Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Plan Formulation: General
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
FDR1 - 1 Flood Risk management History/Mission/Policies.
Louisiana Coastal Erosion. The problem LA contains approximately 40% of the nation's wetlands and experiences 80% of the nation's coastal wetland loss.
TAMPA HARBOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, Big Bend Channel Alafia River Channel Port Sutton Channel TAMPA HARBOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, Big Bend Channel Alafia.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Community College Workforce Development Center Melfa, Virginia August 16, 2013 “ A Unified Voice.
Coastal Zone Management.  Coastal Zone Management Act (1972) –Administered by Coastal Programs Division of NOAA –Covers over 22% of U.S. Land Area –Multi-purpose.
Corps Regional Sediment Management and Habitat Restoration: Cape May, NJ J. Bailey Smith National Planning Center of Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Navigation Partnership Meeting “ A Unified Voice for Navigation, Project Prioritization, and.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Presentation to the: Governor’s Advisory Commission Chris Accardo Chief, Operations Division.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
CHARLESTONMOBILE WILMINGTON SAVANNAH JACKSONVILLE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NC Water Resources Congress Christine Brayman Deputy For.
1 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) Overview Why the Federal Government Must Invest in Seaport Related Infrastructure for AASHTO/ITTS Webinar Jim.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Project
DRAFT CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONTRACTS: Louisiana Coastal Area, Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, and Lake Pontchartrain & Vicinity Presented to the Coastal Protection.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
WRRDA and WRDA: How are they different, and does it make any difference? Inland Rivers, Ports and Terminals, Inc. Tuesday, April 29, 2014 James A. Kearns.
Lakes District At Louisiana State University CAP 206 Project US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District.
Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures.
Dredging Engineering: Building & Maintaining Underwater Highways
“Getting the Funding Right” Kim Koleos Juris Doctor, University of Florida.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER1: Authorities and Policies.
World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC) and the International Environmental Commission Technical Seminar October 28, 2009 Westin.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
1 RSM through CAP Sec 204/ Implementation issues and opportunities Lynn Martin Institute for Water Resources, USACE
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
BUILDING STRONG SM Partnering and Coordination to Accomplish the Navigation Mission.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Cost Sharing Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE.
Modeling in the USACE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Bruce Ebersole U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal & Hydraulics.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"
Coastal Brownfields: At the Water’s Edge Panel: Waterfront Revitalization and Marine Transportation.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Module 2011 Planning Associates Class Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE Mission Overview.
US Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District FY04tpr\skbcongressional Civil Works Program Missions Missions Process Process Select Authorities Select Authorities.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Propeller Club for Port of New Orleans 24 September 2015.
Harbors Module NH3: Formulation – Measures, Strategies and Plans.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Toke Point Marina Pipeline Maintenance Dredging with Flowlane Disposal at Willapa Harbor, Washington Hiram.
San Francisco Ocean Beach-Great Highway Erosion Control Project.
Time for Public-Private Partnerships for U.S. Navigation Projects Dominic Izzo PE – KBR Director, PIANC Commissioner Karim El Kheiashy PhD, MBA, PE – KBR.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Intracoastal Waterway Setback Guidance Shelley Trulock Project Manager, Programs & Project Management Division.
 What is EWP & How Does the Program Work? Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
Beneficial Use of Dredge Materials: Introduction to Dredging and Policy J. Bailey Smith US Army Corps of Engineers April 4, 2011.
Back River Flooding and Shoaling Citizens Committee Back River Flooding and Shoaling Citizens Committee August 15, 2007.
Lake Erie Dredge Material: Finding a Solution for Ohio Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 April 6-7, 2016.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Overview of USDA - PL-566 Small Watershed Program - EWP Program Mahoning County FRM Informational Meeting August 16, 2016 Natural Resources Conservation.
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Continuing Authorities Program
EHCMA Hurricane Workshop
Construction Management & Inspection
Beneficial Use of Dredged Material
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies

NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal /Corps role in navigation  Explain the concept of Navigation Servitude  Describe Corps navigation authorities and the non- Federal sponsor responsibilities  Apply the cost sharing for project implementation  Identify policies affecting navigation

NH1 - 3 BU ILDING STRONG SM Federal Involvement – Why?  The Federal Interest is established by the Constitution –Commerce Clause  Provides means of commercial transportation  Is part of national defense

NH1 - 4 BU ILDING STRONG SM Navigation Servitude  Gives public right to use water for navigation despite private ownership of the bed or bank  River and Harbor Act of 1899 authorized the Secretary of the Army to define harbor lines beyond which no obstructions could be placed without a permit

NH1 - 5 BU ILDING STRONG SM Corps Involvement – So How Did the Corps Get Involved? Gallatin’s 1808 report to Congress on waterways, canals and roads Congressionally directed in 1824 to remove snags from Ohio & Mississippi Rivers

NH1 - 6 BU ILDING STRONG SM What is the Deep-Draft Navigation System? Major ports with congressionally authorized channels.

