Gas Bar Decommissioning Project. OUTLINE o Background o Project Status o Cost to CANEX o Active Sites o Conclusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Chris Ford and James Hughes ( ) ( )
Advertisements

1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
Office of Science Experience with Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) of Environmental Remediation David Michlewicz – DOE Office of Science, Office of Safety,
Adjusting the Accounts
Measure M2 Environmental Cleanup Program Taxpayers Oversight Committee Aug 9, 2011.
GASB 49 –Accounting & Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations An Overview.
John Lynch, P.E. Palisade Software Miami Users Conference October 25,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Mary Bender, REAP Administrator State Conservation Commission Ag Environment Partnership Webinar, March 3, 2009 Welcome to a REAP Update.
IAEA/CNSC RSLS Elliot Lake Ontario Canada Workshop Presented by Amy Sparks Environment Canada May 1, 2014 Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP)
ADVANCE SPENDING REQUESTS – DEVELOPING REVISED PROGRAM Lynelle A. Gehrke, Associate Director Office of Contract & Grant Administration Campus Cost Transfer.
Jennifer Wendel, EPA March 25, 2015
Environmentally Impaired Property Transaction Analysis Combining Decision Trees and Monte Carlo Simulation Timothy Havranek and Poh Boon Ung October 2007.
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Dounreay Nuclear and Chemical Land Contamination.
Sam Winer Motors Technical Outreach Support for Communities Michigan State University East Lansing, MI November 29, 2001.
Responding to Soil Contamination in the Moanataiari Subdivision And when the NES does and does not apply May 2012.
Virtual Business: Retailing
Energy Management System (EnMS) Awareness
Business Opportunity EPRS Energy Co. Inc.. Overview World-wide oil production has been declining for decades. There are over 400,000 stripper or marginal.
Virtual Health & Safety Management System (VHSMS) A Brief Guide for Head Teachers.
Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act
Every student. every classroom. every day. Professional Services Contracts Overview and Current Processes.
0 FY12 State Budget Discussion Policy and Fiscal Committee November 1, 2010.
BACKGROUND Comprehensive Spending Review 2010 marked the beginning of the grant reduction programme Local government anticipating a 28% cut in grant over.
Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management Recent Successes 1 Environmental Remediation –Approximately $1B of environmental remediation remains.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Type A Water License Renewal for the Nanisivik Mine Project Fisheries and Oceans.
1 E-911 Services Board Meeting General Business Meeting September 8,
Urban Natural Features Strategy Planning and Environment Committee April 24, 2007.
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
Energy Northwest Executive Board Meeting February 27, 2003.
Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) Environmental Services Cooperative Agreement (ESCA) Remediation Program (RP) 1 FORA Environmental Liability Insurance Presentation.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
1 Collateral/Security A Regulators Perspective Wednesday, February 8,2012 John Schrock, Administrator –State of Michigan Workers’ Compensation Agency Self-Insured.
BUWALOFEFPUFAFPSAEFL Environmental Pollution and Applicability of Remediation Technologies in Latin American Countries BUWALOFEFPUFAFPSAEFL Contaminated.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Site License Advisory Team Feb. 25, 2010 meeting.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
Green Energy and the Brownfields: Energy and the Environment Clean up of Manufactured Gas Sites in Illinois Lawrence W. Eastep, P.E. Manager, Remedial.
Lupin Mines Incorporated Lupin Mine Project Type ‘A’ Water Licence Renewal Application Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting & Pre-Hearing Conference Kugluktuk,
Chapter Objectives Be able to: n Explain the differences in tax implications between asset sales and share sales. n Explain the implications to the vendor.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
Real Estate Loans.  Payment = (loan amount ÷ 1000) x table value  Use REAL ESTATE amortization table found on p Because this table lists the principal.
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request authorization to award Professional Services Agreement (PSA) No with Geomatrix; and PSA No with Hart Crowser for.
Chapter 3-1 Adjusting the Accounts Accounting Principles, Ninth Edition.
Planning Commission Work Session February 19, 2015.
Identifying Risks due to Historical Dry Cleaners.
CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 18, 2011 Central Park Gazebo Replacement.
Community LLC Driven Solar Electricity Development.
Education Funding: How Much is Enough?
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Dealmakers -- Not Deal Breakers
Project XYC: Project Plan
Limited Service Agreements
Presentation Outline Background Summary of City Actions
Advanced Environmental Management (AEM) Training Phase I
UNC Superfund Research Program
Solid Waste Department Rate Stabilization Plan Recommendation
Establish New Park Space in the Central District & Appropriate Funds to Acquire a Portion of an Existing Parking Lot for Conversion to Park Space March.
Psychology Learner Quick Start Guide: Practicum/Internship Application
final Discussions on the budget
Board of Public Utilities August 17, 2017
UST Universe- As of EOY FY2013
Presentation transcript:

Gas Bar Decommissioning Project

OUTLINE o Background o Project Status o Cost to CANEX o Active Sites o Conclusion

BACKGROUND In 1994 Shell advised CANEX that because of a new corporate policy, they would not be able to renew their supplier agreement with CANEX. No other gasoline supplier was willing to purchase Shell’s equipment and assume the attendant environmental risk. A decision was made to have Shell remove their equipment.

BACKGROUND Negotiations with Shell resulted in sharing remedial costs 50/50 between CANEX and Shell. The CANEX portion was divided between CANEX and Public Funds using the cost sharing formula established in CFP 110.

PROJECT STATUS  In total, 46 former CANEX Gas Bar sites were included in the project.  Clean-up started in spring  To date:  25 sites have been released  9 sites are awaiting pending releases  4 sites required no remedial action  8 sites are still at different stages of testing and/or remediation

REMEDIAL COSTS CANEX’ SHARE  Between 1995 and Feb 2003, CANEX spent $2.8M for soil testing, remediation and monitoring.  A reserve of $506K was set up at the end of FY 02/03 for remaining work.  While some sites will continue to be monitored until they meet guidelines, most of the work will be completed by the end of the current fiscal year.

TOTAL PROJECT COST  To date, the total cost of the project has been divided between CANEX, Shell and DND as follows:  CANEX $2.8M  Shell 3.5M  DND 1.3M  Total $7.6M

ACTIVE SITES  Of the 8 active sites, Shearwater is the most significant one with clean-up costs estimated at $350K of which CANEX would pay $250K.  North Bay will also require soil and groundwater remediation. Estimated costs $55K with a CANEX share of $13,750.  Work at other sites mostly involves monitoring or decommissioning of wells.

CONCLUSION The Gas Bar Decommissioning project is nearly completed. Once completed, total project cost should be around $8.4M with a CANEX share of $3.1M. All remedial costs have been either expensed or accrued between FY 95/96 and FY 02/03. No further liability is known at this point.