS 283 A 283 B232 A 232 B 233 A 233 B50 A 50 B GRAMMAR 4 UNITS 284 A 284 B215 A 215 B 216 A 216 B217 A 217 B

Visualization #1 of the A/B plan: Accordion High Beg A INT A HIGH INT A ADV A High Beg B INT B HIGH INT B ADV B STUDENT ADVANCING FAST

Visualization #1 of the A/B plan: Accordion High Beg A INT A HIGH INT A ADV A High Beg B INT B HIGH INT B ADV B STUDENT ADVANCING SLOWER

Visualization #1 of the A/B plan: Accordion High Beg A INT A HIGH INT A ADV A High Beg B INT B HIGH INT B ADV B STUDENT ADJUSTING TO PROGRESS

Visualization #2 of the A/B plan: Stairs ADV B ADV A HIGH INT B HIGH INT A INT B INT A HIGH BEG B HIGH BEG A STUDENT ADVANCING FASTER

Visualization #2 of the A/B plan: Stairs ADV B ADV A HIGH INT B HIGH INT A INT B INT A HIGH BEG B HIGH BEG A STUDENT ADVANCING SLOWER

Visualization #2 of the A/B plan: Stairs STUDENT ADJUSTING TO PROGRESS ADV B ADV A HIGH INT B HIGH INT A INT B INT A HIGH BEG B HIGH BEG A

Other features of A/B system: All students initially test into an A level B levels are only for those who have passed A and are not ready for the next A level Students taking A and B of a level are in class together and are only identified on the roster Attempt to alternate, not repeat instructors/ materials if possible

Other features of A/B system: Students assessed toward end of semester to determine their best next class: Students finishing A level: – If failing, repeat the A level – If marginal, advance to the B level – If proficient, advance to the next A level Students finishing B level: – If failing, repeat the B level – If proficient, advance to the next A level