Chemical Composition of PM2.5 over N. America Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) G.Smoky Mtn. Yellowstone Mammuth Cave Sequoia ? ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our National Parks Founded in part by John Muir. John Muir
Advertisements

National Parks Research Project. National Parks The purpose of the United States National Parks system is to protect the scenery, wildlife and natural.
STN Carbon Field Blank Analysis, Derived Organic Carbon Analysis and IMPROVE blank corrected artifact analysis Bret Schichtel.
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
Biomass Smoke Aerosol: Spatial and Temporal Pattern over the US October 2005
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Use of National PM2.5 and Speciation Network Measurements for Model Evaluation For presentation at PM Model Performance Workshop February 10-11, 2004:
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET CAPITA September 2004 Natural Aerosol.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
Calculating Percent Composition Mrs. Page 10 th Chemistry.
National Parks Research Project. Project Requirements Create a research project that details: –History of your park –Ecology of park (habitat, animals,
A Tale of Two Capitols – Beijing, PRC and Washington, USA Summary by Thomas A. Cahill, Professor of Physics (recalled) and Atmospheric Sciences (emeritus)
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
Evolving Understanding of Pollutant Transport from Asia to North America Richard (Tony) VanCuren Research Division, California Air Resources Board Department.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Global and Local Dust over North America Direct questions to Rudolf B. Husar
Observation-Based Quantification of the PM and Ozone at the US-Global Boundary CAPITACAPITA, Washington University Rudolf B. Husar, PI In Cooperation with.
CATT (Comparative Aerosol Trajectory Tool) CAPITA Web-based Tool for Ensemble Trajectory Analysis, MANE-VU & MW RPO funding support, Currently functional.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
Estimating the Contribution of Smoke and Its Fuel Types to Fine Particulate Carbon using a Hybrid- CMB Model Bret A. Schichtel and William C. Malm - NPS.
Combined Aerosol & Trajectory Tool (CATT) Development R. Husar, K. Hoijarvi, J. Colson, S. Falke Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA)
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
Global and Local Dust over North America R. B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University, St. Louis, MO Prepared.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
“Quick Look” Trajectory Assessment of Phase 1 Battelle PMF Sources at Lye Brook Wilderness IMPROVE Site P. Wishinski & R. Poirot, VT DEC ° 9 PMF Sources.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Oil & Natural Gas Partnership. Problem We are having problems meeting NAAQS and regional haze standards in the West Our existing programs are sometimes.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support.
Air Quality Modeling for SAMI: July 1995 Episode Talat Odman, Ted Russell, Jim Wilkinson, Yueh-Jiun Yang, Jim Boylan, Alberto Mendoza.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
WRAP Meeting Sept 13, 2006 Air Resources in Western National Parks Chris Shaver Air Resources Division National Park Service.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Proposal to NARSTO: Incorporation of Canadian and Mexican PM data into NAM Spatio-Temporal Analysis Submitted to NARSTO Rudolf Husar May 2001.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
North American Visibility. rdyswth Seasonal Bext.
Global and Local Dust over N. America Observations and Analysis Tools Rudolf Husar CAPITACAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis Presented at: Second.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Emissions Background and Rationale North American SO 2 Emission Rates North American NO x Emission Rates Contact: Bret Schichtel,
National Parks Research Project. What are National Parks? America's National Parks An Introduction to National Parks - PBS.
Brian Timin- EPA/OAQPS
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From a manuscript draft courtesy of Bill Malm, National Park Service
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Marc Pitchford NOAA/EPA
Acadia NP Size – 7.4 Horiz – 2.0 Vert – 0.1.
Acadia NP Size – 7.4 Horiz – 2.0 Vert – 0.1.
Presentation transcript:

Chemical Composition of PM2.5 over N. America Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) G.Smoky Mtn. Yellowstone Mammuth Cave Sequoia ? ?

Aerosol Types Aerosol are composed of multiple types. Each type may be considered a different pollutant since it has its own class of sources, aerosol properties and is associated with different effects. In other words, sulfate, nitrate organics, dust (soil) components of PM have no more commonalities then CO, NOx and SO2. The aerosol types are lumped into “PM2.5” by the current regulations. The IMPROVE aerosol types are:IMPROVE aerosol types SULFATE = 4.125*S Ammonium sulfate NITRATE = 1.29*NO3Ammonium nitrate ORGANICS = 1.4(O1+O2+O3+O4+OP)1.4* various organics (OMC) SOOT = E1+E2+E3+OPLight absorbing carbon (LAC) SOIL = 2.2AL++2.49SI+1.63CA+2.42FE+1.94TI Crustal elements FMASS = SULFATE + NITRATE + LAC + OCM + SOILReconstructed fine mass CMASS= MT-MF Coarse=PM10-FMASS Issue: Each aerosol type has many variants in nature. I think that the IMPROVE typing (aggregation) used by Malm & Co is good and it should be retained for presenting the network results. Need for alternative aggregations? I am open for discussion RBH.

Method: Cumulative Seasonal PM2.5 Composition PM2.5 chemical components were calculated based on the CIRA methodologyCIRA methodology In addition, the the organics were (tentatively) further separated as Primary Smoke Organics (red) and Remainder organics (purple) PSO = 20*(K *Si – 0.02* Na) Remainder Org = Organics - PSO Also, the ‘Unknown’ mass (white area) is the difference between the gravimetrically measured and the chemically reconstructed PM2.5. The daily chemical composition was aggregated over the available IMPROVE data range ( ) to retain the seasonal structure. I order to reduce the noise the daily data were smoothed by a 15-day moving average filter. Shenandoah

Regional Grouping of Sites IMPROVE sites were grouped as follows: –New England () –Mid-Atlantic () –Central EUS () –Peripheral ()

Peripheral Sites: Chemical Mass Balance Eastern N. America is surrounded by aerosol source regions such as Sahara and Central America. As a consequence, the PM concentration at the ‘edges’ ranges between 4-15 ug/m3; much of it originating outside. The chemical composition of the inflow varies by location and season. Sahara dust, and smoke from Central America and W. US/Canada are the main contributions. Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Acadia Everglades

Peripheral Sites Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3) Acadia Everglades

Upper BuffaloMammuth CaveShining Rock G.Smoky Mtn. Sipsy

Mid-Atlantic Region Shenandoah Washington DCBrigantine Dolly SodsJefferson

New England Region Lye Brook MoosehornAcadia Proctor Maple Ringwood

Upper Midwest Badlands Voyageurs

TX, NM Chiricahua Bandelier White RiverGuadalupe Big Bend

TX, NM Tonto Petrified For.Saguaro Chiricahua

TX, NM Tonto Petrified For.Saguaro Chiricahua

Idaho Tonto Three SistersYellowstone Bridger Jawbridge Great Basin

California - Background Bliss State (2043 m) Lessen (1800 m) Crater Lake (1980 m) Point Reyes (38 m, Beach)

California - Perturbed Yosemite S. Lake TahoeSequoia San Gorgonio Pinnacles

Northwest - Perturbed Abbotsford (0 m) Chilliwack (9 m) Puget Sound (99 m) Columbia River (90 m) Mt. Rainier (436 m)

Remote ‘Global’ Sites Denali (640 m) Virgin Islands (46 m) Mauna Loa (3398 m)

Chemical Speciation of the Fine Mass Based on IMPROVEIMPROVE See Sisler & MalmSisler & Malm Over the remote Eastern US, sulfates dominate the Fine Mass The Southeast is also influenced by ‘smoke’ (organics+LAC) and dust. Over the West, organics, nitrates and dust dominate