1 Robotics Challenge Overview. 2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Left to Right: Michael Kelton, Ethan Hall, Greg Wegman, Vashisht Lakhmani.
Advertisements

JEEVES the Robot Butler
Test-Driven Development with Lego Mindstorms Ru Maaret
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV)
R.F.N.T. ( Radio Frequency Navigational Tracker ) Josh Bingaman Ryan Hitchler John Maitin Fabien Nervais Matt Sharp Capstone Fall 2004.
UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June
Different Conceptual Designs. Designs for Further Consideration and Evaluation BELT VEST NECKLACE.
Justin Heyer Ted Keppner. Build an autonomous barn floor scrapper Needs to be able to be adapted to multiple barns Solutions to clean either slotted/solid.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition 2006 Brigham Young University.
Colorado Robotics Challenge Year 6 Saturday April 7th, 2012.
P10216 – Robot Navigation and Plant Platform Mahbubul Alam (CE) – Team Lead Corey Provencher (EE) – Technical Lead Marcus Gwillim (CE) Alan Olson (EE)
A Self-Supervised Terrain Roughness Estimator for Off-Road Autonomous Driving David Stavens and Sebastian Thrun Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab.
Colorado Robot Challenge Year 4 Saturday April 10 th, 2010.
Modeling and Simulation of a Mobile Robot for Polar Environments Thesis Presented by Eric Akers October 20, 2003 Committee Chair – Professor Agah Committee.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Smart Rover Aaron Westphal Ben Merkel Joe Merrill Mike Wissolik.
1 Autonomously Controlled Vehicles with Collision Avoidance Mike Gregoire Rob Beauchamp Dan Holcomb Tim Brett.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Heterogenous Hazard Avoidance Behavior in Autonomous, Mobile Robots Joseph D. Lawton & Jeffery A. Seeger Project Advisor: Jeffrey Horn Northern Evolutionary.
Colorado Robot Challenge April 7th, :00 a.m.
Deon Blaauw Modular Robot Design University of Stellenbosch Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering.
SDP 2009 Team Siqueira Rohan Balakrishnan (CSE) Conan Jen (EE) Andrew Lok (EE) Jonathan Tang (EE) MAPPER: A Perfectly Portable Exploration Robot.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
WRSC 2011 RoBoaTAU. Group Members Ziv Ramati Vova Perelman Anthon Nepomnyashchiy Dror Laufer Dan Yaari Itamar Gilad.
Localization Using Interactive C and a Standard LEGO Mindstorms Hardware Suite Gary R. Mayer, Dr. Jerry Weinberg, Dr. Xudong Yu
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
PropaGator Oral Report 2 Andrew Wegener IMDL 2012.
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Caitlin Motsinger ● Sure Program ● Summer 2007 Advisor: Dr. Todd Hubing ● Graduate Student Assistant: Robert Clippard Clemson University ● Clemson, South.
AUTOMATIC PARKING SYSTEM
Design Development Image credit:
The SFA Rover Team Project. The SFA Rover  Must be demonstrated at the beginning of the last lab of the semester, Dec 11 th.  Teams can work on this.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
KAITLIN PERANSKI: IE, PROJECT MANAGER JEREMY BERKE: EE, SCRIBE/LEAD SOFTWARE CHRIS CAPORALE: EE, LEAD HARDWARE SPENCER WASILEWSKI: ME, MODELING/MACHINIST.
Overview of Project 3: Phase A Slides are available at : Report for all phases due last day of class
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
By Rachel Hoffman DrumBot.  Mission  Overview  Hardware  Software  Special Sensor  Behaviors  Timeline  Questions Objectives.
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV) Jared Speer Lamar Williams Jr. Nathan Stephan University of Central Oklahoma Department of Engineering and Physics.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
PropaGator Oral Report 3 Andrew Wegener IMDL 2012.
CHROMATIC TRAILBLAZER 25 th November, 2008 University of Florida, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Intelligent Machine Design Lab (EEL.
Figure 12.1 The UP1-bot. Figure 12.2 Left: Radio Control Servo Motor and Right: Servo with Case and Gears Removed.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Smart Lens Robot William McCombie IMDL Spring 2007.
Tiltmeter, Compass,Temperature modules for the PPM.
Transportation LandSeaAir. Transportation Transport or transportation is the movement of people and goods from one place to another. The term is derived.
1 of 20 How to use the Compass A. Compass. 2 Compass: - Provides heading relative to Magnetic North, not true North HMC5883L V input - I2C (not.
MECHANICAL and AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Active Reconfiguration for Performance Enhancement in Articulated Wheeled Vehicles Aliakbar Alamdari PhD Candidate.
Louise Hunter. Background Search & Rescue Collapsed caves/mines Natural disasters Robots Underwater surveying Planetary exploration Bomb disposal.
Project Overview  Introduction  Frame Build  Motion  Power  Control  Sensors  Advanced Sensors  Open design challenges  Project evaluation.
The 4th Annual Colorado Robot Challenge
PRESENTATION ON Line follower robot.
VEX IQ Curriculum It’s Your Future Lesson 11 Lesson Materials:
Packaging Specifications & Design
Robot Society Team: Bradley Sosusco, Rachel Sucharski, Chris Quintana, John Cheslock, Matt Sadler, Bryan Fudge, Martin McKee, Chris Dahle. Advisors: George.
Community College of Aurora Cheez Botics
CSU Robot Challenge 2010 Team: Ben Gindl, Katie Mantell, Sean Throckmorton, Tim Schneider, Travis Histed Advisors: Dr. Azer Yalin, Dr. Mark Lindsay, Grant.
‘SONAR’ using Arduino & ultrasonic distance sensor
Review and Ideas for future Projects
Project Overview Introduction Frame Build Motion Power Control Sensors
Autonomous Design for PCC’s Robotics Challenge Entry
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Fall 2011
CajunBot: Tech Challenges
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
AUTOMATIC PARKING SYSTEM. Introduction ► A prototype of automated multi-storey car parking ► An idea for space conservation ► A learning process thereby.
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
Mars Rover Challenge – Path around Olympus Mons (middle and early high school) Olympus Mons on the surface of Mars at 69,841 feet (more than twice the.
Presentation transcript:

