Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors V. Chiochia a, C.Amsler a, D.Bortoletto c, L.Cremaldi d, S.Cucciarelli e, A.Dorokhov a,b*, C.Hörmann a,b,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Advertisements

Epitaxial Silicon Detectors for Particle Tracking Overview on Radiation Tolerance at Extreme Hadron Fluence G. Lindström (a), E. Fretwurst (a), F. Hönniger.
TCT study of silicon epitaxial and MCZ detectors V. Eremin 1, M. Boscardin 2, M. Bruzzi 3, D. Creanza 4, A. Macchiolo 5, D. Menichelli 3, C. Piemonte 2,
Università degli Studi di Perugia Università degli Studi di Perugia IMM Bologna 1 Measurements and Simulations of Charge Collection Efficiency of p+/n.
Trapping in silicon detectors G. Kramberger Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Slovenia G. Kramberger, Trapping in silicon detectors, Aug , 2006,
3D simulations of device performance for 3D-Trench electrode detector Jianwei Chen a,b, Hao Ding a,b, Zheng Li a,b,c, *, Shaoan Yan a,b a Xiangtan University,
New approach to simulate radiation damage to single-crystal diamonds with SILVACO TCAD Florian Kassel, Moritz Guthoff, Anne Dabrowski, Wim de Boer.
Sensor simulation and position calibration for the CMS Pixel detector
CMS Pixel Simulation Vincenzo Chiochia
128 September, 2005 Silicon Sensor for the CMS Tracker The Silicon Sensors for the Inner Tracker of CMS CMS Tracker and it‘s Silicon Strip Sensors Radiation.
Department of Physics VERTEX 2002 – Hawaii, 3-7 Nov Outline: Introduction ISE simulation of non-irradiated and irradiated devices Non-homogeneous.
Test of Pixel Sensors for the CMS experiment Amitava Roy Purdue University.
November 3-8, 2002D. Bortoletto - Vertex Silicon Sensors for CMS Daniela Bortoletto Purdue University Grad students: Kim Giolo, Amit Roy, Seunghee.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Detectors for Harsh Radiation Environments
EE415 VLSI Design The Devices: Diode [Adapted from Rabaey’s Digital Integrated Circuits, ©2002, J. Rabaey et al.]
On MCz SCSI after 24 GeV/c proton irradiation 12th RD50 Workshop Ljubljana, 2-4 June 2008 D. Creanza On behalf of the Bari and Pisa RD50 groups.
Semiconductor detectors
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
1 Semiconductor Detectors  It may be that when this class is taught 10 years on, we may only study semiconductor detectors  In general, silicon provides.
8/22/01Marina Artuso - Pixel Sensor Meeting - Aug Sensor R&D at Syracuse University Marina Artuso Chaouki Boulahouache Brian Gantz Paul Gelling.
Drift and Diffusion Current
Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors AUTHOR: Irena Dolenc ADVISOR: prof. dr. Vladimir Cindro.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik
Study of leakage current and effective dopant concentration in irradiated epi-Si detectors I. Dolenc, V. Cindro, G. Kramberger, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Jožef.
Study of Behaviour of n-in-p Silicon Sensor Structures Before and After Irradiation Y. Unno, S. Mitsui, Y. Ikegami, S. Terada, K. Nakamura (KEK), O. Jinnouchi,
Edge-TCT and Alibava measurements with pion and neutron irradiated micro-strip detectors V. Cindro 1, G. Kramberger 1, I. Mandić 1, M. Mikuž 1,2, M. Milovanović.
TCAD Simulations of Radiation Damage Effects at High Fluences in Silicon Detectors with Sentaurus TCAD D. Passeri(1,2), F. Moscatelli(2,3), A. Morozzi(1,2),
1 G. Pellegrini The 9th LC-Spain meeting 8th "Trento" Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors 3D Double-Sided sensors for the CMS phase-2 vertex.
J.Harkonen and Z.Li, LHCC open session, CERN, 24th November CERN RD39 Collaboration: Cryogenic Tracking Detectors RD39 Status Report 2004 Jaakko.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
D. Menichelli, RD50, Hamburg, august TSC, DLTS and transient analysis in MCz silicon Detectors at different process temperature, irradiation.
Trento, Feb.28, 2005 Workshop on p-type detectors 1 Comprehensive Radiation Damage Modeling of Silicon Detectors Petasecca M. 1,3, Moscatelli F. 1,2,3,
1 Space charge sign inversion and electric field reconstruction in 24 GeV proton irradiated MCZ Si p + -n(TD)-n + detectors processed via thermal donor.
