E- Cloud Machine Studies-Systematic Study of Single Bunch Tunes I. Pinger timing effect on single bunch tunes II. Vertical/horizontal pinger high voltage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. How to Use a Spectrum Analyzer Wi-Spy Version Last Update
Electron cloud tune shift measurements for long trains Tune Shift versus current: Measured the tune shift for 45 and 115 bunch positron trains with 14ns.
CornellVideo Talk. Dec page 1 John Byrd Experimental studies of the fast- beam ion instability in the ALS- The Sequel John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley.
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Recent observations of collective effects at KEKB H. Fukuma, J. W. Flanagan, S. Hiramatsu, T. Ieiri, H. Ikeda, T. Kawamoto, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Tobiyama,
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
Turn by turn horizontal and vertical positions at consecutive horizontally focusing quads 8W and 10W. Horizontal motion excited by horizontal shaker.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
CESR Beam-Beam Effects at CESR Mark A. Palmer Cornell University July 14, 2001.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Roman Numerals Jessica Pompey First Grade Lesson EDT 3470 Click here for next slide.
Number Sense By: Student 1. Introduction In this unit we will learn: – Adding & Subtracting Review – How to Compare Numbers – Ordering numbers from
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction ECLOUD Simulations for the DAFNE wiggler ECLOUD Simulations for build up in presence.
Elias Métral, 1st ICE meeting, 14/07/2010 /191 STATUS OF THE LHC INSTABILITIES E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni, Hannes Bartosik, Sandra Aumon 27/06/2012 ICE.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Recent electron cloud studies at CESR David Rice Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni 05/06/2012 LIU-PS meeting, CERN.
BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
LCWA09 – October 1 st S. De Santis Measurements of the Electron Cloud Density by TE wave propagation in Cesr-TA M. Billing, J. Calvey, B. Carlson, S. De.
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE.
Frank Zimmermann, material for LTC coherent tune shift due to collimator impedance - its dependence on gap size, bunch length, chromaticity, beta function,
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
CLICK ON THE CLOCK What’s the time? It’s half past nine. GREAT TRY AGAIN It’s nine o’clock. It’s a quarter to twelve.
New Studies on Electron Clouds and Specific Luminosity
Jim Crittenden CHESS Simulation Working Group 30 March 2015
Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Space charge studies at the SPS
e- Cloud Machine Studies-Tune Shift Studies
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
e-/e+ Vertical beam size with 6 Wigglers Low and Off
The Effect of Poisson Data Weighting on Streak Camera Diagnostics
e+/e- Vertical Beam Dynamics during CHESS Operation-Part II
Transformations.
ILC DR workshop at Cornell
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Electron cloud studies at CESR
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
e-/e+ Vertical Beam Dynamics with 6 and 12Wigglers On
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Which of the following is a form of amplitude modulation?
G. Codner, E. Tanke, M. Palmer Cornell University
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Table One Table Two Table One Table Two To create table tents:
CHOOSE THE CORRECT NUMBER
Preliminary Analysis of April 24, 2006 CESR Bunch Measurements
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Tuesday 20 September 2011.
M. Forster, G. Codner, R. Holtzapple, J. Kern, and E.Tanke
Table Two Table One To create table tents:
Presentation transcript:

e- Cloud Machine Studies-Systematic Study of Single Bunch Tunes I. Pinger timing effect on single bunch tunes II. Vertical/horizontal pinger high voltage effect on single bunch tunes III. Vertical/horizontal feedback amplitude dependence on single bunch tunes IV.Vertical/horizontal tune setting dependence on single bunch tunes These results are from measurements made by G. Dugan, J. Calvey, M. Palmer, and R. Holtzapple on 10/29/2008.

I. Pinger timing-Varied the pinger timing in thirteen steps and measured the tunes twice at each step The vertical tune shift along the 10 bunch train did not change over this timing scan. The spectrum peak amplitude did not change over this timing scan. Our step size is either too course/fine or we did not adjust the correct timing signal. We must try this again in January.

II. Vertical pinger high voltage adjustment-Varied the vertical pinger high voltage from 204cu to 20cu in six steps and measured the tunes twice at each step The vertical tune shift along the 10 bunch train does not vary with the pinger HV. At the lower voltage settings the tune was not detected for several bunches.

Vertical spectrum for 10 bunch trains at six different vertical pinger high voltage settings. Spectrum peak changed with pinger amplitude as expected. HV=204cu HV=100cu HV=46cu HV=30cu HV=20cu HV=73cu

Movie (click to start) of the vertical spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the six vertical pinger settings (sequence 204, 100, 46, 30, 20, 73cu). The vertical tune shifts along the 10 bunch train at each pinger amplitude. Movie (click to start) of the vertical position at the beam position monitor for bunch at the six vertical pinger settings (sequence 204, 100, 46, 30, 20, 73cu). The vertical amplitude dependence with pinger amplitude.