1 Robotics Challenge Overview

2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics

3 What to expect

4

5

6

7 -Challenging Environment -Wind, Sand, Iron, Water -Navigate to a central beacon -4 Courses -1 - Can the robot find the beacon on level terrain -2 – Above plus obstacles to demonstrate obstacle avoidance -3 – Above plus uneven terrain to demonstrate finding a safe course -- 4 Above plus even more challenges

8 Parts to design -Motion -Frame and motors -Sensors -IR, Ultra Sonic, Accelerometer, Compass, Radios, bump sensors -Direction Determination -The Brains and determining where to go.

9

10 Entires

CSU Robotics Challenge Design Credit: Symposium 2010 presentation COSCG 2010

Basic Design Constraints <1.5 Kg vehicle weight ~ $500 hardware cost Must stay on ground

Pre-Manufactured base –4-wheel drive rock crawler –Single motor –Standard steering –High articulation suspension

Rover 1 Benefits –Removes mechanical issues from development cycle –Robust platform – it’s a rock crawler –Allows rapid electronics package and software development

Electronics Sensors –3 IR sensors – two forward one rearward Not mechanically hindered by sand –1 forward sonar sensor Good range and clean data

Electronics Sensors –Digital Compass Highly accurate 1 degree resolution serial communication –433 MHz transceiver Used by challenge organizers as base station –Contact switch tilt sensor Basic vehicle pitch and yaw data

Software Integration of sensors and outputs –Sometimes straightforward Calibration –What does the sensor data tell us High level logic –How to act on the sensor data

Software Basic Flow Chart

Testing Conducted mainly in the lab and parking lot Allowed for trouble shooting and refinement of obstacle avoidance Did not allow for testing and refinement of hole avoidance

Performance Robot Challenge –Completed one obstacle course –Found north –Liked holes –IR vs. SONAR –Polarization –Magnetic Sand

Lessons Learned Identify and address developmental bottlenecks early –Either component or personnel Start work earlier and more often than you think Plan for problems Need to use better and more sensors for rover to make intelligent decisions

Beacon Basestation produced by PCC Electronics just about complete Protocol – ID Angle CRC 255 –ID is [1, 2, 3] –Angle is Compas heading / 2 Final detials posted along with results on Jan 1, 2011

Each School Update Contact Information updates? participants Team plan Initial entry concept Any help Lessons Learned from previous years.

Resources –WebpageWebpage challengehttp://spacegrant.colorado.edu/index.php/robotics- challenge –Sparkfun.com Parts and ideas