1 ATLAS Pixel Sensors Sally Seidel University of New Mexico U.S. ATLAS Pixel Review LBNL, 2 November 2000.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
1 ATLAS Pixel Sensors Sally Seidel University of New Mexico U.S. ATLAS Pixel Review LBNL, 9 November 2001.
Effects of long term annealing in p-type strip detectors irradiated with neutrons to Φ eq =1·10 16 cm -2, investigated by Edge-TCT V. Cindro 1, G. Kramberger.
Jean-Marie Brom (IPHC) – 1 DETECTOR TECHNOLOGIES Lecture 3: Semi-conductors - Generalities - Material and types - Evolution.
Charge Collection and Trapping in Epitaxial Silicon Detectors after Neutron-Irradiation Thomas Pöhlsen, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner,
New research activity “Silicon detectors modeling in RD50”: goals, tasks and the first steps Vladimir Eremin Ioffe Phisical – technical institute St. Petresburg,
INFN and University of Perugia Characterization of radiation damage effects in silicon detectors at High Fluence HL-LHC D. Passeri (1,2), F. Moscatelli.
Inversion Study on MCz-n and MCz-p silicon PAD detectors irradiated with 24 GeV/c protons Nicola Pacifico Excerpt from the MSc thesis Tutors: Prof. Mauro.
TCT measurements with SCP slim edge strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko.
Annealing of CCE in HPK strip detectors irradiated with pions and neutrons Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko.
Simulations of Hadron Irradiation Effects for Si Sensors Using Effective Bulk Damage Model A. Bhardwaj 1, H. Neugebauer 2, R. Dalal 1, M. Moll 2, Geetika.
Celso Figueiredo26/10/2015 Characterization and optimization of silicon sensors for intense radiation fields Traineeship project within the PH-DT-DD section.
Charge Collection, Power, and Annealing Behaviour of Planar Silicon Detectors after Reactor Neutron, Pion and Proton Doses up to 1.6×10 16 n eq cm -2 A.
TCAD Simulation – Semiconductor Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) tool ENEXSS 5.5, developed by SELETE in Japan Device simulation part: HyDeLEOS.
July 24,2000Gabriele Chiodini1 Measurements in magnetic field - digression Lorentz angle measurements –ATLAS measurements – CMS measurements Radiation.
6th Trento Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors1/16 J.P. BalbuenaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona IMB-CNM (CSIC) J.P. Balbuena, G.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
Double Electric field Peak Simulation of Irradiated Detectors Using Silvaco Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Kirti Ranjan, Ranjeet Singh*, Ram K. Shivpuri Center for.
Giulio Pellegrini Actividades 3D G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, D. Quirion, JP Balbuena, D. Bassignana.
Investigation of electric field and evidence of charge multiplication by Edge-TCT G.Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy study of 3D silicon Mahfuza Ahmed.
Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors V. Chiochia a, C.Amsler a, D.Bortoletto c, L.Cremaldi d, S.Cucciarelli e, A.Dorokhov a,b*, C.Hörmann a,b,
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
Zheng Li, 96th LHCC open session, 19th November 2008, CERN RD39 Status Report 2008 Zheng Li and Jaakko Härkönen Full author list available at
June T-CAD Simulations of 3D Microstrip detectors a) Richard Bates b) J.P. Balbuena,C. Fleta, G. Pellegrini, M. Lozano c) U. Parzefall, M. Kohler,
Vertex 2004, Villa Vigoni Menaggio – Como, 13 – 18 September 2004 A. Dorokhov et al. 1 Pixel sensors under heavy irradiation A. Dorokhov a, b,*, C. Amsler.
Making Tracks at DØ Satish Desai – Fermilab. Making Tracks at D-Zero 2 What Does a Tracker Do? ● It finds tracks (well, duh!) ● Particle ID (e/ separation,
Study of radiation damage induced by 26MeV protons and reactor neutrons on heavily irradiated MCz, FZ and Epi silicon detectors N. Manna Dipartimento.
HG-Cal Simulation using Silvaco TCAD tool at Delhi University Chakresh Jain, Geetika Jain, Ranjeet Dalal, Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Kirti Ranjan CMS simulation.
Results from the first diode irradiation and status of bonding tests
TCAD Simulations of Silicon Detectors operating at High Fluences D
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
Presentation transcript:

Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors V. Chiochia a, C.Amsler a, D.Bortoletto c, L.Cremaldi d, S.Cucciarelli e, A.Dorokhov a,b*, C.Hörmann a,b, M.Konecki e, D.Kotlinski b, K.Prokofiev a,b, C.Regenfus a, T.Rohe b, D.Sanders d, S.Son c, T.Speer a, D.Kim f, M.Swartz f a Physik Institut der Universität Zürich-Irchel, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland b Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villingen PSI, Switzerland c Purdue University, Task G, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA d Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA e Institut für Physik der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland f Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA * Now at: Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, F67037 Strasbourg, France Beam test measurements and simulation

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Outline 1.The CMS pixel detector and data reconstruction 2.Analysis ingredients: beam test data and detector simulation 3.Physical modelling of radiation damage: a)Models with a constant effective doping concentration b)EVL models (V.Eremin, E.Verbitskaya, Z.Li) c)Advanced double junction models (V.C., M.Swartz) 4.Conclusions

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , The CMS pixel detector 3-d tracking with 66 million channels Barrel layers at radii = 4.3cm, 7.2cm and 11.0cm Pixel cell size: 100x150 µm 2 Fluence 3(1)x10 14 n eq /cm 2 year, inner layer for high(low) luminosity Modules are unit cells of the system (1% of X 0 ) 704 barrel modules / 96 barrel half modules / 672 endcap modules ~15k front end chips and ~1m 2 of silicon

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , The LHC radiation environment Fluence per year at full luminosity 4 cm layer  3x10 14 n/cm 2 /yr Fluence decreases quadratically with the radius Pixel detectors = 4-15 cm mostly pion irradiation Strip detectors = cm mostly neutron irradiation  pp inelastic = 80 mb L = cm -2 s -1  pp inelastic = 80 mb L = cm -2 s -1 What is the sensors response after few years of operation?

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Impact on reconstruction Sensor irradiation Charge Carriers Trapping Asymmetric pixel clusters Example: Long clusters along the z-coordinate at high  Variation of the electric field profile Lorentz deflection Example: Non-linear charge sharing in the r-  plane

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Prototype sensors for beam tests p-spray design with biasing grid and punch through structures (CiS, Germany)p-spray design with biasing grid and punch through structures (CiS, Germany) 125x125  m 2 cell size125x125  m 2 cell size 22x32 pixel matrix, 285 μm thick DOFZ wafer, n-in-n type22x32 pixel matrix, 285 μm thick DOFZ wafer, n-in-n type Samples irradiated with 21 GeV protons at the CERN PS facilitySamples irradiated with 21 GeV protons at the CERN PS facility Fluences:  eq =(0.47,2.0,5.9)x10 14 n eq /cm 2Fluences:  eq =(0.47,2.0,5.9)x10 14 n eq /cm 2 Annealed for three days at 30º CAnnealed for three days at 30º C Bump bonded at room temperature to non irradiated front-end chips with non zero- suppressed readout, stored at -20ºCBump bonded at room temperature to non irradiated front-end chips with non zero- suppressed readout, stored at -20ºC 125  m 2

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Beam test setup CERN Prevessin site H2 area 3T Helmoltz magnet beam: 150 GeV  B field pixel sensor support Silicon strip beam telescope: 50 μm readout pitch,~1 μm resolution Cooling circuit T =-30 ºC or -10ºC

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Charge collection measurement Charge collection was studied with the cluster profiles in a row of pixels illuminated by a 15º beam and no magnetic field ½ year LHC low luminosity 2 years LHC low luminosity n + sidep-side charge trapping charge trapping 2 years LHC high luminosity Temperature = -25 ºC and -10ºC  eq = (0, 0.5, 2, 6)x10 14 n/cm 2

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Detector simulation Charge deposit Charge transport Trapping Trapping times from literature Electronic response + data formatting ROC+FED response ROOT Analysis Double traps models (DESSIS) 3-D Electric field mesh ISE TCAD 9.0 PIXELAV

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , The classic picture After irradiation the sensor bulk becomes more acceptor-like The effective doping concentration is constant (and negative) across the sensor thickness The p-n junction moves to the pixel implants side Based on C-V measurements! after type inversion N eff <0 -

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Models with constant N eff A model based on a type-inverted device with constant N eff across the bulk does not describe the measured charge collection profiles  = 6x10 14 n/cm 2

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Two traps models E Conduction E Valence Electron traps Hole traps Eremin-Verbitskaya-Li Model (EVL) N A and N D are fixed to TCT measurements 1.12 eV donor E V eV acceptorE C eV Given these parameters the charge carriers dynamics is governed by the Shockley-Read-Hall statistics

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , The double peak electric field n+p junction np+ junction -HV a) Current density b) Carrier concentration c) Effective doping concentration d) Electric field p-like n-like

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , EVL models 100% observed leakage current  =1.5x cm 2 30% observed leakage current  =0.5x cm 2 The EVL model based on double traps can produce large tails but description of the data is still unsatisfactory  1 =6x10 14 n/cm 2

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Advanced EVL models The recipe: 1.Relax the assumption on the cross sections 2.Let the parameters (N A, N D,  A/D e,  A/D h ) vary 3.Keep the traps energy levels (E A, E D ) to the EVL values Constraints to the model: 1.Charge collection profiles (at different V bias and  eq ) 2.Trapping rates 3.Generated leakage current  e/h from literature  eq known within 10%  e/h from literature  eq known within 10%