NH1 - 7 BU ILDING STRONG SM What is the Deep-Draft Navigation System?  Channels – provide depth & width  Protective works – wave action and shoaling reduction  Anchorages and Turning Basins  Locks – Exception rather than rule for Deep-Draft  Local Service Facilities  Dredged Material Disposal Sites

NH1 - 8 BU ILDING STRONG SM Corps Responsibilities General navigation features  Channels  Jetties  Breakwaters  Locks  Disposal Sites Crescent City Harbor, CA

NH1 - 9 BU ILDING STRONG SM Federal Project Features not Included as Corps Responsibility Coast Guard is responsible for Aids to Navigation  Buoys  Lights  Other Channel Markers

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Non-Federal Responsibilities  Will cost share in the construction of General Navigation Features  Will cost share Operation and Maintenance  Local Service Facilities  LERR

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Cost Sharing - Construction Local Sponsor Share of Construction, in percent *The second number, 10%, is the amount of total cost of general navigation features that the local sponsor must pay over a period not to exceed 30 years. This amount may be offset by the value of LERR. **Further clarification: If the project only involves widening, the cost share is the same as the existing project. However, if there have not been any improvements, the widening is assessed at the naturally controlling depth and entrance channels are governed by the deepest protected interior channel depth.

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Cost Sharing – Operations and Maintenance Local Sponsor Share of O&M in percent

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Local Service Facilities  Docks  Terminal and transfer facilities  Berthing areas  Local access channels  Must be accessible and available to all on equal terms

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Lands, Easements, Right of Way, and Relocations (LERR)  Value of LERR can be used to offset the additional 10% cost of GNF  Relocations – permitted public or private utilities  Removals – Taken out as a result of navigation servitude

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Policies Affecting Navigation  Shoreline changes  Beneficial uses of dredged material  Access channels  Single owner  Progressive development

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Policies - Shoreline Changes  Analyze affect of project on shoreline  Minimum of 10 miles on either side

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Policies - Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material  Land creation  Beach nourishment  Mitigation/restoration

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Beneficial Uses - Beach Nourishment  Authorized by Section 204 of WRDA 1992 and Section 207 of WRDA 1996  Eligibility for Federal cost-sharing  The State requests and the Secretary of the Army considers it in the public interest  Hurricane and storm damage benefits will justify the additional expense  The beach is open to public use

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Beneficial Uses - Restoration/Mitigation  Creation of wetlands is most common  Creation of shallow water habitat or nesting islands  Ecosystem restoration can be accomplished in the context of a multi-purpose project

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Policies - Access Channels Number of facilities served must be:  Two or more with separate owners or  Under public ownership

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Single Owner Situations and General Versus Special Interest Considerations  Determination of general interest is required for WRDA 86 cost sharing  Determination of general interest requires consideration of number and type of properties served  Two or more facilities  Multiple users of a single facility who have formed a non-profit cooperative  Public facility

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Policies - Progressive Development  Progressive development includes situations where the last small increment of a channel serves a non-public owner.  This is treated as a multiple-owner situation unless a disproportionate incremental investment is required.

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Special Navigation Programs  Removal of wrecks and obstructions  Snagging and clearing for navigation  Drift and debris removal  Modification of existing highway and rail bridges that obstruct navigation  Mitigation of shoreline damage  Dredging contaminated sediments

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM For Further Information  Contact the National Planning Center of Expertise for Deep Draft Navigation at CESAD  Attend other Navigation related Prospect Course  Check the IWR Planning References CD  Visit the DDN PCX Website at

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Take Away Points  General navigation features is a special term that refers to the physical features that relate to navigation.  Local sponsors are responsible for facilities such as docks, terminal and transfer facilities, berthing areas, local access channels and connecting infrastructure.  There are special rules that cover relocations, removals, and single owner/progressive development situations.  Authorities encourage the beneficial uses of dredged material.

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Where We are Going  Next, we’ll cover data requirements and forecasting as they relate to navigation planning.  We’ll develop an understanding of how to identify problems and opportunities, and determine the objectives and constraints upon which plans for navigation improvements will be based.

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Challenge Question: How do cost sharing concerns impact plan formulation?