Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

M.Gasior, CERN-AB-BIBase-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System 1 Base-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System Marek Gasior Beam Instrumentation Group, CERN.
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
IU e-Cloud Feedback Workshop March 13, 2007 LA-UR Review of the e-p feedback experiments Rod McCrady Los Alamos National Lab.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
March 2, 2007ELC Experience with clearing voltages and solenoids at SPS damper pick-ups W. Hofle Acknowledgements PS-OP, SL-OP, SL-BI LHC-VAC, SL-HRF.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BIBE-KT Innovation Day, 3 June Base Band Tune (BBQ) measurement systems - observing beam oscillations with sub-micrometre amplitudes.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Elias Métral, CERN Accelerator School, Darmstadt, Germany, October 3rd, 2009 /221 TRANSVERSE INSTABILITIES E. Métral (CERN) Time (20 ns/div)  The purpose.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
Storage ring optics characterization – the basics
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Proposal for LHC Microwave Schottky Pickups Ralph J. Pasquinelli 3/9/2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Chapter Concept of Radiation.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Accelerator Fundamentals Brief history of accelerator Accelerator building blocks Transverse beam dynamics coordinate system Mei Bai BND School, Sept.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
F. Caspers, S. Federmann, E. Mahner, B. Salvant, D. Seebacher 1.
F f Quadrupole Pick-Ups at CERN & Fermilab A.Jansson FNAL.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Cape Electrical and Electronic Technology Topic: Electromagnetic Waves By: Tahvorn George & Charles,J.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
Measuring Chromaticity Beam Dynamics meets Diagnostics Workshop Florence, Italy 4 th – 6 th November, 2015 Dr. Rhodri Jones Head of the CERN Beam Instrumentation.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Lecture 8 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Beam based measurements
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Presentation transcript:

Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel

Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the edge of the conductor. This image charge follows a moving packet of charge through the cylinder

Offset Wall Current If beam is offset in the beam pipe, field lines are more dense closer to the bunch. The dense field lines produce more dense image current, the image current becomes asymmetric

Split Plate Current If pipe is split and beam is offset, more current flows through plate closest to beam. Difference in current between different plates is proportional to beam displacement from center and beam current. Sum of current proportional to total beam current. Divide difference by sum to normalize position

Stripline Pickup Model Model of current Tevatron BPM pickup. Called a stripline pickup because the conducting plate forms a transmission line with beam pipe.

Stripline Pickup Model Beam current enters the pickup, and the image current excites the stripline. Half the current goes through the launch and the other half enters the transmission line (assuming matched impedance). Current pulse in the stripline transmission line travels with the beam Z0Z0 Z0Z0 V t Signal Out of First Launch

Stripline Pickup Model As beam exits the detector, it produces an equal amplitude but inverted pulse in the transmission line. The counter-directional pulses cancel each other at the downstream launch. Inverted pulse continues down the transmission line in opposite direction Z0Z0 Z0Z0 V t Signal Out of First Launch

Stripline Pickup Model Inverted pulse reaches other end of transmission line. The two pulses combine at the upstream launch to produce the doublet effect. V t Signal Out of First Launch

Beam Signal from Stripline Sum (top-red) and difference (bottom-red) signals from 1m long stripline pickup in the Tevatron.

Response of Stripline Pickup Downstream end of stripline looks like a short circuit. Response of pickup to beam spectrum looks like response of shorted single stub tuner. No DC response. Y0Y0 Y0Y0 Fraction of total current transmitted to launch for 20cm stripline. Freq (MHz) l

Beam Properties Measured by BPM Beam Intensity Phase Dispersion Betatron Oscillations Mean Position

Beam Intensity Signal from launch proportional to beam position and beam intensity. Combining signal from both planes, in phase, produces pure intensity signal. Intensity spectrum without any modulation is confined to revolution harmonics (47kHz in Tev). Relative intensity of revolution harmonics determined by bunch spacing.

Standard Store Configuration Distribution of protons in a standard store. Pbars not included Fourier spectrum of beam starting at DC. Note that for equal bunch population, only every third harmonic is visible due to 3-fold symmetry.

