PROGRESS REPORT ON 802.20 Arnie Greenspan Chair 802.20 Member Standards Board Piscataway, NJ September 27, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE P1850 IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot Primer 5 April 2005 Presented by Andy Ickowicz & Noelle Humenick IEEE Standards Activities.
Advertisements

THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 5 – Immunity Stephen R Whitesell SC-5 Chair 11/13/2014.
P802.16q to Sponsor Ballot: Conditional Approval Request 17 July 2014 IEEE Gdoc.
EC Closing Slides and Motions November 2009 Atlanta, GA.
Doc.: IEEE Submission March 2015 Motions and Supporting Material for EC Meeting Agenda Items Friday, March 13, 2015 Estrel.
Doc.: IEEE /1454r7 Submission March 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 20 March 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: , Session #18, London Closing Plenary Date Submitted: January, 2007 Presented.
Submitting Your IEEE Standards Project for Approval Consideration RevCom Presentation PE/IC Meeting 9 November 2009 Prepared by Moira Patterson.
IEEE Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) IEEE /0047.
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: , Session #21, San Francisco Closing Plenary Date Submitted: July, 2007 Presented.
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: , Session #17, Dallas Closing Plenary Date Submitted: November, 2006 Presented.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
Doc.: Submission1 IEEE Motions in July Plenary DCN: Title: Request for Sponsor Ballot Approval for IEEE a.
Doc.: IEEE /0547r0 Submission May 2009 Menzo Wentink, QualcommSlide 1 IEEE TGz Montreal Agenda Date: May 10, 2009 Authors:
Doc. IEEE n: Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG 4n discussion.
Doc.: IEEE /224r3 Submission May 2001 Tom Siep, TMS ConsultantsSlide 1 TG3 Review Procedure Proposal NOTE: All of these recommendations do not.
Doc.: IEEE /0775r0 Submission July 2009 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 1 TGn Closing Report - July 16 ‘09 Date: 2009-July-09 Authors: 5488 Marvell.
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: , Session #20, Montreal Closing Plenary Date Submitted: May, 2007 Presented.
Doc.: IEEE m TG4mSlide 1 March 2013 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0096r6 Report September 2013 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide nd Vice Chair’s Report September 2013 Date:
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson.
Doc.: IEEE /0185r0 Submission September 2012 Prabodh Varshney, NokiaSlide af Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r0 Submission September 2015 Slide 1 IEEE ah Closing Report for September 2015 Date: Authors: Yongho Seok and.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures for COPS & PRS May 17, 2005.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
Doc.: IEEE /0667r1 Submission aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming San Francisco Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /2263r1 Submission July 2007 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 TGy July Closing Report Date: Authors:
802.16m Closing Report July 16, 2009 San Francisco, CA Session # IEEE m-09/0035r1.
Month Year IEEE Motions in July, 2017 Plenary
IEEE TGw March Agenda Date: Authors: May 2008
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
doc.: IEEE /479r0 Mika Kasslin TGh chair
802.11e Portland Report July 16, 2004 July 16, 2004
802.11e Berlin Report September 17, 2004 September, 2004
TGaf Waikoloa Closing Report
Working Group March Plenary EC Closing Motions Package
TGs San Diego Closing Report
ADVANCE DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT
March 2002 November 2002 SEC Overview of WG Proposal to Amend a to address Japanese bands and rules PAR and 5 criteria Bruce Kraemer, Intersil.
p Approval to Start Sponsor Ballot
TGs Montreal Closing Report
IEEE Motions in July Plenary DCN:
TGaf Geneva Closing Report
IEEE TGaf Waikoloa Closing Report
General Procedures for Meetings
TGaf Indian Wells Closing Report
TGs LA Closing Report Date: Author: January 2011
TGaf San Antonio Closing Report
IEEE Task Group G Report
Meetings.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
Submission Title: TG 4n discussion items for September 2015 meeting
Submission Title: [REVCOM Submission Information]
TGaf Waikoloa Closing Report
P4001 Meeting #3 Hyperspectral Stds.
TGaf Orlando Closing Report
Liaison Report Date: Authors: September 2010
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
Sheung Li Task Group J Chairperson March 19, 2004
TGaf San Antonio Closing Report
IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Network
TGr Closing Report for March 2008
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report Sept02]
Liaison Report Date: Authors: September 2010
P802.11j Sponsor Ballot Procedure 10
September 2008 doc.: IEEE /1003r0 Sep 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

