NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION Michael Casper, Compliance Manager  September 4, 2014.
Section 3 Steed Robinson – Office of Community Development  9/4/2014.
 WELCOME  Welcome to the home page for the Louisiana Mapping Project (LaMP). The LaMP effort is being undertaken by Department of Homeland Security’s.
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 3, 2014.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2013 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE LITE.
1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Glenn Misner  September 4, 2014.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Section 3 Overview (see also DCA Policy– Appendix R)
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Making Good Decisions in the Environmental Review Process 2012 Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program Information Workshop Monday, February 1, 2010.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Fair Housing/ Equal Opportunity and Section 3.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Environmental Troubleshooting State Community Development Block Grant Rhode Island December 2012.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
2012 DCA CHIP Applicants’ Workshop Community HOME Investment Program (CHIP) HOMEOWNER REHABILITATION FEDERAL COMPLIANCE.
Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 2, 2015.
Immediate Threat and Danger Program Pam Truitt  September 10, 2015.
Program Overview/Changes & Environmental Review January 28, 2016 Small Cities CDBG Workshop - January 28, Hartford.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
HOME Commitments, Grant Based Accounting, and Managing HOME Deadlines March 14, 2016 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
ACA Conference - September 2017
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
HUD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2018 – 19 PUBLIC SERVICES PRE-APPLICATION WORKSHOP December 11th and 12th, 2017 City of White Plains Department.
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015

Why Environmental Review? Avoid or mitigate impacts that may harm residents Avoid litigation that could halt a project on environmental grounds Avoid monitoring findings and/or loss of CDBG financial assistance to your project REQUIRED – by Federal Law & Regulation under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and NEPA related laws

Statutory & Regulatory Structure  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and implementing regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR Parts ).  HUD Regulations (24 CFR Part 58).  NEPA-Related Laws and Authorities (List at 24 CFR 58.5).

Environmental Review Regulations 24 CFR Part 58  HUD’s regulation allows local units of government to perform NEPA responsibilities and assume the responsibilities of HUD.  Regulation titled “Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities”  Covered in Chapter 2 of the Recipients’ Manual  Compliance is a General Condition of all CDBG Awards.

Who Is Responsible for the Environmental Review?  Chief Elected Official (CEO)  Assumes responsibility for environmental review  Must sign the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and the Request for Release of Funds/Certification  Accepts the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts as the responsible entity in environmental matters for this certification

When should the Environmental Review start?  Before making choice limiting actions, including acquisition  Must be able to reject the site  Before commitment of funds – 24 CFR Part (a)  Neither a recipient nor any participant, including private non-profit or for-profit entity, may commit federal funds before approval of the RROF  Neither a recipient nor any participant may commit non-HUD funds if the project has the potential to have an adverse impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives.

Steps in the Environmental Review Process  Create the Environmental Review Record  Must be Available to Public  Determine the Level of Environmental Review Required  Applies to the project as a whole not just CDBG funds  Complete the Environmental Review and document Compliance with the related Laws  Publish Required Notices According to Level of Review

Steps in the Environmental Review Process (cont.)  Submit the Request for Release of Funds and public notices to DCA  DCA issues Release of Funds Letter “Removing Environmental Conditions”  Maintain Documentation of Compliance (Including Mitigation) in the Environmental Review Record (ERR)

Levels of Environmental Review  Four levels of review:  24 CFR Part 58.34(a) Exempt  24 CFR Part Categorically Excluded Categorical exclusions SUBJECT to laws and authorities at 24 CFR Part 58.5 Categorical exclusions NOT subject to laws and authorities at 24 CFR Part 58.5  24 CFR Part Environmental Assessment  24 CFR Part Environmental Impact Statement

Exempt Activities  Activities which are deemed not to affect the human and/or physical environment (i.e. environmental studies, planning, or administrative activities)  No publication requirements  Document finding in the environmental review record and proceed with project

Categorically Excluded  2 Classes  58.35(a) – activities SUBJECT TO other federal laws or authorities May Convert to Exempt - if formal compliance or mitigation is not required  58.35(b) – activities NOT SUBJECT TO other federal laws or authorities

Categorically Excluded Not Subject to 58.5  Working Capital or equipment in Economic Development projects  Housing Downpayment Assistance or Housing Supportive Services

Categorically Excluded Subject to 58.5  Acquisition, repair, improvement or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity by more than 20%.  Special projects directed to remove barriers in ADA projects or acquisition of land or buildings retained for the same use.

Environmental Assessment (EA)  EA is required if project activities are not determined to be Exempt or Categorically Excluded  Housing requires an EA when the project consist of 5 or more housing units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and there are not more than four housing units on one site.

Environmental Assessment  Use current form on DCA Website  Cite Authoritative Sources of Info  See HUD tool ( review/federal-related-laws-and-authorities)  Describe mitigation measure for any identified negative impacts  Evaluate all alternatives  Certifying Officer must sign FONSI

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)  Most CDBG projects do not trigger  Contact DCA immediately for assistance

Environmental Notices – Local Comment Period  Publish in local newspaper of general circulation.  Legal or non-legal section  Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds (NOI): 7 days  FONSI and NOI (Combined notice): 15 days  Notice allows for an additional 15 days for public objection of RROF to DCA.  Begins when DCA receives the RROF.

Local Period – Objections  Basis for Objections  Anything  Local Government must consider comments  Acknowledge and respond in writing

RROF Submission Requirements  Signed and dated RROF by Certifying Official  Copy of the Public Notice  Including Floodplain/Wetland (if applicable)  DO NOT submit the assessment  Funds will be released 16 days after receipt if no objections are received

Objections to DCA  Basis for Objections  RROF not signed by Certifying Officer  Omission of a required decision, finding, or step applicable to the environmental process  Committed funds prior to release of funds

Importance of Early Start  Begin environmental review process as soon as possible.  Typical times required to complete review range from 1 to 120 days.  Must be completed by someone competent to do review

Important Tips  Change of scope in project might require additional review.  DON’T SPEND A DIME – until your ER is complete and you have received Release of Funds from DCA  Exception for Admin and Design Costs  When in doubt – contact DCA/CDBG staff!

NEPA-Related Laws/Authorities  National Historic Preservation Act (1966)  Floodplain Management & Wetlands Protection: Executive Orders (1977)  Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972  Safe Drinking Water Act (1974)  Endangered Species Act (1973)  Wild & Scenic Rivers Act (1968)

NEPA-Related Laws/Authorities  Clean Air Act (1970)  Farmland Protection Policy Act (1981)  HUD Environmental Criteria & Standards  Noise Abatement and Control  Near Explosives or Flammable Sites  Near Airport Runway Protection Zones  Near Toxic Hazards  Environmental Justice E.O. (1994)  Noise Control Act (1972)

Contacts  Michael Casper  Pam Truitt