Controller Design (to determine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers) Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Design Based on Transient Response Criteria
Advertisements

Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers
Chapter 9 PID Tuning Methods.
13. Controller Tuning and Troubleshooting
10.1 Introduction Chapter 10 PID Controls
Optimization-based PI/PID control for SOPDT process
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
PID Controllers and PID tuning
Discrete Controller Design
Chapter 4: Basic Properties of Feedback
Controller Design, Tuning. Must be stable. Provide good disturbance rejection---minimizing the effects of disturbance. Have good set-point tracking---Rapid,
Ratio Control Chapter 15.
Nyquist Stability Criterion
(ex) Consider a plant with
Chapter 12. Direct Synthesis ( G includes G m, G v ) 1. Specify closed-loop response (transfer function) 2. Need process model, (= G P G M G V ) 3. Solve.
PID Control -1 + Professor Walter W. Olson
A UTOMATING PID C ONTROLS IN M ATHCAD Neil Kuyvenhoven Engr 315 December 11,2002.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Controllers With Two Degrees of Freedom
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Development of Empirical Models From Process Data
Process Control Instrumentation II
Lecture 7: PID Tuning.
Professor of Electrical Engineering
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
PID Tuning and Controllability Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Chapter 7 PID Control.
Lecture 5: PID Control.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
ERT 210/4 Process Control & Dynamics
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS
Alternative form with detuning factor F
Simple rules for PID tuning Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Chapter 8 Model Based Control Using Wireless Transmitter.
CS 478: Microcontroller Systems University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Dan Ernst Feedback Control.
Chapter 14 Frequency Response Force dynamic process with A sin  t, Chapter
Control Systems Design Part: Optimisation Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava 2007.
PID Controller Design and
Feedback Control system
Chapter 9 PID Controller Tuning ※ Control performance by three goals 1.Controlled-variable performance ― Minimize the IAE of controlled variable 2.Model.
Chapter 7 Adjusting Controller Parameters Professor Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan.
PID CONTROLLERS By Harshal Inamdar.
SELF TUNING OF CONTROLLERS What is a Controller Controller is an active element or device that receives the information from the measurements and takes.
Automatic Synthesis Using Genetic Programming of an Improved General-Purpose Controller for Industrially Representative Plants Martin A. Keane Econometrics,
CHAPTER 12: Controller Design, Tuning, & Troubleshooting
Features of PID Controllers
Chapter 4 A First Analysis of Feedback Feedback Control A Feedback Control seeks to bring the measured quantity to its desired value or set-point (also.
Controllability Analysis for Process and Control System Design
Feedback Controllers Chapter 8
Optimal PI-Control & Verification of the SIMC Tuning Rule
Lecture 9: PID Controller.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
1 CBE 491 / Oct 12 Deadtime in a Process. 2 Dead Time in a Process Show how dead time might show up How it affects block diagrams How it affects.
ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems PID Control Dr. Tony E. Grift Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering.
EEN-E1040 Measurement and Control of Energy Systems Control I: Control, processes, PID controllers and PID tuning Nov 3rd 2016 If not marked otherwise,
Control engineering and signal processing
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Introduction to PID control
Basic Design of PID Controller
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Unit 3-Tuning of Controllers
Features of PID Controllers
Feedback Controllers Chapter 8
Closed-Loop Frequency Response and Sensitivity Functions
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
PID Controller Design and
Controller Tuning Relations
Presentation transcript:

Controller Design (to determine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers) Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12

Desirable Controller Features 1.The closed-loop system must be stable. 2.The effects of disturbances are minimized, i.e., good disturbance rejection. 3.Quick and smooth responses to the set-point changes are guaranteed, i.e., good set-point tracking. 4.Off-set is eliminated. 5.Excessive controller action is avoided. 6.The control system is robust, i.e., it is insensitive to changes in operating conditions and to inaccuracies in process model and/or measurements. Chapter 12

Simplified Block Diagram

B(s) P(s) D(s)

Example

Chapter 12

Example 12.1

Chapter 12

Alternatives for Controller Design 1.Direct synthesis (DS) method 2.Internal model control (IMC) method 3.Controller tuning relations 4.Frequency response techniques 5.Computer simulation 6.On-line tuning after the control system is installed. Chapter 12

Direct Synthesis

Direct Synthesis Steps 1.Specify desired closed-loop response (transfer function) 2.Assume process model 3.Solve for controller transfer function

Direct Synthesis to Achieve Perfect Control

Direct Synthesis to Achieve Finite Settling Time

Example

Direct Synthesis for Time- Delayed Systems

Taylor Series Approximation

Example 1

Example 2

Pade Approximation

Example

Use the DS design method to calculate PID controller settings for the process: Chapter 12 Example 12.1

Consider three values of the desired closed-loop time constant:. Evaluate the controllers for unit step changes in both the set point and the disturbance, assuming that G d = G. Repeat the evaluation for two cases: a.The process model is perfect ( = G). b.The model gain is = 0.9, instead of the actual value, K = 2. Thus, The controller settings for this example are: Chapter 12

Figure 12.3 Simulation results for Example 12.1 (a): correct model gain. Chapter 12

Simulation results for Example 21.1(b): incorrect model gain.

