The Yeast Deletion Collection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grow on 5-FOA Gene 1 knockout Gene 2 knockout Gene 1 knockout
Advertisements

Genetika Molekuler (5) Sutarno. Lecture #4 Notes (Yeast Genetics) LECTURE 4: CLONING AND MANIPULATING GENES IN YEAST Basically, we use the same techniques.
Molecular biology tools for the genetic manipulation of yeast
Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways Parsons et al Nature Biotechnology.
Genetika molekuler (4) Sutarno. Lecture #3 Notes (Yeast Genetics) LECTURE 3: TETRAD ANALYSIS Tetrad analysis can give lots of information, but you have.
Gene Inactivation Michael Snyder October 2, 2006.
Synthetic lethal analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans posterior embryonic patterning genes identifies conserved genetic interactions L Ryan Baugh, Joanne.
Molecular biology Transformation: introduction of DNA – Selectable marker – Spheroplasts, Li 2+ salts, electroporation Yeast plasmids are shuttle plasmids,
Uses of Microarrays in Research Anne Rosenwald Biology Department Georgetown University.
Introduction to yeast genetics Michelle Attner July 24, 2012.
1.Generate mutants by mutagenesis of seeds Use a genetic background with lots of known polymorphisms compared to other genotypes. Availability of polymorphic.
A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Article by Peter Uetz, et.al. Presented by Kerstin Obando.
Using Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as Model Systems for Teaching Genomics to Undergraduates Breaking the silence: researching the SIR2.
Genetics Laboratory BL415, Spring 2015 Yeast Transformation.
The mating type locus Chr. III. The MAT locus information The MAT locus can encode three regulatory peptides: - a1 is encoded by the MATa allele -
Genetic Analysis of Carbonyl Reductase Function in Yeast By Joshua Baumgart Mentor: Dr. Gary Merrill.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics MCB 317 Topic 10, part 5 A Story of Transcription.
Model organism genetics and human disease
Yeast as a model organism Model eukaryote –Experimental genetics –Gene function – Orthologs, family members –Pathway function - “Biological synteny” Testbed.
Multiple signaling pathways control the cellular response to O 2 levels Stephen D. Willis 2 and Mark J. Hickman 1,2 Departments of 1 Biological Sciences.
Protein protein interactions
Yeast as a Model System MBIOS 520/420 September 29, 2005.
Lecture 11. Functional Genomics at the Level of the Whole Organism:
Yeast as a model organism Model eukaryote –Experimental genetics –Gene function – Orthologs, family members –Pathway function - “Biological synteny” Testbed.
Chap. 5 Problem 1 Recessive mutations must be present in two copies (homozygous) in diploid organisms to show a phenotype (Fig. 5.2). These mutations show.
Uses of Microarrays in Research Anne Rosenwald Georgetown University.
Molecular Cell Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lecture I: Biology, Genetics, Genomics and Proteomics Zhang Yi, National Institute of Biological.
Yeast geneticists frequently invoke:
Lecture 9 Assignment 3 Yeast complementation analysis Discussion of Article 6.
Announcements for MCB 110L
Gene Interaction.
Yeast as a Model System II
Genetics and Genomics Forward genetics Reverse genetics
Mutations to Aid in Gene Study By: Yvette Medina Cell Phys
Functions and Mutations of the Proapoptotic Protein bax in Yeast Cells
BISC 220 Lab—Series 2 Protein Transport through the Secretory Pathway
Mapping variation in growth in response to glucose concentration
Map-based cloning of interesting genes
Peter John M.Phil, PhD Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB) National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST)
Gene Interactions Chapter 6, Part b
PCR genotype analysis. PCR genotype analysis. (A) Primer pairs for detection of deletion alleles. The designation YFG refers to any of the genes UME6,
A Robust Toolkit for Functional Profiling of the Yeast Genome
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Genome-wide Consequences of Deleting Any Single Gene
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Cancer therapeutics in yeast
A DNA Integrity Network in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Shiv I.S Grewal, Amar J.S Klar  Cell 
Rnq1 Molecular Cell Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Sequential Steps in Genome Mapping
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Interplay between Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and DNA Damage Response Pathways Reveals that Stn1 and Ten1 Are the Key CST Telomere-Cap Components  Eva-Maria.
Volume 134, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
PD NPD T AB aB Ab ab Random assortment 1 : 4 Linkage >1 : <1 ?
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Proteasome Involvement in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Generation and characterization of a diploid shuffle ts allele array.
A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools  Xiaolan Zhao, Eric G.D Muller, Rodney Rothstein 
Fig. S1 HO Kan HygB Tetrads MATa MATα x
Table 1. Synaptotagmin Project Strains
Genetic suppression of NNS and FACT by set1∆ and jhd2∆ dependent and independent of H3K4me. Genetic suppression of NNS and FACT by set1∆ and jhd2∆ dependent.
Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast  Hong Hwa Lim, Phuay-Yee Goh, Uttam Surana 
Strategy for marker recycling through CRISPR-Cas9-induced marker excision. Strategy for marker recycling through CRISPR-Cas9-induced marker excision. Consider.
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

The Yeast Deletion Collection Constructed by the “Yeast Consortium” A resource for the whole community Total of about 16,000 strains

The Consortium U.S./ Canada Jef Boeke, Johns Hopkins University Howard Bussey, McGill University Ron Davis, Stanford University Mark Johnston, Washington University at St. Louis Jasper Rine, University of California at Berkeley Rosetta Inpharmatics, Kirkland, Washington Jeffery Strathern & David Garfinkel, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center Michael Snyder, Yale University   EUROFAN: Bruno Andre, University Libre de Bruxelles Francoise Foury, Universite Catholique de Louvain Johannes Hegemann, Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen Steve Kelly, University of Wales Aberystwyth Peter Philippsen, Biozentrum, Basel Bart Scherens & F. Messenguy, Institut de Recherches du CERIA Jose Revuelta, Universidad de Salamanca Giorgio Valle, University of Padova Guido Volckaert, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