Horizontal pinger high voltage adjustment -Varied the horizontal pinger high voltage from 150cu to 100cu in three steps and measured the tunes twice at each step The horizontal tune along the 10 bunch train does not vary with the pinger high voltage. At the 100cu voltage settings the tune signal was weak.

HV=124cu HV=100cu HV=150cu Horizontal spectrum for 10 bunch trains at three different horizontal pinger high voltage settings. Spectrum amplitude for 124cu voltage is larger than 150cu voltage.

Movie (click to start) of the horizontal spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the three horizontal pinger settings (sequence 124, 100, 150cu). There is no horizontal tune shift along the train. Movie (click to start) of the horizontal position at the beam position monitor for bunch 1-10 at the three horizontal pinger settings (sequence 124, 100, 150cu). Horizontal amplitude is greater at 124cu than 150cu setting-confirms spectrum amplitude difference.

III. Vertical feedback adjustment -Varied the vertical feedback amplitude from -1000cu to 0cu (off) in five steps and measured the vertical tune twice at each step. The vertical pinger HV was set to 69cu at each feedback setting. The vertical tune shift along the 10 bunch train does not vary with vertical feedback.

Vertical spectrum for 10 bunch trains at five vertical feedback amplitude settings. The vertical spectrum increases as the feedback amplitude is reduced. Vert. Vert.

Movie (click to start) of the vertical spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the five vertical feedback settings (sequence -1000, -500, - 250, -100, and 0cu). Notice the vertical tune shift along the train. The width of the tune signal increases near the end of the 10 bunch train. Movie (click to start) of the vertical position at the beam position monitor for bunches 1-10 at the five vertical feedback settings (sequence -1000, - 500, -250, -100, and 0cu). Vertical amplitude increases as the feedback amplitude is reduced. A vertical instability is noted when the vertical feedback is turned off (the vertical amplitude does not damp).

Horizontal feedback adjustment -Varied the horizontal feedback amplitude from 1000cu to 0cu (turned off) in four steps and measured the horizontal tune twice at each step. The horizontal pinger high voltage was set to 150cu at each feedback setting. The horizontal tune along the 10 bunch train does not vary much along the train by varying the horizontal feedback.

Horizontal spectrum for 10 bunch trains at five vertical feedback amplitude settings. The horizontal spectrum peak increases as the feedback amplitude is reduced. Horz. Horz.

Movie (click to start) of the horizontal spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the four horizontal pinger settings (sequence 1000, 500, 250, and 0 cu). There is no horizontal tune shift along the train. The peak spectrum signal increases as the feedback amplitude is reduced. Movie (click to start) of the horizontal position at the beam position monitor for bunch 1-10 at the four horizontal feedback settings (sequence 1000, 500, 250, and 0cu). When the horizontal feedback is turned off, several of the bunches appear to be horizontally unstable.

IV. Horizontal Tune Scan-Measured the horizontal tune ate five different tune locations. The vertical feedback was set at -500cu and the vertical tune was set to ~237kHz. No large variation in the horizontal tune shift was measured at the different tune locations.

Qx=216kHzQx=225kHz Qx=231kHzQx=220kHz Qx=205kHz Horizontal spectrum for 10 bunch trains at the five different tune settings. The horizontal spectrum amplitude changes depending on the horizontal tune location. Near 231kHz, sidebands pop up near the horizontal tune.

Movie (click to start) of the horizontal spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the five different horizontal settings (sequence 216, 225, 231, 220, and 205kHz). There is no horizontal tune shift along the train at any of the tune settings. A signal in the spectrum appears at ~238kHz when the tune is set to 231kHz. Movie (click to start) of the horizontal position at the beam position monitor for bunch 1-10 at the five different horizontal settings (sequence 216, 225, 231, 220, and 205kHz). The horizontal amplitude varies along the ten bunch train at several of the tune settings.

Vertical Tune Scan-Measured the vertical tune at three different tune locations. The vertical feedback was set at -500cu and the horizontal tune was at 217kHz. At each tune setting, a vertical tune shift along the 10 bunch train is measured.

Vertical spectrum for 10 bunch trains at the three different tune settings. The vertical spectrum amplitude changes depending on the vertical tune location. Qy=237kHzQy=228kHz Qy=245kHz

Movie (click to start) of the vertical spectrum for bunches 1-10 at the three different horizontal settings (sequence 237, 228, and 245kHz). A vertical tune shift along the train is denoted at each tune settings. The width of the tune signal increases for bunches near the end of the 10 bunch train. Movie (click to start) of the vertical position at the beam position monitor for bunch 1-10 at the three different vertical settings (sequence 237, 228, and 245kHz). The vertical amplitude varies along the ten bunch train at several of the tune settings.