Alex Friedman Fusion Energy Sciences Program, LLNL (for the NDCX-II team) ARPA-E Visit to LBNL, September 4, 2013 * This work was performed under the auspices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Advertisements

Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy A Few Comments on the Photoinjector Performance X.J. Wang National Synchrotron Light Source Brookhaven.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Beam steering capability for target position uncertainty Simon Yu & Enrique Henestroza Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ARIES Meeting October 3, 2002.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Recent Numerical Advances for Beam-Driven HEDP Experiments S.A. Veitzer, P.H. Stoltz, J.R. Cary Tech-X Corporation J.J. Barnard Lawrence Livermore National.
Update on LLNL FI activities on the Titan Laser A.J.Mackinnon Feb 28, 2007 Fusion Science Center Meeting Chicago.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory SIMULATIONS OF TARGETS FOR NDCX II* J. J. Barnard 1, J. Armijo 2, F. M. Bieniosek 2, A. Friedman 1, M.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Plasmas Alex Friedman This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Highly Compressed Ion Beams for Warm Dense Matter Science * Alex Friedman 1,2, John J. Barnard 1,2, Richard.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Analytical and Numerical Studies of Ion Beam Plasma Interaction for Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Fusion Igor.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Pulsed Normal Quadrupoles for a Heavy Ion Fusion Driver Final Focus Section D. Shuman, S. S. Yu, LBNL.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
1 Development and testing of a pulsed helium ion source for probing materials and warm dense matter studies Qing Ji a, Peter Seidl a, Will Waldron a, Jeff.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Simulations of particle beam heating of foils for studies of warm dense matter* J. J. Barnard 1, A. Friedman.
Heavy Ion Fusion Sciences Virtual National Laboratory Warp simulations illustrate the novel acceleration strategy Design Studies for NDCX-II W. M. Sharp,
I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,
Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.
Toward a physics design for NDCX-II, a next-step platform for ion beam-driven physics studies * A. Friedman, D. P. Grote, W. M. Sharp, LLNL E. Henestroza,
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
A. Friedman, J. J. Barnard, R. H. Cohen, D. P. Grote, S. M. Lund, W. M. Sharp, LLNL A. Faltens, E. Henestroza, J-Y. Jung, J. W. Kwan, E. P. Lee, M. A.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Question 1: Assess and document target preheat effects from beams and plasma for the various options.
Collective Focusing of a Neutralized Intense Ion Beam Propagating Along a Weak Solenodial Magnetic Field M. Dorf (LLNL) In collaboration with I. Kaganovich,
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
* This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX beam experiments and plans Peter Seidl Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, HIFS-VNL 11th Japan.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
1 Short Electron Pulses from RF Photoinjectors Massimo Ferrario INFN - LNF.
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Oct 6, 2009 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX-II Project Joe Kwan Project Manager Sept. 7, 2009 San Francisco US-Japan Workshop.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.
Sharp 10/28/09 NDCX-II Tweaks W M Sharp, A Friedman, D P Grote - LLNL L L Reginato, W L Waldron, J-L Vay - LBNL 12 January 2011.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation, Fermilab,
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Group and phase velocity matching in THz IFEL interaction
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Cornell Injector Performance
Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update*
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Physics Design on Injector I
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

Alex Friedman Fusion Energy Sciences Program, LLNL (for the NDCX-II team) ARPA-E Visit to LBNL, September 4, 2013 * This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, by LBNL under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231, and by PPPL under Contract DEFG0295ER NDCX-II: the ion beam Condensed from LLNL-PRES , Jan Beam traversing an acceleration gap

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 2 Neutralized Drift Compression Experiment-II (NDCX-II) ION BEAM BUNCH TARGET FOIL A user facility for studies of: –physics of ion-heated matter –heavy-ion-driven ICF target physics –space-charge-dominated beams VOLUMETRIC DEPOSITION

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 3 The “drift compression” process is used to shorten an ion bunch Induction cells impart a head-to-tail velocity gradient (“tilt”) to the beam The beam shortens as it “drifts” down the beam line In non-neutral drift compression, the space charge force opposes (“stagnates”) the inward flow, leading to a nearly mono-energetic compressed pulse: In neutralized drift compression, the space charge force is eliminated, resulting in a shorter pulse but a larger velocity spread: vzvz z   vzvz z vzvz z   vzvz z   (in beam frame)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 4 NDCX-II applies drift compression to its ion beam twice Initial non-neutral pre-bunching leads to a dense non-neutral beam in the accelerator inject apply tilt driftaccelerate apply tilt neutral- ized drift target Final neutralized drift compression onto the target NDCX-II will compress a 1 m, 600 ns initial bunch to ~ 6 mm, 1 ns at the target.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 5 NDCX-II baseline configuration modified ATA induction cells with pulsed 2.5 T solenoids Li + ion injector final focus solenoid and target chamber (existing) neutralized drift compression line with plasma sources ATA Blumlein voltage sources oil-filled ATA transmission lines long-pulse voltage sources 12 active cells