Phase Oscillations Bunches of beam perform time oscillations about a synchronous orbit. These oscillations phase modulate the intensity spectrum, producing sidebands around the revolution harmonics. Plot showing synchrotron oscillations in the Tevatron at 150 GeV around the first revol- ution harmonic. Blue trace is after injection, and green trace is after dampers are on.

Phase Oscillations In Tevatron, modulation frequency varies from ~80 Hz at 150 GeV to ~30 Hz at 980 GeV. Relative distribution of synchrotron line amplitudes around revolution lines determined by phase distribution of bunch oscillations. Synchrotron lines are modulations of fundamental frequency not revolution harmonics. There can be large synchrotron lines around revolution lines that are nulled by the bunch pattern.

Dispersion Dispersion quantifies the dependence of beam displacement on beam energy. Dispersion can be measured by giving beam a known energy change and measuring relative displacement in average position. Synchrotron oscillations are modulations in energy as well as time. Effects of dispersion are seen as amplitude modulation of the position at the synchrotron sidebands.

Betatron Oscillations Resonant oscillation of beam position caused by number, strength, and spacing of quadrupole magnets. Much higher frequency modulation than synchrotron oscillation (many oscillations per turn). Oscillation frequency can (and should) be different for each plane. As with synchrotron oscillations, betatron lines are distributed around revolution lines according to the phase distribution of each bunches amplitude modulation. There can be large betatron lines around small or nulled revolution lines.

Chromaticity Chromaticity describes the change in betatron resonant frequency (tune) as a function of beam momentum. Synchrotron oscillations modulate the beam energy which modulates the tune through the chromaticity. Tune lines show FM modulation in the presence of synchrotron oscillations.

Coupling Coupling describes the dependence of the motion in one plane on position in the other plane. Magnets are not perfectly orthogonal. Some non-linear components produce bending/focusing in one plane that is dependent on some product of the positions in both planes.

Betatron Oscillations Plot showing the spectrums from the Schottky pickups in the Tevatron. The center frequency is set to be close to the tune line. The band- width is about 27 kHz.

Mean Position I define mean position of the beam as the beam position with the betatron and synchrotron motion averaged out. The mean position information is located in the revolution harmonics. Resolution bandwidth of system must be good enough to discern revolution harmonics without corruption from synchrotron and betatron sidebands.

Lattice Definition The lattice is defined as the type, strength, and spacing of the magnets in the accelerator. The lattice changes as the Tevatron transitions between different operations and energy. The lattice dictates tunes, chromaticity, dispersion, coupling, etc. It is very important that the lattice is monitored and controlled.

Changes in Lattice Up the Ramp Plot showing the time evolution of tune up the ramp on the pbar helix.

Lattice Measurement The lattice is measured by displacing the beam in one location and measuring the effect of the displacement around the ring. Displacement may be static by applying a well calibrated offset current to a dipole magnet. Measure the average position at all BPMs (both planes). Only reveals relative amplitudes of beta functions. Displacement may be dynamic by applying a ping, chirp, or sine wave stimulation to a magnet or stripline. Data from multiple BPMs can be correlated to get more info about beta functions.

Lattice Measurement Plot showing effect of errors in the lattice with the BPMs. Notice the pattern of the amp- litude functions.

Response Measurements A known input signal is applied to some device and the output of the device is compared to the input. Processing of the two signals reveals their relative amplitude and phase differences. Network analyzers and vector signal analyzers are examples of response instrumentation. NWA StimulusReferenceInput DUT Ain/Aref &  ref-  in

Beam Response Measurements Same as regular response measurement, but beam is tickled and the response is measured at a different point in the ring. The frequency of interest moves from the revolution line to the betatron line. Can get both relative amplitude and relative phase info. Need enough resolution bandwidth to discern tune line from synchro-betatron lines. NWA StimulusReferenceInput Ain/Aref &  ref-  in

Beam Response Measurement These plots show the response of the beam around the tune line. Stimulus is a chirp. Top (green) plot shows the relative Real component of the beam response in the horizontal plane. Bottom plot (blue) shows vertical.

Beam Response Measurements The stimulus is not required to be the reference for beam response measurements. The relative phase and amplitude between two separate pickups can be measured. Only one kicker required for whole ring, no synchronization with BPMs required. Can get both relative amplitude and relative phase info. NWA StimulusReferenceInput Ain/Aref &  ref-  in