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Best fit:  1 =6x10 14 n/cm 2  Data --- Simulation  Data --- Simulation  1 =6x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.40  h /  e =0.25  1 =6x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.40  h /  e =0.25

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Temperature dependence Charge collection profiles depend on temperature T-dependent recombination in TCAD and T-dependent variables in PIXELAV (  e/h,  e/h, v e/h ) The model can predict the variation of charge collection due to the temperature change T=-10ºC T=-25ºC  1 =6x10 14 n/cm 2

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Scaling to lower fluences (1)  2 =2x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.68   h /   e =0.25  D h /  D e =1.00  2 =2x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.68   h /   e =0.25  D h /  D e =1.00 Preserve linear scaling of  e/h and of the current with  eq Not shown: Linear scaling of trap densities does not describe the data! !

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Scaling to lower fluences (2) Near the ‘type-invesion’ point: the double peak structure is still visible in the data! Profiles are not described by thermodynamically ionized acceptors alone At these low bias voltages the drift times are comparable to the preamp shaping time (simulation may be not reliable)  3 =0.5x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.75   h /   e =0.25  D h /  D e =1.00  3 =0.5x10 14 n/cm 2 N A /N D =0.75   h /   e =0.25  D h /  D e =1.00

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Scaling summary Donors concentration increases faster than acceptors N A /N D increases for decreasing fluences Electric field peak at the p+ backplane increases with irradiation

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Lorentz angle vs depth Lorentz angle and electric field extracted from the test beam measurements The Lorentz angle is not constant across the sensor thickness Lorentz angleElectric field

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Conclusions (1) 1.A simulation based on a constant effective doping (or “type inverted”) across the sensor bulk does not describe the measured charge collection profiles 2.A effective model based on two defect levels can be tuned to describe the observed charge collection profiles 3.Trapping of the leakage current produces an electric field profile with two maxima at the detector implants. Is it time to leave the classical notion of ‘partial depletion’? 4.The model can: account for the expected leakage current and, within the uncertainties, for free carriers trapping predict the temperature dependence of charge collection

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Conclusions (2) 5.In reality the chemistry of Si defects is more complicated and there are several trap states 6.The levels in this model have no physical reality and have to be considered as an ‘effective sum’ of multiple charged states 7.The simulation is a very nice tool for predicting the behavior of our pixel sensors during the operation in CMS. The hit reconstruction algorithms need to be fine tuned to cope with radiation effects

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , References V. Eremin, E. Verbitskaya, and Z. Li, “The origin of double peak electric field distribution in heavily irradiated silicon detectors”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A476, pp (2002)V. Eremin, E. Verbitskaya, and Z. Li, “The origin of double peak electric field distribution in heavily irradiated silicon detectors”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A476, pp (2002) M.Swartz, “CMS Pixel simulations”, Nucl.Instr.Meth. A511, 88 (2003)M.Swartz, “CMS Pixel simulations”, Nucl.Instr.Meth. A511, 88 (2003) V.Chiochia, M.Swartz et al., “Simulation of Heavily Irradiated Silicon Pixel Sensors and Comparison with Test Beam Measurements”, accepted for publication on IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci., eprint:physics/ V.Chiochia, M.Swartz et al., “Simulation of Heavily Irradiated Silicon Pixel Sensors and Comparison with Test Beam Measurements”, accepted for publication on IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci., eprint:physics/ A.Dorokhov et al.,A.Dorokhov et al., ISE TCAD 9.0:

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Backup slides

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , CMS pixel sensor design n+ p+ n- bulk Si 3 N 4 passivation Si 3 N 4 Al nitride Indium-Bump p+ pspray Al nitride + LTO Gold Nickel Titanium punch-through biasing Bump-bond contact n+/Al opening cross section metal line Vendor: CiS, Erfurt -

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Test beam setup Magnetic field = 3 T or pixel sensor Four modules of silicon strip detectors Beam telescope resolution ~ 1  m Sensors enclosed in a water cooled box (down to -30ºC) No zero suppression, unirradiated readout chip Setup placed in a 3T Helmoltz magnet  PIN diode trigger 

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , ISE TCAD simulation

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , PIXELAV simulation

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , SRH statistics

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , SRH generation current

V. Chiochia – Charge collection in irradiated pixel sensors 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors - Wildbad Kreuth, June , Lorentz angle vs bias ‘Effective’ Lorentz angle as function of the bias voltage Strong dependence with the bias voltage (electric field) Weak dependence on irradiation This is a simplified picture!! Magnetic field = 4 T