PROGRESS REPORT ON Arnie Greenspan Chair Member Standards Board Piscataway, NJ September 27, 2007

BACKGROUND Last report presented in June Last report presented in June  Reported significant progress  Reported on WG efforts to develop a new broad based consensus draft containing significant proposal inputs from Motorola, Kyocera, Samsung, LGE and Qualcomm

GOALS Joint mission of this Standards Board the IEEE-SA OC for the 802 EC, OC and myself was to: Joint mission of this Standards Board the IEEE-SA OC for the 802 EC, OC and myself was to:  Address the issue of dominance within  Produce a good consensus standard in a fair and open manner

SIGNIFICANT NEW EVENTS The OC held a series of interviews and investigated the perception of dominance within The OC held a series of interviews and investigated the perception of dominance within  At the San Francisco meeting the OC recommended several actions to the unconflicted EC including changing the voting method in from individual voting to a hybrid entity/member approach  This new voting approach is believed to address both positive and negative dominance in the short and long term

WHAT IS HYBRID MEMBER /ENTITY VOTING Voting in will be done by a designated voter selected by an eligible entity Voting in will be done by a designated voter selected by an eligible entity Eligibility of an entity in is derived through an individual that has established membership by complying with the membership. Attendance rules of 802 and and who has declared affiliation with that entity while establishing membership. Eligibility of an entity in is derived through an individual that has established membership by complying with the membership. Attendance rules of 802 and and who has declared affiliation with that entity while establishing membership.

WHAT IS HYBRID/MEMBER ENTITY VOTING cont’d Corollaries of this approach ar: Corollaries of this approach ar:  Each entity will have one vote  In order to maintain voting rights the entity must maintain a designated voter who is a member of  New entities that desire voting rights or members of who wish to vote on behalf of a new entity must attend 4 meetings, 2 of which are plenary meetings after declaring their affiliation to that entity. (This is an 802 rule)  An existing member of may become the designated voter of an entity that has existing rights at the next meeting after declaring affiliation to that entity The approach and rules implemented by precludes potential abuses such as individual members making their membership votes available to differing entities on a meeting by meeting basis

PROGRESS UNDER THE NEW VOTING APPROACH The new voting approach for was implemented in San Francisco in July The new voting approach for was implemented in San Francisco in July Under these voting rules Under these voting rules  The WG established 15 entity voters  The entity voters voted to advance the draft to Letter Ballot status 13 approve 0 opposed 0 opposed 2 abstain 2 abstain

BETWEEN MEETINGS All current entities of were contacted and told of the new voting approach and requested to designate a voter All current entities of were contacted and told of the new voting approach and requested to designate a voter Responses expanded the entity voter list from 15 to 25 Responses expanded the entity voter list from 15 to 25 Instructions were sent for the Working Group Letter Ballot and a 40-day Letter Ballot was begun Instructions were sent for the Working Group Letter Ballot and a 40-day Letter Ballot was begun

BALLOT RESULTS Nineteen ballots were received from the potential 25 entity voters - a greater than 50% response The ballot response was: 10 yes4 no5 abstain Two ballots were received past the deadline, 1 yes and 1 no. All comments late and otherwise were acted upon. The two late ballots were not counted for statistical purposes, resulting in a 75% approval of the Letter Ballot

COMMENT RESOLUTION 1785 comments were received: 818 Technical 820 Editorial 147 Hybrid At the September meeting ALL comments were addressed by working incredible hours

COMMENT RESOLUTION CONT’D 13 Entity voters were present in Hawaii which constituted a quorum Two votes were taken: Approval of the San Francisco minutes by acclamation Approval of the San Francisco minutes by acclamation Affirmations of the comment resolutions by the Working Group in a vote of Affirmations of the comment resolutions by the Working Group in a vote of 8 approve4 abstainThe Chair not voting

NEXT ACTIONS The modified draft will be posted sowing the changes due to comment resolution A 30-day recirculation ballot will be undertaken under Letter Ballot recirculation rules The ballot will open October 7 and close November 6 - one week before the 802 Plenary meeting in Atlanta