Chapter 12

PID vs. IMC

PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 1: factor process model

PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 2: derive IMC transfer function

PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 3: derive PID transfer function

Chapter 12

Example

Controller Synthesis Criteria in Time Domain Time-domain techniques can be classified into two groups: (a) Criteria based on a few points in the response (b) Criteria based on the entire response, or integral criteria

Approach (a) Based on settling time, % overshoot, rise time, decay ratio (Fig can be viewed as closed- loop response). Several methods based on 1/4 decay ratio have been proposed, e.g., Cohen-Coon and Ziegler- Nichols.

Chapter 12

Approach (b) - Criteria Integral of absolute value of error (IAE) Integral of square error (ISE) Time-weighted IAE (ITAE)

Approach (b) - Remarks Pick controller parameters to minimize integral. 1.IAE allows larger overall deviation than ISE (with smaller overshoots). 2.ISE needs longer settling time 3.ITAE weights errors occurring later more heavily Approximate optimum tuning parameters are correlated with K, ,  (Table 12.3).

Chapter 12

Example 1

ITAE IAE ISE

Example 2

Chapter 12

Summary of Tuning Relationships 1. K C is inversely proportional to K P K V K M. 2. K C decreases as  /  increases. 3.  I and  D increase as  /  increases (typically  D = 0.25  I ). 4. Reduce K c, when adding more integral action; increase K c, when adding derivative action 5. To reduce oscillation, decrease K C and increase  I. Chapter 12

Disadvantages of Tuning Correlations 1. Interactions are ignored (decreased stability limits). 2. Derivative action equipment specific. 3. First order + time delay model can be inaccurate. 4. K p,  can vary. 5. Resolution, measurement errors decrease stability margins. 6. ¼ decay ratio not conservative standard (too oscillatory). Chapter 12

Example 12.4 Consider a lag-dominant model with Design four PI controllers: a)IMC b)IMC based on the integrator approximation in Eq c)IMC with Skogestad’s modification (Eq ) d)Direct Synthesis method for disturbance rejection (Chen and Seborg, 2002): The controller settings are K c = and Chapter 12

Evaluate the four controllers by comparing their performance for unit step changes in both set point and disturbance. Assume that the model is perfect and that G d (s) = G(s). Solution The PI controller settings are: ControllerKcKc (a)IMC (b) Integrator approximation (c) Skogestad0.5 8 (d) DS-d Chapter 12

Figure Comparison of set-point responses (top) and disturbance responses (bottom) for Example The responses for the Chen and Seborg and integrator approximation methods are essentially identical. Chapter 12

On-Line Controller Tuning 1.Controller tuning inevitably involves a tradeoff between performance and robustness. 2.Controller settings do not have to be precisely determined. In general, a small change in a controller setting from its best value (for example, ±10%) has little effect on closed-loop responses. 3.For most plants, it is not feasible to manually tune each controller. Tuning is usually done by a control specialist (engineer or technician) or by a plant operator. Because each person is typically responsible for 300 to 1000 control loops, it is not feasible to tune every controller. 4.Diagnostic techniques for monitoring control system performance are available. Chapter 12

Controller Tuning and Troubleshooting Control Loops Chapter 12

Ziegler-Nichols Rules: These well-known tuning rules were published by Z-N in 1942: controllerKcKc II DD P PI PID 0.5 K CU 0.45 K CU 0.6 K CU - P U /1.2 P U /2 - P U /8 Z-N controller settings are widely considered to be an "industry standard". Z-N settings were developed to provide 1/4 decay ratio -- too oscillatory?

Chapter 12 Modified Z-N settings for PID control controllerKcKc II DD original Some overshoot No overshoot 0.6 K CU 0.33 K CU 0.2 K CU P U /2 P U /3 P U /8 P U /3 P U /2

Chapter 12

Figure Typical process reaction curves: (a) non-self- regulating process, (b) self-regulating process. Chapter 12

Figure Process reaction curve for Example Chapter 12

Figure Block diagram for Example Chapter 12