LiOAC transformation into strain: Diploid (70%) BY4743: MATa/a his3D1/his3D1 leu2D0 /leu2D0 lys2D0/LYS2 MET15/met15D0 ura3D0 /ura3D0 Haploids (30%) BY4741: MATa his3D1 leu2D0 met15D0 ura3D0 Or BY4742   MATa his3D1 leu2D0 lys2D0 ura3D0

Strains were verified in either haploids or diploids

Total of ~ 6200 deletions 383 genes could not be deleted

STRANGE THINGS ABOUT TRANSFORMATION From Peter Philippsen: 53/819 (6.5%) of diploids segregated unlinked lethals G418 G418 G418 + + or + + + let 2:2 Non-essential 2:0 Essential + (~5000) (~1000)

96 well format = 76 plates (Omnitrays) Combine four plates = 384 format = 19 Omnitrays Four Sets 2 haploid (MATa ot MAT) 2 diploids (homozygous and heterozygous)

One good use is to transfer mutants to your genetic background KanMX4 200 bp 200 bp 200 bp

Screen the library to test for any phenotype BUT BEWARE Strange things about strains From Rosetta 22/290 strains that were expression profiled were aneuploid (7.5%)

Simple Genetic Screens Drug Resistance

Using the deletion set Replica Pinner ~5000 mutants (orf::G418) Pin the strains onto plates +/- drug

YPD YPD + Benomyl

Advantages: Simple Comprehensive (at least for non-essential genes) Instant gene identification Eliminates cloning by complementation Eliminates confirming the cloned gene (right gene vs suppressor) However, still requires proof (CAN YOU THINK OF AT LEAST TWO METHODS FOR HOW YOU WOULD DO THIS?) (WHAT A JUICY EXAM QUESTION !!!!!! )

Very Useful for screening for phenotypes But what if you wanted to do genetics with the entire collection ……such as make double mutants? For example, do any of the deletion mutants suppress yfg1? How would you make the double mutants? You could PCR amplify and transform into yfg1….(6000 transformations!!!) Too boring. You need….The Magic Marker

Must recall mating type determination in yeast DEFAULT sg (OFF) a1 asg (ON) MATa sg (ON) 1 2 asg (OFF) MAT sg (OFF) a1 1 2 asg (OFF) MATa/MAT

GENETICS USING THE DELETION SET MFA1 gene encodes the mating factor “a” therefore an asg expressed only MATa cells MAT PMFA1-HIS3 yfg1:URA3 his3 ura3 x MATa orf:G418 his3 ura3 his- ura+ G418S his- ura- G418R Cross to deletion collection in MATa Select diploids SC-ura+G418

MATa PMFA1-HIS3 yfg1:URA3 orf::G418 MAT + + + Sporulate We are not about to dissect tetrads from 6000 crosses Therefore we do “random spore analysis” Select haploids on SC-his Must be MATa and have the PMFA1-HIS3 ½ the spores are URA+, ½ are G418R Therefore ¼ are URA+ and G418R (double mutant)

Synthetic lethality Two genes exhibit a synthetic lethal interaction when mutations in either gene by itself result in viable cells, but the double mutant is dead. xy x y Mutant x is viable Mutant y is viable Double mutant xy is inviable

From Boone, Bussey and Andrews, 2007

Systematic Genetic Array Analysis xy x y Mutant x is viable Mutant y is viable Double mutant xy is inviable yfg1::NAT Orf::G418

SGA From Boone, Bussey and Andrews, 2007

(double mutant selection) 768 format Haploid selection plates

A Typical Screen Yields ~ 200 hits Secondary Screen Serial 10 fold dilutions of the same spores #1 #2 #3 #4 #1 #2 #3 #4 Haploid selection Double Mutant

Confirm the interactions Tetrads (PD, NPD, T for NAT and G418) NPD’s are 2:2 for viability or 2. Random spore analysis

Random Spore Analysis Select haploid spores, replica plate to: no drug, single drug, double drug measure ratio of markers Diploid Spores Synthetic lethality + NAT G418 + + G418 + + NAT G418 NAT

No synthetic lethality Haploid selection plate Replica plate to: ORF No drug G418 NAT G418+NAT YOR381W 50 22 26 11 YJL204C 80 42 38 24 YJR018W 61 29 20 YJR050W 110 58 59 YML013C-A 90 49 8 YDR452W 82 1 YDL198C 67 34 No synthetic lethality Synthetic lethality auxotrophs

The spindle checkpoint Bub1 Bub3 Mps1 Bub2 Byr4 Mad1 Mad2 Mad3 Tem1, MEN Cdc20 Cdc14 Swi5 Pds1 Cdh1 Sic1 Clb2 Esp1 METAPHASE ANAPHASE G1

BioMatrix Robot with 192 plates Plates are bar coded and loaded Pinning at 1536 density = 5 plates/genome Can do 38 different SGA crosses per run with BioMatrix 5000/38= 132 runs to do 5000 mutants (the genome) The goal is to have a complete SGA analysis of the genome (5,000 x 5000)

A competing technology is called DSLAM (Diploid-based Synthetic Lethal Analysis by Microarrays) DSLAM uses the unique 20-mer “barcodes” of each mutant called the uptag and dntag. Both are flanked by universal primers

From Boone, Bussey and Andrews, 2007

From Boone, Bussey and Andrews, 2007