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 6 Accelerating waveforms are either long-pulse moderate-voltage or short-pulse high-voltage (Blumleins) 200 kV “ramp” measured waveform from test stand “shaped” to equalize beam energy after injection “shaped” for initial bunch compression (scaled from measured waveforms) 250 kV “flat-top” measured waveform from test stand 40g

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 7 Ion beams are plasmas; strong space charge forces and plasma effects require kinetic simulations along with experiments R,Z Warp simulation (a) during initial non-neutral compression in accelerator and (b) at peak compression in the target plane. (The low-density tail appears dense due to the large number of simulation particles, but almost all beam is in the red-colored core.)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 8 3-D Warp simulation of beam in the NDCX-II linac ndcx40g simulation and movie from D P Grote exiting accelerating entering

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 9 3-D Warp simulation of NDCX-II beam (video)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 10 We assessed sensitivity to various errors using “ensemble” runs Spread at zero jitter is due to simulation particle statistics 2 40g-12 Figure-of-merit (Mbar) 2-ns nominal jitter in firing of acceleration pulses

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 11 Warp runs showed that a bright spot is achieved with expected machine alignment errors (not expected to vary shot-to-shot) plots show beam deposition for three sets of solenoid offsets (no steering applied) maximum offset for each case is 0.5 mm larger red circles include half of deposited energy smaller red circles indicate hot spots x (mm) y (mm) J/cm 2 x (mm) y (mm) J/cm 2 x (mm) y (mm) J/cm 2 ASP and Warp runs show that “steering” with dipoles can increase intensity see Y-J Chen, et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Phys. Res. A 292, 455 (1990)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 12 Detail showing last induction cell and neutralized drift line Induction core Neutralized Drift Compression Section made of Ferroelectric Plasma Sources 250 kV Insulator Solenoid for transverse confinement of ion beam Accelerating voltage (EMF) appears across this gap Main NDCX- II Linac Final Focus and Target chamber Final induction cell

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 13 1 Ferroelectric Plasma Sources (dev. by PPPL) 4 Cathodic-Arc Plasma Sources NDCX-II beam neutralization is based on NDCX-I experience Final-Focus Solenoid (FFS)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory kV, ~ 600 ns Li + injector 12 induction plus 15 drift cells 2-3 T beam-transport solenoids Neutralizing plasma drift section for final compression 8.5 – 9 T Final Focus Solenoid Intercepting & non-intercepting beam diagnostics Target chamber & instrumentation 2 shots/minute repetition rate Machine characteristics – complete 1.2 MeV configuration

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 15 NDCX-II capabilities would increase qualitatively with completion of commissioning as originally planned Need to: -connect the Blumlein voltage sources -add drift line, final focus, target chamber … and tune: –brightness and uniformity of the injected beam –longitudinal beam manipulations and compression –beam steering to correct for residual misalignments –beam neutralization and final focusing Goals for 12-cell layout Now (w/o Blumleins, drift, focus) Goals Charge (in √2x duration) 50 nC Ion kinetic energy (MeV) 0.2 MeV1.2 MeV Focal radius (50% of beam) N/A<1 mm FWHM Duration 50 ns<1 ns Peak current0.65 A>30 A Peak fluenceN/A>8 J/cm 2

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 16 Additional induction cells would greatly enhance performance NDCX-I (bunched beam) NDCX-II 12 active cell (27 periods) 21 active cell (37 periods) Ion speciesK + (A=39)Li + (A=7) Charge15 nC50 nC Ion kinetic energy0.3 MeV1.2 MeV3.1 MeV Focal radius (50% of beam) 2 mm0.6 mm Duration (FWHM)2 ns0.6 ns0.3 ns Peak current3 A36 A86 A Peak fluence (time integrated) 0.03 J/cm J/cm 2 22 J/cm 2 Fluence w/in 0.1 mm diameter, w/in duration 5.3 J/cm 2 15 J/cm 2 Max. central pressure in Al target 0.07 Mbar0.23 Mbar Max. central pressure in Au target 0.18 Mbar0.64 Mbar Higher kinetic energy, shorter pulse Thus higher target pressures, above many critical points More uniform heating (beam slows through Bragg peak while in target) For 3 MeV, append 10 lattice periods (we have additional cells from LLNL on hand)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 17 Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory NDCX-II can be a unique user facility for a broad range of applications

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 18 We use target pressure as the figure of merit for machine optimization We use a parametric fit to Hydra results for the pressure (in Mbar) that the beam generates in a nominal Al foil target Here, ƒ is the fluence in J/cm 2,  is the FWHM pulse duration in ns, E is the ion kinetic energy in MeV  0 roughly approximates a scale time in ns 30 J/cm 2 15 J/cm 2  pulse (ns) P (Mbar)